Search

Objectives: Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric tumors in patients taking antithrombotic drugs, in particular direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), remains unresolved; therefore, we evaluated the risk factors for post‐ESD bleeding and drug differences in patients taking DOACs. Methods: We included 278 patients taking antithrombotic drugs who underwent gastric ESD between January 2017 and March 2022. Antithrombotic drugs were withdrawn following the 2017 guidelines (Appendix on anticoagulants including DOACs). To further clarify differences in antithrombotic agents' effects, the peri‐cancerous mucosa in the resected specimen was pathologically evaluated according to the Updated Sydney System. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the risk of post‐ESD bleeding. Results: The incidence of post‐ESD bleeding in patients taking DOACs was 19.6% (10/51). Among patients taking antithrombotic drugs, DOACs were identified as a possible factor involved in post‐ESD bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 4.92). Among patients taking DOACs, possible factors included resection length diameter ≥30 mm (OR 3.72), presence of neutrophil infiltration (OR 2.71), lesions occurring in the lower third of stomach (OR 2.34), and preoperative antiplatelet use (OR 2.22). Post‐ESD bleeding by DOAC type was 25.0% of patients (4/16) receiving apixaban, in 20.0% (3/15) receiving edoxaban, in 21.4% (3/14) receiving rivaroxaban, and in none of those receiving dabigatran. Conclusions: The administration of DOACs was shown to be a possible factor involved in post‐ESD bleeding, and risk factors for patients taking DOACs included neutrophil infiltration. The pharmacological differences in the effects of DOACs contributing to bleeding in gastric ulcers suggest comparatively less bleeding with dabigatran after ESD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) carries a substantial risk of recurrence. However, previous studies have reported a significant proportion of cases in which the deep margin of endoscopic resection was positive for cancer due to the technical difficulties of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). With the advancement of endoscopic technology and techniques resulting in the reduction of positive resection margins, it is important to reassess the long-term prognosis and major risk factors for recurrence in cases of negative deep margins. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with T1 CRC who underwent endoscopic resection between January 2006 and December 2021 with negative deep margins. The histological findings of the resected specimens were analyzed to determine the risk factors associated with the primary outcomes of this study, including recurrence and cancer-related deaths. Results: The median age of the 190 patients was 70 years, of which 63% were male, and endoscopic treatment was performed in 64% by endoscopic mucosal resection and 36% by ESD. Eighty-two patients were in the curative resection (CR) group and 108 were in the non-curative resection (NCR) group, wherein the latter comprised 79 patients who underwent additional surgery (AS) and 29 patients who did not receive AS. Five-year recurrence-free survival rates were 98.4% (95% CI: 89.3–99.8) for CR, 98.3% (95% CI: 88.8–99.8) for NCR with AS, and 73.7% (95% CI: 46.5–88.5) for NCR without AS. Lymphatic invasion and budding grade 2/3 were the major risk factors for recurrence, with hazard ratios of 40.7 (p < 0.001) and 23.1 (p = 0.007), respectively. Of the patients in the NCR group without AS, the 5-year recurrence-free rate was 85.6% (95% CI: 52.5–96.3) if there were no major risk factors (i.e., no lymphatic invasion or budding grade 2/3) (n = 21), whereas the prognosis was poor in the presence of one or more of the major risk factors, with a median recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival of 2.5 and 3.1 years, respectively (n = 8). Discussion: In endoscopically resected T1 CRC with negative deep margins, lymphatic invasion or budding grade 2/3 may indicate a higher risk of recurrence when followed up without AS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Studies investigating the risk of gallstones in the Japanese population are sparse. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective cohort study assessing risk factors of gallstones in Japan. Methods: A nationwide population-based prospective cohort of 112,109 men and women, aged 40–69 years, self-completed questionnaires at baseline regarding exposures to potential risk factors, between 1990 and 1994. The occurrence of gallstones and cholecystectomy for gallstones were ascertained from another questionnaire after 10 years. Odds ratios and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the multivariate logistic regression. Results: During the 10-year follow-up, 3,092 (5.0%) participants developed gallstones and 729 (1.2%) participants required cholecystectomy. Increasing age, high body mass index, and diabetes mellitus were associated with the risk of gallstones in both sexes. In men, weight gain or loss of >5 kg over the follow-up period and stress were associated with risk of gallstones, whereas alcohol intake was inversely associated with the risk. In women, weight gain of >5 kg during the follow-up period, smoking, menopause, and lipid-lowering drugs were associated with risk of gallstones, whereas late onset of menarche was inversely associated with risk of gallstones. The risk of cholecystectomy broadly reflected the risk of gallstones for both sexes respectively. Conclusion: Risk factors for both gallstones and cholecystectomy for gallstones are multifactorial and differ between men and women. Novel findings in this study include an inverse association between late onset of menarche and gallstones, and an association between self-reported stress in men and gallstones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Perforations of jejunal diverticula are uncommon and repeated symptomatic perforations have been reported only twice before in the literature. This is the first case report of recurrent perforation of a jejunal diverticulum to be successfully managed non-operatively. Case presentation We report a recurrent perforation of a jejunal diverticulum in an 87-year-old Caucasian man who presented with a 1-week history of epigastric pain. The diagnosis of a perforated jejunal diverticulum was made from the appearances of the abdominal computed tomography scan together with the presence of jejunal diverticula noted at the time of a previous laparotomy for the first perforation of a jejunal diverticulum. Conclusion Whilst this case report by itself does not add to the knowledge we already have of jejunal diverticula, it is one report of a rare condition and more reports are required in the future to establish the recurrence rate of jejunal diverticula perforation and how perforated jejunal diverticula are best managed.