Search

Roll in... and become an active partner in the business of thinking about reality and understanding the bits and the whole of what is and what is not. This event, commented by Brian Kemple (Lyceum Institute) and chaired by William Passarini (Mansarda Acesa), is part of the activities of the 2022 International Open Seminar on Semiotics: a Tribute to John Deely on the Fifth Anniversary of His Passing, cooperatively organized by the Institute for Philosophical Studies of the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Coimbra, the Lyceum Institute, the Deely Project, Saint Vincent College, the Iranian Society for Phenomenology at the Iranian Political Science Association, the International Association for Semiotics of Space and Time, the Institute for Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Semiotic Society of America, the American Maritain Association, the International Association for Semiotic Studies, the International Society for Biosemiotic Studies, the International Center for Semiotics and Intercultural Dialogue, Moscow State Academic University for the Humanities and the Mansarda Acesa with the support of the FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education of the Government of Portugal under the UID/FIL/00010/2020 project. *** Luigi Russi holds a Ph.D. in sociology from the University of Exeter (UK) and currently works as Co-convenor of the Research-in-Action Community, in which capacity he accompanies researcher-practitioners, as they take up a practice of inquiry in the midst of everyday circumstances. Luigi is also a member of the Lyceum Institute, through which he has discovered the work and legacy of John Deely. As part of IO2S, he shares his ongoing exploration into how the semiotic realism of John Deely can provide ways of "taking experience seriously" without "losing the forest for the trees". Luigi's recent scholarly contributions have appeared in Human Arenas, Cultural Praxis, and the Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. *** Brian Kemple holds a PhD in Philosophy from the University of St. Thomas, in Houston TX, where he wrote his dissertation under the inimitable John Deely. He is the Founder and Executive Director of the Lyceum Institute. Philosophical interests and areas of study include: Thomas Aquinas, John Poinsot, Charles Peirce, Martin Heidegger, the history and importance of semiotics, scholasticism, phenomenology; as well as ancillary interests in the liberal arts, technology, and education as a moral habit. He has published two scholarly books—Ens Primum Cognitum in Thomas Aquinas and the Tradition (Brill: 2017) and The Intersections of Semiotics and Phenomenology: Peirce and Heidegger in Dialogue (De Gruyter: 2019), as well as a number of scholarly articles, popular articles, and his own Introduction to Philosophical Principles: Logic, Physics, and the Human Person (2019) and the forthcoming Linguistic Signification: A Classical Course in Grammar and Composition (2021). In addition to being the Executive Director of the Lyceum Institute, he is the Executive Editor of Reality: a Journal for Philosophical Discourse. *** Homepage: https://www.uc.pt/fluc/uidief/act/io2s Auditorium: https://www.uc.pt/fluc/uidief/act/io2s/auditorium *** The cover image for the video was designed by Zahra Soltani. Technical support assured by Robert Junqueira.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:24:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2008-12-11Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T19:32:12Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 alvarenga_rcm_me_mar.pdf: 686086 bytes, checksum: 62ed2a9b4f662c28ab1ea8d907bc6cd5 (MD5) Este trabalho teve como objetivos a análise das heurísticas envolvidas numa experiência de ensino por meio da perspectiva metodológica da resolução de problemas e a análise da relação dos alunos do Ensino Médio com a disciplina Matemática. À luz da Teoria Histórico-Cultural, este trabalho pode contribuir para análise da subjetividade dos processos de formação de conceitos, dos modos de pensar dos educandos face à aprendizagem Matemática, de sua criatividade e raciocínio lógico ao resolver problemas. A metodologia utilizada foi a pesquisa qualitativa. Os alunos, sujeitos da pesquisa, foram considerados ora como resolvedores, ora como propositores de problemas; os dados foram coletados, em aulas de Matemática, de Maio a Novembro de 2.007. Ao conhecer como a experiência e os conhecimentos específicos afetam a solução de um problema, analisei os resultados e conclui que a eficiência na sua resolução depende não somente da memória, das idéias prévias e estratégias, mas de todos esses processos enunciados que participam efetivamente da formação do conceito matemático. Também conclui que prevalece, ainda, entre os educandos, uma visão ingênua e marcada por mitos resistentes a respeito da Matemática, porém se mostraram criativos ao resolverem problemas e modificaram aspectos importantes na sua relação com esta disciplina após serem submetidos a aulas na perspectiva metodológica de resolução de problemas. Pode-se afirmar que a perspectiva mencionada anteriormente propicia o conhecimento da Matemática, conduz à formação dos conceitos e ao desenvolvimento da criatividade dos educandos. Em suma, faz-se necessária uma ampla revisão na prática pedagógica desenvolvida em Matemática, a fim de que esta contribua para que os educandos tornem-se sujeitos de transformações sociais. This paper had as the goal the analysis of heuristics involved in a teaching experience through the methodological perspective of the problems solving and the analysis of the relations from the high school students with the subject Mathematics. In the light the view of the Historical-Cultural Theory, this paper can contribute for the analysis of the subjectivity of the concept-formation processes, the learners ways of thinking when talking about the Math s learning, their creativity and logical thinking while solving problems. The methodology applied was the qualitative research. The students, individuals of the research, were considered sometimes problem-solvers and other times problem-proposers; the data were collected, in Math classes, from May to November, 2.007. When we know how the experience and the specific knowledge affect the solving of a problem, I analyzed the results and concluded that the efficiency in this resolution depends not only memory, previous ideas and strategies, but through all these mentioned processes that effectively take part in the formation of the Math concept. I concluded that it prevails, yet, among the learners a naïve view and marked by resistant myths concerning to Math, but they showed themselves creative when solving problems and changed important aspects of their relation with this subject after being given classes in the methodological perspective of the problem solving. We can state that the perspective mentioned above provides the Math knowledge; it conducts to the formation of concepts and the development of the learners ׳ creativity. In short, it is necessary a large review on the pedagogical practice developed in Mathematics, so that this subject can contribute for the learners to become individuals from social transformations.