1. Clinical criteria for integrated molecular pathology in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: less is more.
- Author
-
Simpson RE, Cockerill NJ, Yip-Schneider MT, Ceppa EP, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Al-Haddad MA, and Schmidt CM
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal diagnosis, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal surgery, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Pancreatic Cyst diagnosis, Pancreatic Cyst surgery, Pancreatic Ducts pathology, Pancreatic Ducts surgery, Pancreatic Neoplasms diagnosis, Pancreatic Neoplasms surgery, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal pathology, Pancreatic Cyst pathology, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background: For pancreatic cysts with negative cytology, Integrated Molecular Pathology (IMP) is a malignancy risk score integrating clinical criteria with pancreatic cyst fluid DNA profiling. Aside from main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter, integrated clinical criteria are not International Consensus Guidelines High-Risk Stigmata. We predicted exclusion of clinical criteria except MPD diameter could simplify the IMP and better distinguish invasive/malignant disease., Methods: Records of >1100 patients with IPMN were reviewed retrospectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional IMP for invasive/malignant disease was compared to DNA profile including only MPD ≥10mm (IMP-10.) Invasive outcomes were invasive-IPMN/adenocarcinoma on surgical pathology, pathologic or radiographic evidence of invasive/metastatic disease during surveillance. Malignant outcomes included high grade dysplastic IPMN (HGD-IPMN)., Results: 225 patients who met study criteria underwent 283 IMP evaluations: 98 followed by surgery, 185 followed by ≥ 23 months surveillance. IMP-10 had greater specificity (90.1% vs. 73.7%) and accuracy (89.8% vs. 74.2%) for invasive disease compared to IMP in surgery + surveillance patients, but lower sensitivity (77.8% vs. 88.9%). Trends were similar in surgery patients alone and malignant outcome analyses., Conclusion: IMP-10 excludes less-reliable clinical factors resulting in greater accuracy in predicting invasive/malignant disease and fewer patients with benign disease being recommended for surgery., (Copyright © 2018 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF