Search

Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has emerged as a global health crisis, with clinical manifestations including those suggesting injury to various organs such as the ovaries, which implies that it extends beyond respiratory infections. Changes in gut microbiota may exhibit correlations with the mechanisms and stages of severity in COVID-19, as well as a link with sex hormones, embryo development, and pregnancy. Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is used to induce the development of multiple high-quality follicles during in vitro fertilization (IVF). Our research aimed to investigate whether patients infected with COVID-19 have altered gut microbiota compositions that would affect the outcomes of COS. Methods: Twenty-one healthy females and seventeen patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. Samples were sequenced for gut microbiota identification through 16 S rRNA V3-V4 region, including species annotation, community diversity, and community functions. Results: No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of in IVF cycle outcomes and laboratory parameters. Patients with COVID-19 and healthy women showed no significant difference in the total number of available blastocyst embryos. Furthermore, the gut microbiota alpha diversity index in the COVID-19 group were markedly reduced compared to those of healthy females. Comparing the COVID-19 group to the controls, the gut microbiota dysbiosis decreased levels of Ruminococcus, and Agathobater, and elevated levels of Achromobacter and Raistonia. Finally, we identified a series of microbial functional characteristics, including membrane transport and carbohydrate metabolism, that exhibited significant disparities between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients in the COVID-19 group exhibited significant disparities in the gut microbiota composition compared to the healthy women during COS. However, the IVF outcomes did not show any significant differences between the two groups. Collectively, our speculation suggests that SARS-COV-2 infection may alter the gut microbiota without impacting IVF outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

De novo onset of Graves' disease (GD) after controlled ovarian stimulation (OS) is exceptional. Only one case of progression to GD after OS in a patient with pre‐existing subclinical hyperthyroidism has been reported. We describe the case of a patient with neither previous thyroid disorders nor autoimmunity who developed GD after OS for primary infertility. A 40‐year‐old woman with primary infertility underwent four cycles of OS. Her thyroid function performed before the last cycle was unremarkable (thyroid stimulating hormone [TSH] 1.9 mU/L, fT4 1.3 ng/dL, fT3 2.4 pg/mL), and thyroid autoimmunity was negative (anti‐thyroperoxidase antibodies and anti‐thyroglobuline antibodies). Six weeks after the last cycle she developed overt thyrotoxicosis (TSH < 0.005 mU/L, fT4 4.79 ng/dL, fT3 15.6 pg/mL) with anti‐thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAb) positivity (9.2 IU/L). She was diagnosed with GD and anti‐thyroid therapy was instituted. After 1 year of treatment, thyroid function was still suboptimal (TSH 0.2 mU/L, fT4 1.04 ng/dL, fT3 2.2 pg/mL), and TRAb titer still elevated (8.75 IU/L). Despite her desire to achieve pregnancy, a further cycle of OS was postponed until complete remission of thyroid dysfunction and withdrawal of anti‐thyroid therapy. Although TSH assay after OS is not recommended in euthyroid women without autoimmunity, in the presence of hyperthyroid symptoms throughout OS it is advisable to evaluate thyroid function and TRAb. It is advisable to carefully evaluate the course of GD before proceeding with further courses of OS that could lead to its exacerbation or recurrence. In cases where a strong desire for pregnancy persists, thyroidectomy may be proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• During COS patients undergo significant hemodynamic changes over a short period. • CO and SVI significantly increased at estradiol peak compared to baseline. • SVRI significantly decreased at estradiol peak compared to baseline. To study hemodynamic changes along controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Prospective observational cohort study conducted at Mother and Child Department of University Hospital Federico II, in Naples, Italy, between April 2021 and July 2022. Sixty-eight infertile patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin, antagonist protocol and a fresh embryo transfer were included. Haemodynamic assessment was carried out using UltraSonic Cardiac Output Monitor at baseline (T1), estradiol peak (T2), fresh embryo-transfer day (T3). To evaluate relationships between quantitative variables and groups a Student T test for independent data was assessed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the differences between the means of three time points (T1, T2 and T3) for quantitative variables. A mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the differences between groups, among time points (T1, T2 and T3). Sixty-eight patients were included. Significant differences over the three time points have been observed for CO (f = 3.78 l/min; p = 0.025), SVI (f = 3.56 ml/m2;p = 0.013), and RSVI (f = 4.84 dscm-5 m2; p = 0.009). No significant differences in trends have been found between beta hCG positive and beta hCG negative groups. There were no significant differences in maternal hemodynamic parameters at time-point T3 between patients treated with hCG 10,000 UI and with Triptorelin. Patients considered at increased risk of hyperstimulation reported a significant increase in SVI at baseline (26.9 ± 9.0 mL/m2 vs 21.9 ± 7.0 mL/m2; p = 0.010). According to the results of our study, during controlled ovarian stimulation with antagonist protocol, patients undergo significant changes in maternal cardiovascular parameters over a very short period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has emerged as a global health crisis, with clinical manifestations including those suggesting injury to various organs such as the ovaries, which implies that it extends beyond respiratory infections. Changes in gut microbiota may exhibit correlations with the mechanisms and stages of severity in COVID-19, as well as a link with sex hormones, embryo development, and pregnancy. Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is used to induce the development of multiple high-quality follicles during in vitro fertilization (IVF). Our research aimed to investigate whether patients infected with COVID-19 have altered gut microbiota compositions that would affect the outcomes of COS. Methods Twenty-one healthy females and seventeen patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. Samples were sequenced for gut microbiota identification through 16 S rRNA V3-V4 region, including species annotation, community diversity, and community functions. Results No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of in IVF cycle outcomes and laboratory parameters. Patients with COVID-19 and healthy women showed no significant difference in the total number of available blastocyst embryos. Furthermore, the gut microbiota alpha diversity index in the COVID-19 group were markedly reduced compared to those of healthy females. Comparing the COVID-19 group to the controls, the gut microbiota dysbiosis decreased levels of Ruminococcus, and Agathobater, and elevated levels of Achromobacter and Raistonia. Finally, we identified a series of microbial functional characteristics, including membrane transport and carbohydrate metabolism, that exhibited significant disparities between the two groups. Conclusions Patients in the COVID-19 group exhibited significant disparities in the gut microbiota composition compared to the healthy women during COS. However, the IVF outcomes did not show any significant differences between the two groups. Collectively, our speculation suggests that SARS-COV-2 infection may alter the gut microbiota without impacting IVF outcomes.

Abstract The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between gut microbial taxonomy and various ovarian responses to controlled ovarian stimulation. A total of 22 IVF cycles with a follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI)

Objective: To compare two cancellation policies in controlled ovarian stimulation‐intrauterine insemination (COS‐IUI) cycles to lower the risk of multiple pregnancies (MP). Design: We performed a bicentric retrospective cohort study in two academic medical centers: Angers (group A) and Besançon (group B) University Hospitals. We included 7056 COS‐IUI cycles between 2011 and 2019. In group A, cancellation strategy was based on an algorithm taking into account the woman's age, the serum estradiol level, and the number of follicles of 14 mm or greater on ovulation trigger day. In group B, cancellation strategy was case‐by‐case and physician‐dependent, based on the woman's age, number of follicles of 15 mm or greater, and the previous number of failed COS‐IUI cycles, without any predefined cut‐off. Our main outcome measures were the MP rate (MPR) and the live‐birth rate (LBR). Results: We included 884 clinical pregnancies (790 singletons, 86 twins, and 8 triplets) obtained from 6582 COS‐IUI cycles. MPR was significantly lower in group A compared with group B (8.1% vs 13.3%, P = 0.01), but LBR were comparable (10.8% vs 11.8%, P = 0.19). Multivariate logistic regression found the following to be risk factors for MP: the "cancellation strategy" effect (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–2.60) and the number of follicles of 14 mm or greater (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16–1.66). Cycle cancellation rate for excessive response was significantly lower in group A compared with group B (1.3% vs 2.4%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of an algorithm based on the woman's age, serum estradiol level and number of follicles of at least 14 mm on trigger day allows the MPR to be reduced without impacting the LBR. Synopsis: A cancellation strategy based on an algorithm allows reduction of the risk of multiple pregnancies without impacting the live birth rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol, the oral administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate has been observed to effectively inhibit the LH surge during ovarian stimulation in patients experiencing infertility. Nevertheless, the use of utilizing medroxyprogesterone acetate during ovarian stimulation can result in more pronounced pituitary suppression, potentially necessitating increased doses of gonadotropins and extended treatment durations. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the optimal dose of medroxyprogesterone acetate, aiming to use relatively lower concentrations of medroxyprogesterone acetate to effectively and safely suppress early LH surges. Method: This retrospective cohort study included 710 patients who underwent cycles of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and were subjected the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol utilizing letrozole between from 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2021. The study population was divided into low, medium, and high concentration groups based on the daily dosage of medroxyprogesterone acetate. The primary focus of this investigation was on the cumulative live birth rate. Secondary outcomes encompassed the occurrence of a premature surge in luteinizing hormone, the quantity of retrieved oocytes, viable embryos, and high-quality embryos, as well as clinical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and multiple pregnancy rate. Results: In this study, significant differences were observed among three groups in various parameters including body mass index, baseline levels of Anti- Müllerian hormone and luteinizing hormone, antral follicle count, total dose of gonadotropin, and duration of gonadotropin administration (p<0.05). The number of oocytes and viable embryos were significantly higher in medium group and higher than those in the low dose group. Following adjustments for confounding factors related to medroxyprogesterone acetate for various outcome measures, we conducted multiple regression analysis to investigate the independent effects of daily medroxyprogesterone acetate dosage within the combined progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and letrozole protocol. Following multivariable regression analysis, no disparities were found in embryo characteristics (number of oocytes retrieved, number of available embryos, number of high-quality embryos) or pregnancy outcomes (clinical pregnancy rate, cumulative live birth rate) among the three groups. Conclusion: Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with letrozole using different dose of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day was comparable in terms of the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of high-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The association between estrogen and hypercoagulability is well-established but little is known about coagulation dynamics during IVF. Our goal was to measure coagulation potential prior to, during, and following an IVF cycle and to investigate differences by conception outcome. Patients undergoing IVF with fresh embryo transfer at a single academic center using oral contraceptive pills for cycle batching underwent evaluation of thrombin generation using the calibrated automated thrombogram at multiple points during the IVF cycle. Multiple thrombin generation parameters were compared across timepoints and by IVF cycle outcome using ANOVA repeated measures analysis. Of the 17 patients included, 11 conceived. There was a significant increase in peak and total thrombin generation in the entire cohort between the pre-treatment natural follicular phase and following a short course of oral contraceptive pills used for cycle batching. Further increase in these parameters was seen at the time of oocyte retrieval. In the pre-treatment natural follicular phase, patients who conceived had lower peak thrombin generation. There were changes throughout the cycle for factors II, V, VIII, X, XI, XII, antithrombin, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Only Factor XI was distinguishable by conception status; values were lower at all visits in patients who conceived. Increases in coagulation potential are seen in patients undergoing IVF following a short course of oral contraceptive pills for cycle batching and continue during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Those who conceived were seen to have lower peak thrombin generation in the pre-treatment natural follicular phase. • Controlled ovarian stimulation during IVF is associated with a procoagulant shift. • Increased coagulability is seen after cycle batching using oral contraceptive pills. • Women who conceive through IVF have lower baseline thrombin generation potential. • Levels of numerous coagulation factors and anticoagulants fluctuate during IVF. • Women who conceive through IVF have persistently lower Factor XI levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hongchao Li,1 Wei He,2 Hongbo Lin,3 Angying Du,4 Xue Zhang,5 Han Yang,5 Shuli Qu5 1School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, People’s Republic of China; 2Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Centre, The Southwest Hospital of AMU, Chongqing, 400038, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, People’s Republic of China; 4Merck Serono, an Affiliate of Merck KGaA Darmstadt Germany, Beijing, 100016, People’s Republic of China; 5Real-World Solutions, IQVIA, Shanghai, 200041, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Shuli Qu, Real-World Solutions, IQVIA, 1359 Yaolong Road, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, Email shuli.qu1@iqvia.comBackground: To compare the cost-effectiveness of originator (reference) recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone alfa (rhFSH-α) (follitropin alfa, GONAL-f) and its biosimilar (rhFSH, JinSaiHeng) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) from a Chinese patient perspective.Methods: A decision tree model was developed to simulate the treatment pathway of infertile women undergoing ART using GONAL-f or JinSaiHeng. Published clinical and cost data were used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the rhFSH-α. The cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), direct medical costs and costs per cumulative live birth were estimated via an analytic decision-tree model.Results: CLBR of GONAL-f was higher than JinSaiHeng preparation (88.3% vs 84.4%), while the cost per cumulative live birth was lower (51,475 vs 52,095 CNY).Conclusion: The originator rhFSH-α was associated with higher CLBR and lower cost per cumulative live birth, with incremental cost per additional live birth of 38,096 CNY (Chinese Yuan).Keywords: recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone, controlled ovarian stimulation, assisted reproductive technology, cost-effectiveness analysis

In the registration trials, follitropin delta was compared with a fixed dose of 150 UI of follitropin alpha/beta, finding higher chances to reach a target response of 8–14 oocytes compared to controls. For this reason, follitropin delta is marketed as particularly useful in expected hyper-responder patients. The main outcome of this study is to report if comparable results are reached in a real-life scenario with follitropin alpha/beta doses chosen by the physician, based on patients’ characteristics. This is a retrospective study performed in two public fertility centres. All first cycles from January 2020 to June 2022 with either follitropin delta (cases) or alpha/beta (controls) in patients with anti-Müllerian hormone >2.5 ng/mL were compared by an inverse probability weighting approach based on propensity score. The follitropin total dose was higher in controls (1179.06 ± 344.93 vs 1668.67 ± 555.22 IU, P < 0.001). The target response of 8–14 oocytes was reached by 40.2% of cases and 40.7% of controls (odds ratio (OR): 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65–1.53, P = 0.98). Fewer than 8 oocytes were collected in 24.1% of cases and 22% of controls (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.71–1.69, P = 0.67); more than 14 oocytes in 35.7% of cases and 37.3% of controls (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.54–1.28, P = 0.40). Our experience did not find worse results in term of proportion of patients who reached the target response with an algorithm-chosen dose of follitropin delta compared to a personalised starting dose of follitropin alpha/beta, with follitropin delta having the advantage of objectivity. However, larger numbers are needed to confirm these results.

Purpose: To compare the DNA damage in granulosa cells (GCs) of women undergoing ovarian-stimulated cycles with four widely used recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormones (rhFSH) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) protocols (Corneumon®, Gonal-F®, Pergoveris® and Puregon®). Methods: A randomized trial was carried out at a Mexican hospital. GCs were isolated from 18 women with infertility undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Four controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols including Corneumon®, Gonal-F®, Pergoveris® or Puregon® were used. GCs DNA damage was assessed by the Comet assay. Two parameters were measured: comet tail length (CTL), and Olive tail moment (OTM, the percentage of DNA in the tail multiplied by the distance between the center of the tail and head). Results: Use of the different hrFSH in COS caused variable and statistically significant levels of DNA damage in GCs of infertile women. CTL was similar in the Corneumon® and Pergoveris® groups (mean values of 48.73 and 55.18, respectively) and Corneumon® CTL was significantly lower compared to the Gonal-F® and Puregon® groups (mean values of 61.98 and 91.17, respectively). Mean OTM values were significantly lower in Corneumon® and Pergoveris® groups, compared to Gonal-F® and Puregon® groups (25.59, 27.35, 34.76, and 47.27, respectively). Conclusion: Use of Corneumon® and Pergoveris® in COS caused statistically significantly lower levels of DNA damage in GCs of infertile women undergoing ART, which could potentially correlate with better reproductive outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Luteinizing hormone (LH) is present throughout the natural follicular phase. However, the debate is still not settled on whether LH is needed during ovarian stimulation in IVF. This commentary looks at the evolution of this debate, mentioning three elephants in the room that were ignored by the Pharma industry, professional organizations, and clinicians alike: The different endocrinology between the long agonist and the antagonist protocols. The fixed dose of the two most widely commercially available antagonist preparations, namely cetrorelix and ganirelix. The fact that most research in this area uses population-based criteria, ignoring endocrine parameters. Individual genetics of the LH receptor gene may also serve to individualize LH needs during stimulation; however, the jury is still out regarding this approach. Conclusions: Individual endocrine and genetics parameters may shed meaningful light on the question of LH supplemental during ovarian stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Fertility preservation for adolescent pubescent girls is a concern of the healthcare system and parents. Oocyte cryopreservation is regarded as a standard medical intervention for patients with a minimum age of 18 years. Evidence suggests that mature oocyte cryopreservation is possible for adolescent pubescent girls, although, ovarian stimulation for these patients remains a challenge. Cases presentation This case series is the first report regarding ovarian stimulation with oocyte cryopreservation in younger than 18 years cancerous girls, who refer to ROYAN institute, Tehran, Iran, prior to the start of the treatment of cancer (November 2015 to February 2021). The oocyte cryopreservation was carried out in the 7 patients (five patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, one patient with Ewing sarcoma, and one patient with osteogenic tumor), the embryo cryopreservation in one patient with dysgerminoma, and the oocyte and embryo cryopreservation in one patient with germ cell tumor. No oocytes were retrieved after ovarian stimulation in the patient with medulloblastoma. For one of the patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, half of the tissues of one ovary were cryopreserved prior to ovarian stimulation. Conclusions Oocyte cryopreservation is a feasible option of fertility preservation in the adolescent’s patients with cancer. However, only if reported acceptable fertilization rates, as well as the successful cases of live birth from oocyte cryopreservation at the ages under 18, this option of preserving fertility can be applied to this age range.

Abstract Background The maximum daily dose of follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is 12 μg (180 IU), according to the algorithm developed by the manufacturer, and based on patient’s ovarian reserve and weight. This study aimed to assess whether 150 IU of menotropin combined with follitropin delta improves the response to stimulation in women with serum antimullerian hormone levels less than 2.1 ng/mL. Methods This study involved a prospective intervention group of 44 women who received 12 μg of follitropin delta combined with 150 IU of menotropin from the beginning of stimulation and a retrospective control group of 297 women who received 12 μg of follitropin delta alone during the phase 3 study of this drug. The inclusion and exclusion criteria and other treatment and follow-up protocols in the two groups were similar. The pituitary suppression was achieved by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Ovulation triggering with human chorionic gonadotropin or GnRH agonist and the option of transferring fresh embryos or using freeze-all strategy were made according to the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Results Women who received follitropin delta combined with menotropin had higher estradiol levels on trigger day (2150 pg/mL vs. 1373 pg/mL, p

Abstract Background Adequately selecting the initial follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is key for success in assisted reproduction. The objective of COS is to obtain an optimal number of oocytes to increase the chances of achieving a pregnancy, while avoiding complications for the patient. Current clinical protocols do achieve good results for the majority of patients, but further refinements in individualized FSH dosing may reduce the risk of poor ovarian response while also limiting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk. Models to select the first FSH dose in COS have been presented in literature with promising results. However, most have only been developed and tested in normo-ovulatory women under the age of 40 years. Methods This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blinded, clinical trial. This study will be performed in 236 first cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) patients, randomized 1:1 in two arms. In the intervention arm, the dose of FSH will be assigned by a machine learning (ML) model called IDoser, while in the control arm, the dose will be determined by the clinician following standard practice. Stratified block randomization will be carried out depending on the patient being classified as expected low responder, high responder, or normo-responder. Patients will complete their participation in the trial once the first embryo transfer result is known. The primary outcome of the study is the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved at ovarian pick up (OPU) and the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the intervention arm compared to the control. Secondary outcomes include the number of cycle cancelations (due to low response or no retrieval of mature oocytes), risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per first transfer. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to test clinical performance of an all-patient inclusive model to select the first dose of FSH for COS. Prospective trials for machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are scarce but necessary for clinical application. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05948293 . Registered on 14 July 2023.

Abstract Background To explore the role of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in predicting the need to step up recombinant FSH (rFSH) dose following long GnRH agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI cycles of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) women. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of 825 PCOS women undergoing long GnRH agonist protocol enrolled from Jan 2019 to Dec 2021. The daily rFSH dose at which the first response to rFSH were recorded. The dose at which the first response to rFSH was based on folliculometry during follow up in which two or more follicles reached ≥ 11 mm. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to investigate the ability of AMH to predict the need to step up initial rFSH dose. Results PCOS women who needed to step up initial rFSH dose had a significantly higher AMH compared with those didn’t step up initial rFSH dose (11.37 ± 3.25ng/ml vs. 8.69 ± 3.16ng/ml, p 9.30 ng/ml required increased rFSH dose compared to 18.8% of women with AMH ≤ 9.30ng/ml (p 9.30 ng/ml vs. AMH ≤ 9.30ng/ml (20.8% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.043). Conclusion PCOS women with AMH > 9.30 ng/ml were resistant to rFSH stimulation and require increased dose for the cycle recruitment of ovarian follicles.

Abstract Objective To determine whether dynamic changes in serum total testosterone (TT) levels during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) by a GnRH‐a (gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone agonist) long protocol may predict pregnancy in women with normal ovarian reserve in in vitro fertilization. Methods The TT measurements were added to routine hormone tests during COS. The TT dynamic changes, clinical pregnancy rate, and quality of oocytes and embryos of 109 patients were analyzed. Results Compared with the non‐pregnancy group, in the pregnancy group the TT level on Gn initial day (TTinitial‐d) increased sharply when the dominant follicle reached a diameter 10–12 mm [TTfΦ (10–12)‐d] and on human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) day (TTHCG‐d), also the ratios of TTfΦ (10–12)‐d to TTinitial‐d (1.23 ± 0.37 vs. 1.10 ± 0.58, p = 0.040) and TTHCG‐d to TTinitial‐d (2.32 ± 1.26 vs. 2.00 ± 1.43, p = 0.019) increased notably. Of the 2 TT ratios, the first tertile limit was regarded as the threshold of high TT ratios (1.00, 1.45). High tertiles had higher pregnancy rates than low tertiles (82.86% vs. 42.11%, p = 0.006; 71.43% vs. 44.83%, p = 0.040). The 2 TT ratios were positively associated with the number of metaphase II oocytes and good‐quality embryos. Conclusion Of COS in a long GnRH‐a protocol with optimized outcome, serum TT kinetics appears to be characterized by sharp rises at the early and late stages of follicle growth. The ratios of TTΦ (10–12)‐d to TTinitial‐d and TTHCG‐d to TTinitial‐d may be predictors for pregnancy and qualitative outcomes of oocytes and embryos.

Abstract Background Several studies have explored which COS protocol yields a higher blastocyst euploidy rate, but findings have been inconsistent. The present study aimed to explore whether controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols was associated with euploid blastocyst rate in pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles. Methods The study was a retrospective study where data were obtained from three reproductive medicine centers. The study included PGT-A cycles with the GnRH-a, GnRH-ant, or PPOS protocols, and the data on patient demographics, protocols, and embryonic outcomes were collected for the PGT-A cycles performed between January 2019 and August 2022. Results This study included 457 PGT-A cycles from three reproductive medicine centers, with 152, 126, and 179 cycles performed using the PPOS, GnRH-a, and GnRH-ant protocols, respectively. The baseline characteristics of the three groups show no significant differences were observed in female BMI, infertility type, and infertility duration among the PPOS, GnRH-a, and GnRH-ant protocol groups. The study found no significant association between Gn dosage, Gn duration, and blastocyst euploidy. The mean number of euploidy blastocysts in PPOS protocol was significantly lower than that of GnRH-a protocol and GnRH-ant protocol (0.75 ± 0.92 vs. 1.79 ± 1.78 vs. 1.80 ± 1.67). The euploidy rate per biopsy blastocyst (48.4% vs. 49.1% vs. 33.1%), per oocyte retrieved (15.0% vs. 14.7% vs. 10.5%), and per MII oocyte (17.7% vs. 16.4% vs. 11.7%) were significantly higher in the cycles using the GnRH-ant and GnRH-a protocols than that of PPOS protocol group. Regression analyses indicated that, compared with the PPOS protocol, the GnRH-ant protocol was positively associated with the euploid blastocyst rate and the mean number of euploid blastocysts, whereas the GnRH-a protocol showed no such relationship. Limitations and reasons for caution The main limitation of this study was the retrospective design. Although this study also used other tests to account for confounding factors and reduce potential bias, multiple tests have its own weaknesses. Conclusions GnRH-ant protocol was the most effective for PGT-A cycles. The findings emphasize the need for personalized treatment strategies, considering patient demographics, and optimizing COS protocols to enhance the chances of successful outcomes in ART procedures.

Abstract Background Premature progesterone (P) rise during IVF stimulation reduces endometrial receptivity and is associated with lower pregnancy rates following embryo transfer (ET), which can influence provider recommendation for fresh or frozen ET. This study aimed to determine whether change in P level between in IVF baseline and trigger (𝚫P) is predictive of pregnancy outcome following fresh ET, and whether the ratio of gonadotropins influences P rise and, as a result, clinical pregnancy outcomes: clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR). Methods Retrospective cohort study at a single fertility center at an academic institution. The peak P level and 𝚫P were modeled in relation to prediction of CPR and LBR, and the ratios of hMG:rFSH were also modeled in relation to prediction of peak P level on day of trigger, 𝚫P, and CPR/LBR in a total of 291 patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-IVF (COH-IVF). Results 𝚫P correlates with CPR, with the most predictive range for success as 𝚫P 0.7–0.85 ng/mL (p = 0.005, 95% CI 0.635, 3.636; predicting CPR of 88.9%). The optimal range for peak P in regard to pregnancy outcome was 0.15–1.349 ng/mL (p = 0.01; 95% CI for coefficient in model 0.48–3.570). A multivariable logistic model for prediction of CPR and LBR using either peak or 𝚫P supported a stronger association between 𝚫P and CPR/LBR as compared to peak P. Furthermore, an hMG:rFSH ratio of > 0.6 was predictive of lowest peak P (p = 0.010, 95% CI 0.035, 0.256) and smallest 𝚫P (p = 0.012, 95% CI 0.030, 0.243) during COH-IVF cycles. Highest CPRs were observed within hMG:rFSH ratios of 0.3–0.4 [75.6% vs. 62.5% within and outside of the range, respectively, (p = 0.023, 95% CI 0.119, 1.618)]. Highest LBRs were seen within the range of 0.3–0.6 hMG:rFSH, [LBR of 55.4% vs. 41.4% (p = 0.010, 95% CI 0.176, 1.311)]. Conclusions Our data supports use of 𝚫P to best predict pregnancy rates and therefore can improve clinical decision making as to when fresh ET is most appropriate. Furthermore, we found optimal gonadotropin ratios can be considered to minimize P rise and to optimize CPR/LBR, emphasizing the importance of luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in COH-IVF cycles.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a serious complication associated with assisted reproductive technology. This systematic review aims to identify who is at high risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, along with evidence-based strategies to prevent it and replaces the document of the same name last published in 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• controlled ovarian stimulation. • follitropin delta. • real-world evidence. To describe the use, efficacy and safety profile of follitropin delta in women undergoing IVF/ICSI in routine clinical practice after one treatment cycle. This was a French multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in 14 fertility centers between June 2020 and June 2021. During this period, 248 women undergoing IVF or ICSI were treated with follitropin delta for the first time. Women were followed up to 10–11 weeks after the first fresh or frozen embryo transfer. The main outcomes were use of dosing algorithm, follitropin delta dosing patterns, ovarian response, pregnancy, and adverse drug reactions in routine clinical practice. The analyzable population consisted of 223 patients with mean ± SD age of 33.0 ± 4.4 years, body weight of 65.7 ± 11.8 kg, and the median (IQR) AMH level was 2.6 (1.5–4.0) ng/mL. For 193 patients (86.5 %) it was the first IVF/ICSI cycle and for 30 (13.5 %) the second. The algorithm was used for the calculation of the starting dose for 88.3 % of the patients. The mean daily starting dose of follitropin delta was 11.4 ± 4.1 mcg for the whole analyzable population and 14.4 ± 5.2 mcg for the sub-group of 26 patients dosed without the algorithm. The mean duration of stimulation with follitropin delta was 10.8 ± 5.2 days. The mean total dose of follitropin delta administered was 122.2 ± 80.0 mcg. An antagonist protocol was used in 90.3 % of patients. The mean ± SD number of oocytes retrieved among patients that started stimulation was 11.3 ± 6.8 and 46.1 % of patients achieved the targeted response of the algorithm of 8–14 oocytes retrieved. A fresh transfer was performed for 77.6 % of patients; the mean ± SD number of embryos transferred was 1.3 ± 0.5. The implantation rate was 36.0 %. Per started cycle, clinical pregnancy was reported in 35.0 % of the patients and ongoing pregnancy in 29.6 %. In total, 5 patients (2.2 %) reported an event of OHSS. Clinical results as collected in routine clinical practice are promising, showing a favorable effectiveness-safety profile of follitropin delta for a very varied patient population (including anovulatory PCOS, very poor responders, or non-IVF naïve patients). These real-world data complement results from clinical trials and provide useful information for usual clinical practice within a heterogeneous population group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adequately selecting the initial follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is key for success in assisted reproduction. The objective of COS is to obtain an optimal number of oocytes to increase the chances of achieving a pregnancy, while avoiding complications for the patient. Current clinical protocols do achieve good results for the majority of patients, but further refinements in individualized FSH dosing may reduce the risk of poor ovarian response while also limiting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk. Models to select the first FSH dose in COS have been presented in literature with promising results. However, most have only been developed and tested in normo-ovulatory women under the age of 40 years. Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blinded, clinical trial. This study will be performed in 236 first cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) patients, randomized 1:1 in two arms. In the intervention arm, the dose of FSH will be assigned by a machine learning (ML) model called IDoser, while in the control arm, the dose will be determined by the clinician following standard practice. Stratified block randomization will be carried out depending on the patient being classified as expected low responder, high responder, or normo-responder. Patients will complete their participation in the trial once the first embryo transfer result is known. The primary outcome of the study is the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved at ovarian pick up (OPU) and the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the intervention arm compared to the control. Secondary outcomes include the number of cycle cancelations (due to low response or no retrieval of mature oocytes), risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per first transfer. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to test clinical performance of an all-patient inclusive model to select the first dose of FSH for COS. Prospective trials for machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are scarce but necessary for clinical application. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05948293. Registered on 14 July 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The maximum daily dose of follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is 12 μg (180 IU), according to the algorithm developed by the manufacturer, and based on patient's ovarian reserve and weight. This study aimed to assess whether 150 IU of menotropin combined with follitropin delta improves the response to stimulation in women with serum antimullerian hormone levels less than 2.1 ng/mL. Methods: This study involved a prospective intervention group of 44 women who received 12 μg of follitropin delta combined with 150 IU of menotropin from the beginning of stimulation and a retrospective control group of 297 women who received 12 μg of follitropin delta alone during the phase 3 study of this drug. The inclusion and exclusion criteria and other treatment and follow-up protocols in the two groups were similar. The pituitary suppression was achieved by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Ovulation triggering with human chorionic gonadotropin or GnRH agonist and the option of transferring fresh embryos or using freeze-all strategy were made according to the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Results: Women who received follitropin delta combined with menotropin had higher estradiol levels on trigger day (2150 pg/mL vs. 1373 pg/mL, p < 0.001), more blastocysts (3.1 vs. 2.4, p = 0.003) and more top-quality blastocysts (1.8 vs. 1.3, p = 0.017). No difference was observed in pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and live birth rates after the first embryo transfer. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome did not differ between the groups. However, preventive measures for the syndrome were more frequent in the group using both drugs than in the control group (13.6% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In women with serum antimullerian hormone levels less than 2.1 ng/mL, the administration of 150 IU of menotropin combined with 12 μg of follitropin delta improved the ovarian response, making it a valid therapeutic option in situations where ovulation triggering with a GnRH agonist and freeze-all embryos strategy can be used routinely. Trial registration: U1111-1247-3260 (Brazilian Register of Clinical Trials, available at https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-2kmyfm). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore the cycle characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) using fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in conjunction with letrozole (LE) in infertile women by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic medical center. Population: A total of 3173 infertile women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment within the period from January 2017 to December 2020. Methods: A total of 1068 and 783 patients who underwent a fixed dose of MPA combined with LE and a degressive dose of MPA combined with LE protocols, respectively, were enrolled in this study. The freeze-all approach and later frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) were performed in both groups. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the dosage of MPA and the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges. The secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the fetal malformation rate. Results: We created a perfect match of 478 patients in each group. The dosage of MPA, the LH serum level on the eighth day of stimulation, progesterone (P) level and LH level on the hCG trigger day were significantly higher in the LE + fixed MPA group than in the LE + degressive MPA group (52.1 ± 13.1 mg vs. 44.9 ± 12.5 mg; 5.0 ± 2.7 IU/L vs. 3.7 ± 1.7 IU/L; 0.9 ± 0.5 ng/ml vs. 0.8 ± 0.5 ng/ml; 3.3 ± 2.4 IU/L vs. 2.8 ± 1.9 IU/L; P < 0.01). The duration of Gn, the number of follicles with diameter more than 16mmon trigger day, the estradiol (E2) level on the hCG trigger day were lower in the LE + fixed MPA group than in the LE + degressive MPA group (9.7 ± 1.7 days vs. 10.3 ± 1.5 days; 5.6 ± 3.0 vs. 6.3 ± 3.0; 1752.5 ± 1120.8 pg/ml vs. 1997.2 ± 1108.5 pg/ml; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of premature LH surge, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of top-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), CLBR or fetal malformation rate between the two groups. Conclusion: The combination of a degressive MPA dose with LE proved effective in reducing the total MPA dosage with comparable premature LH surge and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing the PPOS protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To explore the role of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in predicting the need to step up recombinant FSH (rFSH) dose following long GnRH agonist protocol in IVF/ICSI cycles of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) women. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 825 PCOS women undergoing long GnRH agonist protocol enrolled from Jan 2019 to Dec 2021. The daily rFSH dose at which the first response to rFSH were recorded. The dose at which the first response to rFSH was based on folliculometry during follow up in which two or more follicles reached ≥ 11 mm. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to investigate the ability of AMH to predict the need to step up initial rFSH dose. Results: PCOS women who needed to step up initial rFSH dose had a significantly higher AMH compared with those didn't step up initial rFSH dose (11.37 ± 3.25ng/ml vs. 8.69 ± 3.16ng/ml, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, increased AMH level was an independent factor for the need to step up initial rFSH dose in PCOS patients after adjusted for confounding factors. ROC curve analysis showed AMH could predict the need to step up initial rFSH dose (AUC = 0.738, 95%CI: 0.704–0.773), having 75.4% specificity and 63% sensitivity when the threshold AMH concentration was 9.30ng/ml. 58.8% PCOS women with AMH > 9.30 ng/ml required increased rFSH dose compared to 18.8% of women with AMH ≤ 9.30ng/ml (p < 0.001). Although the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were not significantly different, there was a higher incidence of OHSS among women with AMH > 9.30 ng/ml vs. AMH ≤ 9.30ng/ml (20.8% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.043). Conclusion: PCOS women with AMH > 9.30 ng/ml were resistant to rFSH stimulation and require increased dose for the cycle recruitment of ovarian follicles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ovarian response to stimulation mainly determines the length of stimulation. However, there is no clarity in the literature regarding the optimal duration required to achieve oocyte maturity in patients with the poor ovarian response (POR) defined by Bologna criteria. Therefore, a total of 267 cycles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected retrospectively. Group A constitute of patients with a stimulation period < 9 d (n = 70); and group B included patients with a stimulation period ≥ 9 d (n = 133). The results showed that antral follicle count (5.72 ± 1.82 vs. 5.10 ± 1.78, p = 0.023), serum oestradiol level on hCG day (1286.88 ± 778.18 pg/mL vs. 820.14 ± 479.04 pg/mL, p = 0.001), and total gonadotropin dose used (2949.53 ± 727.92 IU vs 2020.94 ± 415.17 IU, p = 0.0001) were higher in group B when compared to group A. Although the number of total (5.47 ± 3.32 vs 3.86 ± 2.15, p = 0.0001) and mature oocytes retrieved (4.34 ± 2.88 vs 2.84 ± 1.67, p = 0.0001) were higher in group B, no significant difference was observed in the pregnancy rates between groups (25.6 vs 15.7%, p > 0.05). In conclusion, no deleterious effect of a shorter duration of stimulation on cycle outcome was seen in patients with POR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study is to understand the global practice of routine hormonal monitoring (HM) during ovarian stimulation (OS) in the context of assisted reproductive technique (ART) treatment. Methods: An open-access questionnaire was available to 3,845 members of IVFWorldwide. com from September 8 to October 13, 2021. The survey comprised 25 multiple-choice questions on when and how ultrasound (US) and hormone tests were conducted during ovarian stimulation OS. For most questions, respondents were required to select a single option. Some questions allowed the selection of multiple options. Results: In all, 528 (13.7%) members from 88 countries responded to the questionnaire. Most respondents (98.9%) reported using US to monitor OS cycles. HM was used by 79.5% of respondents during any of the cycle monitoring visits and was most commonly performed on the day of, or a day prior to final oocyte maturation. Overall, 87% of respondents claimed adjusting the dose of gonadotropin during OS, with 61.7% adjusting the dose based on hormonal levels. Oestradiol (E2) was the most frequently monitored hormone during all visits and was used by 74% of respondents for the prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). On or a day prior to ovulation triggering (OT), the number of respondents who measured progesterone increased from 34.3% in the second/third visit to 67.7%. Approximately one-third of respondents measured luteinizing hormone during all visits. Conclusion: Globally, most ART specialists (~80%) use HM, along with US, for monitoring OS, especially for the prevention of OHSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several studies have explored which COS protocol yields a higher blastocyst euploidy rate, but findings have been inconsistent. The present study aimed to explore whether controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols was associated with euploid blastocyst rate in pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles. Methods: The study was a retrospective study where data were obtained from three reproductive medicine centers. The study included PGT-A cycles with the GnRH-a, GnRH-ant, or PPOS protocols, and the data on patient demographics, protocols, and embryonic outcomes were collected for the PGT-A cycles performed between January 2019 and August 2022. Results: This study included 457 PGT-A cycles from three reproductive medicine centers, with 152, 126, and 179 cycles performed using the PPOS, GnRH-a, and GnRH-ant protocols, respectively. The baseline characteristics of the three groups show no significant differences were observed in female BMI, infertility type, and infertility duration among the PPOS, GnRH-a, and GnRH-ant protocol groups. The study found no significant association between Gn dosage, Gn duration, and blastocyst euploidy. The mean number of euploidy blastocysts in PPOS protocol was significantly lower than that of GnRH-a protocol and GnRH-ant protocol (0.75 ± 0.92 vs. 1.79 ± 1.78 vs. 1.80 ± 1.67). The euploidy rate per biopsy blastocyst (48.4% vs. 49.1% vs. 33.1%), per oocyte retrieved (15.0% vs. 14.7% vs. 10.5%), and per MII oocyte (17.7% vs. 16.4% vs. 11.7%) were significantly higher in the cycles using the GnRH-ant and GnRH-a protocols than that of PPOS protocol group. Regression analyses indicated that, compared with the PPOS protocol, the GnRH-ant protocol was positively associated with the euploid blastocyst rate and the mean number of euploid blastocysts, whereas the GnRH-a protocol showed no such relationship. Limitations and reasons for caution: The main limitation of this study was the retrospective design. Although this study also used other tests to account for confounding factors and reduce potential bias, multiple tests have its own weaknesses. Conclusions: GnRH-ant protocol was the most effective for PGT-A cycles. The findings emphasize the need for personalized treatment strategies, considering patient demographics, and optimizing COS protocols to enhance the chances of successful outcomes in ART procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Premature progesterone (P) rise during IVF stimulation reduces endometrial receptivity and is associated with lower pregnancy rates following embryo transfer (ET), which can influence provider recommendation for fresh or frozen ET. This study aimed to determine whether change in P level between in IVF baseline and trigger (횫P) is predictive of pregnancy outcome following fresh ET, and whether the ratio of gonadotropins influences P rise and, as a result, clinical pregnancy outcomes: clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR). Methods: Retrospective cohort study at a single fertility center at an academic institution. The peak P level and 횫P were modeled in relation to prediction of CPR and LBR, and the ratios of hMG:rFSH were also modeled in relation to prediction of peak P level on day of trigger, 횫P, and CPR/LBR in a total of 291 patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-IVF (COH-IVF). Results: 횫P correlates with CPR, with the most predictive range for success as 횫P 0.7–0.85 ng/mL (p = 0.005, 95% CI 0.635, 3.636; predicting CPR of 88.9%). The optimal range for peak P in regard to pregnancy outcome was 0.15–1.349 ng/mL (p = 0.01; 95% CI for coefficient in model 0.48–3.570). A multivariable logistic model for prediction of CPR and LBR using either peak or 횫P supported a stronger association between 횫P and CPR/LBR as compared to peak P. Furthermore, an hMG:rFSH ratio of > 0.6 was predictive of lowest peak P (p = 0.010, 95% CI 0.035, 0.256) and smallest 횫P (p = 0.012, 95% CI 0.030, 0.243) during COH-IVF cycles. Highest CPRs were observed within hMG:rFSH ratios of 0.3–0.4 [75.6% vs. 62.5% within and outside of the range, respectively, (p = 0.023, 95% CI 0.119, 1.618)]. Highest LBRs were seen within the range of 0.3–0.6 hMG:rFSH, [LBR of 55.4% vs. 41.4% (p = 0.010, 95% CI 0.176, 1.311)]. Conclusions: Our data supports use of 횫P to best predict pregnancy rates and therefore can improve clinical decision making as to when fresh ET is most appropriate. Furthermore, we found optimal gonadotropin ratios can be considered to minimize P rise and to optimize CPR/LBR, emphasizing the importance of luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in COH-IVF cycles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the oncologic outcomes of patients with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) treated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperminjection (IVF/ICSI) following fertility-sparing treatment (FST). Methods: A total of 62 patients who underwent IVF/ICSI treatment in a single fertility center between June 2010 and December 2021 after conservative treatment for early-stage EEC were assigned to a recurrence group and a non-recurrence group. Their clinical characteristics and disease outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Results: The 62 women with complete remission (CR) after FST for EEC underwent 103 IVF cycles, resulting in 41 fresh embryo transfers (ETs) and 70 frozen-thawed transfers; 27 (43.55%) achieved clinical pregnancies, and 20 (32.26%) gave birth to a total of 23 live neonates. Additionally, nine patients had live births from natural pregnancies after IVF failure, bringing the cumulative live birth rate to 46.77% (29/62). After a median follow-up period of 53.88 months (range 20.2-127.5 months), 17 patients (27.42%) experienced recurrence within 2.8 to 57.9 months after the first controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). The probability of relapse at 1, 2, and 3 years after the initiation of COS was 14.52% (9/62), 21% (13/62), and 25.81% (16/62), respectively. Factors such as the time to CR, the time to IVF, the frequency of COS, maintenance treatment before IVF, and histology type were not found to significantly affect recurrence (p = 0.079, 0.182, 0.093, 0.267, and 0.41, respectively). Live births (hazard ratio (HR): 0.28, 95% CI: 0.082-0.962, p = 0.043) and the protocol of letrozole plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/agonist used during IVF (HR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.011-0.882, p = 0.038) were identified as independent favorable factors for recurrence. Conclusions: Live birth was associated with decreased recurrence of EEC. Reducing estrogen levels during COS may serve to mitigate the risk of endometrial cancer recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fertility loss is one of the primary concerns among female oncology patients of childbearing age about to undergo gonadotoxic therapy. Currently, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) followed by oocyte or embryo cryopreservation is the only technique of fertility preservation (FP) endorsed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. This retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified 'DuoStim' COS protocol in 36 female oncology patients at an FP clinic at St Mary's Hospital Reproductive Medicine Unit (Manchester, UK). Patients underwent two consecutive cycles of COS and outcomes assessed included total oocyte yield, mature oocytes of metaphase stage II, side effects of ovarian stimulation such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and delays to planned cancer therapy. Details of patient outcomes were determined by the review of patient medical records. Results of the study showed that this novel protocol increased oocyte yield by two-fold without delaying oncology treatment. Medical records confirmed that none of the 36 patients developed OHSS or experienced any delays in their cancer therapy. We conclude that the results of this study are encouraging and support DuoStim protocol as an effective strategy for FP in female FP patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The presence of different breast cancer receptor status may impact ovarian stimulation outcomes. Aim: To study the association between oestrogen receptor (ER) status in breast cancer patients and fertility preservation outcomes in a major tertiary referral centre. Materials and Methods: Women who underwent fertility preservation following the diagnosis of breast cancer from 2008 to 2018 were included in the study. Patient age, ovarian stimulation parameters and laboratory outcomes were recorded and compared between the ER positive and negative groups. The primary outcome was total number of oocytes frozen. Secondary outcomes included total number of oocytes collected, mature oocytes, and embryos frozen. Results: The women included in the study (n = 214) were analysed in the following groups based on their fertility preservation method: oocyte freezing (n = 131), embryo freezing (n = 70), and both embryo and oocyte freezing (n = 13). There was an increase in the mean (but not mature) number of oocytes frozen (12.4 and 9.2, P‐value = 0.03) favouring the ER positive group, even though the women in this group were older (35.0 and 33.4, P‐value of 0.03). There is no difference in the starting follicle‐stimulating hormone dose, duration of stimulation, mature oocytes collected, and embryos frozen in both groups. Conclusion: Patients with ER positive breast cancer may have more positive ovarian stimulation outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widely used as an embryo selection technique in in vitro fertilization (IVF), but its effectiveness and potential beneficiary populations are unclear. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent their first oocyte retrieval cycles at CITIC-Xiangya between January 2016 and November 2019, and the associated fresh and thawed embryo transfer cycles up to November 30, 2020. PGT-A (PGT-A group) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/IVF (non-PGT-A group) cycles were included. The numbers of oocytes and embryos obtained were unrestricted. In total, 60,580 patients were enrolled, and baseline data were matched between groups using 1:3 propensity score matching. Sensitivity analyses, including propensity score stratification and traditional multivariate logistic regression, were performed on the original unmatched cohort to check the robustness of the overall results. Analyses were stratified by age, body mass index, ovarian reserve/responsiveness, and potential indications to explore benefits in subgroups. The primary outcome was cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The other outcomes included live birth rate (LBR), pregnancy loss rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy complications, low birth weight rate, and neonatal malformation rate. Results In total, 4195 PGT-A users were matched with 10,140 non-PGT-A users. A significant reduction in CLBR was observed in women using PGT-A (27.5% vs. 31.1%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–0.91; P

Background: We compared the performance of follitropin delta and follitropin alfa in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and discussed the distinctive features of follitropin delta in COS. Methods: Patients underwent COS using the GnRH antagonist protocol with either recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and oocytes were retrieved. We compared the results of COS, oocyte pick up, fertilization, embryo culture, and clinical pregnancy between the follitropin alfa group and the follitropin delta group. Results: The serum estrogen level at trigger was significantly lower in the delta than in the alfa group (3,576.69 ± 1,775.60 vs. 2,833.19 ± 1,567.88) as was serum P4 level (2.14 ± 1.26 vs. 1.19 ± 0.85). The stimulation duration (in days) were longer (12.97 ± 2.38 vs. 13.96 ± 2.26) and total gonadotropin dose significantly lower (199.69 ± 54.47 vs. 114.27 ± 39.92), respectively, in the delta group than in the alfa group. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate was significantly lower in the delta than in the alfa group (48.1% vs. 58.6%). Fertilization, good blastocyst, and clinical pregnancy rates were not significantly different. COS using follitropin delta is characterized by significantly slower follicle development than COS using follitropin alfa. A comparison of developing follicles showed that the minimum follicle was significantly smaller in the delta group on days 6–8 of COS. The maximum follicle was significantly smaller in the delta group on days 6–8 and 11–13 of COS. The number of follicles larger than 14 mm was significantly lower in the delta group on days 6–8 of COS. Conclusions: Using follitropin delta is associated with slow follicular development, slow serum E2 elevation, and longer stimulation duration; however, excessive elevation of serum estrogen levels during COS is reduced and so is the incidence of mild OHSS.

Background: Ovarian reactivity to gonadotrophin stimulation varies, and individual adjustments to the timing and dose of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration are necessary to prevent excessive increases and decreases in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in patients with different ovarian response following the GnRH antagonist (GnRH-A) protocol. The present study aims to investigate optimal LH suppression thresholds for patients with normal ovarian response (NOR), high ovarian response (HOR), and poor ovarian response (POR) following the GnRH-A protocol respectively. Methods: A total of 865 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using a flexible or fixed GnRH-A protocol were included. Patients were categorized into the HOR, NOR, or POR group according to their anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. Then, patients in each group were stratified into one of four subgroups according to the quartile (Q1-Q4) of the basal LH level to LH on triggering day ratio (bLH/hLH). The primary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, and the secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, two pronucleus (2PN) embryos, and good-quality embryos. Results: There were 526 patients with NOR, 180 with HOR, and 159 with POR. Basal LH level, LH on triggering day and bLH/hLH were identified as independent predictors of clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate by logistics regression analysis. Compared to those with NOR, patients with POR had the lowest embryo implantation rate (22.6% vs. 32.8%, P

Backgrounds: The present study was designed to establish and validate a prediction model for high ovarian response (HOR) in the GnRH antagonist protocol. Methods: In this retrospective study, the data of 4160 cycles were analyzed following the in vitro fertilization (IVF) at our reproductive medical center from June 2018 to May 2022. The cycles were divided into a training cohort (n=3121) and a validation cohort (n=1039) using a random sampling method. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to screen out the risk factors for HOR, and the nomogram was established based on the regression coefficient of the relevant variables. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the calibration curve, and the decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, body mass index (BMI), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), antral follicle count (AFC), and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) were independent risk factors for HOR (all P< 0.05). The prediction model for HOR was constructed based on these factors. The AUC of the training cohort was 0.884 (95% CI: 0.869–0.899), and the AUC of the validation cohort was 0.884 (95% CI:0.863–0.905). Conclusion: The prediction model can predict the probability of high ovarian response prior to IVF treatment, enabling clinicians to better predict the risk of HOR and guide treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widely used as an embryo selection technique in in vitro fertilization (IVF), but its effectiveness and potential beneficiary populations are unclear. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent their first oocyte retrieval cycles at CITIC-Xiangya between January 2016 and November 2019, and the associated fresh and thawed embryo transfer cycles up to November 30, 2020. PGT-A (PGT-A group) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/IVF (non-PGT-A group) cycles were included. The numbers of oocytes and embryos obtained were unrestricted. In total, 60,580 patients were enrolled, and baseline data were matched between groups using 1:3 propensity score matching. Sensitivity analyses, including propensity score stratification and traditional multivariate logistic regression, were performed on the original unmatched cohort to check the robustness of the overall results. Analyses were stratified by age, body mass index, ovarian reserve/responsiveness, and potential indications to explore benefits in subgroups. The primary outcome was cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The other outcomes included live birth rate (LBR), pregnancy loss rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy complications, low birth weight rate, and neonatal malformation rate. Results: In total, 4195 PGT-A users were matched with 10,140 non-PGT-A users. A significant reduction in CLBR was observed in women using PGT-A (27.5% vs. 31.1%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–0.91; P < 0.001). However, women using PGT-A had higher first-transfer pregnancy (63.9% vs. 46.9%; OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.81–2.23; P < 0.001) and LBR (52.6% vs. 34.2%, OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.92–2.36; P < 0.001) rates and lower rates of early miscarriage (12.8% vs. 20.2%; OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.48–0.70; P < 0.001), preterm birth (8.6% vs 17.3%; P < 0.001), and low birth weight (4.9% vs. 19.3%; P < 0.001). Moreover, subgroup analyses revealed that women aged ≥ 38 years, diagnosed with recurrent pregnancy loss or intrauterine adhesions benefited from PGT-A, with a significant increase in first-transfer LBR without a decrease in CLBR. Conclusion: PGT-A does not increase and decrease CLBR per oocyte retrieval cycle; nonetheless, it is effective in infertile populations with specific indications. PGT-A reduces complications associated with multiple gestations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes and cost‐effectiveness of progestin‐primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and the gonadotropin‐releasing hormone‐antagonist (GnRH‐A) protocol in fertility preservation (FP) in cancer patients. The stimulation option when patients were in the luteal phase was also explored. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from 163 patients who underwent FP. The number of retrieved oocytes and vitrified oocytes/embryos, total dose of gonadotropin, duration of stimulation, number of injections, and cost were compared among the PPOS, GnRH‐A, and luteal phase stimulation (LPS) groups. Results: No significant differences were noted in the numbers of retrieved oocytes and vitrified oocytes/embryos among the three groups. In the multiple regression model, age (P = 0.02) and antral follicle count (AFC) (P < 0.001), but not the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols (P = 0.586), were associated with the number of retrieved oocytes. The number of injections and the cost were all significantly lower in the PPOS and LPS groups than in the GnRH‐A group(P < 0.001). Conclusion: PPOS had similar clinical results but was superior medically and economically to GnRH‐A. For patients in the luteal phase, LPS was an optional protocol with similar outcomes and costs to PPOS. Synopsis: PPOS protocols had similar clinical but superior medico‐economic to GnRH‐A. LPS was an optional protocol with similar outcomes and costs as PPOS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study compares two protocols for ovarian controlled stimulation in terms of number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. We employed a single injection of 150mcg of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval for TAIL group and a conventional administration of corifollitropin alfa after a 5-day OCP-free interval with additional rFSH from 8th of ovarian controlled stimulation. Prospective, randomized, comparative, non-inferiority, opened and controlled trial carried out in 180 oocyte donors 31 were excluded, 81 were randomized to the control group and 68 to the TAIL group. No differences were found in the number of follicles larger than 14 and 17 mm at triggering day. However, a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes were obtained in TAIL group compared to the control group, expressed as median (interquartile range): 10.5 (5.5-19) vs. 14 [11-21] and 9 (4-13) vs. 12 (9-17) respectively. Additionally, the incidence of failed retrieval or metaphase II oocytes = 0 was higher in TAIL group 7(10.3%) vs. 1(1.2%) p = 0.024. The use of a single injection of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval in oocyte donors resulted in a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. No additional rFSH was administered in this group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH [Follitrope™]) in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). To identify predictors of ovarian response that induce optimal clinical outcomes. This multicenter prospective study enrolled infertile women who were scheduled to undergo IVF after ovarian stimulation with rhFSH (Follitrope™) following the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or GnRH antagonist protocol. Predictive factors for ovarian response were identified in the GnRH antagonist group based on the number of oocytes retrieved. A total of 516 infertile women were enrolled, among whom 136 (except one who withdrew before administration) received rhFSH using the GnRH agonist protocol and 379 using the antagonist protocol. The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 13.4 in the GnRH agonist group and 13.6 in the GnRH antagonist group. The clinical pregnancy rates were 32.3% (30/93) and 39.9% (115/288) in the GnRH agonist and antagonist groups, respectively. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 1.8% and 3.4% in the GnRH agonist and antagonist groups, respectively. No other significant safety risks associated with rhFSH administration were identified. Body mass index, basal serum FSH and anti-Müllerian hormone levels, and antral follicle count were identified as predictors of ovarian response by multiple regression with backward elimination, and the final regression model accounted for 26.5% of the response variability. In real-world practice, rhFSH (Follitrope™) is safe and effective in inducing ovarian stimulation in infertile women. Patient characteristics identified as predictors can be considered to be highly related to optimal clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) is an effective method for the treatment of infertility combined with endometriosis (EMs). The ultra-long protocol of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) for the long-term down-regulation of pituitary can help to improve pregnancy outcomes in infertile patients with EMs. In recent years, more and more ovulation induction protocols have been applied in patients with EMs -related infertility, such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRHA) protocol and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol. These protocols have showed their potential in improving the pregnancy outcomes in patients with EMs-related infertility. However, the choice of ovulation induction protocols in patients with EMsrelated infertility is controversial due to unknown etiology, complex staging and clinical heterogeneity. It is necessary to conduct more high-quality clinical studies to validate the efficiency of these protocols in the different individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To demonstrate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for a clinical prediction of corifollitropin alfa protocol. Methods: The retrospective study involved 1,221 cycles from 1,180 patients undergoing corifollitropin alfa protocol with oocyte retrieval events from a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) center. The ML models were assigned to the following tasks, which are the dosage of corifollitropin alfa, trigger type, the dosage of recombinant FSH (rFSH), the dosage of recombinant LH (rLH), the duration between the follow-up visit (FUV), and oocyte retrieval. Interpretable SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were selected to analyze the input features. The ranking of the prediction powers from each input feature reveals the level of contribution to the model. Result(s): Two series of interpretable ML models were developed to predict classification tasks and regression tasks. The areas under ROC (AUC) for predicting the dosage of corifollitropin alfa and trigger type were 0.933 ([Formula: see text] CI 0.907–0.958) and 0.891 ([Formula: see text] CI 0.864–0.918), while accuracies were 0.944 and 0.904. The mean absolute errors (MAEs) that predict the dosage of rFSH, the dosage of rLH, and the duration between the FUV and oocyte retrieval were 97.08 IU (rFSH), 105.61 IU (rLH), and 0.45 days. Conclusions: The study demonstrates a set of interpretable ML models predicting tasks involved in corifollitropin alfa protocol. The potential for the clinical application is to provide consistency in corifollitropin protocol adjustments.

Abstract Background Resistant ovarian syndrome(ROS) is a rare disease. It is difficult to diagnose and treat. Most of the literature reports on assisted pregnancy treatment for ROS patients are individual case reports. In this paper, the ovulation stimulation protocol and assisted pregnancy process of ROS infertile patients in our reproductive center were summarized and analyzed to provide information and support for the clinical treatment of ROS patients. Methods From January 2017 to March 2022, assisted reproductive technology treatments and clinical characteristics parameters of six patients with ROS were retrospectively reviewed. Based on controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, these stimulation cycles were separated into four groups: Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol (EFLL) group (n = 6), Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation(PPOS) protocol group (n = 5), mild-stimulation protocol group (n = 2), and Natural cycle protocol group (n = 3). Results A total of 16 cycles of ovulation stimulation were carried out in 6 patients with ROS. A total of 19 oocytes were retrieved, as well as 13 MII oocytes, 11 two pronuclear(2PN) fertilized embryos, and 8 excellent embryos. The oocytes acquisition rate was 50% and the fertilization rate of 2PN was 57.9%, and the excellent embryo rate was 72.7%. The EFLL protocol obtained 17 oocytes, 12 MII oocytes, 11 2PN fertilized embryos, and 8 excellent embryos; the mild-stimulation protocol obtained 1 oocyte; the Natural cycle protocol obtained 1 oocyte, and oocytes were not matured after in vitro maturation (IVM); the PPOS protocol obtained no oocytes. Compared with three other protocols, The fertilization rate of 2PN (64.7%) and excellent embryo rate (72.7%) in the EFLL protocol were higher than those of other protocols(0%). Two fresh cycle embryo transfers resulted in live births, while two frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles resulted in one live birth and one clinical pregnancy using the EFLL protocol. Conclusion Although the current study is based on a small sample of participants, the findings suggest that the EFLL protocol can be employed for ovarian stimulation and may result in a live birth in ROS patients.

Background and Aims: Follitropin delta is the third recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) expressed in a host cell line of human fetal retinal origin that currently emphasizes that the actual tendency of administration is a personalized dosing algorithm based on the anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and body mass index (BMI) for ovarian stimulation. Methods: In this present manuscript, we aimed to gather all available data published between 2018–2022 regarding the co-administration and administration of follitropin delta and the clinical outcomes reported following an in vitro fertilization (IVF). Results: Follitropin delta is non-inferior in contrast to its previously launched agents for ovarian stimulation, enhancing a similar-to-superior response reflected by both the reproductive and pregnancy outcomes in parallel with a low risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), being well tolerated. The body weight and AMH level are factors that may influence the outcome in a patient. Despite controversy and results that refute these arguments on several occasions, follitropin delta exceeds the benefits of conventional dosing with either follitropin alfa or follitropin beta. Therefore, all post hoc derived analyzes and subgroups of patients who participated in subsequent studies support this statement. Conclusion: Despite the relatively limited range of data in the current literature, most authors provide strong evidence to support the later use of this drug according to patient profiles and overcoming ethnic limitations. Others disagree with these observations, but this topic and this drug have great potential. As such, additional research is needed to fill existing knowledge gaps and extend this experience to a larger scale. Demonstrate overcoming all limitations.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to understand the global practice of routine hormonal monitoring (HM) during ovarian stimulation (OS) in the context of assisted reproductive technique (ART) treatment.MethodsAn open-access questionnaire was available to 3,845 members of IVF-Worldwide.com from September 8 to October 13, 2021. The survey comprised 25 multiple-choice questions on when and how ultrasound (US) and hormone tests were conducted during ovarian stimulation OS. For most questions, respondents were required to select a single option. Some questions allowed the selection of multiple options.ResultsIn all, 528 (13.7%) members from 88 countries responded to the questionnaire. Most respondents (98.9%) reported using US to monitor OS cycles. HM was used by 79.5% of respondents during any of the cycle monitoring visits and was most commonly performed on the day of, or a day prior to final oocyte maturation. Overall, 87% of respondents claimed adjusting the dose of gonadotropin during OS, with 61.7% adjusting the dose based on hormonal levels. Oestradiol (E2) was the most frequently monitored hormone during all visits and was used by 74% of respondents for the prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). On or a day prior to ovulation triggering (OT), the number of respondents who measured progesterone increased from 34.3% in the second/third visit to 67.7%. Approximately one-third of respondents measured luteinizing hormone during all visits.ConclusionGlobally, most ART specialists (~80%) use HM, along with US, for monitoring OS, especially for the prevention of OHSS.