Search

Ionizing radiation induces many different types of DNA lesions. But one of its characteristics is to produce complex DNA damage, of which tandem DNA damage has received much attention, owing to its promise of distinctive biological properties. Oxidative stresses in response to inflammation in tissues and metal-catalyzed reactions that result in generation of radicals also form these DNA lesions. In this minireview, we have summarized the formation of the tandem lesions as well as the replication and repair studies carried out on them after site-specific synthesis. Many of these lesions are resistant to the traditional base excision repair, so that they can only be repaired by the nucleotide excision repair pathway. They also block DNA replication and, when lesion bypass occurs, it may be significantly error-prone. Some of these tandem DNA lesions may contribute to ageing, neurological diseases, and cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A potential novel function of xeroderma pigmentosum group( XPA) in nucleotide excision repair (NER) to stabilize the unwound DNA intermediate surrounding the lesion using a homogeneous form of XPA purified from baculovirus-infected calls is studied. It is proposed that XPA plays a significant role in stabilizing, via its high affinity to ds-ssDNA junctions, the DNA strand opening surrounding the lesion for stable formation of preincision NER intermediates.

The studies of comparative mutagenesis of [gamma]- or X-ray-induced tandem DNA lesions G[8,5-Me]T and T[5-Me,8]G intrastrand cross-links in simian (COS-7) and human embyronic (293T) kidney cells are presented. The results from in vitro bypass study of G[8,5-Me]T suggested that human polymerase [eta] (hpol [eta]) might be involved in the correct mutagenic bypass to incorporate dNMP opposite each cross-linked base.

Comparative mutagenesis of γ- or X-ray-induced tandem DNA lesions G[8,5-Me]T and T[5- Me,8]G intrastrand cross-links was investigated in simian (COS-7) and human embryonic (293T) kidney cells. For G[8,5-Me]T in 293T cells, 5.8% of progeny contained targeted base substitutions, whereas 10.0% showed semitargeted single-base substitutions. Of the targeted mutations, the G → T mutation occurred with the highest frequency. The semitargeted mutations were detected up to two bases 5′ and three bases 3′ to the cross-link. The most prevalent semitargeted mutation was a C → T transition immediately 5' to the G[8,5-Me]T cross-link. Frameshifts (4.6%) (mostly small deletions) and multiple- base substitutions (2.7%) also were detected. For the T[5-Me,8]G cross-link, a similar pattern of mutations was noted, but the mutational frequency was significantly higher than that of G[8,5-MeIT. Both targeted and semitargeted mutations occurred with a frequency of ~16%, and both included a dominant G→ T transversion. As in 293T cells, more than twice as many targeted mutations in COS cells occurred in T[5-Me,8]G (11.4%) as in G[8,5-Me]T (4.7%). Also, the level of semitargeted single-base substitutions 5' to the lesion was increased and 3' to the lesion decreased in T[5-Me,8]G relative to G[8,5-Me]T in COS cells. It appeared that the majority of the base substitutions at or near the cross-links resulted from incorporation of dAMP opposite the template base, in agreement with the so-called "A-rule". To determine if human polymerase η (hpol η) might be involved in the mutagenic bypass, an in vitro bypass study of G[8,5-Me]T in the same sequence was carried out, which showed that hpol η can bypass the cross-link incorporating the correct dNMP opposite each cross-linked base. For G[8,5-Me]T, nucleotide incorporation by hpol ~ was significantly different from that by yeast pol η in that the latter was more error-prone opposite the cross-linked Gua. The incorporation of the correct nucleotide, dAMP, by hpol η opposite cross-linked T was 3-5-fold more efficient than that of a wrong nucleotide, whereas incorporation of dCMP opposite the cross-linked G was 10-fold more efficient than that with dTMP. Therefore, the nucleotide incorporation pattern by hpol j was not consistent with the observed cellular mutations. Nevertheless, at and near the lesion, hpol η was more error-prone compared to a control template. The in vitro data suggest that translesion synthesis by another Y-family DNA polymerase and/or flawed participation of an accessory protein is a more likely scenario in the mutagenesis of these lesions in mammalian cells. However, hpol η may play a role in correct bypass of the cross-links. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The metabolite (-)-lomaiviticin A, which contains two diazotetrahydrobenzo[b]fluorene (diazofluorene) functional groups, inhibits the growth of cultured human cancer cells at nanomolar-picomolar concentrations; however, the mechanism responsible for the potent cytotoxicity of this natural product is not known. Here we report that (-)-lomaiviticin A nicks and cleaves plasmid DNA by a pathway that is independent of reactive oxygen species and iron, and that the potent cytotoxicity of (-)-lomaiviticin A arises from the induction of DNA double-strand breaks (dsbs). In a plasmid cleavage assay, the ratio of single-strand breaks (ssbs) to dsbs is 5.3 ± 0.6:1. Labelling studies suggest that this cleavage occurs via a radical pathway. The structurally related isolates (-)-lomaiviticin C and (-)-kinamycin C, which contain one diazofluorene, are demonstrated to be much less effective DNA cleavage agents, thereby providing an explanation for the enhanced cytotoxicity of (-)-lomaiviticin A compared to that of other members of this family.

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) plays an important role in maintaining the integrity of DNA by removing various types of bulky or distorting DNA adducts in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. In Escherichia coli, the excision repair proteins UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC recognize and incise the bulky DNA damages induced by UV light and chemical carcinogens. In this process, when a putative lesion in DNA is identified initially by UvrA, a subsequent strand opening is carried out by UvrB that not only ensures that the distortion is indeed due to a damaged nucleotide but also recognizes the chemical structure of the modified nucleotides with varying efficiencies. UvrB also recruits UvrC that catalyzes both the 3'- and the 5'-incisions. Herein, we examined the interaction of UvrABC with a DNA substrate containing a single G[8,5-Me]T cross-link and compared it with T[6,4]T (the 6-4 pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoproduct) and the C8 guanine adduct of N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene (AAF). The intrastrand vicinal cross-link G[8,5-Me]T containing a covalent bond between the C8 position of guanine and the 5-methyl carbon of the 3'-thymine is formed by X-radiation, while T[6,4]T is a vicinal cross-link induced by the UV light. We also selected the AAF adduct for comparison because it represents a highly distorting monoadduct containing a covalent linkage at the C8 position of guanine. The dissociation constants (K(d)) for UvrA protein binding to DNA substrates containing the G[8,5-Me]T, T[6,4]T, and AAF adducts, as determined by gel mobility shift assays, were 3.1 +/- 1.3, 2.8 +/- 0.9, and 8.2 +/- 1.9, respectively. Although UvrA had a considerably higher affinity for G[8,5-Me]T than for the AAF adduct, the G[8,5-Me]T intrastrand cross-link was incised by UvrABC much less efficiently than the T[6,4]T intrastrand cross-link and the AAF adduct. Similar incision results also were obtained with the DNA substrates containing the adducts in a six-nucleotide bubble, indicating that the inefficient incision of G[8,5-Me]T cross-link by UvrABC was probably due to the lack of efficient recognition of the adduct by UvrB at the second step of DNA damage recognition in the E. coli NER. Indeed, as compared to T[6,4]T and AAF substrates, which clearly showed UvrB-DNA complex formation, very little UvrB complex was detectable with the G[8,5-Me]T substrate. Our result suggests that G[8,5-Me]T intrastrand cross-link is more resistant to excision repair in comparison with the T[6,4]T and AAF adducts and thus will likely persist longer in E. coli cells.