Search

This detailed analysis further characterizes the safety profile of talazoparib plus enzalutamide in the ongoing randomized, phase III TALAPRO-2 study in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In both the all-comers and homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient populations, talazoparib plus enzalutamide significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival compared with placebo plus enzalutamide. The talazoparib plus enzalutamide safety populations in TALAPRO-2 included 398 patients from cohort 1 (all-comers, unselected for HRR gene alterations) and 198 patients from the combined HRR-deficient population (patients from the all-comers population with HRR gene alterations plus subsequently enrolled patients with HRR gene alterations; cohort 2). Patients received talazoparib 0.5 mg (0.35 mg, moderate renal impairment) and enzalutamide 160 mg once daily. Safety analyses evaluated common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), their type, severity, timing, seriousness, and relationship to study treatment. In the all-comers (n = 398) and HRR-deficient populations (n = 198), all-cause grade 3/4 (G3/4) TEAEs with talazoparib plus enzalutamide were reported in 71.9 % and 66.2 % of patients, respectively. Most common G3/4 hematologic TEAEs were anemia (46.7 % and 40.9 %, respectively), neutropenia (18.3 % and 18.7 %), and thrombocytopenia (7.3 % and 7.1 %). Median time to event was 3.3 and 3.3 months for G3/4 anemia, 2.3 and 2.3 months for G3/4 neutropenia, and 2.3 and 1.5 months for G3/4 thrombocytopenia. Maximum hemoglobin reduction occurred after 13 and 15 weeks of treatment. 18.8 % and 10.1 % of patients discontinued talazoparib. TEAEs were managed with dose interruption (62.1 % and 57.6 %), reduction (52.8 % and 52.0 %), hematologic supportive care (13.1 % and 10.6 %), and packed red blood cell transfusions (39.2 % and 35.9 %). Talazoparib plus enzalutamide had a generally manageable safety profile in patients with mCRPC within the all-comers and the HRR-deficient populations. NCT03395197 • We present detailed safety analyses of talazoparib plus enzalutamide from TALAPRO-2. • Anemia, neutropenia, and fatigue were the most common any-grade adverse events. • Median time to grade 3/4 myelosuppression-related events ranged from 1.5–3.3 months. • Anemia was managed with dose modifications and hematologic supportive care. • Talazoparib plus enzalutamide for mCRPC has a generally manageable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Brain maturation continues well into adulthood, but little is known of the effects of MPH on cognitive development. • Boys and men with ADHD were randomized to either MPH or placebo; cognition was evaluated before and one-week after treatment. • The results show effects of MPH on cognition are limited to the moment of treatment in both ADHD boys and men. • The lack of detrimental lasting effects could be consoling. Methylphenidate (MPH) is the first-choice pharmacological treatment for treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) across the lifespan. However, it is unclear whether MPH affects cognitive development, while recent (pre-) clinical studies suggest effects on the developing brain. The present randomized, placebo-controlled trial aims to determine whether MPH has short-term, age-dependent effects on cognitive performance in ADHD after a 1-week washout. Effects of 16 weeks MPH treatment were assessed after a one-week washout on cognitive functioning. Boys (age=10–12) and men (age=23–40) with ADHD were assigned to MPH treatment (boys n =25, men n =24) or placebo (boys n =25, men n =24). Outcome measures were working memory, response inhibition, response speed, episodic memory, and delay aversion. Differences in task performances over time (pre-, mid-, and post-treatment, following a 1-week wash-out) were compared between age and treatment conditions with mixed ANOVAs. MPH improved working memory and response speed, but only during treatment. No lasting age*treatment effects were observed post intervention. Overall, the results from the present randomized, placebo-controlled trial show that the effects of MPH on cognition do not extend past treatment in children or adults. While treatment with MPH improves cognition during treatment, these effects appear transient after 16-weeks of treatment. (Title trial: "Effects of methylphenidate on the developing brain"; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3103) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of botulinum toxin type B (rimabotulinumtoxinB, BoNT/B) in spastic upper limb muscles. Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up. Setting: Tertiary care center. Participants: Referred sample of adult hemiparetic patients (N=24) with disabling elbow flexor overactivity after stroke or traumatic brain injury. Interventions: Injection of 10,000U of rimabotulinumtoxinB (fixed 2500U dose into elbow flexors; n=8), 15,000U (5000U into elbow flexors; n=8), or placebo (n=8) into overactive upper limb muscles selected as per investigator's discretion. Main Outcome Measures: At 1 month postinjection, active range of elbow extension (goniometry; primary outcome); active upper limb function (Modified Frenchay Scale [MFS]); subjective global self-assessment (GSA) of arm pain, stiffness, and function; rapid alternating elbow flexion-extension movement frequency over the maximal range; elbow flexor spasticity grade and angle (Tardieu), and tone (Ashworth). Results: No adverse effects were associated with either BoNT/B dose. Both doses improved active elbow extension versus placebo (+8.3°; 95% confidence interval, 1.1°–15.5°; analysis of covariance, P=.028). The high dose of BoNT/B also improved subject-perceived stiffness (P=.005) and the composite pain, stiffness, and function GSA (P=.017), effects that persisted 3 months from injection. No MFS change was demonstrated, although subjects with a baseline MFS <70/100 seemed more likely to benefit from BoNT/B. Conclusions: In this short-term study, BoNT/B up to 15,000U into spastic upper limb muscles, including the elbow flexors, was well tolerated and improved active elbow extension and subject-perceived stiffness. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: Patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) have an elevated prevalence of mood disorders compared with the general population. We investigated the change of RLS-related mood impairment during treatment of RLS with pramipexole, a dopamine D3/D2 agonist. Methods: Adults with moderate to very severe RLS were enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase IV pramipexole trial. A moderate to very severe RLS-related mood disturbance at baseline (score⩾2 on Item 10 of the International RLS Study Group Rating Scale [IRLS]) was also required. Pramipexole (0.125 to 0.75mg once daily) was flexibly titrated over the first 4weeks. Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 199 patients on placebo and 203 on pramipexole. At week 12, adjusted mean total-score changes on IRLS were –14.2±0.7 for pramipexole and –8.1±0.7 for placebo (p< 0.0001), and on the Beck Depression Inventory version II, –7.3±0.4 for pramipexole and –5.8±0.5 for placebo (p= 0.0199). For IRLS item 10, the 12-week responder rate (reduction to no or mild mood disturbance) was 75.9% for pramipexole and 57.3% for placebo (p< 0.0001). Study withdrawal rates were higher for placebo (20.5%) than for pramipexole (12.8%). Conclusions: In patients with RLS-related mood disturbance, pramipexole improved RLS while also improving RLS-related mood impairment. Tolerability of pramipexole was similar to that in previous studies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Depression is common but undertreated. Web-based self-help provides a widely accessible treatment alternative for mild to moderate depression. However, the lack of therapist guidance may limit its efficacy. The authors assess the efficacy of therapist-guided web-based cognitive behavioural treatment (web-CBT) of mild to moderate depression. Fifty-four individuals with chronic, moderate depression participated in a randomized wait-list controlled trial, with an 18-month follow-up (immediate treatment: n = 36, wait-list control: n = 18). Primary outcome measures were the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA) and the Depression scale of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R. DEP). Secondary outcome measures were the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales and the Well-Being Questionnaire. Five participants (9%) dropped out. Intention-to-treat analyses of covariance revealed that participants in the treatment condition improved significantly more than those in the wait-list control condition (.011 < p < .015). With regard to the primary measures, between-group effects (d) were 0.7 for the BDI-IA and 1.1 for the SCL-90-R DEP. Posttest SCL-90- R DEP scores indicated recovery of 49% of the participants in the treatment group compared with 6% in the control group (odds ratio = 14.5; p < .004). On average, the effects were stable up to 18 months (n = 39), although medication was a strong predictor of relapse. The results demonstrate the efficacy of web-CBT for mild to moderate depression and the importance of therapist guidance in psychological interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Suffering a stroke can be a devastating and life-changing event. Although there is a large evidence base for stroke rehabilitation in the acute and subacute stages, it has been long accepted that patients with stroke reach a plateau in their rehabilitation recovery relatively early. We have recently published the results of a systematic review designed to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where a rehabilitation intervention was initiated more than 6 months after the onset of the stroke. Of the trials identified, 339 RCTs met inclusion criteria, demonstrating an evidence base for stroke rehabilitation in the chronic phase as well. This seems at odds with the assumption that further recovery is unlikely and the subsequent lack of resources devoted to chronic stroke rehabilitation and management. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background and Objectives: Depression is common in patients on hemodialysis, but data on the benefits and risks of antidepressants in this setting are limited. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sertraline over 6 months in patients on hemodialysis with depression to determine study feasibility, safety, and effectiveness., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: Patients on hemodialysis at five United Kingdom renal centers completed the Beck Depression Inventory II. Those scoring ≥16 and not already on treatment for depression were invited to undergo diagnostic interview to confirm major depressive disorder. Eligible patients with major depressive disorder were randomized to receive the study medication-either sertraline or placebo. Outcomes included recruitment and dropout rates, change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Beck Depression Inventory II, and qualitative information to guide design of a large-scale trial., Results: In total, 709 patients were screened and enrolled between April of 2013 and October of 2014; 231 (32.6%) had Beck Depression Inventory II scores ≥16, and 68 (29%) of these were already receiving treatment for depression. Sixty-three underwent diagnostic interview, 37 were diagnosed with major depressive disorder, and 30 were randomized; 21 completed the trial: eight of 15 on sertraline and 13 of 15 on placebo (P=0.05). Dropouts due to adverse and serious adverse events were greater in the sertraline group. All occurred in the first 3 months. Over 6 months, depression scores improved in both groups. Beck Depression Inventory II score fell from 29.1±8.4 to 17.3±12.4 (P<0.001), and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score fell from 24.5±4.1 to 10.3±5.8 (P<0.001). There were no differences between sertraline and placebo groups., Conclusions: Although small, this is the largest randomized trial to date of antidepressant medication in patients on hemodialysis. Our results highlight recruitment issues. No benefit was observed, but trial size and the substantial dropout render consideration of benefit inconclusive. A definitive trial could use shorter follow-up and include depressed patients already taking antidepressants., (Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background and Purpose: The ABC/2 score estimates intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume, yet validations have been limited by small samples and inappropriate outcome measures. We determined accuracy of the ABC/2 score calculated at a specialized reading center (RC-ABC) or local site (site-ABC) versus the reference-standard computed tomography-based planimetry (CTP)., Methods: In Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation-II (MISTIE-II), Clot Lysis Evaluation of Accelerated Resolution of Intraventricular Hemorrhage (CLEAR-IVH) and CLEAR-III trials. ICH volume was prospectively calculated by CTP, RC-ABC, and site-ABC. Agreement between CTP and ABC/2 was defined as an absolute difference up to 5 mL and relative difference within 20%. Determinants of ABC/2 accuracy were assessed by logistic regression., Results: In 4369 scans from 507 patients, CTP was more strongly correlated with RC-ABC (r(2)=0.93) than with site-ABC (r(2)=0.87). Although RC-ABC overestimated CTP-based volume on average (RC-ABC, 15.2 cm(3); CTP, 12.7 cm3), agreement was reasonable when categorized into mild, moderate, and severe ICH (κ=0.75; P<0.001). This was consistent with overestimation of ICH volume in 6 of 8 previous studies. Agreement with CTP was greater for RC-ABC (84% within 5 mL; 48% of scans within 20%) than for site-ABC (81% within 5 mL; 41% within 20%). RC-ABC had moderate accuracy for detecting ≥5 mL change in CTP volume between consecutive scans (sensitivity, 0.76; specificity, 0.86) and was more accurate with smaller ICH, thalamic hemorrhage, and homogeneous clots., Conclusions: ABC/2 scores at local or central sites are sufficiently accurate to categorize ICH volume and assess eligibility for the CLEAR-III and MISTIE III studies and moderately accurate for change in ICH volume. However, accuracy decreases with large, irregular, or lobar clots., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: MISTIE-II NCT00224770; CLEAR-III NCT00784134., (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background and Objectives: We compared the efficacy and safety of valsartan and rosuvastatin combination therapy with each treatment alone in hypercholesterolemic hypertensive patients., Subjects and Methods: Patients who met inclusion criteria were randomized to receive 1 of the following 2-month drug regimens: valsartan 160 mg plus rosuvastatin 20 mg, valsartan 160 mg plus placebo, or rosuvastatin 20 mg plus placebo. The primary efficacy variables were change in sitting diastolic blood pressure (sitDBP) and sitting systolic blood pressure (sitSBP), and percentage change in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) in the combination, valsartan, and rosuvastatin groups. Adverse events (AEs) during the study were analyzed., Results: A total of 354 patients were screened and 123 of them were finally randomized. Changes of sitDBP by least squares mean (LSM) were -11.1, -7.2, and -3.6 mm Hg, respectively, and was greater in the combination, as compared to both valsartan (p=0.02) and rosuvastatin (p<0.001). Changes of sitSBP by LSM were -13.2, -10.8, and -4.9 mm Hg, and was greater in the combination, as compared to rosuvastatin (p=0.006) and not valsartan (p=0.42). Percentage changes of LDL-C by LSM were -52, -4, and -47% in each group, and was greater in the combination, as compared to valsartan (p<0.001), similar to rosuvastatin (p=0.16). Most AEs were mild and resolved by the end of the study., Conclusion: Combination treatment with valsartan and rosuvastatin exhibited an additive blood pressure-lowering effect with acceptable tolerability, as compared to valsartan monotherapy. Its lipid lowering effect was similar to rosuvatatin monotherapy.