Search

We conducted a realist review of state-authorized dyslexia pilot projects to understand how they have been implemented and evaluated, and the extent to which they adhere to best practice recommendations. We found that states have piloted broadly similar policy programs minimally consisting of professional development, universal screening, and instructional intervention. However, none of the pilot report documents we reviewed included explicit logic models or theories of action, which makes it difficult to understand the pilot projects and their results. Officially, most of the pilot project evaluations sought to establish the effectiveness of their programs. However, only two states used evaluation designs that are well-suited to making causal inferences about program effects, which complicates the interpretation of pilot project results. To make future pilot projects more useful to evidence-based policymaking, we make recommendations to improve their design, implementation, and evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with neuromuscular knee instability who are fitted with orthotic devices experience issues such as pain, falls, mobility limitations, and restricted participation. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the burden of disease in patients using a microprocessor-stance-and-swing-control orthosis (MP-SSCO) and, if they had a previous orthosis, to compare their outcomes to those with previous use of a traditional knee-ankle-foot-orthosis (KAFO) under real-world conditions. METHODOLOGY: A structured cross-sectional survey was conducted in six orthotic and prosthetic clinics in Germany. Individuals who had been using an MP-SSCO (C-Brace) for at least six months, answered an internet-based survey to rate their current and recall previous device outcomes and experience. The questionnaire was self-developed based on established questionnaire design principles and pretested. Patients' well-being dimensions were analyzed with Likert scales. Experiences with current and previous orthotic devices were compared. Falls were analyzed both with and without outliers. FINDINGS: 21 individuals who had used a MP-SSCO for an average duration of two years participated. Fourteen patients had prior experience with a traditional KAFO orthosis. Among them, 78.6% recalled experiencing falls, with a combined annual frequency of 67.9 (SD=167.0, Median=12.0) events. After excluding the two outliers (624 and 182 falls), a mean of 12.1 falls per patient per year was reported (range: 0 to 54, SD=15.9, Median=8.5). With the MP-SSCO, only 42.7% reported falls with an annual frequency of 5.3 (SD=17.0, Median=0.0) falls (p

Background: Following below-knee surgery, the optimal medical mobility device remains controversial as adequate nonweightbearing of the operated extremity is critical to ensure successful healing. The use of forearm crutches (FACs) is well established but requires using both upper extremities. The hands-free single orthosis (HFSO) is an alternative that spares the upper extremities. This pilot study compared functional, spiroergometric, and subjective parameters between HFSO and FAC. Methods: Ten healthy (5 females, 5 males) participants were asked to use HFSOs and FACs in a randomized order. Five functional tests were performed: climbing stairs (CS), an L-shaped indoor course (IC), an outdoor course (OC), a 10-meter walk test (10MWT), and a 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Tripping events were counted while performing IC, OC, and 6MWT. Spiroergometric measurements consisted of a 2-step treadmill test with speeds of 1.5 and 2 km/h, each for 3 minutes. Lastly, a VAS questionnaire was completed to collect data regarding comfort, safety, pain, and recommendations. Results: Significant differences between both aids were observed in CS and IC (HFSO: 29.3 seconds; FAC: 26.1 seconds, P

Introduction: In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess the outcome following orthopedic surgery. But, we are lacking a standard set of PROMs to assess the outcome of hallux valgus surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the chosen patient rated outcome scores used in studies reporting on hallux valgus surgery. Materials and methods: The study was based on a previously published living systematic review. Included were prospective, comparative studies of different surgical procedures or the same procedure for different degrees of deformity. Four common databases were searched for the last decade. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were made by two independent reviewers. Data assessed were the individual PROMs used to assess the outcome of hallux valgus surgery. Results: 46 studies (30 RCTs and 16 non-randomized prospective studies) met the inclusion criteria. The most commonly used clinical outcome measures were the AOFAS (55%) and the VAS (30%). No differences were found between frequency of the individual scores per the level of evidence or the type of osteotomy. Conclusion: Based on a systematic literature review, the AOFAS and VAS are the most frequently used outcome tools in studies assessing the outcome following hallux valgus surgery. Based on the literature available, the MOXFQ is a more valid alternative. Level of evidence: Level I; systematic review of prospective comparative (level II) and randomized controlled trials (level I). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hallux valgus deformity severity is one determent for the surgical procedure for hallux valgus (HV) correction. HV deformities are usually classified into mild/moderate/severe. The aim was to investigate the cut-off criteria used to classify HV deformity. Materials and Methods: The study was based on a previous living systematic review. Four common databases were searched for the last decade. All review-steps were conducted by two reviewers. Data assessed were the individual cut-off values used to classify HV deformity into mild/moderate/severe, and the referenced classification systems. Results: 46 studies were included. 21/18 studies grade deformity based on the intermetatarsal angle (IMA)/ hallux valgus angle (HVA) with great heterogeneity throughout the different cut-off values. The most referenced classification systems were the Coughlin and Mann's and the Robinson classification. Conclusions: The currently used classification systems are heterogenic, and no standard could be defined. The community should define a uniform classification system. Level of Evidence. Level I, systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: More than 100 surgical techniques are described for hallux valgus (HV) correction, but the most appropriate technique remains debatable. The aim of this study was to develop and conduct a "living systematic review" for the outcome of surgically treated HV. Materials and methods: The "living systematic review" was conducted per the PRISMA-P and PICOS guidelines and is the basis for the German AWMF S2e guideline "Hallux valgus" (033-018). Four common databases and the grey-literature were searched. Eligible were studies on adult patients comparing either two different primary surgical interventions or the same primary surgical intervention for different hallux valgus severities. The main outcome parameters were the osseous correction potential and the patient rated outcome. Results: Out of 3022 studies, 46 studies (100 arms) were included. The meta-analysis included 31 studies (53 arms). The IMA (1933 procedures) improved on average by 7.3°, without significant group differences. The HVA (1883 procedures) improved on average by 18.9°, with significantly better results for third generation MIS (21.2°). The AOFAS (1338 procedures) improved on average by 33.8 points without significant group differences. The meta-regression revealed constant AOFAS scores over time. 69%/39% of the correction potential for the IMA/HVA could be explained by the preoperative values and 82% of the AOFAS improvement by the preoperative AOFAS scores. Conclusion: Open and minimally invasive techniques are powerful tools to correct hallux valgus deformity. Third generation MIS procedures revealed a possible superiority for the correction of the HVA. The AOFAS improvement appeared to be constant over time. Level of evidence: Level I; living systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies (level II) and randomized controlled trials (level I). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Patients with neuromuscular knee-instability assisted with orthotic devices experience problems including pain, falls, mobility issues and limited engagement in daily activities. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse current real-life burden, needs and orthotic device outcomes in patients in need for advanced orthotic knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (KAFOs). METHODOLOGY: An observer-based semi-structured telephone interview with orthotic care experts in Germany was applied. Interviews were transcribed and content-analysed. Quantitative questions were analysed descriptively. FINDINGS: Clinical experts from eight centres which delivered an average of 49.9 KAFOs per year and 13.3 microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot orthoses (MP-SSCOs) since product availability participated. Reported underlying conditions comprised incomplete paraplegia (18%), peripheral nerve lesions (20%), poliomyelitis (41%), post-traumatic lesions (8%) and other disorders (13%). The leading observed patient burdens were “restriction of mobility” (n=6), followed by “emotional strain” (n=5) and “impaired gait pattern” (n=4). Corresponding results for potential patient benefits were seen in “improved quality-of-life” (n=8) as well as “improved gait pattern” (n=8) followed by “high reliability of the orthosis” (n=7). In total, experts reported falls occurring in 71.5% of patients at a combined annual frequency of 7.0 fall events per year when using KAFOs or stance control orthoses (SCOs). In contrast, falls were observed in only 7.2 % of MP-SSCO users. CONCLUSION: Advanced orthotic technology might contribute to better quality of life of patients, improved gait pattern and perceived reliability of orthosis. In terms of safety a substantial decrease in frequency of falls was observed when comparing KAFO and MP-SSCO users. Layman's Abstract Patients who are not able to control the muscles of their legs may need to wear a brace to improve their ability to walk. However, some users are reporting problems including pain, falls, mobility issues and limited engagement in daily activities. The aim of this study was to analyse current real-life burden, needs and experiences of patients who need to wear a brace for their knee, ankle and foot (KAFO). Therefor, experts were interviewed via telephone with a structured set of questions. Eight experts provided observations for patients who suffered from several diseases affecting leg muscle control. The leading patient burdens were identified as “restriction of mobility”, followed by “emotional strain” and “impaired way of walking”. Potential patient benefits were seen in “improved quality-of-life” as well as “improved way of walking” followed by a “high trust in the brace”. Experts reported a higher number of falls per year when using KAFO without the active control of a microprocessor. On a long-term basis, experts observed consequences of KAFO use as disorders of the back, reduced amount of muscles as well as swelling in areas not covered by the brace, scrub marks and degenerative impact on joints. Braces with active control of a microprocessor might result in better quality of life of patients, improved normal way of walking and perceived trust in the brace. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/37795/29114 How To Cite: Brüggenjürgen B., Braatz F., Greitemann B., Drewitz H., Ruetz A., Schäfer M., et al. Experts’ perceived patient burden and outcomes of knee-ankle-foot-orthoses (KAFOs) vs. microprocessor-stance-and-swing-phase-controlled-knee-ankle-foot orthoses (MP-SSCOs). Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.7.https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.37795 Corresponding Author: Prof. Dr. med. Bernd Brüggenjürgen, Head Institute Health Services Research and Technical Orthopedics, Orthopedic Department - Medical School Hannover (MHH) at DIAKOVERE Annastift Hospital, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany. E-Mail:brueggenjuergen.bernd@mh-hannover.de ORCID ID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8866-0809

There is a lack of basic anatomic informations regarding the ossa cuneiformia. The aim of the present descriptive study was the detailed evaluation of the anatomy of the ossa cuneiformia. We analyzed 100 computer tomography scans of feet without deformities or previous trauma. The length, height and width of each cuneiforme and their articular surfaces were assessed. We itemized the data to gender differences and to foot length. The medial cuneiforme os had a length of 23.8±2.4 mm (mean ± standard deviation), a width of 15.9±2.7 mm and a height of 26.9±3.6 mm. The respective values for the intermediate cuneiforme were 17.7±1.9 mm, 12.4±3.1 mm and 20.8±2.9 mm and for the lateral cuneiforme 24.3±2.9 mm, 14.9±2.9 mm and 17.3±4.3 mm. We found statistical relevant differences regarding gender and foot length subgroups whereas not for all parameters. The present study illustrates basic anatomic data regarding the ossa cuneiformia. This information might be helpful for implant design and placement during midfoot surgery. Erratum in: https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2019.7876

Quantifying hearing thresholds via mobile self-assessment audiometric applications has been demonstrated repeatedly with heterogenous results regarding the accuracy. One important limitation of several of these applications has been the lack of appropriate calibration of their core technical components (sound generator and headphones). The current study aimed at evaluating accuracy and reliability of a calibrated application (app) for pure-tone screening audiometry by self-assessment on a tablet computer: Audimatch app installed on Apple iPad 4 in combination with Sennheiser HDA-280 headphones. In a repeated-measures design audiometric thresholds collected by the app were compared to those obtained by standardized automated audiometry and additionally test-retest reliability was evaluated. Sixty-eight participants aged 19–65 years with normal hearing were tested in a sound-attenuating booth. An equivalence test revealed highly similar hearing thresholds for the app compared with standardized automated audiometry. A test-retest reliability analysis within each method showed a high correlation coefficient for the app (Spearman rank correlation: rho = 0.829) and for the automated audiometer (rho = 0.792). The results imply that the self-assessment of audiometric thresholds via a calibrated mobile device represents a valid and reliable alternative for stationary assessment of hearing loss thresholds, supporting the potential usability within the area of occupational health care.