Search

Background: Previous studies have indicated that patients with thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) low activity (TPMT(LA)) have reduced risk of relapse but increased risk of second malignant neoplasm (SMN) compared to patients with TPMT wild-type (TPMT(WT)) when treated with 6 MP maintenance therapy starting doses of 75 mg/m(2)/day. To reduce SMN risk, 6MP starting doses were reduced to 50 mg/m(2)/day for patients with TPMT heterozygosity in the Nordic Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology (NOPHO) ALL2000 protocol., Procedure: We explored the pattern of SMN and relapse in the NOPHO ALL2000 protocol (n = 674) and NOPHO ALL92 protocol (n = 601) in relation to TPMT pheno- and/or genotype., Results: The overall risk of any event did not differ significantly between the two protocols. However, in event pattern analyses considering only the patients with TPMT(LA) who experienced relapse or SMN, the risk of SMN versus leukemia relapse was significantly lower in the ALL2000 cohort for patients with a 6MP starting dose <75 mg/m(2)/day when compared to the patients in ALL92 (relapse (n = 11) and SMN (n = 0) in ALL2000 versus relapse (n = 5) and SMN (n = 4) in ALL92, P = 0.03). Furthermore, the 8-year cumulative incidence of relapse for patients with TPMT(LA) was significantly higher in the ALL2000 compared to the ALL92 cohort (19.7% (11.6-33.3%) vs. 6.7% (2.9-15.5%), P = 0.03)., Conclusion: This study indicates that reducing 6MP starting dose for patients with TPMT(LA) may reduce SMN risk but lead to a relapse risk similar to that of patients with TPMT(WT)., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Fas Ligand (FasL, CD178) is a cytokine that may be secreted or expressed as a transmembrane ligand at the cell surface, and induces apoptosis by binding to the "death receptor" Fas (CD95). Here, we show that Grb2, an SH3 domain-containing adaptor protein, binds to the proline-rich domain of FasL and regulates its cell surface expression. We found that knocking down Grb2 expression decreased the amount of FasL at the cell surface and increased the abundance of intracellular vesicles containing FasL. Furthermore, we showed that Grb2 acts as an adaptor for FasL to interact with adaptin beta, a molecule known to regulate trafficking. Our data reveal that Grb2 facilitates the association of FasL with adaptin beta, and promotes sorting of FasL to the cell surface. As FasL is a potent regulator of cell death, dynamic regulation of its cell surface localization is critical for controlling local tissue remodeling and inflammation.

Background: CD30, a 120 kDa surface phosphorylated protein is a member of tumour necrosis/nerve growth factor receptor (TNF/NGFR) family and constitutively expressed by Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and the neoplastic cells of Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL). A disease-specific protein marker is yet to be identified in Hodgkin lymphoma cells. In order to define HL-specific biomarkers, novel murine monoclonal antibodies were developed in our laboratory., Results: Murine monoclonal antibodies (mabs) were raised against the B3 sub clone of HL-derived cell line KM-H2. Two of these mabs (clone R23.1 mab and clone R24.1 mab) are IgG1 class antibodies that recognize a 21 kDa protein present at the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm in HL-derived cell lines. Clone R24.1 mab recognizes a formalin-resistant epitope and labels HRS cells in tissue samples from patients with HL of the classical type, ALCL, and subsets of T and B cell aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHL). The antigen recognized by the clone R23.1 mab and clone R24.1 mab does not share epitopes with CD30 cluster regions A, B, or C, and, unlike CD30, is not expressed by phytohemagglutinin (PHA) activated T cells., Conclusion: The 21 kDa protein detected by clone R23.1 and clone R24.1 mabs is a novel membrane-associated protein that may be a potential marker for the diagnosis and targeted therapy of HL and aggressive T and B cell NHL.

Fas ligand (FasL) binds Fas (CD95) to induce apoptosis or activate other signaling pathways. In addition, FasL transduces bidirectional or 'reverse signals'. The intracellular domain of FasL contains consensus sequences for phosphorylation and an extended proline rich region, which regulate its surface expression through undetermined mechanism(s). Here, we used a proteomics approach to identify novel FasL interacting proteins in Schwann cells to investigate signaling through and trafficking of this protein in the nervous system. We identified two novel FasL interacting proteins, sorting nexin 18 and adaptin beta, as well as two proteins previously identified as FasL interacting proteins in T cells, PACSIN2 and PACSIN3. These proteins are all associated with endocytosis and trafficking, highlighting the tight regulation of cell surface expression of FasL in the nervous system.

Purpose: To address early and late treatment failures in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we designed a two-stage randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) versus rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP), with a second random assignment to maintenance rituximab (MR) or observation in responding patients., Patients and Methods: Untreated DLBCL patients who were 60 years or older were randomly assigned to R-CHOP (n = 318) or CHOP (n = 314); 415 responders were randomly assigned to MR (n = 207) or observation (n = 208). The primary end point was failure-free survival (FFS). All P values were two sided., Results: Three-year FFS rate was 53% for R-CHOP patients and 46% for CHOP patients (P = .04) at a median follow-up time of 3.5 years. Two-year FFS rate from second random assignment was 76% for MR compared with 61% for observation (P = .009). No significant differences in survival were seen according to induction or maintenance therapy. FFS was prolonged with MR after CHOP (P = .0004) but not after R-CHOP (P = .81) with 2-year FFS rates from second random assignment of 77%, 79%, 74%, and 45% for R-CHOP, R-CHOP + MR, CHOP + MR, and CHOP, respectively. In a secondary analysis excluding MR patients, R-CHOP alone reduced the risks of treatment failure (P = .003) and death (P = .05) compared with CHOP alone., Conclusion: Rituximab administered as induction or maintenance with CHOP chemotherapy significantly prolonged FFS in older DLBCL patients. After R-CHOP, no benefit was provided by MR. These results, which are consistent with an additive effect of rituximab, suggest that future studies could focus on maintenance strategies with novel agents as well as new induction therapies.

Loss-of-function mutations in the murine dominant white spotting/c-kit locus affect a diverse array of biological processes and cell lineages and cause a range of phenotypes, including severe anemia, defective pigmentation, sterility, mast cell deficits, a lack of interstitial cells of Cajal, spatial learning memory deficits, and defects in peripheral nerve regeneration. Here we show that tyrosine residues 567 and 569 in the juxtamembrane (Jx) domain of the murine Kit receptor tyrosine kinase are crucial for the function of Kit in melanogenesis and mast cell development, but are dispensable for the normal development of erythroid, interstitial cells of Cajal and germ cells. Furthermore, adult mice lacking both tyrosines exhibit splenomegaly, dysregulation of B-cell and megakaryocyte development, and enlarged stomachs. Analysis of signal transduction events induced by the mutant receptors after ligand stimulation indicates that Jx tyrosine mutations diminish receptor autophosphorylation and selectively attenuate activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinases. Together, these observations demonstrate that the Jx domain of Kit plays a cell-type specific regulatory role in vivo and illustrate how engineered mutations in Kit can be used to understand the complex biological and molecular events that result from activating a receptor tyrosine kinase.

Although at least 35,000 human genes have been sequenced and mapped, adequate expression or functional information is available for only approximately 15% of them. Gene-trap mutagenesis is a technique that randomly generates loss-of-function mutations and reports the expression of many mouse genes. At present, several large-scale, gene-trap screens are being carried out with various new vectors, which aim to generate a public resource of mutagenized embryonic stem (ES) cells. This resource now includes more than 8,000 mutagenized ES-cell lines, which are freely available, making it an appropriate time to evaluate the recent advances in this area of genomic technology and the technical hurdles it has yet to overcome.

Background: Single-agent chemotherapy produces partial responses in the range of 7-27% in patients with Stage IV nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Cisplatin-based combination regimens have achieved higher response rates but with significant toxicity. Two prior studies employing 24-hour infusions of paclitaxel showed responses of 21% and 24%. The purpose of this Phase II study was to determine the effects of paclitaxel administered by short duration infusions on response rate, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with NSCLC., Methods: Twenty patients with histologically proven Stage IV NSCLC were enrolled in this study. All were treated on an outpatient basis with standard premedication followed by paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 infused intravenously over 3 hours. Treatments were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles., Results: The objective response rate was 6/19 (32%; 95% confidence interval, 13-57%). The median duration of response was 6.0 months (range, 2-13 months). The median survival of the entire group was 6.0 months (range, 2-24+ months), and the 1-year survival rate was 22%. Toxicity was mild, with only one hospitalization required for treatment of catheter-related thrombosis. Nonresponding patients were found to have worsening Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-G and FACT-L scores. Because this was a small clinical study, it did not demonstrate consistent improvement in FACT-G or FACT-L in responding patients., Conclusions: Paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion is a well-tolerated, active single agent in the treatment of Stage IV NSCLC, worthy of further study. Baseline QOL scores predicted those more likely to respond to treatment, but changes in QOL status did not correlate well with objective response status.

As the power source for vocalization, the lower respiratory tract plays a key role in voice production. This is particularly true with sustained singing, where continued high ventilatory demands are present. Changes in pulmonary function that are insignificant with normal speech have been shown to lead to performance impairment. The purpose of this study was to examine and characterize this problem in a large group of singers. Systematic evaluation of a defined population, along with inhalational and singing challenge, was the design. The demographic characteristics, history, pulmonary function, and response to treatment were evaluated in 20 professional or serious amateur singers with voice problems, who did not have causal laryngeal pathology, whose history and evaluation suggested increased airway reactivity, and who responded to anti-asthma therapy. An additional patient was challenged by the exercise of singing in the office, with pulmonary function measurements before and after. This group of serious singers demonstrated vocalization complaints referable to bronchodilator responsive airway obstruction. They responded to treatment for asthma, with improvement in their performance-related difficulties. An additional subject demonstrated a small decline in expiratory flow rates with only 20 minutes of singing in the office. This was readily reversed by an inhaled bronchodilator. Singers who present with complaints of impaired vocalization, such as vocal fatigue, decreased control, and excessive muscular tension, should be evaluated for increased airway reactivity as a possible cause of their complaints.

This 7- to 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to determine the dose-effect relationship and minimum effective dose for fluvoxamine maleate in a titrated fixed-dose study of major depressive disorder. Gradual titration over 2 weeks to fixed maintenance doses was employed to minimize dropout due to initial side effects. The study enrolled 600 outpatients, male and female, age 18-65, meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder. A 13-item subscore of the standard 21-Item Hamilton Depression Scale was used to minimize the possible contribution of known side effects from serotonin reuptake inhibitors to the overall HAM-D score. Secondary efficacy assessments included the HAM-D retardation factor, HAM-D depressed mood item, CGI-severity of illness item, and SCL depression factor. Fluvoxamine (50-150 mg/day) was therapeutically effective and well tolerated during 6 weeks of therapy. Based on the HAM-D depressed mood item, efficacy was dose dependent. The minimum effective dose was 50 mg/day. Fluvoxamine maleate shows dose-related effectiveness in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.

We report on the results of a study comparing mianserin with amitriptyline and placebo, in outpatients with major depression (DSM-III 296.2 or 296.3). One hundred and forty-nine patients were randomized to mianserin (n = 50), amitriptyline (n = 50) or placebo (n = 49). Medication was taken in a nightly (qhs) dose. During Week 1, the maximum dose was 60 mg mianserin, 120 mg amitriptyline or two placebo capsules. Beginning at Day 7 (through Day 42) maximum dosages were 150 mg mianserin, 300 mg amitriptyline or five placebo capsules. At multiple weeks and endpoint, statistically significant reductions in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) 17- and 21-item scores were recorded for both active drugs compared with placebo. Positive results with the HAM-D were corroborated by other measures of efficacy. There were no statistically significant differences between mianserin and amitriptyline in terms of efficacy; however, the results do suggest a more rapid therapeutic response for mianserin compared with amitriptyline, in terms of percentage of patients showing > or = 50% improvement at Weeks 2 (30% vs 23%) and 4 (61% vs 44%). The most common adverse experiences were somnolence (amitriptyline and mianserin 60%, placebo 31%) and dry mouth (amitriptyline 76%, mianserin 30% and placebo 20%). Our results indicate that mianserin is clearly superior to placebo, compares favorably with amitriptyline, and is a safe, well-tolerated, effective medication in the treatment of depressed outpatients.

1. This four-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of adinazolam-SR, at three dosage levels, with placebo. Forty (40) patients were randomized at our site: 10 to adinazolam 30 mg/day, 10 to 60 mg/day, 10 to 90 mg/day, and 10 to placebo. All patients were moderately anxious with Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) scores of > or = 21 at baseline. 2. The data were analyzed by pooling the three adinazolam groups and comparing them with the placebo group using t-tests. HAM-A scores decreased significantly more in the pooled adinazolam-SR treatment group than in the placebo group at both Week one (p < .02) and at Week two (p < .01), as well as at endpoint (p < .03). 3. At endpoint the adinazolam-treated group included 8 "responders" (> or = 50% reduction on the baseline HAM-A score) while none of the placebo patients were responders (p < .05). Dose-response effects were evaluated and relationships were not statistically significant. 4. The results indicate that adinazolam-SR was clearly superior to placebo for the treatment of patients suffering from Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

These data provide evidence for the antidepressant efficacy of paroxetine. Paroxetine- and imipramine-treated patients were significantly different from placebo-treated patients, but little different to each other, on all depressive outcome measures. However, paroxetine appeared to have a possibly greater and earlier beneficial effect on anxiety symptoms associated with depression, when compared with imipramine. Both active therapies were effective in treating patients with severe depression. Side effects for paroxetine were typical of other serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitors but different from those of imipramine. In particular, anticholinergic and cardiovascular symptoms were reduced, and premature withdrawal less likely.

The antidepressant efficacy and cardiac safety of trimipramine were evaluated in 22 depressed patients with mild heart disease (New York Heart Association class I, II, or III) who received doses of 50 to 200 mg/day for 28 days. Efficacy was evidenced by a significant decrease from baseline in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores. The only significant change from baseline in electrocardiographic, Holter monitor, myocardial function, or vital sign evaluations was a transient prolongation of the mean QRS interval. None of the adverse reactions involved the cardiovascular system. The results demonstrate that trimipramine is effective in the treatment of depression and is not likely to produce serious or harmful cardiovascular side effects in patients with mild heart disease.

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor which is being developed as an antidepressant. Previous studies suggest it is effective in the treatment of depression and has a low incidence of side effects. The authors report on a 6-week, randomized, prospective trial of paroxetine, imipramine, and placebo in 120 outpatients with major depression. The results showed that paroxetine was significantly superior to placebo in relieving depression. There were no significant differences in antidepressant efficacy between paroxetine and imipramine. However, paroxetine was also significantly superior to placebo on several measures of anxiety. Imipramine either was not superior on these measures or took longer to show a significant difference. Paroxetine lacked the typical anticholinergic side effects that accompanied imipramine therapy. The results show that paroxetine is an effective antidepressant that may have value especially when depression is accompanied by significant anxiety.

Depressive illness among the elderly is an important public health concern. However, treatment of the elderly may be complicated by age-related changes in physiology, general medical status, and susceptibility to side effects. There is therefore a need for improved treatment modalities for depressed elderly patients. Paroxetine is an antidepressant that acts through selective inhibition of serotonin reuptake. It lacks the anticholinergic and cardiovascular side effects of most first- and second-generation antidepressants. The authors present the combined data from two similarly designed comparisons of paroxetine and doxepin in outpatients over 60 years of age with major depression. The results show that paroxetine was an effective as doxepin in alleviating depression as measured on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score, the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL) depression factor score. Paroxetine was significantly superior to doxepin on the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale for severity of illness, the HAM-D retardation factor, and the HAM-D depressed mood item. Doxepin produced significantly more anticholinergic effects, sedation, and confusion. Paroxetine was associated with more reports of nausea and headache. These results suggest that paroxetine may be a valuable tool for the treatment of major depression in the elderly.

This retrospective evaluation involved 197 patients from independent clinical investigations of four antidepressant medications. Six variables were analyzed for their discriminative utility in predicting placebo response rates: gender; marital status; age; education; duration of illness; and severity of depressive symptomatology, as measured by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D or HDRS) scores. Men were slightly more responsive to placebo than were women (29.8%, n = 94 vs. 24.3%, n = 103). Married patients demonstrated the highest probability of a positive placebo response (38.15%, n = 76), as compared with widowed/separated/divorced (21.9%, n = 73) or single (16.7%, n = 48) patients. A trend toward an increased probability of placebo response was detected for patients aged 60 and above (35.7%, n = 14). Educational level achieved and duration of illness were not predictive. Severity of illness proved most noteworthy, with the placebo response rate higher in the more mild patients (40.8%, n = 27 vs. 23.4%, n = 77).

This report presents the results of a retrospective analysis of pooled efficacy data from eight studies in which buspirone was compared to placebo in 520 patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). In addition to evaluating overall efficacy in the composite patient data base, four criteria were used to identify subsets of patients with GAD who had coexisting depressive symptoms of at least moderate intensity: (1) a score of > or = 2 on the Hamilton Anxiety (HAM-A) Rating Scale item 6 (depressed mood), (2) a score of > or = 2 on the Hamilton Depression (HAM-D) Rating Scale item 1 (depressed mood), (3) a HAM-D total score of > or = 18, or (4) a HAM-D Retardation Factor value (items 1, 7, 8, and 14) greater than the median for the group. Overall, patients treated with buspirone demonstrated significant (p < or = 0.001) improvement over baseline in total HAM-A scores compared to patients who received placebo. Buspirone also produced significant (p < or = 0.001) global improvement compared to placebo as assessed by the attending physician. Of the GAD patients stratified according to the four criteria for coexisting depressive symptoms, a substantial percentage (44-64%) of the total patient sample exhibited significant depressive symptoms as part of their anxiety disorder. Patients with GAD and coexisting depressive symptoms of at least moderate intensity exhibited significantly greater improvement with buspirone compared to placebo treatment regardless of the stratification criterion used. They also responded at least as well or better to buspirone therapy as did those with GAD who had less intense depressive symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To compare the safety and antidepressant efficacy of paroxetine, imipramine, and placebo, data from six centres using the same protocol were pooled. A double-blind parallel-group design was used, with therapy lasting six weeks. From week 2 onwards, both the 240 paroxetine-treated and the 237 imipramine-treated patients were significantly different from the 240 placebo-treated patients, but no different from each other. Side-effects with paroxetine were less likely to lead to drop-out than with imipramine. Paroxetine had a possible earlier antidepressant effect than imipramine, and a possible earlier beneficial effect on anxiety symptoms associated with depression.

Estazolam is a new benzodiazepine hypnotic agent with an intermediate half-life of 12 to 15 hours. The authors designed an investigation to compare its hypnotic efficacy to that of flurazepam, generally considered the reference standard. The hypnotic efficacy of estazolam at two doses (1 mg and 2 mg) was compared with that of flurazepam (30 mg) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 7-night study that involved 223 outpatients with insomnia. On subjective assessments of the patients, no differences were noted between estazolam 2 mg and flurazepam 30 mg on any of six sleep parameters. Patients who were receiving estazolam 1 mg rated their sleep significantly better than did patients who were receiving placebo on all parameters except sleep latency. Global evaluation of the physicians indicated significant improvement in quality of sleep, sleep depth, sleep duration, and nocturnal awakenings in all three active treatment groups; estazolam 2 mg and flurazepam also decreased sleep latency significantly. The percentage of patients who reported any adverse experience was 68% for flurazepam, 58% for estazolam 2 mg, and 54% for estazolam 1 mg; the incidence of adverse events in the placebo group was 43%. In conclusion, estazolam 2 mg was found to be as effective a hypnotic as flurazepam 30 mg. Estazolam 1 mg is also effective in the treatment of outpatients with insomnia, but to a lesser degree.

1. To develop a diagnostic battery sensitive to and specific for the early detection of Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia, the authors reviewed over 400 journal articles dealing with the diagnosis of A.D. or senile dementia and cognitive assessment in organic brain dysfunction and closed head injury. 2. We culled those studies that met our criteria for solid, reliable and statistically significant results and recommend the testing paradigms that most often produced good discrimination of mild AD dementia from normal senescence. 3. These include tests of language, verbal and non-verbal memory, perception, praxis, attention and reasoning. 4. The battery we assembled takes less than 1 hour to administer, requires no special equipment, and was designed as an early screen for use by psychologists, psychiatrists and other trained health care professionals; it is not intended for repeated administration, as in pharmacological or longitudinal studies.

Two hundred forty-one elderly depressed patients entered the 8-week, double-blind phase of this parallel-group, multicenter study; 161 patients were randomized to receive sertraline (50-200 mg/day) and 80 were randomized to receive amitriptyline (50-150 mg/day). Among evaluable patients, there were no statistically significant differences between treatments in any of the primary efficacy variables: change in total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score (17 items), percentage change in HAM-D score, change in HAM-D Item 1, change in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Severity score, change in the Depression Factor of the 56-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist, and the CGI Improvement score at the last visit. Similar results were obtained using data from all patients (intention-to-treat analysis), except that amitriptyline was superior in HAM-D Total score (p = .044). The two drugs produced a similar degree of response: on the basis of the HAM-D criterion, 69.4% of sertraline patients and 62.5% of amitriptyline patients responded, and, on the basis of CGI criterion, 79.5% of sertraline and 73.4% of amitriptyline patients responded. Twenty-eight percent of the sertraline patients withdrew from the study because of a treatment-related side effect and 2.5% (4) because of a laboratory abnormality. In comparison, 35% of the amitriptyline patients withdrew because of treatment-related side effects. Sertraline was associated with a statistically lower frequency of somnolence, dry mouth, constipation, ataxia, and pain and a higher frequency of nausea, anorexia, diarrhea/loose stools, and insomnia; thus, anticholinergic effects were less common and gastrointestinal effects were more common with sertraline than with amitriptyline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In a blinded experiment, we report the first allelic association of the dopamine D2 receptor gene in alcoholism. From 70 brain samples of alcoholics and nonalcoholics, DNA was digested with restriction endonucleases and probed with a clone that contained the entire 3' coding exon, the polyadenylation signal, and approximately 16.4 kilobases of noncoding 3' sequence of the human dopamine D2 receptor gene (lambda hD2G1). In the present samples, the presence of A1 allele of the dopamine D2 receptor gene correctly classified 77% of alcoholics, and its absence classified 72% of nonalcoholics. The polymorphic pattern of this receptor gene suggests that a gene that confers susceptibility to at least one form of alcoholism is located on the q22-q23 region of chromosome 11.

The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of paroxetine with imipramine and placebo in depressed outpatients. Following a 4- to 14-day placebo washout, patients were randomized into treatment groups and received study compound for up to 42 days. At Day 42, paroxetine was significantly more effective than placebo (p less than .05) in several observer- and patient-rated scales: the Retardation and Anxiety/Somatization factors of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Raskin Depression Scale, the Covi Anxiety Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Improvement Scale, the Symptom Checklist-56 (SCL-56) Total, and the Patient's Global Evaluation (PGE). There were no significant differences between paroxetine and imipramine. Significantly more imipramine (75%) than paroxetine (35%) or placebo (23%) patients reported anticholinergic side effects, including blurred vision (5%, 0%, and 0%, respectively), constipation (35%, 8%, and 15%, respectively), and dry mouth (63%, 25%, and 15%, respectively). The data from this study indicated that paroxetine is a safe, well-tolerated, effective treatment for major depressive disorder.

Both nomifensine and imipramine were superior to placebo in a 4-week double-blind study involving 63 geriatric patients (greater than 60 years) with primary affective disorder-depression. Significant improvement in the active drug groups was demonstrated on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and Hopkins Symptom Check List. Analysis of laboratory and physical examination data, including ECGs, revealed no clinically significant changes associated with either drug. Compared to the imipramine group, nomifensine-treated patients showed a more rapid rate of improvement and a lower incidence of discomforting side effects.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 200 patients with moderate to moderately severe anxiety we compared the anxiolytic efficacy and safety of alprazolam and lorazepam. Dosing was flexible and ranged from 1 to 4.5 mg/day of alprazolam and from 2 to 9 mg/day of lorazepam. The mean daily dose at the end of the 16 week study was alprazolam 3.3 mg and lorazepam 5.1 mg. Both active drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in relieving the symptoms of anxiety on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, with a trend toward more improvement in the alprazolam group in the later weeks of the study. Target Symptoms, Physician's and Patient's Global Impressions and the Self Rating Symptom Scale indicate that alprazolam and lorazepam were superior to placebo. The major side effects were sedation and drowsiness; the frequency was similar for alprazolam and lorazepam and twice as high for active drug as placebo. An overall rating of side effect severity was not significantly different among the three groups.

This study investigated a therapeutic regimen of buspirone, a new anxioselective drug, in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. The single-blind study, conducted in 23 outpatients, consisted of 28 days of buspirone treatment followed by four days of placebo treatment. Patients received a single 10-mg dose of buspirone on study day one, which was titrated to 10 mg three times daily by study day seven and which remained at 10 mg three times daily through study day 28. Blood samples were drawn on days one, 14, 28, and 32 for determination of plasma levels of prolactin, growth hormone, and cortisol. The therapeutic effect of buspirone was assessed by standard psychometric rating scales. When titrated to a total daily dose of 30 mg per day (10 mg three times daily), buspirone provided effective antianxiety therapy and had no significant effect on plasma levels of prolactin, growth hormone, or cortisol.

This was a 6-week, double-blind comparison of fluoxetine, imipramine, and placebo in 89 patients with bipolar depression. Using the criteria of greater than or equal to 50% improvement in the HAMD-total score after at least 3 weeks on study drug, endpoint analysis showed 86% of the fluoxetine-treated patients improved compared with 57% of the imipramine-treated and 38% of the placebo-treated patients. Significantly fewer fluoxetine-treated patients discontinued due to adverse events than did imipramine-treated patients (7% vs. 30%, respectively).

In 72 outpatients with DSM-III major depressive episode, adinazolam was superior to placebo in all measurements. Significantly more adinazolam-treated subjects (N = 36) than placebo subjects (N = 36) completed the study (67% vs. 19%), were rated "much" or "very much" improved (78% vs. 19%), and had a "moderate" or "marked" therapeutic effect of the drug (67% vs. 19%). The total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score decreased by 50% or more in 61% of the adinazolam group and in 17% of the placebo group; 72% of the adinazolam group reported that they felt "moderately," "much," or "very much" improved compared with 17% of the placebo group. The adinazolam group reported significantly more drowsiness and lightheadedness, dizziness, or faintness; the severity of these side effects decreased with time. No significant anticholinergic effects were observed.

Pooled data for 427 patients with generalized anxiety disorders were analyzed retrospectively from six double-blind trials evaluating buspirone, a nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic, in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. After a 4- to 7-day washout period, patients were allocated at random to receive treatment over a 4-week period. Buspirone dose ranged from 10 to 60 mg. Patients were assessed on entry and at weekly intervals using the 14 symptom groups (items) of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). Buspirone improved all symptom groups significantly; onset of anxiolytic activity was observed at week 1 in 3 groups of psychic symptoms of anxiety. Within 2 weeks, 8 of the 14 symptom groups were improved significantly by buspirone versus placebo, and symptoms of anxiety improved further up to the 4-week end point. Psychic symptoms of anxiety improved earlier in general than the somatic symptoms of anxiety. At the end of treatment, analyses of the HAM-A scores indicated that all of the 14 symptom groups (individual items), the total HAM-A score, and the 2 composite Psychic and Somatic Anxiety Factors were significantly improved with buspirone as compared to placebo. The beneficial effects of buspirone were not compromised by any significant side effects.

Both alprazolam and diazepam were superior to placebo for the treatment of the clinical anxiety syndrome throughout a four-week double-blind multiclinic trial in 976 outpatients. At the fourth-week evaluation of the 845 patients completing the study, the 326 patients receiving alprazolam showed significantly more improvement than the 344 patients receiving diazepam on all 4 anxiety rating scales utilized (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Physician's Global Assessment, Patient's Global Assessment, and Target Symptoms).

Buspirone was compared to alprazolam and lorazepam in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in a 4-week, double-blind study of 60 patients. All three medications were effective and similar in producing significant reductions in anxiety as assessed by standardized anxiety rating scales and by global evaluations of patients by physicians. There were significant differences in drowsiness, lethargy, and/or fatigue: fewer patients in the buspirone group than in the alprazolam group (16% vs. 60%, respectively; p less than .01) or the lorazepam group (16% vs. 65%, respectively; p less than .0003) experienced these undesirable side effects. This demonstration of similar effectiveness and superior safety would favor buspirone in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.

Tricyclic antidepressants may prolong cardiac conduction as a result of their direct cellular membrane depressant effects. These effects can be evaluated by careful quantitative assessment of the electrocardiogram (ECG). This study compared the ECG effects of bupropion and amitriptyline at therapeutically comparable doses. No significant changes were seen with bupropion in any of the ECG parameters measured (PR interval, QRS duration, QTc interval, and QRS height). Amitriptyline, however, caused a significant prolongation in PR interval (p less than .01) and QRS duration (p less than .05), as well as a decrease in QRS height (p less than .001). These results suggest that bupropion is less likely to cause cardiac conduction abnormalities in patients prone to such problems, or in those patients who overdose.

A double-blind crossover study in 53 psychiatric outpatients compared the safety and efficacy of triazolam and placebo in relieving insomnia refractory to treatment with a tricyclic antidepressant. Patients with a depressive disorder who had been taking a TCA for at least 6 weeks received triazolam or placebo for 4 days, neither medication for 1 day, and the alternative treatment for 4 days. The antidepressant regimen was maintained throughout the study. Sleep measurements showed triazolam to be consistently more effective than placebo in promoting and maintaining sleep and enabling the patient to awaken feeling rested. No worsening in depression or anxiety was seen with either triazolam or placebo; some measures indicated improvement in anxiety and depression symptoms on triazolam. One patient on triazolam dropped out because of side effects. The most common side effect was mild to moderate drowsiness.

Buspirone, a new nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic agent, was compared with clorazepate in a double-blind, multicenter trial conducted with 336 outpatients who had moderate to severe anxiety. The two treatments were equally effective for relief of symptoms, including anxiety with associated depression. Although both agents were generally well tolerated, the profile of side effects was dissimilar. Drowsiness and depression occurred significantly (p less than 0.055) more frequently with clorazepate, whereas nausea and headache occurred significantly (p less than 0.055) more frequently with buspirone. Clorazepate-treated patients were significantly (p less than 0.055) more likely to have had an adverse experience that was considered drug related or that interfered with the therapeutic effect. In this study, buspirone was shown to be an effective antianxiety agent, causing significantly less sedation than clorazepate.

The effects of pentoxifylline on intermittent claudication were evaluated at a dose of 1200 mg/day in an open-label twelve-week study on geriatric patients with chronic occlusive arterial disease (COAD). Standardized treadmill testing and clinical signs and symptoms of COAD were followed up before and during drug administration. Twenty-four subjects with a mean age of 73.5 years, capable of walking between 20 and 200 meters on the treadmill, were entered into the trial; 22 participated for eight weeks and 19 completed the study in terms of treadmill walking distance measurements at 12 weeks. The mean walking distance for all patients was increased 111% over baseline at week 12. Thirteen subjects were considered drug responders (greater than or equal to 50% increase in treadmill walking distance) and 9 were considered nonresponders (less than 50% increase). Improvements in clinical signs and symptoms of COAD were noted. Decreases in elevated systemic systolic pressures (but not diastolic) were unexpectedly observed in many drug responders. Seven of 19 males reported sexual function improvements while receiving pentoxifylline. Fourteen (58%) of the 24 subjects reported mild side effects of dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, or insomnia; no subjects were withdrawn from the study because of side effects. In summary, pentoxifylline improved function and symptoms in 13 of 22 geriatric patients with intermittent claudication; the drug was safe and well tolerated at the usual dosage in this geriatric patient population.

Therapeutic doses of phenothiazines increased serum levels of prolactin, resulting in a number of side effects. Bromocriptine, a potent dopamine agonist, appears to effectively reduce the serum prolactin level. In this open pilot study, bromocriptine mesylate (Parlodel, Sandoz) was administered in an escalating dose schedule to 11 stabilized psychiatric outpatients with hyperprolactinemia resulting from thioridazine HCl (Mellaril, Sandoz) treatment. 6 of 9 patients showed decreases. Overall global psychiatric evaluations were unchanged over the course of combined therapy for all but 1 patient, who showed improvement. The trend of decreased prolactin serum levels indicates that bromocriptine mesylate may prove a useful adjunct to reduce the side effects of hyperprolactinemia.

A double-blind crossover study compared the hypnotic effect, daytime carryover, and safety of triazolam 0.5 mg, lorazepam 2 mg, and placebo. The two active drugs were similar in hypnotic effect and superior to placebo. Patients reported more drowsiness upon awakening and more sleepiness in mid-morning and mid-afternoon after nights on lorazepam than nights on triazolam or placebo. The most common side effects--drowsiness, lightheadedness, restlessness, impaired coordination, dizziness, and nausea--were reported three times as often with lorazepam than with triazolam or placebo.

Fluoxetine was compared to doxepin in geriatric out-patients with major depressive illness. At the end of the 6-week double-blind study, the mean endpoint scores for all rating scales were significantly improved over base-line in both treatment groups. A subsequent 48-week open-label study supported the finding that both drugs are efficacious for maintenance therapy in elderly depressed patients. Fluoxetine, which lacks anticholinergic effects and is nonsedating, was well-tolerated by most patients and had fewer total side effects than doxepin. Common drug-related side effects for fluoxetine included nervousness/anxiety and nausea. Common side effects of doxepin were dry mouth, drowsiness/sedation, constipation, and dizziness/lightheadedness.

The efficacy and safety of fluoxetine were compared with those of imipramine and of placebo in a 6-week randomized double-blind parallel study of patients with major depressive illness. Mean values for all efficacy measurements were improved over baseline with fluoxetine and imipramine treatment (p less than .001). More fluoxetine patients completed the study than did imipramine or placebo patients. Predominant adverse experiences reported by imipramine patients were dry mouth and dizziness/lightheadedness. Predominant adverse experiences reported by fluoxetine patients were drowsiness/sedation and excessive sweating. In a subsequent 48-week open-label study, the predominant adverse experience in the fluoxetine group was excessive sweating and in the imipramine group was still dry mouth. In this study, fluoxetine relieved the symptoms of major depressive illness effectively and significantly better than placebo and was better tolerated than imipramine.