Search

Process mining aims at gaining insights into business processes by analyzing the event data that is generated and recorded during process execution. The vast majority of existing process mining techniques works offline, i.e. using static, historical data, stored in event logs. Recently, the notion of online process mining has emerged, in which techniques are applied on live event streams, i.e. as the process executions unfold. Analyzing event streams allows us to gain instant insights into business processes. However, most online process mining techniques assume the input stream to be completely free of noise and other anomalous behavior. Hence, applying these techniques to real data leads to results of inferior quality. In this paper, we propose an event processor that enables us to filter out infrequent behavior from live event streams. Our experiments show that we are able to effectively filter out events from the input stream and, as such, improve online process mining results.

This paper contributes an approach for automatically correcting “same timestamp” errors in business process event logs. These errors consist in multiple events exhibiting the same timestamp within a given process instance. Such errors are common in practice and can be due to the logging granularity or the performance load of the logging system. Analyzing logs that have not been properly screened for such problems is likely to lead to wrong or misleading process insights. The proposed approach revolves around two techniques: one to reorder events with same-timestamp errors, the other to assign an estimated timestamp to each such event. The approach has been implemented in a software prototype and extensively evaluated in different settings, using both artificial and real-life logs. The experiments show that the approach significantly reduces the number of inaccurate timestamps, while the reordering of events scales well to large and complex datasets. The evaluation is complemented by a case study in the meat & livestock domain showing the usefulness of the approach in practice.

Process mining allows analysts to exploit logs of historical executions of business processes to extract insights regarding the actual performance of these processes. One of the most widely studied process mining operations is automated process discovery. An automated process discovery method takes as input an event log, and produces as output a business process model that captures the control-flow relations between tasks that are observed in or implied by the event log. Various automated process discovery methods have been proposed in the past two decades, striking different tradeoffs between scalability, accuracy, and complexity of the resulting models. However, these methods have been evaluated in an ad-hoc manner, employing different datasets, experimental setups, evaluation measures, and baselines, often leading to incomparable conclusions and sometimes unreproducible results due to the use of closed datasets. This article provides a systematic review and comparative evaluation of automated process discovery methods, using an open-source benchmark and covering 12 publicly-available real-life event logs, 12 proprietary real-life event logs, and nine quality metrics. The results highlight gaps and unexplored tradeoffs in the field, including the lack of scalability of some methods and a strong divergence in their performance with respect to the different quality metrics used.

The problem of automated discovery of process models from event logs has been intensively researched in the past two decades. Despite a rich field of proposals, state-of-the-art automated process discovery methods suffer from two recurrent deficiencies when applied to real-life logs: (i) they produce large and spaghetti-like models; and (ii) they produce models that either poorly fit the event log (low fitness) or over-generalize it (low precision). Striking a trade-off between these quality dimensions in a robust and scalable manner has proved elusive. This paper presents an automated process discovery method, namely Split Miner, which produces simple process models with low branching complexity and consistently high and balanced fitness and precision, while achieving considerably faster execution times than state-of-the-art methods, measured on a benchmark covering twelve real-life event logs. Split Miner combines a novel approach to filter the directly-follows graph induced by an event log, with an approach to identify combinations of split gateways that accurately capture the concurrency, conflict and causal relations between neighbors in the directly-follows graph. Split Miner is also the first automated process discovery method that is guaranteed to produce deadlock-free process models with concurrency, while not being restricted to producing block-structured process models

The problem of automated discovery of process models from event logs has been intensively researched in the past two decades. Despite a rich field of propos- als, state-of-the-art automated process discovery methods suffer from two recurrent deficiencies when applied to real-life logs: (i) they produce large and spaghetti-like models; and (ii) they produce models that either poorly fit the event log (low fitness) or over-generalize it (low precision). Striking a tradeoff between these quality di- mensions in a robust and scalable manner has proved elusive. This paper presents an automated process discovery method, namely Split Miner, which produces simple process models with low branching complexity and consistently high and balanced fitness and precision, while achieving considerably faster execution times than state- of-the-art methods, measured on a benchmark covering twelve real-life event logs. Split Miner combines a novel approach to filter the directly-follows graph induced by an event log, with an approach to identify combinations of split gateways that accurately capture the concurrency, conflict, and causal relations between neighbors in the directly-follows graph. Split Miner is also the first automated process discovery method that is guaranteed to produce deadlock-free process models with concurrency, while not being restricted to producing block-structured process models.

This article tackles the problem of discovering a process model from an event log recording the execution of tasks in a business process. Previous approaches to this reverse-engineering problem strike different tradeoffs between the accuracy of the discovered models and their structural complexity. With respect to the latter property, empirical studies have demonstrated that block-structured process models are gener- ally more understandable and less error-prone than unstructured ones. Accordingly, several methods for automated process model discovery generate block-structured models only. These methods however intertwine the objective of producing accurate models with that of ensuring their structuredness, and often sacrifice the former in favour of the latter. In this paper we propose an alternative approach that separates these concerns. Instead of directly discovering a structured process model, we first apply a well-known heuristic that discovers accurate but oftentimes unstructured (and even unsound) process models, and then we transform the resulting process model into a structured (and sound) one. An experimental evaluation on synthetic and real-life event logs shows that this discover-and-structure approach consistently outperforms previous approaches with respect to a range of accuracy and complexity measures.

Automated process discovery techniques allow us to extract business process models from event logs. The quality of process models discovered by these techniques can be assessed with respect to various quality criteria related to simplicity and accuracy. One of these criteria, namely precision, captures the extent to which the behavior allowed by a discovered process model is observed in the log. While numerous measures of precision have been proposed in the literature, a recent study has shown that none of them fulfils a set of five axioms that capture intuitive properties behind the concept of precision. In addition, several existing precision measures suffer from scalability issues when applied to models discovered from real-life event logs. This paper presents a versatile framework for defining precision measures based on behavior abstractions. The key idea is that a precision measure can be defined by three ingredients: a function that abstracts a process model (e.g. as a transition system), a function that does the same for an event log, and a function that compares the behavior abstraction of the model with that of the log. We show empirically that different instances of this framework allow us to strike different tradeoffs between scalability and sensitivity. We also show that two instances of the framework based on lossless abstraction functions yield a precision measure that fulfils all the above-mentioned axioms.

Process mining aims at gaining insights into business processes by analysing event data recorded during process execution. The majority of existing process mining techniques works offline, i.e. using static, historical data stored in event logs. Recently, the notion of online process mining has emerged, whereby techniques are applied on live event streams, as process executions un- fold. Analysing event streams allows us to gain instant insights into business processes. However, current techniques assume the input stream to be completely free of noise and other anomalous behaviour. Hence, applying these techniques on real data leads to results of inferior quality. In this paper, we propose an event processor that enables us to effectively filter out spurious events from a live event stream. Our experiments show that we are able to effectively filter out spurious events from the input stream and, as such, enhance online process mining results.

This paper contributes an approach for automatically correcting timestamp errors in business process execution logs. These errors are quite common in practice due to the logging granularity or the performance load of the logging system. Analyzing logs that have not been properly screened for such problems is likely to lead to wrong or misleading process insights. The proposed approach revolves around two techniques: one to reorder events with erroneous timestamps, the other to assign an estimated timestamp to each such event. The approach has been implemented in a software tool and extensively evaluated in different settings, using both synthetic and real-life logs. The experiments show that the approach significantly reduces the amount of incorrect timestamps, while the reordering of events scales well to large and complex datasets. The evaluation is complemented by a case study in the meat & livestock domain showing the usefulness of the approach in practice.

This paper proposes a recommendation system that supports process participants in taking risk-informed decisions, with the goal of reducing risks that may arise during process execution. Risk reduction involves decreasing the likelihood and severity of a process fault from occurring. Given a business process exposed to risks, e.g. a financial process exposed to a risk of reputation loss, we enact this process and whenever a process participant needs to provide input to the process, e.g. by selecting the next task to execute or by filling out a form, we suggest the participant the action to perform which minimizes the predicted process risk. Risks are predicted by traversing decision trees generated from the logs of past process executions, which consider process data, involved resources, task durations and other information elements like task frequencies. When applied in the context of multiple process instances running concurrently, a second technique is employed that uses integer linear programming to compute the optimal assignment of resources to tasks to be performed, in order to deal with the interplay between risks relative to different instances. The recommendation system has been implemented as a set of components on top of the YAWL BPM system and its effectiveness has been evaluated using a real-life scenario, in collaboration with risk analysts of a large insurance company. The results, based on a simulation of the real-life scenario and its comparison with the event data provided by the company, show that the process instances executed concurrently complete with significantly fewer faults and with lower fault severities, when the recommendations provided by our system are taken into account. Keywords: business process management, risk management, risk prediction, job scheduling, work distribution, YAWL.

Process querying addresses the problem of automatically retrieving process models from collections thereof on the basis of user-defined queries. Process querying can be used to tackle problems of process compliance, reuse, redesign, and standardization [1].In this paper, we demonstrate a process querying environment that resulted from integrating Process Query Language (PQL) [2] into the Apromore process model reposi-tory [3]. PQL is a programming language based upon temporal logic with an intuitive SQL-like syntax for the specification of queries. The semantics of PQL queries is grounded in process model behavior. The intent of a PQL query is to retrieve process models from a collection of models based on the arrangements of activities and/or events in the process instances that these models describe. A screen cast that demonstrates the environment is available at https://youtu.be/S_U6frTWd3M. In the remainder of this paper, we provide an overview of PQL and its implementation,present the Apromore process model repository, discuss the integration of PQL into Apromore, and demonstrate the use of PQL in Apromore using a typical process querying scenario in the context of a process model collection taken from industry