1. Expanding the Application of Sentinel-2 Chlorophyll Monitoring across United States Lakes.
- Author
-
Salls WB, Schaeffer BA, Pahlevan N, Coffer MM, Seegers BN, Werdell PJ, Ferriby H, Stumpf RP, Binding CE, and Keith DJ
- Abstract
Eutrophication of inland lakes poses various societal and ecological threats, making water quality monitoring crucial. Satellites provide a comprehensive and cost-effective supplement to traditional in situ sampling. The Sentinel-2 MultiSpectral Instrument (S2 MSI) offers unique spectral bands positioned to quantify chlorophyll a , a water-quality and trophic-state indicator, along with fine spatial resolution, enabling the monitoring of small waterbodies. In this study, two algorithms-the Maximum Chlorophyll Index (MCI) and the Normalized Difference Chlorophyll Index (NDCI)-were applied to S2 MSI data. They were calibrated and validated using in situ chlorophyll a measurements for 103 lakes across the contiguous U.S. Both algorithms were tested using top-of-atmosphere reflectances ( ρ
t ), Rayleigh-corrected reflectances ( ρs ), and remote sensing reflectances ( Rrs ). MCI slightly outperformed NDCI across all reflectance products. MCI using ρt showed the best overall performance, with a mean absolute error factor of 2.08 and a mean bias factor of 1.15. Conversion of derived chlorophyll a to trophic state improved the potential for management applications, with 82% accuracy using a binary classification. We report algorithm-to-chlorophyll- a conversions that show potential for application across the U.S., demonstrating that S2 can serve as a monitoring tool for inland lakes across broad spatial scales., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Author N.P. was employed by the company Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Author M.M.C. was employed by the company Global Science & Technology, Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results..- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF