Search

IMPORTANCE Correct diagnosis of ovarian cancer results in better prognosis. Adnexal lesions can be stratified into the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) risk of malignancy categories with either the O-RADS lexicon, proposed by the American College of Radiology, or the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) 2-step strategy. OBJECTIVE To investigate the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS lexicon and the IOTA 2-step strategy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective external diagnostic validation study based on interim data of IOTA5, a prospective international multicenter cohort study, in 36 oncology referral centers or other types of centers. A total of 8519 consecutive adult patients presenting with an adnexal mass between January 1, 2012, and March 1, 2015, and treated either with surgery or conservatively were included in this diagnostic study. Twenty-five patients were excluded for withdrawal of consent, 2777 were excluded from 19 centers that did not meet predefined data quality criteria, and 812 were excluded because they were already in follow-up at recruitment. The analysis included 4905 patients with a newly detected adnexal mass in 17 centers that met predefined data quality criteria. Data were analyzed from January 31 to March 1, 2022. EXPOSURES Stratification into O-RADS categories (malignancy risk < 1%, 1% to < 10%, 10% to < 50%, and-50%). For the IOTA 2-step strategy, the stratification is based on the individual risk of malignancy calculated with the IOTA 2-step strategy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Observed prevalence of malignancy in each O-RADS risk category, as well as sensitivity and specificity. The reference standard was the status of the tumor at inclusion, determined by histology or clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up for 1 year. Multiple imputation was used for uncertain outcomes owing to inconclusive follow-up information. RESULTS Median age of the 4905 patients was 48 years (IQR, 36-62 years). Data

Importance: Correct diagnosis of ovarian cancer results in better prognosis. Adnexal lesions can be stratified into the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) risk of malignancy categories with either the O-RADS lexicon, proposed by the American College of Radiology, or the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) 2-step strategy. Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS lexicon and the IOTA 2-step strategy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective external diagnostic validation study based on interim data of IOTA5, a prospective international multicenter cohort study, in 36 oncology referral centers or other types of centers. A total of 8519 consecutive adult patients presenting with an adnexal mass between January 1, 2012, and March 1, 2015, and treated either with surgery or conservatively were included in this diagnostic study. Twenty-five patients were excluded for withdrawal of consent, 2777 were excluded from 19 centers that did not meet predefined data quality criteria, and 812 were excluded because they were already in follow-up at recruitment. The analysis included 4905 patients with a newly detected adnexal mass in 17 centers that met predefined data quality criteria. Data were analyzed from January 31 to March 1, 2022. Exposures: Stratification into O-RADS categories (malignancy risk <1%, 1% to <10%, 10% to <50%, and ≥50%). For the IOTA 2-step strategy, the stratification is based on the individual risk of malignancy calculated with the IOTA 2-step strategy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Observed prevalence of malignancy in each O-RADS risk category, as well as sensitivity and specificity. The reference standard was the status of the tumor at inclusion, determined by histology or clinical and ultrasonographic follow-up for 1 year. Multiple imputation was used for uncertain outcomes owing to inconclusive follow-up information. Results: Median age of the 4905 patients was 48 years (IQR, 36-62 years).

PURPOSE: Housekeeping genes (HKGs), reference or endogenous control genes, are vital to normalize mRNA levels between different samples. Since using inappropriate HKGs can lead to unreliable results, selecting the proper ones is critical for gene expression studies. To this end, normal human ovaries, as well as those from patients diagnosed with ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma (OEA), ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma (OMA), ovarian serous papillary carcinoma (OSPC), and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), were used to identify the most suitable housekeeping genes. METHODS: RNA was isolated from 5 normal human ovaries (52-79 years of age), 9 cancerous ovaries (3 OEA, 3 OMA, 3 OSPC; 49-75 years of age), and 4 PCOS ovaries (18-35 years of age) in women undergoing hysterectomy. cDNA was synthesized using a whole transcriptome kit, and quantitative real-time PCR was performed using TaqMan array 96-well plates containing 32 human endogenous controls in triplicate. RESULTS: Among 32 HKGs studied, RPS17, RPL37A, PPIA, 18srRNA, B2M, RPLP0, RPLP30, HPRT1, POP4, CDKN1B, and ELF1 were selected as the best reference genes. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms recent investigations demonstrating that conventional HKGs, such as GAPDH and beta-actin, are not suitable reference genes for specific pathological conditions, emphasizing the importance of determining the best HKGs on a case-by-case basis and according to tissue type. Our results have identified reliable HKGs for studies of normal human ovaries and those affected by OEA, OMA, OSPC, or PCOS, as well as combined studies of control subjects vs. each cancer or PCOS group.