1. Phantom Movement Training Without Classifier Performance Feedback Improves Mobilization Ability While Maintaining EMG Pattern Classification
- Author
-
Olivier Rossel, Manon Chateaux, Nathanaël Jarrassé, Fabien Vérité, Amélie Touillet, Caroline Nicol, Jean Paysant, Jozina B. De Graaf, Contrôle Artificiel de Mouvements et de Neuroprothèses Intuitives (CAMIN), Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée (CRISAM), Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria), Institut des Sciences du Mouvement Etienne Jules Marey (ISM), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique (ISIR), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation Louis Pierquin [Nancy] (IRR Louis Pierquin)
- Subjects
Human-Computer Interaction ,[SPI]Engineering Sciences [physics] ,Amputation EMG-classification Feedback Phantom movement training ,Control and Optimization ,Artificial Intelligence ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Biomedical Engineering ,EMG-classification ,Amputation ,Feedback ,Phantom movement training ,Computer Science Applications - Abstract
International audience; Voluntary phantom movements are systematically associated with muscle contractions in the residual limb. These latter are specific to the type of movement and can be classified by pattern recognition algorithms. However, phantom mobility generates fatigue that could impact classification metrics. This study explored whether daily phantom movement training at home with no other feedback than inherent somatosensory information can impact the classification success rate. Kinematics and muscle activity were compared between before and after a two-month home training in six major upper limb amputees. Surface EMG patterns were classified to quantify a potential change in the features space with training. Our results showed that this type of training induces faster, smoother, and richer phantom mobility. However, classification metrics did not change with training. When including the new types of movements achievable after training, accuracy did not decrease, indicating that muscle activation patterns associated with these movements were sufficiently different not to interfere with the already existing movement classes. Thus, although phantom training with only somatosensory feedback increases the overall phantom movement capacity, it does not increase the classification success rate. Yet, it is possible that paired with other forms of feedback, phantom training could improve this success rate.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF