1. Characteristics of Mid-Term Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Patients Attending a Follow-Up Clinic: A Prospective Comparison Between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Survivors
- Author
-
Anne-Françoise Rousseau, MD, PhD, Camille Colson, RN, Pauline Minguet, RN, Isabelle Kellens, PT, PhD, Maxine Collard, PT, Camille Vancraybex, PT, Julien Guiot, MD, PhD, Bernard Lambermont, MD, PhD, and Benoit Misset, MD
- Subjects
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ,RC86-88.9 - Abstract
IMPORTANCE:. At present, it is not clear if critically ill COVID-19 survivors have different needs in terms of follow-up compared with other critically ill survivors, and thus if duplicated post-ICU trajectories are mandatory. OBJECTIVES:. To compare the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome and non-COVID-19 (NC) survivors referred to a follow-up clinic at 3 months (M3) after ICU discharge. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:. Adults who survived an ICU stay greater than or equal to 7 days and attended the M3 consultation were included in this observational study performed in a post-ICU follow-up clinic of a single tertiary hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:. Patients underwent a standardized assessment, addressing health-related quality of life (3-level version of EQ-5D), sleep disorders (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), physical status (Barthel index, handgrip and quadriceps strengths), mental health disorders (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Impact of Event Scale-Revised [IES-R]), and cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]). RESULTS:. A total of 143 survivors (86 COVID and 57 NC) attended the M3 consultation. Their median age and severity scores were similar. NC patients had a shorter ICU stay (10 d [8–17.2 d]) compared with COVID group (18 d [10.8–30 d]) (p = 0.001). M3 outcomes were similar in the two groups, except for a higher PSQI (p = 0.038) in the COVID group (6 [3–9.5]) versus NC group (4 [2–7]), and a slightly lower Barthel index in the NC group (100 [100–100]) than in the COVID group (100 [85–100]) (p = 0.026). However, the proportion of patients with abnormal values at each score was similar in the two groups. Health-related quality of life was similar in the two groups. The three MoCA (≥ 26), IES-R (
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF