Search

Funder: Victorian Cancer Agency, Funder: NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Funder: Cancer Research UK, Funder: Cancer Council Tasmania, Funder: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Funder: Cancer Australia, Funder: NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Funder: Fundación Científica de la Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, Funder: Cancer Council South Australia, Funder: Swedish Cancer Society, Funder: NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Funder: Institut Català de la Salut, Funder: Cancer Council Victoria, Funder: Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Funder: National Institutes of Health, BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome is a rare familial cancer syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2, that cause predisposition to various cancers, predominantly colorectal and endometrial cancer. Data are emerging that pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes increase the risk of early-onset aggressive prostate cancer. The IMPACT study is prospectively assessing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men with germline mismatch repair pathogenic variants. Here, we report the usefulness of PSA screening, prostate cancer incidence, and tumour characteristics after the first screening round in men with and without these germline pathogenic variants. METHODS: The IMPACT study is an international, prospective study. Men aged 40-69 years without a previous prostate cancer diagnosis and with a known germline pathogenic variant in the MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 gene, and age-matched male controls who tested negative for a familial pathogenic variant in these genes were recruited from 34 genetic and urology clinics in eight countries, and underwent a baseline PSA screening. Men who had a PSA level higher than 3·0 ng/mL were offered a transrectal, ultrasound-guided, prostate biopsy and a histopathological analysis was done. All participants are undergoing a minimum of 5 years' annual screening. The primary endpoint was to determine the incidence, stage, and pathology of screening-detected prostate cancer in carriers of pathogenic variants compared with non-carrier controls. We used Fisher's exact test to compare the number of cases, cancer incidence, and positive predictive values of the PSA cutoff and biopsy between carriers and non-carriers and the differences between disease types (ie, cancer vs no cancer, clinically significant cancer vs no cancer). We assessed screening outcomes and tumour characteristics by pathogenic variant status. Here we present results from the first round of PSA screening in the IMPACT study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00261456, and is now closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Sept 28, 2012, and March 1, 2020, 828 men were recruited (644 carriers of mismatch repair pathogenic variants [204 carriers of MLH1, 305 carriers of MSH2, and 135 carriers of MSH6] and 184 non-carrier controls [65 non-carriers of MLH1, 76 non-carriers of MSH2, and 43 non-carriers of MSH6]), and in order to boost the sample size for the non-carrier control groups, we randomly selected 134 non-carriers from the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cohort of the IMPACT study, who were included in all three non-carrier cohorts. Men were predominantly of European ancestry (899 [93%] of 953 with available data), with a mean age of 52·8 years (SD 8·3). Within the first screening round, 56 (6%) men had a PSA concentration of more than 3·0 ng/mL and 35 (4%) biopsies were done. The overall incidence of prostate cancer was 1·9% (18 of 962; 95% CI 1·1-2·9). The incidence among MSH2 carriers was 4·3% (13 of 305; 95% CI 2·3-7·2), MSH2 non-carrier controls was 0·5% (one of 210; 0·0-2·6), MSH6 carriers was 3·0% (four of 135; 0·8-7·4), and none were detected among the MLH1 carriers, MLH1 non-carrier controls, and MSH6 non-carrier controls. Prostate cancer incidence, using a PSA threshold of higher than 3·0 ng/mL, was higher in MSH2 carriers than in MSH2 non-carrier controls (4·3% vs 0·5%; p=0·011) and MSH6 carriers than MSH6 non-carrier controls (3·0% vs 0%; p=0·034). The overall positive predictive value of biopsy using a PSA threshold of 3·0 ng/mL was 51·4% (95% CI 34·0-68·6), and the overall positive predictive value of a PSA threshold of 3·0 ng/mL was 32·1% (20·3-46·0). INTERPRETATION: After the first screening round, carriers of MSH2 and MSH6 pathogenic variants had a higher incidence of prostate cancer compared with age-matched non-carrier controls. These findings support the use of targeted PSA screening in these men to identify those with clinically significant prostate cancer. Further annual screening rounds will need to confirm these findings. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, The Ronald and Rita McAulay Foundation, the National Institute for Health Research support to Biomedical Research Centres (The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust; Oxford; Manchester and the Cambridge Clinical Research Centre), Mr and Mrs Jack Baker, the Cancer Council of Tasmania, Cancer Australia, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Cancer Council of Victoria, Cancer Council of South Australia, the Victorian Cancer Agency, Cancer Australia, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), the Institut Català de la Salut, Autonomous Government of Catalonia, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, Swedish Cancer Society, General Hospital in Malmö Foundation for Combating Cancer.

1580 Background: HLRCC is a hereditary condition with autosomal dominant inheritance due to germline mutations in the fumarate-hydratase gene ( FH). It is characterized by skin leiomyomas (SLM) in 48-84% of individuals, uterine leiomyomas (ULM) in 30-72%, renal cysts (RCy) and renal cell cancer (RCC) in 15-34%. We aimed to describe the genetics, the clinical features and the potential genotype-phenotype associations in the largest cohort of FH mutation carriers from Spain. Methods: We performed a multicenter, observational, retrospective study of individuals with genetic or clinical diagnosis of HLRCC. We collected clinical information from medical records. We analyzed genetic variants and looked for genotype-phenotype associations. Statistical analyses were performed by IBM-SPSS Statistics-v.22. Results: We included 197 individuals (113 women, 84 men), 74 index cases and 123 relatives. Twenty-seven different variants were detected, 26 pathogenic (12 missense, 5 frameshift, 4 large-deletions, 3 splice-site and 2 nonsense) and 1 variant of unknown significance (missense). Of 182 patients with full skin examination, 64.8% presented SLM (median age 36 years; range 8-85). ULM were diagnosed in 90.3% of 103 women with gynecologic exam (median age 30 years; range 17- 55). Hysterectomy was performed in 62.9% (median age 34 years; range 21-54). Of 153 patients with radiological records, 37.3 % presented RCy. Nineteen patients (10.9%) presented RCC, 11 males and 8 females (median age 37 years; range 10-67). The histological diagnoses were: 14 papillary, of which 10 were type 2; 3 clear cell carcinoma and 2 unclassified carcinoma. Six tumors had stage I, 2 stage II, 3 stage III, 4 stage IV, and 4 not available. The median overall survival among patients at stages 3-4 was 2.9 years [1.3-4.5]. Patients with missense pathogenic variants showed higher risk of developing SLM (p = 0.043) and ULM (p = 0.002) than those with loss of function variants. Conclusions: In our cohort, the frequency of RCC (10.9%) is lower than that published in cohorts of similar sample size. The most frequent histology was the papillary type-2; however, other histological patterns do not exclude HLRCC. Individuals with missense pathogenic variants show higher incidence of SLM and ULM.

Síndrome de Lynch; Panell de gens del càncer; Epimutació Síndrome de Lynch; Panel de genes del cáncer; Epimutación Lynch syndrome; Cancer genes panel; Epimutation The causal mechanism for cancer predisposition in Lynch-like syndrome (LLS) remains unknown. Our aim was to elucidate the constitutional basis of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in LLS patients throughout a comprehensive (epi)genetic analysis. One hundred and fifteen LLS patients harboring MMR-deficient tumors and no germline MMR mutations were included. Mutational analysis of 26 colorectal cancer (CRC)-associated genes was performed. Pathogenicity of MMR variants was assessed by splicing and multifactorial likelihood analyses. Genome-wide methylome analysis was performed by the Infinium Human Methylation 450K Bead Chip. The multigene panel analysis revealed the presence of two MMR gene truncating mutations not previously found. Of a total of 15 additional MMR variants identified, five -present in 6 unrelated individuals- were reclassified as pathogenic. In addition, 13 predicted deleterious variants in other CRC-predisposing genes were found in 12 probands. Methylome analysis detected one constitutional MLH1 epimutation, but no additional differentially methylated regions were identified in LLS compared to LS patients or cancer-free individuals. In conclusion, the use of an ad-hoc designed gene panel combined with pathogenicity assessment of variants allowed the identification of deleterious MMR mutations as well as new LLS candidate causal genes. Constitutional epimutations in non-LS-associated genes are not responsible for LLS. This work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and cofunded by FEDER funds -a way to build Europe- (grants SAF2012-33636, SAF2015-68016-R and SAF2016-80888-R), CIBERONC, RTICC Network (RD12/0036/0031 and RD12/0036/0008), the Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC) (080253), the Government of Catalonia (grant 2014SGR338, 2017SGR1282 and PERIS SLT002/16/0037), Fundación Mutua Madrileña (grant AP114252013). We thank CERCA Programme for institutional support. ED was supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. The AECC fellowship to MG-A. AF was supported by a grant from the Catalonian Health Department (SLT002/16/00409). FM was supported by CIBERONC. The Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT) fellowship to GV.

Simple Summary Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) syndrome is a very rare hereditary disorder characterized by cutaneous leiomyomas (CLMs), uterine leiomyomas (ULMs), renal cysts (RCys) and renal cell cancer (RCC), with no data on its prevalence worldwide. No genotype-phenotype associations have been described. The aim of our study was to describe the genotypic and phenotypic features of the largest series of patients with HLRCC from Spain reported to date. Of 27 FH germline pathogenic variants, 12 were not previously reported in databases. Patients with missense pathogenic variants showed higher frequencies of CLMs, ULMs and RCys, than those with loss-of-function variants. The frequency of RCCs (10.9%) was lower than those reported in the previously published series. Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer syndrome (HLRCC) is a very rare hereditary disorder characterized by cutaneous leiomyomas (CLMs), uterine leiomyomas (ULMs), renal cysts (RCys) and renal cell cancers (RCCs). We aimed to describe the genetics, clinical features and potential genotype-phenotype associations in the largest cohort of fumarate hydratase enzyme mutation carriers known from Spain using a multicentre, retrospective study of individuals with a genetic or clinical diagnosis of HLRCC. We collected clinical information from medical records, analysed genetic variants and looked for genotype-phenotype associations. Analyses were performed using R 3.6.0. software. We included 197 individuals: 74 index cases and 123 relatives. CLMs were diagnosed in 65% of patients, ULMs in 90% of women, RCys in 37% and RCC in 10.9%. Twenty-seven different pathogenic variants were detected, 12 (44%) of them not reported previously. Patients with missense pathogenic variants showed higher frequencies of CLMs, ULMs and RCys, than those with loss-of-function variants (p = 0.0380, p = 0.0015 and p = 0.024, respectively). This is the first report of patients with HLRCC from Spain. The frequency of RCCs was lower than those reported in the previously published series. Individuals with missense pathogenic variants had higher frequencies of CLMs, ULMs and RCys.

1582 Background: Despite the use of clinical eligibility criteria and mutation predictive models, a great proportion of families are negative for germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. Traditionally, risk assessment of inconclusive results included the recommendation of high-risk surveillance protocol, the update of incident cancer cases in the family and the consideration of additional testing to rule out the possibility of phenocopy. More recently, next generation sequencing multigene panels have become a standard practice in cancer genetics clinics worldwide. We addressed the value of multigene panel retesting of BRCA1/2 negative HBOC families in our institution. Methods: After genetic counseling session and informed consent, a total of 137 individuals (119 probands and 18 extra cancer-affected relatives) from distinct BRCA1/2 negative families were retested using a panel containing 11 breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes ( BRCA1/2, PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, PTEN, TP53, STK11, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D). Results: According to the BOADICEA model, the remaining probability of mutation in BRCA1/2 or PALB2 genes in our cohort was 5.5% (0.1-61). The reasons for considering retesting were the addition of any incident cancer diagnosis in 33 cases (24%), a prior study with a low sensitivity screening technique (dHPLC) in 6 families (5%) and the expansion of the study to other putative breast and ovarian susceptibility genes in 98 families (71%). Overall, 3 pathogenic (2 BRCA2, 1 CHEK2) and 8 likely pathogenic variants (1 BRCA2, 4 CHEK2 and 3 ATM) were found. The prevalence was 8%. The detection rate among 19 families with a > 10% remaining probability of mutation in BRCA1/2 and PALB2 genes was 26%. The 3 clinically significant variants in BRCA2 were detected in 2 families and 1 updated cancer family history (BOADICEA remaining probability of 59, 61 and 12%, respectively). Cascade testing was subsequently done in 15 relatives resulting 8 in mutation carriers and 9 true negatives. Conclusions: Our results support the value of updating cancer incident cases and considering expanded panels in selected families.

Background: Germline mutation screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is performed in suspected familial breast cancer cases, but a causative mutation is found in only 30% of patients. The development of additional methods to identify good candidates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 analysis would therefore increase the efficacy of diagnostic mutation screening. With this in mind, we developed a study to determine molecular signatures of BRCA1—or BRCA2—mutated breast cancers. Materials and Methods: Array-cgh (comparative genomic hybridization) and transcriptomic analysis were performed on a series of 103 familial breast cancers. The series included 7 breast cancers with a BRCA1 mutation and 5 breast cancers with a BRCA2 mutation. The remaining 91 cases were obtained from 73 families selected on the basis of at least 3 affected first-degree relatives or at least 2 affected first-degree relatives with breast cancer at an average age of 45 years. Array-cgh analyses were performed on a 4407 BAC-array (CIT-V8) manufactured by IntegraGen. Transcriptomic analyses were performed using an Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 chip. Results: Using supervised clustering analyses we identified two transcriptomic signatures: one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers consisting of 600 probe sets and another for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers also consisting of 600 probes sets. We also defined cgh-array signatures, based on the presence of specific genomic rearrangements, one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers and one for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers. Conclusions: This study identified molecular signatures of breast cancers with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. Genes present in these signatures could be exploited to find new markers for such breast cancers. We also identified specific genomic rearrangements in these breast cancers, which could be screened for in a diagnostic setting using fluorescence in situ hybridization, thus improving patient selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 molecular genetic analysis.

Identifying a BRCA mutation among families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer enables distinguishing those who may benefit from a specific medical management. This study aimed to evaluate the uptake of predictive testing among close relatives of a proband in Spanish families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, and to determine the associated demographic and clinical predictors. A retrospective cohort of families undergoing clinical genetic testing at four university hospitals in northeastern Spain was considered. From 108 unrelated BRCA1/2 families, 765 close relatives of probands were analyzed. Sixty percent of the first-degree and 28% of the second-degree relatives underwent predictive testing within a median time of 2 and 6 months, respectively, since the mutation disclosure to the proband. Relatives undergoing genetic testing were more likely to be female, first-degree, and belong to a family with a proband who had a high educational level. Relatives were also more likely to have offspring, a previous cancer diagnosis, and to be aged between 30 and 64 years. Among second-degree relatives, having a first-degree relative with cancer was highly correlated with uptake. In conclusion, uptake of BRCA1/2 predictive testing among close relatives was notably high and within a short period of time after disclosure of the mutation to the proband. Being female, a high educational level of the proband, and having a close relative with cancer were associated with uptake among relatives. Further studies are warranted to determine whether information is disseminated properly by probands and to learn about the reasons for those not undergoing testing.

Background Mutations in breast cancer BRCA1/2 genes increase breast and ovarian cancer risk and are transmitted with an autosomal dominant pattern. Opinion about reproductive decisions among individuals undergoing BRCA1/2 testing in our institutions is unknown. Materials and methods Individuals (n = 77) undergoing BRCA1/2 testing were included in a prospective multicentre study to assess the clinical impact of genetic testing. Demographic and clinical information, psychological status and opinion about reproductive decisions were collected in two questionnaires administered prior to testing. Opinion regarding the use of assisted reproduction techniques for hereditary cancer susceptibility among health care professionals was also collected. Results Twenty-eight individuals (36%) reported that they would decide to have children, regardless of their result. In case of a mutation, 9 (12%) believed that they would decide not to have children, 42 (55%) would consider prenatal diagnosis (PND), 37 (48%) would consider preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and 23 (30%) would consider adoption. Fifty-seven (74%) and 47 (61%) reported that they considered it ethical to offer PND or PGD, respectively, to BRCA+ patients. Individuals older than 40 years were more likely to consider PND or PGD than younger subjects (P = 0.02 and 0.05, respectively). Individuals with cancer compared with those without a diagnosis of malignancy were more likely to consider PGD (61 versus 30%, P = 0.02) and to consider that it was ethical to offer it (74 versus 44%, P = 0.02). Most health care professionals were in favour of PND and PGD for individuals with hereditary cancer susceptibility (58 and 61%, respectively). Conclusions BRCA1/2 genetic results could influence an individual's decisions regarding reproduction. Health care professionals who serve individuals undergoing BRCA testing should incorporate patient education regarding the potential impact of such testing on family planning.

1560 Background: Mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes confer a high lifetime risk of BC. Penetrance varies among populations and individuals suggesting that non-genetic factors may modify the inherited r...