184 results on '"Cold War Era"'
Search Results
2. Fertility Survey Workforce: Puerto Rico, 1949
- Author
-
López, Raúl Necochea, author
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. STRATEGIC TRANSFORMATIONS: INDIA'S PURSUIT OF COUNTERFORCE TARGETING AND REGIONAL STABILITY
- Author
-
Mubeen Ashraf and Syed Saif ul Haq
- Subjects
Nuclear Deterrence ,Cold War Era ,Strategic Stability ,Counterforce Targeting ,Coercive Diplomacy ,Credible Minimum Deterrence ,International relations ,JZ2-6530 ,Private international law. Conflict of laws ,K7000-7720 - Abstract
In the intricate web of South Asia's security dynamics, India and Pakistan's relationship holds the key to equilibrium. Geographical proximity demands swift responses, prompting India's strategic shift towards Counterforce targeting. Official declarations and military posturing attest to India's resolute commitment to recalibrate its deterrence doctrine. This study critically examines the origins of India's Counterforce targeting strategy, drawing from existing literature and employing theoretical frameworks, including posture optimization, escalation ladder, superiority-brinkmanship, mathematical game theory, rational choice theory, and nuclear deterrence. These models collectively contribute to understanding the implications of India's pursuit of nuclear superiority for coercive diplomacy with Pakistan. Beyond enriching the understanding of South Asia's security, this research unravels the interplay between evolving nuclear strategies, the fluid dynamics of deterrence, and nuanced geopolitical ambitions. By deciphering India's counterforce targeting approach, this study fosters a nuanced discourse on South Asian strategic stability, offering insight into the pivotal role of nuclear deterrence in shaping the region. Bibliography Entry Ashraf, Mubeen and Syed Saif ul Haq. 2023. "Strategic Transformations: India's Pursuit of Counterforce Targeting and Regional Stability." Margalla Papers 27 (2): 14-26.
- Published
- 2023
4. STRATEGIC TRANSFORMATIONS: INDIA'S PURSUIT OF COUNTERFORCE TARGETING AND REGIONAL STABILITY.
- Author
-
Ashraf, Mubeen and ul Haq, Syed Saif
- Subjects
RATIONAL choice theory ,NUCLEAR shapes ,NUCLEAR warfare ,FLUID dynamics ,GAME theory - Abstract
In the intricate web of South Asia's security dynamics, India and Pakistan's relationship holds the key to equilibrium. Geographical proximity demands swift responses, prompting India's strategic shift towards Counterforce targeting. Official declarations and military posturing attest to India's resolute commitment to recalibrate its deterrence doctrine. This study critically examines the origins of India's Counterforce targeting strategy, drawing from existing literature and employing theoretical frameworks, including posture optimization, escalation ladder, superiority-brinkmanship, mathematical game theory, rational choice theory, and nuclear deterrence. These models collectively contribute to understanding the implications of India's pursuit of nuclear superiority for coercive diplomacy with Pakistan. Beyond enriching the understanding of South Asia's security, this research unravels the interplay between evolving nuclear strategies, the fluid dynamics of deterrence, and nuanced geopolitical ambitions. By deciphering India's counterforce targeting approach, this study fosters a nuanced discourse on South Asian strategic stability, offering insight into the pivotal role of nuclear deterrence in shaping the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Intersections between Italian and Slavic cinemas.
- Author
-
Laviosa, Flavia
- Subjects
REALISM in motion pictures ,ITALIAN films ,FILM festivals ,TELEVISION programs ,TELEVISION series ,MOTION picture industry - Abstract
The purpose of this issue is to explore the encounter between Italy and Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe and Russia during and after the Soviet period, as well as the fervid cooperation and fruitful co-productions between the film industries in this vast geographic region. More specifically, this Special Issue covers the following topics: the reception of neorealist films in Slavic countries and the influence of neorealism in Slavic cinema, the links between Italian political cinema and Slavic media, the presence of popular Italian genres of television shows and series in these geographical areas, transnational stardom in cinema and television, co-productions and their adaptation to the needs of national film and television markets, Soviet–Italian film institutional exchanges and co-productions and Italian film festivals in Russia and Italy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. An Evaluation of the Failure of the Hegemonic Stability Theory in Terms of International Security (Revelation of 725 Security Council Resolutions Belonging to Cold War Period).
- Author
-
TERZİ, Mahir
- Subjects
STABILITY theory ,COLD War, 1945-1991 ,INTERNATIONAL security ,POST-Cold War Period ,HEGEMONY ,NATIONAL interest ,TERRORISM - Abstract
Copyright of Journal of Defense Sciences / Savunma Bilmleri Dergisi is the property of Turkish Military Academy Defense Sciences Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Fulfilling the Sacred Trust: The UN Campaign for International Accountability for Dependent Territories in the Era of Decolonization
- Author
-
Heiss, Mary Ann, author and Heiss, Mary Ann
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. 1950-1960 YILLARI ARASINDA TÜRKİYE'DE SOL İDEOLOJİNİN GÜVENLİKLEŞTİRİLMESİ.
- Author
-
KILIÇ, ELİFNUR and KALKAN, EROL
- Subjects
COMMUNISM ,CAPITALISM ,COLD War, 1945-1991 - Abstract
Copyright of Ataturk Yolu Journal / Atatürk Yolu Dergisi is the property of Ataturk Yolu Journal / Ataturk Yolu Dergisi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Kissinger and Latin America: Intervention, Human Rights, and Diplomacy
- Author
-
Rabe, Stephen G., author and Rabe, Stephen G.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. The Domestic Sphere as Counter-Surveillance in Lorraine Hansberry's A Raisin in the Sun.
- Author
-
Kiser, Kelsey
- Subjects
- *
IMMIGRANTS , *JEWISH history , *INTERNATIONAL relations - Abstract
Lorraine Hansberry was placed under surveillance by the Federal Bureau of Investigation prior to A Raisin in the Sun's Broadway debut in 1959. Totalling over a thousand pages of memos, reports, and letters of investigative analysis, Hansberry's FBI file reveals that the bureau tracked her play for Communist sympathies but also, and more surprisingly, collected interviews in which she insisted that her occupation was not playwright but housewife. This essay returns to A Raisin in the Sun, which has often been seen to uphold conservative gender ideologies of the Cold War era, to explore how Hansberry depicted radical counter-surveillance against the state through housewife characters. While historians have discussed how Black domestic workers employed in white homes became politically involved, little has been done to document how Black women countered surveillance to protect their families in their own homes. Drawing from evidence found in Hansberry's archive at the Schomburg Center, this article contextualizes A Raisin in the Sun among her unpublished writings and the play's manuscript drafts to argue that Hansberry deliberately subverted discourses that viewed surveillance as a practice primarily affecting individuals and families within isolated domestic environments. I show that Hansberry turned to drama to portray surveillance as a communal experience, thereby shifting narratives of surveillance from those found within earlier twentieth-century fiction depicting lone male protagonists on the run from state oversight to a dramatic oral mode that insists on communal experience through direct communication between performers and audience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Digital Resources: The Bracero History Archive
- Author
-
Leon, Sharon
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Mitigation of Selected Hanford Site Manhattan Project and Cold War Era Artifacts
- Author
-
Harvey, David
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. BOOK REVIEW: The TAKING OF K-129: THE MOST DARING COVERT OPERATION IN HISTORY
- Author
-
ŞENGÖZ, Murat
- Subjects
Social ,Örtülü Operasyon ,Soğuk Savaş Dönemi ,Rusya Federasyonu ,Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ,Covert Operation ,Cold War Era ,Russian Federation ,United States of America ,Sosyal - Abstract
Josh Dean tarafından kaleme alınan "K-129'un Çıkarılması: Tarihin En Cesur Gizli Operasyonu" başlıklı kitap temelde, 1968 Şubat ayında Pasifik Okyanusu’nda kaybolan Rus Deniz Kuvvetlerine ait K-129 isimli bir denizaltının aranması, bulunması, çıkarılması kapsamında Amerikan İstihbarat Teşkilatı tarafından, Amerikan Deniz Kuvvetleri ile birlikte gerçekleştirilen bir örtülü operasyonun hikayesini aktarmaktadır., The book titled "The Taking of K-129: The Most Daring Covert Operation In History", written by Josh Dean, is basically based on the search, discovery and extraction of a Russian Navy submarine called K-129, which was lost in the Pacific Ocean in February 1968. The book conveys the story of a covert co-operation carried out by the Intelligence Agency (CIA) together with the US Navy.
- Published
- 2022
14. Jit Phumisak and His Images in Thai Political Contexts.
- Author
-
Piyada Chonlaworn
- Subjects
- *
SOCIALISM , *DESPOTISM , *MILITARY government - Abstract
Jit Phumisak (1930-66) is one of the most well-known figures among Thai leftist scholars and activists in the 1950s. He was born slightly before monarchical absolutism was abolished, and he grew up in an anti-American atmosphere when socialism was booming. Apart from his numerous writings, what makes Jit different from other socialists and Marxists of his time is his legendary life and untimely death. He became a cultural hero and a legendary figure among young activists in the mid- 1970s democracy movement. His image, however, was constructed and modified by different actors under different agendas. This paper reviews Jit's life and work by focusing on the construction of his image by the military regime, Communist organization, scholars, political activists, and local authorities from the 1970s to the present, taking into account the different political situations in Thailand throughout these periods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Defying Communism
- Author
-
Neier, Aryeh, author
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Uluslararası Güvenlik Açısından Hegemonik İstikrar Teorisinin Başarısızlığına İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme (Soğuk Savaş Dönemindeki 725 Güvenlik Konseyi Kararının Gösterdikleri)
- Author
-
TERZİ, Mahir
- Subjects
Social ,Hegemonic Stability Theory ,International Security ,Cold War Era ,United Nations Security Council ,Hegemonik İstikrar Teorisi ,Uluslararası Güvenlik ,Soğuk Savaş Dönemi ,Birleşmiş Milletler Güvenlik Konseyi ,Sosyal - Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the success of the hegemonic stability theory within the framework of the Cold War era Security Council resolutions. In this direction, 725 resolutions of the Security Council between 1946 and 1991 have been examined and converted into numerical values in terms of content. It is seen that the decisions focused on a limited number of problems in the said period. The results show that the being of a single hegemonic power is not the main factor in providing stability. In addition, when looked at the post-Cold War period, it is possible to assert that the Security Council’s burden has increased. It is seen that the problems increase and diversify in the unipolar world, and international terrorism comes to the fore as the main actor. Hegemonic stability theory has not been successful in terms of international security. For international security, it is necessary to seek stability in a pluralistic structure, not in a single hegemonic power, because it does not seem possible to achieve success by ignoring national interests and the ethnicity and culture on which these national interests are built. Although the bipolar order offers a relatively stable security environment, the high threat perception prevents countries from revealing their potential for development., Bu çalışma, hegemonik istikrar teorisinin başarısını Soğuk Savaş dönemi Güvenlik Konseyi kararları çerçevesinde değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda 1946 ile 1991 yılları arasında Güvenlik Konseyi’nin 725 kararı incelenmiş ve içerik olarak sayısal değerlere dönüştürülmüştür. Söz konusu dönemde kararların sınırlı sayıda sorun üzerine yoğunlaştığı görülmektedir. Ortaya çıkan sonuçlar, tek bir hegemonik gücün varlığının istikrar sağlamada ana unsur olmadığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca Soğuk Savaş sonrası döneme bakıldığında Güvenlik Konseyi’nin yükünün arttığını söylemek mümkündür. Tek kutuplu dünyada sorunların arttığı ve çeşitlendiği, uluslararası terörizmin ana aktör olarak ön plana çıktığı görülmektedir. Hegemonik istikrar teorisi uluslararası güvenlik açısından başarı gösterememiştir. Uluslararası güvenlik için istikrarı tek bir hegemonik güçte değil, çoğulcu bir yapıda aramak gerekmektedir çünkü ulusal çıkarlar ve bu ulusal çıkarların inşa edildiği etnisite ve kültür göz ardı edilerek başarı sağlamak mümkün gözükmemektedir. İki kutuplu düzen ise göreli olarak daha istikrarlı bir güvenlik ortamı sunsa da yüksek tehdit algısı, ülkelerin gelişmeye yönelik potansiyellerini ortaya koymayı engellemektedir.
- Published
- 2022
17. ABD’nin Soğuk Savaş Döneminde Çin, Japonya, Güney Kore ve Kuzey Kore ile İlişkileri Bağlamında Asya-Pasifik Dengeleme Stratejisi
- Author
-
Eyüp Akpınar
- Subjects
balancing strategy ,cold war era ,çin ,asia-pacific ,asya-pasifik ,japan ,united states of america (usa) ,lcsh:Social Sciences ,lcsh:H ,kuzey kore ,north korea ,güney kore ,amerika birleşik devletleri (abd) ,lcsh:H1-99 ,south korea ,lcsh:Social sciences (General) ,china ,japonya ,dengeleme stratejisi ,soğuk savaş dönemi - Abstract
İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası ortaya çıkan iki kutuplu dünya düzeni uluslararası sistemi şekillendirmiştir. Uluslararası sistemdeki bu değişim Asya-Pasifik bölgesini de etkilemiştir. Uluslararası sistemde yer alan güç ve tehdit dengesinin bir benzeri bölgesel düzeyde Asya-Pasifik’te de yaşanmıştır. Soğuk Savaş döneminde Asya-Pasifik bölgesindeki ulus devletler ABD ve Sovyetler Birliği arasındaki güç mücadelesinin ve dengeleme stratejisinin aracı haline gelmiştir. Bu dönemde Kore ve Vietnam'da yaşanan savaşlar, Sovyetler Birliği ile Çin arasında yaşanan uyuşmazlıklar ve bölge ülkelerinin birbiriyle olan sorunları ABD’nin bölgedeki varlığını meşrulaştırıcı etki yaratarak müttefiklik ilişkisi kurulmasına zemin hazırlamıştır. Müttefiklik ilişkisi bölgedeki denge politikalarında başvurulan en önemli enstrüman olmuştur. Devletlerin güç, kapasite, coğrafi konumu, birbirleri hakkındaki niyet ve algılamaları denge stratejilerinin belirlenmesinde en önemli parametredir. Bu parametreler ışığında Soğuk Savaş döneminde Asya-Pasifik bölgesi kendine has bir sistemik dengeyi inşa etmiştir. Bu çalışma Asya-Pasifik dengeleme stratejisini ABD’nin Çin, Japonya, Güney Kore ve Kuzey Kore ile ikili ilişkileri bağlamında inceleyerek ortaya çıkartmayı hedeflemektedir.
- Published
- 2020
18. Historic Building Inventory and Evaluation for Air Force Research Laboratory/Information Directorate, Oneida, Madison, and Herkimer Counties, New York
- Author
-
Sennott, Stephen, O'Rourke, Daniel J., Orr, Andrew, Gierek, Lynn, and Konnie Wescott
- Subjects
Historic ,Historic Background Research ,Architectural Documentation ,Air Force Research Laboratory/Information Directorate ,Cold War ,Architectural Survey ,Cold War Era ,Oneida (County) ,Rome Research Site, Air Force Research Laboratory, Verona Test Annex, Newport Test Annex, Stockbridge Test Annex ,Rome Research Site - Abstract
This report presents the results of a historic building inventory and evaluation conducted on behalf of the United States Department of the Air Force at the Air Force Research Laboratory/Information Directorate, which includes Rome Research Site located in Oneida County, New York, and three affiliated test annexes situated in Madison and Herkimer Counties, New York. The evaluation aids the Air Force Research Laboratory/Information Directorate in managing the historic properties under its jurisdiction as required by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. Argonne National Laboratory evaluated 36 selected facilities at these research sites for architectural significance, integrity, and historical association with United States Department of the Air Force communications research and radar testing missions. Based upon the results of the study, Argonne National Laboratory recommends that the 36 facilities are not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Soğuk Savaş Dönemi Algı ile Gerçek Arasında Bir İmge Olarak Türk Solu; Demokrat Parti'nin Sol Hareketlere Yaklaşımı.
- Author
-
ÖZDEMİR, Emin and ŞENDİL, A. Fatih
- Subjects
WORLD War II ,TURKISH politics & government, 1918-1960 ,COMMUNISM ,PACIFISTS - Abstract
Copyright of Journal of Modern Turkish History Studies / Cumhuriyet Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi (CTAD) is the property of Ataturk Institute for Modern Turkish History and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2016
20. Migration in Postwar Germany through immigrant artists' work
- Author
-
Stoikou, Eleana, Hengst, Lutz, and Kant, Christiane G.
- Subjects
Immigrants ,Cold War era ,social-cultural policy ,immigrant artists ,701 Kunstphilosophie, Kunsttheorie der bildenden und angewandten Kunst ,Berlin art scene ,ddc:701 - Abstract
The purpose of this study is to research the immigration flows to Germany (FRD) through art and accurately through the view of immigrant artists. This paper explores how artists who emigrated in the Federal Republic of Germany during the '60s and the '70s had been influenced by the social phenomenon of immigration and how these images from immigrants' everyday life reflected in their work. Immigrant artists integrated these moments into their artworks and mentioned their personal views. This study focuses on international artistic practices, sociological and aesthetic theory, concerning the Theory of the Avant-Garde and the terms of the ‚scene' and ‚networks'. Consequently, it is proved that new art forms with social references were formed. Specifically, immigrant artists’ artworks described the emotionally charged image of the immigrant, the uncertain reality, the social exclusion in the host country, the radical criticism, the social and the cultural intervention., kunsttexte.de - Journal für Kunst- und Bildgeschichte, Nr. 1 (2021): Kunsttexte
- Published
- 2021
21. Historic Building Inventory and Evaluation for Joint Base Andrews, Prince George’s County, Maryland, Volumes I-III
- Author
-
Sennott, Stephen, O'Rourke, Daniel J., Chiodini, Thomas, Orr, Andrew, and Gierek, Lynn
- Subjects
Historic ,Historic Background Research ,Plantation Period ,Joint Base Andrews Passenger Terminal ,Cold War ,Architectural Survey ,Prince George's (County) ,19TH CENTURY AD ,Architectural Documentation ,Belle Chance ,Joint Base Andrews ,Cold War Era ,Air Force One Maintenance and Support Complex ,Maryland (State / Territory) - Abstract
Argonne National Laboratory conducted a historic building inventory and evaluation on behalf of the United States Air Force at Joint Base Andrews, Camp Springs, Prince George's County, Maryland. The inventory and evaluation aids Joint Base Andrews in managing the historic properties under its jurisdiction as required by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The inventory examined 52 facilities, including four large hangars, three of which are associated with the Air Force One Maintenance and Support Complex (also known as the Presidential Air Group); four pre-base nonmilitary historic structures and landscape features associated with the “Belle Chance” area of the base; and 44 base support and operations facilities. The survey identified five resources that are recommended eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, including three distinctive presidential hangars (Hangars 3, 6, and 19) and the Joint Base Andrews Passenger Terminal, all of which have been a symbolic location for historically significant events associated with the duties of the Presidents of the United States from 1961 to the present. The fifth resource is the Darcy Family Cemetery at Belle Chance, which is eligible because of its association with the original, nineteenth century plantation archaeological site
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Defending Attack from the North: Alaska's Forward Operating Bases During the Cold War
- Author
-
Fernandez, Rachel
- Subjects
Historic Background Research ,Ethnohistoric Research ,King Salmon ,Brochure Booklet ,Galena ,Oral History ,11th Air Force ,United States Air Force ,Alaska (State / Territory) ,Alaskan Forward Operating Bases ,611th Civil Engineer Squadron ,Cold War Era ,611th Air Support Group ,Records Search / Inventory Checking ,Pacific Air Forces ,Historic Summary ,Soviet Bases ,611th ,Veterans - Abstract
The Alaskan forward operating bases (FOBs) played a significant role in the United States’ strategic air defense in the early Cold War. Because the Alaskan FOBs were located close to the Soviet Union, and more importantly, close to Soviet bases used for bomber operations, the fighters stationed there could and did intercept the major share of Soviet aircraft that ventured into American airspace. This booklet presents the history of the FOBs and was compiled from a variety of sources, including recently declassified military histories and interviews with veterans and long-time contractors at the installations.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Historic Building Inventory and Evaluation of Buildings 349, 350, and 351 at Eglin Air Force Base, Okaloosa County, Florida
- Author
-
O'Rourke, Daniel J., Shaw, Brian, Sennott, Stephen, and Konnie Wescott
- Subjects
Historic ,Historic Background Research ,Okaloosa (County) ,Building 349 ,Cold War ,Miesian Modernist ,Architectural Survey ,OK03681 ,Eglin Air Force Base ,8OK04157 ,Architectural Documentation ,New Formalist ,8OK03680 ,Cold War Era ,Building 351 ,Armament Research Complex ,05422 Historic ,Building 350 ,8OK03679 ,Florida (State / Territory) - Abstract
This report presents the results of a National Register of Historic Places evaluation conducted on behalf of the United States Air Force at Eglin Air Force Base, Okaloosa County, Florida. This evaluation aids the Base in managing the historic properties under their jurisdiction as required by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. The study examined three office buildings located within the primary cantonment area: Buildings 349, 350, and 351, which were used for military administration and research. The three buildings were built during the Cold War Era (1945–1991) and were evaluated for historical and architectural significance. Buildings 349 (8OK03679), 350 (8OK03680), and 351 (8OK03681) were examined within the historic context of armament research and testing at Eglin Air Force Base and mid-century modern architectural designs. This study revealed that the New Formalist and Miesian Modernist elements of the architectural design of the buildings as a complex respond to Criterion C of the National Register of Historic Places, which specifies distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. The building complex (Armament Research Complex, 8OK04157) is recommended eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places as a historic district.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Addendum: Final Draft. Section 110 - Eligibility Assessment of Cold War Era Resources at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst
- Author
-
Berg, David
- Subjects
Historic ,Archaeological Feature ,Lighter-Than Air Historic District ,Resource Extraction / Production / Transportation Structure or Features ,Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst ,New Jersey (State / Territory) ,Non-Domestic Structures ,Cold War Era ,Woodland ,PaleoIndian ,Domestic Structure or Architectural Complex ,Archaic ,Architectural History - Abstract
Addendum report to PHE's (2019) JBMDL Section 110 CWE Eligibility Report. The addendum evaluated the NRHP eligibility of 29 facilities. Of the 29 additional facilities evaluated, 13 were found to be demolished or rebuilt in place and 9 were determined not eligible due to property type. The remaining seven facilities were evaluated using NJHPO survey forms. Four were determined not eligible for the NRHP. Three facilities – Facility #131 (Water Treatment House), Facility #140 (PW Chemical Storage) and Facility #170 (Pump House, Well #5) - were found eligible for the NRHP as contributing resources to the National Register listed Lighter-Than-Air (LTA) Historic District.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. VAFB-2020-22: Identification of Historic Properties, Facility 8337 Paint Booth Removal Project, Vandenberg Air Force Base, Santa Barbara County, California (813-20-048)
- Author
-
Smallwood, Josh and Loetzerich, Roscoe
- Subjects
Historic ,Historic Background Research ,Site Evaluation / Testing ,Facility 8337 ,Metal ,Non-Domestic Structures ,Architectural Survey ,Santa Barbara (County) ,front-gable high bay structures ,Reconnaissance / Survey ,Vandenberg Air Force Base, California ,Historic Period ,California (State / Territory) ,Historic Governmental Structure ,Cold War Era ,Building Materials ,Records Search / Inventory Checking ,front-gable one-story structures - Abstract
This document is a government generated Section 106 report consisting of a historic property inventory and an assessment of adverse effects associated with the Facility 8337 Paint Booth Removal Project. The purpose of this document is to compile any prior or current studies performed in support of the Facility 8337 Paint Booth Removal project as a single Section 106 report. This report provides the information needed by the California State Historic Preservation Officer to concur on the project findings and determinations for individual resources as presented by the Vandenberg Air Force Base Cultural Resource Manager. The report specifically examines project impacts and/or avoidance strategies for a single built environment resource; Facility 8337.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Section 110 - Eligibility Assessment of Cold War Era Resources at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst. Final Draft
- Author
-
White, Sharon
- Subjects
Historic ,Archaeological Feature ,Resource Extraction / Production / Transportation Structure or Features ,Lighter-Than-Air Historic District ,Non-Domestic Structures ,Cold War Era ,Woodland ,PaleoIndian ,Domestic Structure or Architectural Complex ,Cathedral of the Air ,Archaic ,Architectural History - Abstract
Architectural resource survey and study (eligibility assessment) of 1,103 facilities built prior to and during the Cold War Era, ranging in date from September 25, 1945 through December 31, 1991. Of these, 712 facilities are considered to be not eligible based upon their property type in consultation with NJHPO. 391 facilities were documented on NJHPO survey forms either individually or combined on single forms in logical groups. Two facilities - Facility #20611: Cathedral of the Air Directory and Facility #79: Warehouse/Supply were found to be eligible for the NRHP, both as contributing resources to the National Register listed LTA Historic District. 389 facilities were determined not eligible for the NRHP.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Rereading Leftist Writings from Southeast Asia
- Author
-
Chonlaworn, Piyada
- Subjects
political polarization ,Marxism ,radical intellectuals ,Jit ,Cold War era ,292.3 - Abstract
Jit Phumisak (1930–66) is one of the most well-known figures among Thai leftist scholars and activists in the 1950s. He was born slightly before monarchical absolutism was abolished, and he grew up in an anti-American atmosphere when socialism was booming. Apart from his numerous writings, what makes Jit different from other socialists and Marxists of his time is his legendary life and untimely death. He became a cultural hero and a legendary figure among young activists in the mid-1970s democracy movement. His image, however, was constructed and modified by different actors under different agendas. This paper reviews Jit's life and work by focusing on the construction of his image by the military regime, Communist organization, scholars, political activists, and local authorities from the 1970s to the present, taking into account the different political situations in Thailand throughout these periods.
- Published
- 2018
28. The Development of American West and Indian Policy : Negative Legacy of the Cold War Era
- Author
-
Uchida, Ayako
- Subjects
核開発 ,Native Americans ,冷戦期 ,アメリカ西部 ,Cold War era ,Nuclear development ,American West ,先住民 - Abstract
After World War II, the U.S. federal Indian policy was changed from the Indian New Deal to the Termination policy. The federal government tried to end the federal trust responsibility to Indian tribes and abolish their reservations. By the 1960s, the Pacific Northwest developed into the most rapidly growing industrial area in the United States owing to its rich natural resources. In Particular, the Hanford Site in southeast-central Washington became one of the most important nuclear facilities in the American West with the strong support of local politicians such as Henry M. Jackson. Although it helped the economic development of local communities in southeast central Washington, it brought serious environmental damages to the Colorado River as well as surrounding residents including Native American tribes. This essay analyzes the relations of the federal Indian policy and the impacts of the military-industrial complex on Native Americans, focusing on the Hanford Site during the Cold War era.
- Published
- 2018
29. Gijutsu to senso: Dainiji Sekai Taisen kara Reisen-ki made no Amerika ni okeru konpyuta gijutsu o rei toshite.
- Author
-
Kita, Chigusa
- Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the relationship between computer technology and war during World War II and the early Cold War era. In doing so, it develops three themes, namely the development of civilian technologies as a result of military tensions, conflict, and strategy; the articulation of technical goals and objectives resulting from the mobilization and integration of scientific and engineering knowledge systems; and the broad relationship between federal research expenditures and technological innovation. On this basis, the paper examines the development of digital computers, primarily in the United States. The first case is about the Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer, ENIAC. As Mitchell Marcus and Atsushi Akera pointed out in their paper "Exploring the Architecture of an Early Machine: The Historical Relevance of the ENIAC Machine Architecture," ENIAC was not developed as a realization of theory, but a compound of practical choices of relevant technologies optimized for the military need of the time. The second case, the British Bombe (along with various other wartime digital and analog computers) utilized analog devices to implement fast computational procedures also to meet narrow military needs. Chikara Hoshino pointed out in his book, Yomigaeru Turing (Recalling Turing), that the decision to use analog devices was essential to the overall conceptualization of the apparatus. Through these instances, it is clear that wartime efforts to develop computers were not derived from any formal theory of computers or computation, but from the practical need for doing computation in military fields such as exterior ballistics, code-breaking, and hydrodynamic simulations. Nor did this wartime work bring most practitioners to theorize about "digital computers." A significant exception was John von Neumann and his famous description of the fundamental architecture for digital computers. As a mathematician, von Neumann pursued various applied mathematics projects for the military, but began to develop a profound interest in theorizing computing machines through his wartime activities. Indeed, von Neumann was a symbolic figure who transgressed the boundary between pure and applied mathematics, and through no coincidence, the practice and theory of computational machines. It was during the war that the general belief in the distinction between science and technology as discrete spheres of activity became blurred as a whole through the fact that many scientists were mobilized for applied, military projects. This blurring continued into the postwar period as the technological fruits of war were declassified and aggressively promoted for peaceful purposes. This technology transfer of what we would now call "dual use technologies" was an explicit policy of the Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD), the science mobilization agency directed by Vannevar Bush. In his Science: The Endless Frontier, published in July 1945, Bush clearly foresaw the need for the broad circulation of knowledge across the military and civilian spheres amidst the postwar expansion in peacetime federal research expenditures. For Bush, "Scientific Manpower" meant both scientists and engineers. His usage of "science" in his visionary report as OSRD Director called for fundamental research in both pure and applied science (e.g. engineering) as a means of systematically augmenting the U.S. national potential for radical technological advances, both military and civilian. After the war, in the 1950s, the knowledge and community of practitioners surrounding digital computers were gradually institutionalized into existing academic fields. During this embryonic phase of computing as a new interdisciplinary field, those involved with digital computers interacted with those from adjoining fields such as communications, control theory, and telecommunications engineering. A prime example of the fruits of this interdisciplinary exchange, and one that again spanned the military and civilian sectors, was the SAGE (Semi-Automatic Ground Environment) air defense system developed through heavy funding by the Air Force. Despite its clearly defined military purpose, the civilian spinoffs of this technology were astounding. In addition to opening up the area of computer networking that provided a foundation for today's Internet, work on the SAGE air defense system contributed extensively to the development of new manufacturing methods and knowledge, which contributed substantially to IBM's subsequent commercial success. Then in the wake of Sputnik, the Defense Department created the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). While originally conceived of as a way to centralize all space systems R&D efforts, when this function was absorbed by the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA), ARPA redefined its mission around the notion of military command and control. Digital computers emerged as an important cornerstone for this work. ARPA's expenditures in computer research (both hardware and software) represented a significant portion of its overall budget, and this funding in turn transformed computing through the development of time-sharing systems, computer graphics, artificial intelligence, networking, and the development of academic computer science itself. The other federal agency whose work spanned military and civilian interests, and whose expenditures fueled other fundamental advances in digital computer technology, was NASA. In the wake of Sputnik, NASA's investments as well as mission specific requirements led to the miniaturization of computer systems and the development of more specialized digital (and analog) electronic systems. Especially during the early 1970s, the research and procurement bankrolled by NASA contributed significantly to the development of the U.S. semiconductor industry. Protests against the "military-industrial-academic complex" became intense during the same period, leading the military to again redefine its R&D mission around more narrowly defined military interests. Ironically, this curtailed the military's ability to contribute to civilian technologies. But by then, military research had laid a firm foundation for the U.S. digital computers industry and for academic computer science research. In this way, this paper demonstrates how the development of computer technology, born out of the military necessities of the "endless frontier," produced both the technological foundations and the industrial infrastructure necessary for the continued and phenomenal expansion of computing within the civilian sector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
30. Comparing Putin’s and Brezhnev’s Policies toward the Middle East.
- Author
-
Katz, Mark
- Subjects
- *
INTERNATIONAL relations , *HISTORY ,ISLAMIC countries ,RUSSIAN foreign relations, 1991- ,FOREIGN relations of the United States - Abstract
This article compares Moscow’s and Washington’s foreign policies toward the Middle East in 1982 and 2008. In 1982, Moscow and Washington each had a distinct set of friends and foes. In 2008, Washington still has a distinct set of friends and foes, but Moscow has relatively good relations with all governments and most major opposition movements in the region—the only exceptions being Al Qaeda and its affiliates. It is argued that Putin’s policy toward the Middle East is not really aimed at displacing the U.S. in the region, but protecting Russia and Russian interests from Al Qaeda and its allies. Indeed, a continued American presence in the region serves to protect Russian interests in the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. <Articles>Jit Phumisak and His Images in Thai Political Contexts
- Author
-
Chonlaworn, Piyada and Chonlaworn, Piyada
- Abstract
Jit Phumisak (1930–66) is one of the most well-known figures among Thai leftist scholars and activists in the 1950s. He was born slightly before monarchical absolutism was abolished, and he grew up in an anti-American atmosphere when socialism was booming. Apart from his numerous writings, what makes Jit different from other socialists and Marxists of his time is his legendary life and untimely death. He became a cultural hero and a legendary figure among young activists in the mid-1970s democracy movement. His image, however, was constructed and modified by different actors under different agendas. This paper reviews Jit's life and work by focusing on the construction of his image by the military regime, Communist organization, scholars, political activists, and local authorities from the 1970s to the present, taking into account the different political situations in Thailand throughout these periods.
- Published
- 2018
32. Facility 516, Water Storage Tank, Tennessee Historical and Architectural Resource Form
- Author
-
Chapman, Shawn
- Subjects
Historic ,Negative Result ,Coffee (County) ,Architectural Survey ,Cold War Era ,Building Materials ,Franklin (County) ,Arnold Air Force Base ,Facility 516 ,Water Storage Tank - Abstract
Tennessee Historical and Architectural Resource Form for Facility 516 at Arnold Air Force Base.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. The Davis Boys and the Fruits of Neoliberalism
- Author
-
Melillo, Edward Dallam, author
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Final Report: A Cultural Resources Survey of Cold War Era Resources at Arnold Air Force Base Coffee and Franklin Counties, Tennessee - Volume IV: Addendum
- Author
-
Prybylski, Matthew E. and Edge, Caitlin E.
- Subjects
Historic ,Negative Result ,Architectural Documentation ,Cold War ,Historic Governmental Structure ,Architectural Survey ,Cold War Era ,Building Materials ,Historic Building Inventory ,Arnold Air Force Base ,Military Structure - Abstract
Review of the 2005 and 2008 survey results and recommendations and to update the significance of 563 Cold War Era resources at Arnold Air Force Base. The Cold War era buildings documented as a part of the 2012 survey was completed in 2014 and date between 1946 and 1989. After the contract for the 2012 survey was executed, the Department of Defense officially defined the Cold War era as dating to the period of 1946-1991. As such, this report represents an investigation of 119 buildings and structures at Arnold Air Force Base dating to 1990 and 1991 as well as additional buildings dating to 1946 – 1989 that were not included in the 2012 survey. Department of Defense contexts and standards, as well as National Register of Historic Places guidelines and scholarship, were used to review the resources and evaluate their historic and architectural significance. Resources documented were assessed individually and as contributing resources to a historic district, historic landscape, or a multiple resource property. Specific topics were considered in making these evaluations, including the development and role of Arnold Air Force Base, especially as a research, development, test, and evaluation facility; what specific Cold War activities occurred on base; its comparative value to other research, development, test, and evaluation facilities; and how the Cold War influenced the base architectural. None of the 119 historic structural resources were determined to be eligible for listing on the National Register. While they were all constructed during the Cold War, none played a significant role in Cold War history.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Final Report: Archaeological Pedestrian Survey of Mt. Ka'ala and Koke'e LRRSs, Hawaii
- Author
-
Hanson, Diane K.
- Subjects
Ahuloulu Heiau Site ,Site Evaluation / Testing ,World War II ,World War II Army Camp ,Bog Site ,11th Air Force ,Pu'u ka Pele House Site ,United States Air Force ,50-30-01-20 ,Perimeter Fence ,Remote Sensing ,Site 212 ,611th Civil Engineer Squadron ,Records Search / Inventory Checking ,Pacific Air Forces ,Kalalau Lookout ,611th ,National Register of Historic Places ,Mt. Ka'ala Long Range Radar Station ,50-30-01-19 ,Pumphouse Building ,Reconnaissance / Survey ,No Archaeological Sites ,Koke'e Long Range Radar Station ,Luakini Fishpond ,Cold War Era ,611th Air Support Group ,Archaeological Pedestrian Survey ,Hawaii (State / Territory) ,Temporary Habitation Site - Abstract
An archaeological pedestrian survey was conducted at Mt. Ka‘ala Long Range Radar Station (LRRS) on July 12, 2016 and at Kōke‘e LRRS, Hawai‘i on July 14 and 15, 2016. The perimeters of the compounds were inspected, but most attention was on the leased properties outside the fence at both radar stations. No cultural properties were identified outside the fence line at either LRRS, and the only properties noted within each compound were those already described in the 2008 draft ICRMP. Recommendations are to evaluate Mt. Ka‘ala as a Traditional Cultural Property or Place, and to re-evaluate the LRRS buildings for the National Register of Historic Places now that many no longer fall under Criteria Consideration G for properties that have achieved significance with the last fifty years. Buildings older than 50 years no longer require exceptional importance to be eligible for the National Register.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Scott Air Force Base Historic Building Inventory
- Author
-
McCourt, Kate and MacDonald, Jeffrey
- Subjects
Historic ,Facility 6008 ,Facility 1650 ,Architectural Survey ,Facility 5713 ,Military Structure ,Facility 1509 ,Architectural Documentation ,Building Materials ,Facility 6383 ,Facility 6020 ,Scott AFB ,Governmental Structure ,Facility 3291 ,National Register of Historic Places ,Facility 432 ,Facility 6018 ,NRHP ,Scott Air Force Base ,Cold War ,Facility 175 ,Facility 1644 ,Facility 3307 ,Historic Governmental Structure ,Cold War Era ,Facility 647 ,Facility 12 ,Facility 3184 ,Historic Building Inventory - Abstract
The Center for Integrated Research on the Environment (CIRE) at the University of Montana provided all labor and materials necessary to perform an intensive level inventory of 15 historic buildings and structures located on land managed by Scott Air Force Base. The project, performed by CIRE staff, consisted of a survey of buildings and structures from the Cold War era that were 50 years old or nearing 50 years old, that had not yet been evaluated for National Register of Historic Places eligibility.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. National Register of Historic Places Themes and Historic Context for Air Force, Army, and Navy in the Cold War, United States Air Force Air Combat Command
- Author
-
Prior, Marsha and Citters, Karen Van
- Subjects
Historic ,Final Report ,Historic Background Research ,Global Power for America ,NRHP ,Cold War ,Air Combat Command ,Anchorage, AK ,Alaska (State / Territory) ,Reconnaissance / Survey ,Phase II ,Remote Sensing ,Historic Context ,Phase I ,Phase III ,Cold War Context ,Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ,Cold War Era ,Phase IV ,National Register of Historic Places ,Cultural Resources - Abstract
This report provides a context and themes for assessing the historic significance of DoD Cold War-era resources for NRHP eligibility. Based on earlier guidelines and investigations, which have highlighted many important military functions, the themes developed for this task allow one to assess the significance of resources within the broader military context common to all DoD Components. It is also beneficial for recognizing the historic significance of resources under and over 50 years of age, and provides a stronger case for the national level of significance as opposed to state and local levels. This document is intended to help all those responsible for DoD Cold War resources to move forward in evaluating resources in a consistent manner.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. U.S. Air Force Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) - Joint Base Charleston
- Author
-
Fernandez, Rachel
- Subjects
Facility No. 595 ,38BK2706 ,Facility No. 111 ,Facility No. 596 ,38BK2707 ,Facility No. 112 ,Facility No. 593 ,38BK2704 ,Facility No. 352 ,Facility No. 594 ,38BK2705 ,Facility No. 357 ,Facility No. 599 ,Facility No. 115 ,Facility No. 116 ,Facility No. 358 ,Facility No. 597 ,38BK2708 ,Facility No. 113 ,Facility No. 598 ,38BK2709 ,Facility No. 356 ,Facility No. 114 ,Facility No. 591 ,Facility No. 350 ,Facility No. 592 ,Facility No. 590 ,Facility No. 4ACX21 ,Facility No. 119 ,Facility No. 4ACX22 ,38BK2710 ,Facility No. 4ACX23 ,Facility No. 117 ,Facility No. 359 ,Facility No. 4ACX24 ,Facility No. 118 ,Facility No. 4ACX25 ,38BK2713 ,38BK2714 ,38BK1867 ,38BK2711 ,38BK1866 ,38BK2712 ,38BK1847 ,Facility No. 584 ,Facility No. 100 ,38BK1846 ,Facility No. 585 ,Facility No. 101 ,38BK1849 ,Facility No. 582 ,38BK1848 ,Facility No. 583 ,Facility No. 588 ,Facility No. 104 ,Facility No. 589 ,Facility No. 105 ,Facility No. 586 ,Facility No. 3514 ,Facility No. 102 ,Facility No. 344 ,Facility No. 587 ,Facility No. 103 ,Facility No. 580 ,Facility No. 581 ,Heritage Management ,Facility No. 348 ,38BK2702 ,38BK2703 ,38BK2700 ,38BK2701 ,38BK1836 ,Facility No. 573 ,38BK1835 ,Facility No. 574 ,38BK1838 ,Facility No. 571 ,38BK1837 ,Facility No. 572 ,Facility No. 577 ,Facility No. 335 ,38BK1839 ,Facility No. 578 ,Facility No. 3506 ,Facility No. 575 ,Facility No. 576 ,Facility No. 570 ,Facility No. 96842 ,Facility No. 339 ,Facility No. 96843 ,38BK1841 ,Facility No. 579 ,38BK1840 ,Facility No. 3508 ,38BK1843 ,38BK1842 ,38BK1845 ,Facility No. 96844 ,38BK1844 ,Facility No. 96845 ,Facility No. 562 ,Facility No. 320 ,Facility No. 563 ,Facility No. 560 ,38BK1678/1679 ,Facility No. 561 ,Facility No. 566 ,Facility No. 324 ,Facility No. 567 ,Facility No. 325 ,Facility No. 564 ,Facility No. 322 ,Facility No. 565 ,South Carolina (State / Territory) ,Facility No. 328 ,Facility No. 568 ,Facility No. 326 ,Facility No. 569 ,38BK1832 ,38BK1831 ,38BK1834 ,38BK1833 ,Facility No. 155 ,Facility No. 156 ,Facility No. 153 ,Facility No. 154 ,Facility No. 159 ,Facility No. 157 ,Facility No. 158 ,Facility No. 151 ,Facility No. 152 ,Facility No. 150 ,Facility No. 144 ,Facility No. 145 ,38BK2737 ,Facility No. 142 ,38BK2738 ,Facility No. 143 ,Facility No. 148 ,Facility No. 149 ,Facility No. 146 ,Facility No. 389 ,Facility No. 147 ,Facility No. 140 ,Facility No. 383 ,Facility No. 141 ,Facility No. 380 ,38BK2728 ,Facility No. 133 ,38BK2729 ,Facility No. 134 ,38BK2726 ,Facility No. 131 ,Facility No. 374 ,38BK2727 ,Facility No. 132 ,Facility No. 137 ,Facility No. 138 ,Facility No. 135 ,Facility No. 136 ,Facility No. 372 ,Facility No. 130 ,38BK2731 ,38BK2732 ,Facility No. 139 ,38BK2730 ,38BK2735 ,38BK2736 ,38BK2733 ,38BK2734 ,38BK2717 ,Facility No. 122 ,38BK2718 ,Facility No. 123 ,38BK2715 ,Facility No. 362 ,Facility No. 120 ,38BK2716 ,Facility No. 121 ,Facility No. 363 ,Facility No. 368 ,Facility No. 126 ,Facility No. 369 ,Facility No. 127 ,38BK2719 ,Facility No. 124 ,Facility No. 366 ,Facility No. 125 ,Facility No. 367 ,Facility No. 360 ,38BK2720 ,38BK2721 ,Facility No. 128 ,Facility No. 129 ,38BK2724 ,38BK2725 ,38BK2722 ,38BK2723 ,Facility No. 5ACX30 ,Facility No. 5ACX32 ,Facility No. 5ACX31 ,Facility No. 511 ,Facility No. 512 ,Facility No. 510 ,Architectural Survey ,Facility No. 515 ,Facility No. 516 ,Facility No. 513 ,Facility No. 514 ,Facility No. 519 ,Facility No. 517 ,Facility No. 518 ,Facility No. 500 ,Facility No. 501 ,Brickyard ,38BK1690 ,38BK1692 ,38BK1691 ,Facility No. 30160 ,38BK1694 ,38BK1693 ,Facility No. 504 ,38BK1696 ,Facility No. 30163 ,Facility No. 2827 ,Facility No. 505 ,38BK1695 ,Facility No. 2828 ,Facility No. 502 ,38BK1698 ,Facility No. 30161 ,Facility No. 2825 ,Facility No. 503 ,38BK1697 ,Facility No. 30162 ,Facility No. 2826 ,Facility No. 508 ,Facility No. 509 ,38BK1699 ,Facility No. 506 ,Facility No. 2829 ,Facility No. 507 ,Facility No. 730 ,Architectural Documentation ,38BK1681 ,38BK1680 ,38BK1683 ,38BK1682 ,38BK1685 ,38BK1684 ,38BK1687 ,38BK1686 ,38BK1689 ,38BK1688 ,Berkeley (County) ,Facility No. 5ACX27 ,Facility No. 5ACX26 ,Facility No. 5ACX29 ,Facility No. 5ACX28 ,Facility No. 724 ,Facility No. 725 ,38BK1677 ,Facility No. 551 ,Facility No. 552 ,Facility No. 310 ,Facility No. 550 ,Facility No. 555 ,Facility No. 798 ,Facility No. 556 ,Facility No. 553 ,Facility No. 311 ,Facility No. 554 ,Facility No. 559 ,Facility No. 317 ,Facility No. 318 ,Facility No. 557 ,38BK1269 ,Facility No. 558 ,Facility No. 1AC6 ,Facility No. 540 ,Facility No. 1AC7 ,Facility No. 541 ,Facility No. 1AC4 ,Facility No. 1AC5 ,Facility No. 544 ,Facility No. 302 ,Facility No. 545 ,Facility No. 542 ,Facility No. 543 ,Facility No. 1AC2 ,Facility No. 1AC3 ,Facility No. 1AC1 ,Colonial Period ,Facility No. 548 ,Facility No. 31297 ,Facility No. 549 ,Facility No. 31296 ,Facility No. 546 ,Facility No. 31295 ,Facility No. 304 ,Facility No. 547 ,Facility No. 308 ,Facility No. 31299 ,Facility No. 530 ,Facility No. 533 ,Facility No. 534 ,Facility No. 531 ,Facility No. 532 ,Facility No. 537 ,Facility No. 538 ,Facility No. 535 ,Facility No. 536 ,Facility No. 539 ,Facility No. 522 ,Facility No. 523 ,Facility No. 520 ,Facility No. 521 ,Facility No. 526 ,Facility No. 527 ,Facility No. 524 ,Facility No. 525 ,Facility No. 528 ,Facility No. 529 ,Facility No. 55758 ,Facility No. 55759 ,Facility No. 10XC60 ,Facility No. 6ACX36 ,Facility No. 6ACX37 ,Facility No. 6ACX34 ,Facility No. 6ACX35 ,Facility No. 6ACX38 ,Facility No. 75 ,Facility No. 74 ,Facility No. 31301 ,Facility No. 73 ,Facility No. 6ACX33 ,Facility No. 72 ,Facility No. 31300 ,Facility No. 71 ,Facility No. 91864 ,Facility No. 91863 ,Facility No. 91862 ,Facility No. 67 ,Facility No. 65 ,Facility No. 55760 ,Facility No. 62 ,Facility No. 55762 ,Facility No. 91867 ,Facility No. 61 ,Facility No. 60 ,Facility No. 91866 ,Facility No. 91865 ,380R119 ,380R118 ,380R111 ,380R110 ,380R113 ,380R112 ,380R115 ,380R114 ,380R117 ,380R116 ,380R120 ,Facility No. 57 ,Facility No. 51 ,380R108 ,380R107 ,380R109 ,380R106 ,380R105 ,Facility No. 48 ,Facility No. 43 ,Facility No. 42 ,Facility No. 41 ,Facility No. 40 ,Facility No. 30017 ,Facility No. 30018 ,Facility No. 30015 ,Facility No. 30016 ,Facility No. 97590 ,Facility No. 11XC62 ,Facility No. 11XC63 ,Facility No. 11XC61 ,Facility No. 98449 ,Facility No. 50026 ,Facility No. 2184 ,380R121 ,Facility No. 2185 ,Facility No. 2182 ,Facility No. 2183 ,Facility No. 2186 ,Facility No. 2187 ,Facility No. 822 ,Facility No. 96 ,Facility No. 93 ,Facility No. 91 ,Facility No. 90 ,Facility No. 41102 ,Facility No. 41101 ,Facility No. 41104 ,Facility No. 41103 ,Facility No. 10XC58 ,Facility No. 10XC59 ,Facility No. 87 ,Facility No. 86 ,Facility No. 85 ,Facility No. 84 ,Facility No. 10XC56 ,Facility No. 10XC57 ,Facility No. 198 ,Facility No. 3483 ,Facility No. 3ACX17 ,Facility No. 3ACX18 ,Facility No. 3ACX19 ,Facility No. 3484 ,Facility No. 3ACX15 ,Facility No. 3ACX16 ,Facility No. 3236 ,Facility No. 60038 ,Facility No. 60034 ,Facility No. 184 ,Facility No. 60035 ,Facility No. 60036 ,Facility No. 60037 ,Facility No. 60033 ,Facility No. 3ACX20 ,Facility No. 95350 ,Facility No. 98620 ,Facility No. 98621 ,Facility No. 170 ,Facility No. 98624 ,Facility No. 98625 ,Facility No. 98622 ,Facility No. 98623 ,Facility No. 166 ,Facility No. 3458 ,Facility No. 167 ,Facility No. 164 ,Facility No. 3456 ,Facility No. 165 ,Facility No. 3450 ,Facility No. 2364 ,Facility No. 162 ,Facility No. 3454 ,Facility No. 163 ,Facility No. 160 ,Facility No. 3452 ,Facility No. 161 ,Facility No. 3446 ,Facility No. 3444 ,Facility No. 2355 ,World War II ,Facility No. 2356 ,Facility No. 97751 ,Facility No. 97752 ,Facility No. 4538 ,Facility No. 97750 ,Facility No. 2353 ,Facility No. 3442 ,Facility No. 2354 ,Facility No. 3443 ,Facility No. 3440 ,Facility No. 2352 ,Facility No. 97753 ,Facility No. 97754 ,Facility No. 29413 ,Facility No. 3677 ,Facility No. 3675 ,Facility No. 3672 ,Facility No. 3671 ,Facility No. 98619 ,Facility No. 95347 ,Facility No. 95349 ,Facility No. 95348 ,Facility No. 96402 ,Facility No. 96403 ,Facility No. 3414 ,Facility No. 3412 ,Facility No. 3410 ,38CH1705 ,Facility No. 97506 ,Facility No. 97507 ,Facility No. 97504 ,Facility No. 97505 ,Facility No. 232 ,Facility No. 233 ,Facility No. 231 ,Facility No. 8ACX50 ,Facility No. 478 ,Facility No. 236 ,Facility No. 237 ,Facility No. 234 ,Facility No. 235 ,Facility No. 470 ,Facility No. 471 ,Archaeological Overview ,Facility No. 97838 ,Facility No. 238 ,Facility No. 239 ,Facility No. 221 ,Facility No. 222 ,Facility No. 8ACX45 ,Facility No. 220 ,Facility No. 8ACX46 ,Facility No. 225 ,Facility No. 3637 ,Facility No. 226 ,Facility No. 468 ,Facility No. 223 ,Facility No. 224 ,Facility No. 8ACX47 ,Facility No. 8ACX48 ,Facility No. 8ACX49 ,Facility No. 227 ,Facility No. 469 ,Facility No. 694 ,38BK1715 ,Facility No. 211 ,Facility No. 695 ,38BK1714 ,Facility No. 453 ,Facility No. 692 ,38BK1717 ,Facility No. 450 ,Facility No. 693 ,38BK1716 ,Facility No. 214 ,Facility No. 698 ,38BK1719 ,Facility No. 456 ,Facility No. 215 ,Facility No. 699 ,38BK1718 ,Facility No. 457 ,Facility No. 212 ,Facility No. 696 ,Facility No. 213 ,Facility No. 697 ,Facility No. 690 ,Facility No. 691 ,Facility No. 218 ,Facility No. 219 ,Facility No. 96964 ,Facility No. 216 ,38BK1720 ,Facility No. 217 ,38BK1722 ,38BK1721 ,Facility No. 96965 ,Facility No. 96966 ,Facility No. 683 ,Facility No. 684 ,38BK1703 ,Facility No. 681 ,38BK1706 ,Facility No. 3852 ,Facility No. 682 ,38BK1705 ,Facility No. 3851 ,Facility No. 687 ,38BK1708 ,Facility No. 688 ,38BK1707 ,Facility No. 685 ,Facility No. 201 ,Facility No. 686 ,38BK1709 ,Facility No. 680 ,Facility No. 689 ,38BK1711 ,38BK1710 ,38BK1713 ,38BK1712 ,Historic ,Facility No. 270 ,Facility No. 265 ,Facility No. 266 ,Facility No. 263 ,Facility No. 264 ,Facility No. 269 ,Facility No. 267 ,Facility No. 268 ,Facility No. 261 ,Facility No. 262 ,Facility No. 260 ,Cold War Era ,Facility No. 3838 ,Facility No. 254 ,Facility No. 255 ,Facility No. 252 ,Facility No. 253 ,Facility No. 258 ,Facility No. 259 ,Facility No. 256 ,Facility No. 257 ,Facility No. 250 ,Facility No. 251 ,38BK1762 ,38BK1765 ,Facility No. 243 ,Facility No. 244 ,Facility No. 241 ,Facility No. 242 ,Facility No. 3814 ,Facility No. 247 ,Facility No. 248 ,Facility No. 245 ,Facility No. 246 ,Facility No. 240 ,Facility No. 5 ,Facility No. 2 ,Facility No. 1 ,Facility No. 3818 ,Facility No. 3817 ,Facility No. 249 ,Facility No. 1620 ,Facility No. 1621 ,Facility No. 632 ,Facility No. 633 ,Facility No. 630 ,Facility No. 631 ,Facility No. 7ACX44 ,Facility No. 7ACX43 ,Facility No. 7ACX42 ,Facility No. 7ACX41 ,Facility No. 7ACX40 ,Facility No. 636 ,Facility No. 637 ,Facility No. 634 ,Facility No. 635 ,Facility No. 638 ,Facility No. 639 ,Facility No. 7ACX39 ,Facility No. 621 ,Facility No. 622 ,Facility No. 620 ,Archaeological site inventory list ,Facility No. 625 ,Facility No. 626 ,Facility No. 623 ,Facility No. 624 ,Facility No. 866 ,Facility No. 629 ,38BK0248 ,38BK0247 ,Facility No. 627 ,Facility No. 628 ,Facility No. 2AC8 ,Facility No. 610 ,Facility No. 611 ,Facility No. 1603 ,Facility No. 2AC9 ,Facility No. 856 ,Facility No. 614 ,Facility No. 615 ,Facility No. 612 ,Facility No. 613 ,Facility No. 618 ,Facility No. 619 ,Facility No. 616 ,Facility No. 617 ,19th Century ,Facility No. 600 ,Facility No. 609 ,Facility No. 603 ,Facility No. 845 ,Facility No. 30020 ,Facility No. 604 ,Facility No. 846 ,Facility No. 601 ,Facility No. 602 ,Facility No. 607 ,Facility No. 608 ,Facility No. 605 ,Facility No. 606 ,Facility No. 672 ,Facility No. 673 ,Facility No. 670 ,Facility No. 671 ,Facility No. 676 ,Facility No. 434 ,Facility No. 677 ,Facility No. 674 ,Facility No. 675 ,Facility No. 37 ,Facility No. 36 ,Facility No. 32 ,Facility No. 678 ,Facility No. 31 ,Facility No. 679 ,Facility No. 30 ,Facility No. 661 ,Facility No. 662 ,Facility No. 660 ,Facility No. 665 ,Facility No. 423 ,Facility No. 666 ,Facility No. 424 ,Facility No. 663 ,Facility No. 421 ,Facility No. 664 ,Facility No. 422 ,Facility No. 27 ,Facility No. 24 ,Facility No. 669 ,Facility No. 427 ,Facility No. 428 ,Facility No. 667 ,Facility No. 425 ,Facility No. 668 ,Facility No. 426 ,Charleston, SC ,Facility No. 650 ,Facility No. 892 ,Facility No. 893 ,Facility No. 651 ,Facility No. 654 ,Facility No. 412 ,Facility No. 655 ,Facility No. 413 ,Facility No. 410 ,Facility No. 652 ,Facility No. 653 ,Facility No. 411 ,Facility No. 658 ,Facility No. 416 ,Records Search / Inventory Checking ,Facility No. 659 ,Facility No. 417 ,Facility No. 656 ,Facility No. 414 ,Facility No. 657 ,Facility No. 415 ,Facility No. 640 ,Facility No. 643 ,Facility No. 401 ,Facility No. 644 ,Facility No. 402 ,Facility No. 641 ,Facility No. 642 ,Naval Weapons Station Charleston ,Facility No. 647 ,Facility No. 405 ,Facility No. 648 ,Facility No. 645 ,Facility No. 646 ,Facility No. 649 ,Facility No. 917 ,Facility No. 918 ,Facility No. 910 ,Facility No. 916 ,Facility No. 914 ,Facility No. 908 ,Facility No. 909 ,Facility No. 906 ,Facility No. 907 ,Facility No. 900 ,Facility No. 901 ,Facility No. 904 ,Facility No. 902 ,Facility No. 9XC51 ,Facility No. 9XC53 ,Facility No. 9XC52 ,Facility No. 9XC55 ,Facility No. 9XC54 ,38BK1270 ,38BK1271 ,8BK1704 ,Facility No. 710 ,Facility No. 714 ,Facility No. 712 ,Facility No. 717 ,Facility No. 718 ,Facility No. 716 ,Facility No. 708 ,Facility No. 702 ,Facility No. 703 ,Facility No. 700 ,Facility No. 701 ,Facility No. 706 ,Facility No. 51006 ,Facility No. 707 ,Facility No. 704 ,Facility No. 705 ,Facility No. 947 ,18th Century ,Facility No. 931 ,Facility No. 932 ,Historic Background Research ,Facility No. 3370 ,38BK1071 ,Facility No. 922 ,Facility No. 920 ,Facility No. 96343 ,Facility No. 97432 ,Facility No. 99611 ,Facility No. 97433 ,Facility No. 96344 ,Facility No. 96341 ,Facility No. 97430 ,Facility No. 96342 ,Facility No. 97431 ,Facility No. 2030 ,Facility No. 2035 ,38BK16 ,Facility No. 96347 ,Facility No. 99615 ,Facility No. 96348 ,Facility No. 99614 ,Facility No. 96345 ,Facility No. 97434 ,Facility No. 99613 ,Facility No. 96346 ,Facility No. 99612 ,Facility No. 96349 ,Facility No. 99616 ,Facility No. 96350 ,Facility No. 96351 ,Facility No. 96352 ,Facility No. 29970 ,Facility No. 95231 ,Facility No. 29967 ,Facility No. 29968 ,Facility No. 290 ,Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan ,Facility No. 293 ,Facility No. 2AC10 ,Facility No. 2AC11 ,Facility No. 2AC12 ,Facility No. 285 ,Facility No. 2AC13 ,Facility No. 286 ,Facility No. 281 ,Facility No. 2000 ,Facility No. 2AC14 ,Facility No. 3560 ,38BK1700 ,38BK1702 ,38BK1701 ,Facility No. 3313 ,Facility No. 3310 ,Facility No. 97648 ,Facility No. 3546 ,Facility No. 3304 ,Facility No. 3544 ,Facility No. 3305 ,Facility No. 3300 ,Environmental Management Plan - Abstract
The Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) is a planning document used to manage an installation's cultural resources management program. The document identifies cultural resource activities such as surveys and building inventories, that have taken place on an installation. It also identifies and describes historic resources within installation boundaries, identifies Native American groups affiliated with an installation, and provides a plan for staying in compliance with cultural resource laws. The document is used by installation command to make decisions about cultural resources management and compliance activities. Inventory of cultural resources at Naval Weapons Station Charleston can be found in tDAR at: https://core.tdar.org/dataset/448189
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Appendix C: List of Facilities on Little Rock Air Force Base at or Approaching 50 years old by 2017 with NRHP Eligibility, SHPO Concurrence, and ACHP Program Contents
- Author
-
Fernandez, Rachel
- Subjects
Building 746 ,Building 1230 ,Building 1350 ,Building 744 ,Building 620 ,Building 748 ,Building 1360 ,Building 1240 ,Building 756 ,Building 83063 ,Building 83061 ,Little Rock Air Force Base ,Heritage Management ,Building 83066 ,Building 1250 ,Building 1370 ,Building 768 ,Building 1570 ,Building 648 ,Building 1210 ,Building 1572 ,Building 1575 ,Building 764 ,Building 1214 ,Building 1576 ,Building 642 ,Building 1578 ,Building 1219 ,Building 528 ,Building 12075 ,Building 12076 ,Building 81096 ,Building 640 ,Building 1340 ,Building 656 ,Building 1100 ,Building 1220 ,Building 536 ,Building 1344 ,Cold War ,Building 11091 ,Building 1346 ,Building 11097 ,Building 1348 ,Building 11096 ,Building 11095 ,Building 11094 ,Building 11098 ,Building 83166 ,Air Force Base ,Building 772 ,Building 4 ,Building 3 ,Building 5 ,Building 546 ,Building 668 ,ACHP ,Building 544 ,Building 542 ,Building 784 ,Building 83015 ,Building 11126 ,Building 81078 ,Building 81076 ,Building 540 ,Building 782 ,Building 783 ,Building 420 ,Building 780 ,Building 41065 ,Building 315 ,Building 558 ,Building 314 ,Building 81083 ,Building 81080 ,Building 11112 ,Building 11111 ,Building 11110 ,Building 75050 ,Building 11114 ,Building 11113 ,Building 81085 ,Cold War Era ,Building 430 ,Building 552 ,Building 310 ,Building 670 ,Building 550 ,Building 207 ,Building 208 ,Building 205 ,Building 206 ,Building 204 ,Building 201 ,Building 202 ,Building 11101 ,Building 11100 ,Building 209 ,Building 11105 ,Building 11225 ,Building 11106 ,Building 320 ,Building 70 ,Building 71 ,Building 335 ,Building 578 ,Building 75 ,Building 2999 ,Building 81180 ,Building 81068 ,Building 81066 ,Building 210 ,Building 574 ,Building 450 ,Building 572 ,Building 330 ,Building 80 ,Building 570 ,Building 69025 ,Building 1075 ,Building 41010 ,Building 1077 ,Building 104 ,Building 105 ,Building 1750 ,Building 102 ,Building 344 ,Building 224 ,Building 13463 ,Building 11162 ,Building 11161 ,Building 13466 ,Building 11287 ,Building 13461 ,Building 11285 ,Building 41016 ,Building 41015 ,Building 222 ,Building 340 ,Building 1080 ,Building 460 ,Building 41013 ,Building 238 ,Building 69015 ,Building 236 ,Building 356 ,Building 82136 ,Building 81166 ,Building 1090 ,Building 230 ,Building 60 ,Building 110 ,Building 350 ,Little Rock, Arkansas ,Building 245 ,Building 1730 ,Building 246 ,Building 84086 ,Building 1735 ,Building 1734 ,Building 11145 ,Building 11144 ,Building 11142 ,Building 11146 ,Building 75041 ,Building 362 ,Building 120 ,Building 242 ,Building 480 ,National Register of Historic Places ,Building 3001 ,Building 258 ,Building 1740 ,Building 256 ,Building 1500 ,Building 257 ,Building 1744 ,Building 84095 ,Building 1748 ,Building 11256 ,Building 252 ,Building 253 ,Building 250 ,Building 251 ,Building 41046 ,Building 370 ,Building 45012 ,Building 12050 ,Building 45010 ,Building 1036 ,Building 148 ,Building 1710 ,Building 11084 ,Building 1712 ,Building 1715 ,Building 1714 ,Building 1718 ,Building 84066 ,Building 264 ,Building 382 ,Building 262 ,Building 45017 ,Governmental Structure ,Building 45016 ,Building 380 ,Building 260 ,Building 714 ,Building 12 ,NRHP ,Building 10 ,Building 830 ,Building 710 ,Building 278 ,Building 1720 ,Building 1601 ,Building 1722 ,Building 11195 ,Building 1724 ,Building 1726 ,Building 718 ,Building 390 ,Building 13016 ,Building 397 ,Building 153 ,Building 154 ,Building 272 ,Building 391 ,Building 150 ,Building 1252 ,Building 2001-2859 ,Building 721 ,Building 840 ,Building 13485 ,Building 12035 ,Building 12036 ,Building 11067 ,Building 11066 ,Building 11065 ,Military Structure ,Building 84166 ,Building 288 ,Building 286 ,Building 162 ,Building 284 ,Building 160 ,Building 1382 ,Building 1260 ,Building 1020 ,Building 1385 ,Building 1024 ,Building 1704 ,Building 1706 ,Building 1705 ,Building 290 ,Building 81101 ,Building 41009 ,Building 41008 ,Historic Governmental Structure ,Advisory Council On Historic Preservation ,Building 41005 ,Building 41004 ,Building 41007 ,Building 41006 ,Building 41001 ,Building 41003 ,Building 1393 ,Building 1030 ,Building 41002 ,Building 1392 - Abstract
Draft List of Facilities on Little Rock Air Force Base at or Approaching 50 years old by 2017 with National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Eligibility, SHPO Concurrence, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) Program Contents.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Property Survey and Evaluation of Cold War Properties at McGuire Air Force Base
- Author
-
System User
- Subjects
20th Century ,Historic ,Military Support Facilities ,Site Evaluation / Testing ,New Egypt, NJ ,Architectural Documentation ,Historic Property Survey ,New Jersey (State / Territory) ,Non-Domestic Structures ,Architectural Survey ,Cold War Era ,Military Structure ,Heritage Management - Abstract
The United States Air Force (USAF), Headquarters, Air Mobility Command (AMC), has conducted real property surveys and evaluations at selected installations throughout the continental United States to identify potentially significant Cold War buildings and structures. The immediate goal of the study is to provide the baseline information required for compliance with Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and for the completion of Cultural Resources Management Plans (CRMPs). A future goal is to assist in compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA as proposed actions warrant. The base did have missions which did play exceptional roles in the Cold War period through its involvement in the air defense of the continental United States. Under the Air Defense Command, McGuire was selected as the first priority in establishing the revolutionary Semi Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE) system, where emerging Cold War computer technology was enlisted to enhance the early detection of intruders and coordinate (through computer and voice links) an effective military and civilian response through its network of combat and direction centers. Only two groups of structures are currently of exceptional importance for properties less than fifty years of age; the SAGE complex (operational 1958-1968) consisting of buildings 1907-9 and the BOMARC missile site (operational 1959-1972), five miles south of New Egypt, NJ. These are not only outstanding examples of America’s investment in high-technology for defense, but are both first (first operational SAGE direction center and the first operational BOMARC site), one-of-a-kind properties that retain a very high degree of integrity. They represent the Cold War theme of technology in the highest order. The NJSHPO has concurred both the air defense component BOMARC missile site and the Sage complex are eligible for the NRHP. No other Cold War era structures have been found NRHP eligible to date. This report concurs on the eligibility of the SAGE and BOMARC facilities.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan, 2018-2022, United States Air Force Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska
- Author
-
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson
- Subjects
Historic ,ANC-01337 ,ANC-00840 ,ANC-02589 ,Late Prehistoric ,ANC-01179 ,ANC-02587 ,ANC-00760 ,ANC-01178 ,ANC-01299 ,Potentially Eligible ,Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plan ,Anchorage, AK ,World War II era ,Early Holocene ,ANC-01175 ,ANC-01173 ,ANC-01174 ,ANC-01171 ,Historic Buildings ,ANC-01172 ,Middle Holocene ,ANC-01170 ,ANC-00099 ,ANC-02596 ,Reconnaissance / Survey ,Late Holocene ,Cold War Era ,Homestead Era ,ANC-02594 ,ANC-01187 ,ANC-02595 ,Railroad ,ANC-01184 ,ANC-02592 ,ANC-02593 ,ANC-01182 ,ANC-02590 ,ANC-01183 ,ANC-02591 ,ANC-01180 ,ANC-01181 ,Cultural Resources ,ANC-02008 ,Not Eligible ,ANC-02006 ,ANC-02005 ,Eligible Sites ,ANC-00668 ,ANC-00822 ,Eklutna Village ,Records Search / Inventory Checking ,ANC-00263 ,ANC-02362 ,ANC-01072 ,ANC-01073 ,ANC-01071 ,Historic Background Research ,Prehistoric Sites ,ANC-02578 ,ANC-02579 ,ANC-00430 ,ANC-01169 ,ANC-02577 ,ANC-01760 ,ANC-00432 ,Prehistoric ,ANC-00431 ,Alaska (State / Territory) ,Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ,ANC-0076 - Abstract
The Integrate Cultural Resource Management Plan for 2018-2022, was developed to provide for effective management and protection of cultural resources. It summarizes the history and prehistory of the installation, and reviews past historical and archaeological survey efforts. It outlines and assigns responsibilities for the management of cultural resources, discusses related concerns, and provides standard operating procedures (SOPs) that will help to preserve the cultural resources of the installation within the context of the mission. The ICRMP is intended for use by all personnel involved in base planning. In lieu of federal, state or FGS requirements, AFI32-7065, Cultural Resources Management, acts as the main driver for the iCRMP.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Table of Proposed Demolition Projects at Little Rock Air Force Base
- Author
-
Fernandez, Rachel
- Subjects
Building 229 ,Building 868 ,Building 667 ,Building 1231 ,Building 624 ,Building 668 ,Building 940 ,Building 786 ,Building 1431 ,Building 620 ,Building 224 ,Building 1435 ,Building 1437 ,Building 1439 ,Building 980 ,Building 340 ,Building 780 ,Governmental Structure ,Building 260 ,Building 714 ,Building 1240 ,Building 711 ,Building 755 ,Building 756 ,Building 830 ,Building 710 ,Building 1724 ,Building 718 ,Little Rock Air Force Base ,Cold War Era ,Building 430 ,Building 552 ,Little Rock, Arkansas ,Building 722 ,Building 721 ,Building 245 ,Building 1257 ,Building 1416 ,Building 1415 ,Building 1418 ,Building 1417 ,Building 529 ,Military Structure ,Building 280 ,Building 640 ,Building 241 ,Building 1342 ,Building 976 ,Building 775 ,Cold War ,Building 259 ,Building 534 ,Building 1420 ,Non-Domestic Structures ,Building 1428 ,Historic Governmental Structure - Abstract
Table of proposed demolition projects at Little Rock Air Force Base.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Collection of Color Photos of BOMARC at McGuire Air Force Base
- Author
-
Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst
- Subjects
Historic ,Architectural Documentation ,Non-Domestic Structures ,Cold War Era ,Military Structure ,Heritage Management - Abstract
This is a collection of color photographs from McGuire Air Force Base with dates ranging from 2002 to 2003. The photos are taken from frontal and aerial views. The collection consists of pictures of the surrounding landscape and existing buildings, as well as the demolition of some of the existing buildings. The survey, excavation, and removal of certain areas are also documented in these photos. These color photos are part of McGuire Air Defense Missile Site Plutonium Remediation, Site Historical Preservation Report, New Egypt, New Jersey, found at https://core.tdar.org/document/438551
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Responses to Deindustrialization in New England during the Cold War Years
- Author
-
Koistinen, David, author
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan, Arnold Engineering Development Complex, Arnold Air Force Base, Tennessee: Final Version 2016-2020
- Author
-
Fernandez, Rachel
- Subjects
Historic ,40FR583 ,40CF325 ,40CF324 ,40FR580 ,40CF321 ,40CF121 ,40CF362 ,Facility 715 ,40FR578 ,Facility 714 ,40CF329 ,40FR574 ,Facility 2134 ,40CF315 ,40FR231 ,40CF359 ,40CF358 ,Facility 2136 ,40FR195 ,40CF355 ,40CF354 ,40CF310 ,40CF352 ,40CF351 ,Camp Forrest ,Arnold Air Force Base ,Heritage Management ,40FR505 ,40FR229 ,Cold War Era ,40FR589 ,40FR148 ,40FR147 ,40CF319 ,40FR146 ,40FR145 ,40CF317 ,40CF44 ,40FR584 ,Facility 265 ,40FR120 ,40CF346 ,40CF344 ,40CF342 ,40CF340 ,Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan ,Military Structure ,40FR239 ,Records Search / Inventory Checking ,Facility 932 ,Facility 3095 ,40FR236 ,40CF308 ,40CF307 ,40FR233 ,40CF349 ,40FR232 ,40CF336 ,Facility 1103 ,Cold War ,Facility 1102 ,40CF331 ,Prehistoric ,40CF297 ,Non-Domestic Structures ,Facility 1106 ,Facility 1105 ,Facility 1104 ,Facility 2117 ,40CF60 ,Historic Governmental Structure ,40CF338 - Abstract
The Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) is a planning document used to manage an installation's cultural resources management program. The document identifies cultural resource activities such as surveys and building inventories, that have taken place on an installation. It also identifies and describes historic resources within installation boundaries, identifies Native American groups affiliated with an installation, and provides a plan for staying in compliance with cultural resource laws. The document is used by installation command to make decisions about cultural resources management and compliance activities.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Survey and Documentation of World War II Defensive Fortifications at Eareckson Air Station, Shemya Island, Alaska
- Author
-
Rogers, Jason S., Blanchard, Morgan R., and Gordaoff, Roberta
- Subjects
World War II ,Architectural Survey ,Eareckson Air Station ,Building Survey ,11th Air Force ,United States Air Force ,ATU-00116 ,ATU-00166 ,ATU-00265 ,Archaeological Survey ,Remote Sensing ,ATU-00121 ,ATU-00264 ,ATU-00168 ,ATU-00124 ,ATU-00266 ,ATU-00123 ,ATU-00145 ,Architectural Documentation ,Shemya Air Force Base ,ATU-00063 ,611th Civil Engineer Squadron ,ATU-00180 ,Records Search / Inventory Checking ,Pacific Air Forces ,611th ,Historic Background Research ,Cold War ,ATU-00206 ,Alaska (State / Territory) ,ATU-00148 ,Fortifications ,ATU-00125 ,Department of the Navy ,ATU-00151,ATU-00152 ,ATU-00177 ,ATU-00077 ,ATU-00110 ,ATU-00176 ,ATU-00179 ,ATU-00178 ,ATU-00175 ,ATU-00174 ,Cold War Era ,ATU-00092 ,611th Air Support Group ,ATU-00093 - Abstract
This report summarizes the survey and documentation of World War II forts at Eareckson Air Station. Research methods used prior to fieldwork included an examination of aerial photographs, maps, and literature. Fieldwork was conducted under the direction of Northern Land Use Research Alaska (NLURA), LLC staff meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards (36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A) for history and archaeology. Sites were located by vehicle and pedestrian survey using GPS location data from OHA records. The survey crew kept written field notes, made sketch maps and feature drawings, and all existing structural remains and associated features were measured, photographed, and documented. Feature location coordinates were recorded with a Garmin GPS Map 76Cx GPS unit. Localized geography and topography, important for understanding the defensive fortification system, was also noted. NLURA supports the continued eligibility of all features as contributing properties to the Shemya Island World War II Historic District (ATU-00063).
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Cultural Resources Survey for the Proposed Fill Material Storage Area, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, United States Air Force, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska
- Author
-
Gaines, Edmund P.
- Subjects
Historic ,ANC-01018 ,Final Report ,Archaeological Investigation ,Environmental Conservation Program ,United States Air Force ,Proposed Fill Material Storage Area ,Anchorage, AK ,World War II era ,Historic Resource ,Area of Potential Affect ,Storage Area ,Cultural Resources Survey ,ANC-01052 ,ANC-01053 ,ANC-00280 ,ANC-01069 ,ANC-00650 ,Metal ,Reconnaissance / Survey ,Wood ,Road ,ANC-ANC-02006 ,Cold War Era ,Homestead Era ,ANC-00175 ,ANC-02590 ,Cultural Resources ,ANC-02008 ,Site Evaluation / Testing ,ANC-00268 ,ANC-02568 ,ANC-02004 ,ANC-00265 ,ANC-02005 ,ANC-00264 ,ANC-03334 ,Dena'ina ,ANC-02003 ,ANC-02606 ,ANC-00822 ,Fill Dirt Material ,Field Methods ,Phase I ,ANC-00263 ,ANC-02362 ,ANC-01070 ,Historic Background Research ,ANC-02578 ,ANC-02579 ,ANC-04239 ,ANC-00430 ,ANC-04238 ,ANC-02577 ,Prehistoric ,Alaska (State / Territory) ,Systematic Survey ,ANC-0423 ,Pedestrian Survey ,Research Design / Data Recovery Plan ,Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ,ANC-00270 - Abstract
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER), had proposed to stack and store fill dirt material in a 22-acre area north of the existing base runway. As the proposed project was an undertaking on federal lands with federal funds, a cultural resource survey of the proposed project’s Area of Potential Effect (APE) was required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA; 16 USC § 470 as amended). Edmund Gaines M.A., R.P.A, served as Principal Investigator and led field efforts for AECOM archaeologists conducting a Phase I identification level survey to locate and identify historic properties that may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This report details that assessment.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Supplemental 2016 North/South Runway Expansion Project Area, JBER, Cultural Resources Survey Report, United States Air Force Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska
- Author
-
Phyllys Callina
- Subjects
Historic ,ANC-01018 ,Military Training and Defense ,World War II ,Environmental Conservation Program ,Potentially Eligible ,United States Air Force ,Anchorage, AK ,Ridge Site ,National Register ,Felled Tree Stand ,ANC-01173 ,Log Cabin Remains ,Historic District ,ANC-01172 ,ANC-02580 ,Cherry Hill Barrow ,NRHP ,Building 52 ,Building 796 ,Foxholes ,Utility Poles ,Winter Training Area ,Cold War Era ,Cultural Resources ,ANC-02008 ,Not Eligible ,ANC-02006 ,ANC-02568 ,ANC-02004 ,ANC-02005 ,ANC-04149 ,ANC-04148 ,ANC-02003 ,Concrete Access Hatch ,Anti-Aircraft Battery ,Aircraft Wreckage ,Eligible ,ANC-00822 ,Hasty Bunker ,Expansion Project Area ,Igloo Complex ,Gun Emplacement and Pillbox ,ANC-02362 ,Corrugated Structure ,Contrite Remains #2 ,Contrite Remains #1 ,National Register of Historic Places ,Historic Background Research ,ANC-02578 ,ANC-04317 ,ANC-02579 ,ANC-04316 ,Flat Site ,ANC-04315 ,ANC-02577 ,ANC-04314 ,Log Cabin ,ANC-04313 ,ANC-00432 ,Prehistoric ,ANC-00431 ,Tank Trench #2 ,Tank Trench #1 ,Rock Fireplace Site ,Alaska (State / Territory) ,Systematic Survey ,Research Design / Data Recovery Plan ,Supplemental 2016 North/South Runway Expansion ,First-Aid Hut ,Haul Road ,Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ,ANC-04155 ,ANC-04154 ,ANC-04153 ,ANC-04152 ,Bunker ,ANC-04151 ,Environmental Setting ,ANC-04150 - Abstract
The U.S. Air Force proposed to extend the north end of the north/south-oriented runway at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. Because the proposed project includes federal funds and lands, it qualified as an undertaking under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), U.S. Code (USC) Title 54, Section 306108 (54 USC 306108); therefore, an identification-phase cultural resources survey of the project area was planned, and completed in August 2016, to comply with section 106 regulations. Brice Environmental Services conducted the survey of the APE to locate and identify any cultural resources that may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This report details that survey.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Cultural Resource and Probability of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, United States Air Force Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska
- Author
-
Phyllys Callina
- Subjects
ANC-03119 ,ANC-03118 ,ANC-03117 ,ANC-00760 ,ANC-03116 ,ANC-03114 ,ANC-01299 ,ANC-03113 ,United States Air Force ,Historic Context ,ANC-03112 ,ANC-03111 ,ANC-01052 ,ANC-03110 ,ANC-01053 ,ANC-01050 ,ANC-01170 ,ANC-01987 ,ANC-03129 ,ANC-01069 ,ANC-03127 ,ANC-00650 ,ANC-03126 ,ANC-01983 ,ANC-02951 ,ANC-03125 ,ANC-01067 ,ANC-01068 ,ANC-03124 ,Fauna ,Homestead Era ,ANC-01065 ,ANC-03123 ,ANC-01186 ,ANC-03122 ,ANC-01066 ,ANC-03121 ,ANC-01184 ,ANC-03120 ,ANC-02602 ,ANC-02603 ,ANC-02600 ,ANC-00788 ,ANC-00425 ,ANC-02601 ,ANC-00787 ,ANC-03136 ,Dena'ina ,ANC-03135 ,ANC-02606 ,ANC-00426 ,ANC-02604 ,ANC-02605 ,ANC-03134 ,ANC-03133 ,ANC-03132 ,ANC-03131 ,ANC-01072 ,ANC-03130 ,ANC-01073 ,ANC-01070 ,ANC-01071 ,ANC-00430 ,ANC-00432 ,ANC-00431 ,Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ,ANC-01086 ,ANC-00790 ,ANC-03141 ,ANC-03140 ,Historic ,ANC-00841 ,ANC-01018 ,ANC-00963 ,ANC-01019 ,ANC-00840 ,ANC-00964 ,ANC-00961 ,ANC-01016 ,ANC-00843 ,ANC-00842 ,ANC-01017 ,ANC-00962 ,ANC-01014 ,ANC-00960 ,ANC-01015 ,Environmental Conservation Program ,ANC-01012 ,ANC-01013 ,ANC-00969 ,ANC-00845 ,ANC-00967 ,ANC-00968 ,ANC-0312 ,ANC-00844 ,ANC-00847 ,ANC-00965 ,ANC-00846 ,ANC-00966 ,Early Holocene ,Cook Inlet ,ANC-01010 ,ANC-01011 ,ANC-00043 ,ANC-00042 ,ANC-02580 ,ANC-00974 ,ANC-01029 ,ANC-00975 ,ANC-00972 ,ANC-01027 ,ANC-00973 ,ANC-01028 ,ANC-00970 ,ANC-01025 ,ANC-02598 ,ANC-02599 ,ANC-00971 ,ANC-01026 ,ANC-01023 ,ANC-01024 ,ANC-02597 ,ANC-00978 ,ANC-00979 ,ANC-00976 ,ANC-00977 ,Cold War Era ,ANC-01021 ,ANC-02594 ,ANC-01022 ,ANC-02595 ,ANC-02593 ,ANC-01020 ,ANC-02590 ,ANC-02008 ,ANC-00985 ,ANC-00986 ,ANC-02006 ,ANC-00983 ,Fire Cracked Rock ,ANC-02007 ,ANC-00984 ,ANC-02004 ,ANC-00981 ,ANC-00982 ,ANC-02005 ,ANC-02365 ,ANC-02003 ,ANC-02804 ,ANC-00989 ,Prehistoric Context ,ANC-00987 ,ANC-00988 ,ANC-02364 ,ANC-01030 ,ANC-02362 ,ANC-01031 ,ANC-03109 ,ANC-00996 ,Historic Background Research ,ANC-03108 ,ANC-00997 ,ANC-03107 ,ANC-00994 ,ANC-01049 ,ANC-00995 ,ANC-03106 ,ANC-03105 ,ANC-00992 ,ANC-03104 ,ANC-01048 ,ANC-00993 ,ANC-01169 ,ANC-00990 ,ANC-03102 ,ANC-01167 ,ANC-00991 ,ANC-0100 ,Macrobotanical ,ANC-00998 ,ANC-00999 ,ANC-03101 ,ANC-03100 ,ANC-00920 ,ANC-00926 ,ANC-00925 ,ANC-00928 ,ANC-00927 ,ANC-00922 ,ANC-00924 ,ANC-00923 ,ANC-00919 ,ANC-00918 ,ANC-00931 ,ANC-00930 ,ANC-01224 ,ANC-00937 ,ANC-00936 ,ANC-00818 ,ANC-00939 ,ANC-00938 ,ANC-00933 ,ANC-00932 ,ANC-00935 ,ANC-00934 ,ANC-00929 ,Denali Complex ,Artifacts ,Cultural Resources ,ANC-00940 ,ANC-02569 ,ANC-01238 ,ANC-01239 ,ANC-00942 ,ANC-00941 ,ANC-02568 ,ANC-01113 ,ANC-00265 ,ANC-00264 ,ANC-00948 ,ANC-00949 ,ANC-00944 ,ANC-00943 ,ANC-00945 ,ANC-00819 ,ANC-03099 ,ANC-03098 ,ANC-03097 ,ANC-03096 ,ANC-03095 ,ANC-03094 ,ANC-01007 ,ANC-00951 ,ANC-01008 ,ANC-00950 ,ANC-01005 ,ANC-00953 ,ANC-02578 ,ANC-01006 ,ANC-02579 ,ANC-00952 ,ANC-01003 ,ANC-01004 ,ANC-02577 ,ANC-01001 ,ANC-01002 ,ANC-00959 ,ANC-00838 ,ANC-00958 ,ANC-00837 ,ANC-00839 ,ANC-00955 ,ANC-00954 ,ANC-01009 ,ANC-00957 ,ANC-00956 ,Beluga Point ,ANC-02570 ,ANC-01240 ,Revised Final Report ,Ethnohistoric Research ,ANC-02862 ,ANC-02860 ,ANC-00443 ,Anchorage, AK ,World War II era ,Middle Holocene ,Reconnaissance / Survey ,Gold Rush Era ,ANC-01795 ,Oral History ,Probability Analysis ,ANC-02897 ,Methodology, Theory, or Synthesis ,ANC-02898 ,ANC-02895 ,ANC-02896 ,Prehistoric ,ANC-00915 ,ANC-00914 ,ANC-00917 ,Alaska (State / Territory) ,ANC-00916 ,ANC-00913 ,Research Design / Data Recovery Plan ,ANC-00912 ,ANC-02090 ,ANC-00908 ,Russian Fur Trade - Abstract
This probability analysis report includes the addition of all cultural resource sites added to the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS) and all cultural resource surveys conducted on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) and reported on between October 2011 and March 2016. It also includes updated prehistorical and historical contexts. Updates have been made to all cultural resources feature point information and the known cultural resources studies.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Building 32448 (ANC-04181) Determination of National Register of Historic Places Eligibility
- Author
-
Jones, Shoshana and Ranzetta, Kirk E.
- Subjects
Final Report ,Building Demolition ,Letter ,NHPA ,Historic Architecture ,Architectural Survey ,Great Depression ,Anchorage, AK ,World War II era ,National Register ,Field Methods ,ANC-04181 ,Historic Context ,Architectural Documentation ,Building 32448 ,Architecture ,Determination ,Background Research ,National Register of Historic Places ,Eligibility ,Historic Background Research ,Vietnam War ,Pearl Harbor ,NRHP ,Eligibility Report ,Alaska (State / Territory) ,Research Design / Data Recovery Plan ,Heritage Management ,Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson ,National Historic Preservation Act ,Historic Building ,Quonset Huts ,Cold War Era ,Klondike Gold Rush ,FOS: Civil engineering ,Cultural Resources - Abstract
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) has proposed to demolish Building 32448 (formerly 62-160) Munitions Maintenance Operations facility, an individual Quonset hut that was constructed in 1942. As the proposed project is an undertaking on federal lands with federal funds, a cultural resource survey of the project's Area of Potential Effect (APE) and a determination of the building's National Register of Historical Places (NRHP) eligibility were required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA; 16 USC§ 470 as amended). Determination of eligibility of Building 32448.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.