Search

Background: Pharmacokinetic (PK) boosting is the intentional use of a drug-drug interaction to enhance systemic drug exposure. PK boosting of olaparib, a CYP3A-substrate, has the potential to reduce PK variability and financial burden. The aim of this study was to investigate equivalence of a boosted, reduced dose of olaparib compared to the non-boosted standard dose., Methods: This cross-over, multicentre trial compared olaparib 300 mg twice daily (BID) with olaparib 100 mg BID boosted with the strong CYP3A-inhibitor cobicistat 150 mg BID. Patients were randomised to the standard therapy followed by the boosted therapy, or vice versa. After seven days of each therapy, dense PK sampling was performed for noncompartmental PK analysis. Equivalence was defined as a 90% Confidence Interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the boosted versus standard therapy area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC 0-12 h ) within no-effect boundaries. These boundaries were set at 0.57-1.25, based on previous pharmacokinetic studies with olaparib capsules and tablets., Results: Of 15 included patients, 12 were eligible for PK analysis. The GMR of the AUC 0-12 h was 1.45 (90% CI 1.27-1.65). No grade ≥3 adverse events were reported during the study., Conclusions: Boosting a 100 mg BID olaparib dose with cobicistat increases olaparib exposure 1.45-fold, compared to the standard dose of 300 mg BID. Equivalence of the boosted olaparib was thus not established. Boosting remains a promising strategy to reduce the olaparib dose as cobicistat increases olaparib exposure Adequate tolerability of the boosted therapy with higher exposure should be established., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: RHJM reports research funding paid to the institute from Astellas, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cristal Therapeutics, Novartis, Pamgene, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Servier. IB reports research funding paid to the institute from GSK. PH reports personal fees from Astellas and consulting or advisory fees from Astellas, MSD, Pfizer AstraZeneca, BMS, Ipsen. GSS reports research funding paid to the institute from Agendia, AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Seagen and a consulting role for Biovica and Seagen. NPvE reports research funding paid to the institute from Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. JKO, NADG, MIMA, PBO, HJB, SLWK, ADRH, FLO and RtH declare no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Exposure to osimertinib, a third generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a sensitizing EGFR mutation, can be substantially below average. We evaluated whether plasma levels could be boosted by co-administration of cobicistat, a strong Cytochrome P450 3A-inhibitor., Methods: This was a pharmacokinetic, proof-of-concept clinical trial (the OSIBOOST trial, NCT03858491). NSCLC-patients with osimertinib were eligible if their steady state osimertinib plasma trough concentration was low (≤195 ng/mL). On day 1, the area under the plasma curve (AUC 0-24,ss ) of osimertinib and its metabolite (AZ5104) was calculated using a limited sampling strategy (four samples). Cobicistat co-treatment (150 mg, once daily) was started on day 2. Between day 22-26, a second AUC was determined. Cobicistat dose could be escalated if the osimertinib trough concentration was still ≤ 195 ng/mL, in the absence of toxicity. Primary endpoint was the increase in osimertinib exposure, secondary endpoint was toxicity. Cobicistat could be continued during the expanded access phase, with follow-up (2-4 months) of the boosting effect., Results: The mean baseline osimertinib trough concentration for the eleven enrolled patients was 154 ng/mL. In all patients, cobicistat addition led to an increase in osimertinib exposure. Mean increase in total AUC 0-24ss (AUC osimertinib + AUC AZ5104) was 60%, (range 19%-192%). The boosting effect was consistent over time. No grade ≥ 2 toxicity was observed., Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic boosting of osimertinib with cobicistat in patients with NSCLC is feasible without increasing toxicity, although the degree of boosting is variable., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Fostemsavir is a prodrug of temsavir, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds directly to HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial viral attachment and entry into host CD4 + T cells with demonstrated efficacy in phase 2 and 3. Temsavir is a P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) substrate; its metabolism is mediated by esterase and CYP3A4 enzymes. Drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A, P-glycoprotein, and BCRP may affect temsavir concentrations. Understanding potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) following fostemsavir coadministration with antiretrovirals approved for HIV-1-infected treatment-experienced patients, including darunavir plus cobicistat (DRV/c) or DRV plus low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) and etravirine, is clinically relevant. Open-label, single-sequence, multiple-dose, multicohort DDI studies were conducted in healthy participants ( n  = 46; n  = 32). The primary objective was to assess the effects of DRV/r, etravirine, DRV/r plus etravirine, cobicistat, and DRV/c on temsavir systemic exposures; safety was a secondary objective. Compared with fostemsavir alone, coadministration with DRV/r increased the temsavir maximum observed plasma concentration ( C max ), area under the concentration-time curve in one dosing interval (AUC tau ), and plasma trough concentration ( C tau ) by 52%, 63%, and 88%, respectively, while etravirine decreased the temsavir C max , AUC tau , and C tau by ∼50% each. DRV/r plus etravirine increased the temsavir C max , AUC tau , and C tau by 53%, 34%, and 33%, respectively. Compared with fostemsavir alone, coadministration with cobicistat increased the temsavir C max , AUC tau , and C tau by 71%, 93%, and 136%, respectively; DRV/c increased the temsavir C max , AUC tau , and C tau by 79%, 97%, and 124%, respectively. Fostemsavir with all combinations was generally well tolerated. No dose adjustment is required for fostemsavir when coadministered with strong CYP3A inhibitors, P-glycoprotein inhibitors, and modest inducers, including regimens with DRV/r, DRV/c, cobicistat, etravirine, and DRV/r plus etravirine based on the therapeutic margin for temsavir (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02063360 and NCT02277600).

Background: Bictegravir coformulated with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide as a fixed-dose combination (BIC/FTC/TAF 50/200/25 mg) is recommended as an initial regimen in patients who are antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve or virologically suppressed on a stable ARV regimen. However, no real-world pharmacokinetic (PK) data are available in treatment-experienced patients with antiretroviral resistance receiving BIC/FTC/TAF plus a boosted protease inhibitor., Setting/methods: This prospective, single-center, nonrandomized pharmacokinetic study enrolled adult treatment-experienced persons with HIV and creatinine clearance >30 mL/min receiving BIC/FTC/TAF + DRV/c as part of routine clinical care. Steady-state PK profiles of BIC, TAF, tenofovir (TFV), and DRV after daily dosing of BIC/FTC/TAF + darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) were obtained with samples at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours postdose. The AUC0-24 at steady state was extrapolated by imputing C0 for C24 for each participant (AUC0-tau,exp)., Results: Nine participants were enrolled with a median age of 59 years (range 54-67) and median number of years on ART of 19 (range 5.8-30). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) BIC AUC0-tau,exp and Cmax values were 128.9 µg*h/mL (78.1-159.5) and 6.9 µg/mL (5.1-9.8), respectively. The median (IQR) TAF AUC0-tau,exp and Cmax values were 0.376 µg*h/mL (0.199-0.430) and 0.276 µg/mL (0.149-0.543), respectively. Predose concentrations of TFV and DRV were comparable with historical data., Conclusion: Treatment-experienced persons with HIV receiving BIC/FTC/TAF + darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) had BIC exposures (AUC0-tau) that were increased by approximately 26% compared with historical PK data. Although TAF exposures were substantially increased, plasma TFV was only modestly higher. These results suggest that BIC/TAF/FTC + DRV/c is a viable antiviral regimen option for treatment-experienced persons., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bictegravir is equally metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies were only conducted for strong inhibitors and inducers, leading to some uncertainty whether moderate perpetrators or multiple drug associations can be safely coadministered with bictegravir. We used physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to simulate DDI magnitudes of various scenarios to guide the clinical DDI management of bictegravir. Clinically observed DDI data for bictegravir coadministered with voriconazole, darunavir/cobicistat, atazanavir/cobicistat, and rifampicin were predicted within the 95% confidence interval of the PBPK model simulations. The area under the curve (AUC) ratio of the DDI divided by the control scenario was always predicted within 1.25-fold of the clinically observed data, demonstrating the predictive capability of the used modeling approach. After the successful verification, various DDI scenarios with drug pairs and multiple concomitant drugs were simulated to analyze their effect on bictegravir exposure. Generally, our simulation results suggest that bictegravir should not be coadministered with strong CYP3A and UGT1A1 inhibitors and inducers (e.g., atazanavir, nilotinib, and rifampicin), but based on the present modeling results, bictegravir could be administered with moderate dual perpetrators (e.g., efavirenz). Importantly, the inducing effect of rifampicin on bictegravir was predicted to be reversed with the concomitant administration of a strong inhibitor such as ritonavir, resulting in a DDI magnitude within the efficacy and safety margin for bictegravir (0.5-2.4-fold). In conclusion, the PBPK modeling strategy can effectively be used to guide the clinical management of DDIs for novel drugs with limited clinical experience, such as bictegravir., (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

The single-tablet regimen darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg has undergone phase III studies AMBER (NCT02431247) and EMERALD (NCT02269917) in HIV-infected patients. An existing population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model for cobicistat-boosted darunavir (DRV) was updated to describe DRV PK in AMBER and EMERALD. For TAF, a PopPK model was developed using richly sampled phase I/II data and updated with sparsely sampled AMBER data. Individual exposure metrics for DRV and TAF in patients receiving D/C/F/TAF were derived (AMBER, n=356; EMERALD, n=750). The DRV PopPK model is a two-compartment model with sequential zero-order, first-order input. TAF PK is described by a one-compartment model with dual parallel input for absorption (slow and fast pathway). DRV covariates were α1-acid-glycoprotein and body weight. TAF covariates were lean body weight and α1-acid-glycoprotein. DRV and TAF PK were unaffected by age, race, or gender. Estimated DRV mean (SD) C 0h and AUC 24h , respectively, were 1899 (759) ng/mL and 87,909 (20,232) ng*h/mL in AMBER; 1813 (859) ng/mL and 85,972 (22,413) ng*h/mL in EMERALD. Estimated TAF mean (SD) AUC 24h was 132 (41) ng*h/mL. These PK parameters were in line with historical data. No apparent relationships of DRV or TAF exposure with efficacy (virologic response) or safety (metabolic, cardiac, liver, gastrointestinal, skin, bone, renal, pancreas, lipid events) parameters were seen. Additionally, our findings demonstrate that in patients with low plasma concentrations, there is no risk of decreased virologic response or virologic rebound. This supports the use of a once-daily, single-tablet regimen of D/C/F/TAF 800/150/200/10 mg for the treatment of HIV-1-infected subjects.

The inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) crizotinib significantly increases survival in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When evaluating crizotinib pharmacokinetics (PKs) in patients taking the standard flat oral dose of 250 mg b.i.d., interindividual PK variability is substantial and patient survival is lower in the quartile with the lowest steady-state trough plasma concentrations (C min,ss ), suggesting that concentrations should be monitored and doses individualized. We investigated whether the CYP3A inhibitor cobicistat increases C min,ss of the CYP3A substrate crizotinib in patients with low exposure. Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC of our outpatient clinic treated with crizotinib were enrolled in a phase I trial (EudraCT 2016-002187-14, DRKS00012360) if crizotinib C min,ss was below 310 ng/mL and treated with cobicistat for 14 days. Crizotinib plasma concentration profiles were established before and after a 14-day co-administration of cobicistat to construct the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in the dosing interval from zero to 12 hours (AUC 0-12 ). Patients were also monitored for adverse events by physical examination, laboratory tests, and 12-lead echocardiogram. Enrolment was prematurely stopped because of the approval of alectinib, a next-generation ALK-inhibitor with superior efficacy. In the only patient enrolled, cobicistat increased C min,ss from 158 ng/mL (before cobicistat) to 308 ng/mL (day 8) and 417 ng/mL (day 14 on cobicistat), concurrently the AUC 0-12 increased by 78% from 2,210 ng/mL*h to 3,925 ng/mL*h. Neither safety signals nor serious adverse events occurred. Pharmacoenhancement with cobicistat as an alternative for dose individualisation for patients with NSCLC with low crizotinib exposure appears to be safe and is cost-effective and feasible., (© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between dabigatran and ritonavir/cobicistat are of major concern in people living with HIV, particularly in those with impaired renal function, because they can result in increased dabigatran exposure and thus an increased risk of major bleeding events. However, the extent of this interaction and subsequent need for dose adjustment in subjects with varying degrees of renal function is currently not yet fully understood. To close this knowledge gap, we conducted an integrated population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis linking changes in dabigatran exposure due to DDIs and varying degrees of renal function to the probability of experiencing an ischemic stroke or major bleeding event within 1 year. The results of our analysis suggest that coadministration of dabigatran etexilate (dabigatran prodrug) and ritonavir/cobicistat should be avoided in subjects with severe renal impairment. A 2-hour dose separation or dabigatran etexilate dose reduction to 110 mg b.i.d. (twice daily) should be considered in subjects with moderate renal impairment when coadministered with ritonavir, while the dabigatran etexilate dose should be further reduced to 75 mg b.i.d. when coadministered with cobicistat. No dabigatran etexilate dose adjustment is needed in subjects with normal renal function receiving ritonavir, but dabigatran etexilate dose reduction to 110 mg b.i.d. should be considered when coadministered with cobicistat., (© 2020 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2020 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: The potential for clinically significant drug interactions (CSDIs) for patients taking ritonavir and cobicistat is high because of their powerful pharmacokinetic effect on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system, most notably their inhibitory effect on CYP3A4., Aims: An audit was conducted to measure and correct for patients exposed to potentially dangerous drug interactions., Methods: Two hundred individuals attending a regional specialist human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic between June and September 2014 who were receiving the pharmacokinetic enhancers ritonavir or cobicistat were interviewed to determine a medication history including medications prescribed by their general practitioner (GP), over-the-counter (OTC) medicines, herbal remedies and recreational drugs., Results: Of the 200 patients interviewed, patients were aged 23-76 years (median age was 41.5), 64% were female and 173 reported taking a co-medication. Sixty-six (33%) were taking a medication or medications which had no significant drug interaction associated with them. One hundred and seven (54%) were taking one or more medications with a CSDI which could require a dose adjustment, close monitoring or an absolute contraindication. Only 27% of these co-medications were identified in the normal course of an outpatient visit outside of the audit., Conclusion: A detailed medication history is often lacking at routine HIV follow-up visits. There is a significant risk of CSDIs in this cohort. Awareness of physicians and pharmacists needs to be raised. Implementation of several innovative strategies to capture the most accurate medication histories and avoid drug toxicities now employed in this cohort is also discussed here.

Introduction : Ritonavir and cobicistat are pharmacoenhancers used to improve the disposition of other HIV antiretrovirals. These drugs are, however, characterized by important pharmacokinetic differences. Areas covered : Here, the authors firstly update the available information on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir and cobicistat. Subsequently, the review focuses on the description of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving cobicistat and comedications that might beneficiate from a shift-back to ritonavir. A MEDLINE Pubmed search for articles published from January 1995 to April 2019 was completed matching the term ritonavir or cobicistat with pharmacokinetics, DDIs, and pharmacology. Moreover, additional studies were identified from the reference list of retrieved articles. Expert opinion : Despite more than 20 years after its introduction on the market, ritonavir still represents a valid option for the treatment of selected HIV-infected patients. The large-scale switch to cobicistat may result in some unexpected DDIs not previously reported for ritonavir. Besides the issue of DDIs, additional advantage of ritonavir over cobicistat is its use in pregnancy, and its availability as single component of pharmaceutical formulations allowing the fine-tuning of antiretroviral regimens in patients with heavy polypharmacy when other unboosted-based therapeutic options cannot be used.

Treatment of individuals coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) requires careful consideration of potential drug-drug interactions. The pharmacokinetic interaction of the HCV fixed-dose combination treatment of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) when coadministered with the fixed-dose combination HIV treatment of elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (EVG/COB/TDF/FTC) was evaluated in 22 healthy adults. In period 1, oral doses of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC (150 mg/150 mg/300 mg/200 mg) were administered once daily for 7 days. In period 2, oral doses of EBR/GZR (50 mg/100 mg) were administered once daily for 10 days. In period 3, oral doses of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC were coadministered with EBR/GZR once daily for 10 days. The pharmacokinetics of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC were not clinically meaningfully altered by concomitant EBR/GZR administration. Geometric mean ratios (90%CIs) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC 0-24 ) in the presence/absence of EBR/GZR were 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) for elvitegravir; 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) for emtricitabine; 1.2 (1.1, 1.2) for tenofovir; and 1.5 (1.4, 1.6) for cobicistat. In comparison, the AUC 0-24 of elbasvir was ∼2 times higher and the AUC 0-24 of grazoprevir was ∼5 times higher following concomitant administration of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC and EBR/GZR. Geometric mean ratios (90%CI) for AUC 0-24 in the presence/absence of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC were 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) for elbasvir and 5.4 (4.5, 6.4) for grazoprevir. Coadministration of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC and EBR/GZR was generally well tolerated in healthy adults in this study. Nevertheless, because of the increased GZR exposure that occurs with coadministration of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC and EBR/GZR, coadministration of this combination is not recommended in those coinfected with HIV and HCV., (© 2019, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

: Product labels for cobicistat with atazanavir or darunavir, and for elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir (alafenamide or disoproxil fumarate) were recently updated to state that these products are not recommended for initiation during pregnancy, and an alternative regimen is recommended for those who become pregnant during therapy with these products. Herein, we present the rationale for these recommendations, which are based on studies in pregnant women evaluating the pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of darunavir/cobicistat or elvitegravir/cobicistat-containing antiretroviral regimens. In these studies, mean steady-state minimum concentrations in the second and third trimester versus postpartum of cobicistat, darunavir, and elvitegravir were reduced by 61-83%, 89-92%, and 82-86%, respectively. In the absence of data with atazanavir/cobicistat, we leveraged the available data with darunavir/cobicistat and elvitegravir/cobicistat to make recommendations for atazanavir/cobicistat. Darunavir/ritonavir and atazanavir/ritonavir remain viable treatment options for pregnant women.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate darunavir and cobicistat pharmacokinetics in pregnant women with HIV-1 infection., Methods: This phase 3b, open-label study enrolled HIV-1-infected pregnant women (18-26 weeks of gestation) receiving combination antiretroviral therapy with once-daily darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg. The plasma pharmacokinetics of darunavir (total and unbound) and cobicistat were assessed over 24 h during the second and third trimesters (24-28 and 34-38 weeks of gestation, respectively) and 6-12 weeks postpartum. Pharmacokinetic parameters [area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC 24 h ), maximum plasma concentration (C max ) and minimum plasma concentration (C min )] were derived using noncompartmental analysis and compared using linear mixed effects modelling (pregnancy versus postpartum). Antiviral activity and safety were evaluated., Results: Seven women were enrolled in the study; six completed it. Total darunavir exposure was lower during pregnancy than postpartum (AUC 24 h , 50-56% lower; C max , 37-49% lower; C min , 89-92% lower); unbound darunavir exposure was also reduced (AUC 24 h , 40-45% lower; C max , 32-41% lower; C min , 88-92% lower). Cobicistat exposure was also lower during pregnancy than postpartum (AUC 24 h , 49-63% lower; C max , 27-50% lower; C min , 83% lower). At study completion, five of six (83%) women were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL). There was one virological failure (the patient was nonadherent; no emerging genotypic resistance was observed and susceptibility to antiretrovirals was maintained). No mother-to-child transmission was detected among six infants born to the six women who completed the study. Overall, darunavir/cobicistat was well tolerated in women and infants., Conclusions: In view of markedly reduced darunavir and cobicistat exposures during pregnancy, this combination is not recommended in HIV-1-infected pregnant women., (© 2019 British HIV Association.)

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) is an oral once-daily single-tablet regimen for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection. Different administration modalities for the D/C/F/TAF fixed-dose combination tablet were explored in this phase 1 randomized, open-label, 3-period, 3-treatment crossover study enrolling 30 healthy adults. The primary objective was to assess the relative bioavailability of each component after a single dose of D/C/F/TAF (800/150/200/10 mg) administered as a split or crushed tablet (tests) versus swallowed whole (reference). Pharmacokinetic parameters (noncompartmental analysis; logarithm-transformed) for each component were compared using linear mixed-effects modeling. For the split versus whole tablet, the bioavailabilities (maximum plasma concentration [C max ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC last ]) of each D/C/F/TAF component were comparable. For the crushed versus whole tablet, the bioavailabilities of darunavir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine were comparable, except for a 17% decrease in emtricitabine C max ; the relative bioavailability of tenofovir alafenamide decreased by 29% and 19% for C max and AUC last , respectively. All intakes were safe and generally well tolerated. In summary, there was no clinically relevant impact on the bioavailability of D/C/F/TAF components when administered as a split tablet compared with a tablet swallowed whole. Administration of a crushed tablet resulted in a modest decrease in tenofovir alafenamide bioavailability; the clinical relevance of this change has not been assessed but is expected to be minimal based on the wide therapeutic window for this agent., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

The effect of food on the bioavailability of the components of the once-daily, single-tablet human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 regimen containing darunavir (DRV 800 mg), cobicistat (COBI 150 mg), emtricitabine (FTC 200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF 10 mg) (D/C/F/TAF) (NCT02475135) and the bioequivalence of D/C/F/TAF versus combined intake of the separate agents (NCT02578550) were evaluated. These were 2 phase 1, open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover studies (7-day washout between treatments) in HIV-negative healthy volunteers. Twenty-four participants each received a single dose of D/C/F/TAF in fasted conditions (test) or after a standardized high-fat breakfast (reference). Ninety-six participants each received a single dose of D/C/F/TAF (test) or combined intake of a single DRV 800-mg tablet, a COBI 150-mg tablet, and an FTC/TAF 200/10-mg tablet (reference), both after a standardized regular-calorie, regular-fat breakfast. Pharmacokinetic profiles for all D/C/F/TAF components, safety, and tolerability were assessed. Following D/C/F/TAF in fasted conditions, DRV peak concentration, area under the concentration-time curve from time of administration until the last time point with a measurable concentration (AUC) last , and extrapolated to infinity (AUC inf ) were lower by 45%, 34%, and 30%, respectively, compared with fed conditions, with no clinically relevant differences in COBI, FTC, or TAF exposures between fed and fasted conditions. In the bioequivalence study 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios of all main pharmacokinetic parameters were within the 80.00% to 125.00% bioequivalence limits for DRV, COBI, FTC, and TAF. No grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, deaths, or discontinuations due to AEs occurred. D/C/F/TAF is bioequivalent to combined administration of the separate agents. Consistent with other (co)formulations of DRV, DRV exposure was lower in fasted than in fed conditions as evaluated when taken with food, so D/C/F/TAF should be taken with food., (© 2018 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Dolutegravir combined with darunavir/cobicistat is a promising NRTI-sparing and/or salvage strategy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection., Methods: This Phase I, open-label, 57 day, crossover, pharmacokinetic (PK) study, enrolled healthy volunteers aged 18-65 years, who were randomized to one of two groups. Group 1 received dolutegravir (50 mg) once daily for 14 days followed by a 7 day washout, then a 14 day dolutegravir/darunavir/cobicistat (DTG/DRV/COBI) once-daily co-administration period followed by a 7 day washout and finally a 14 day period of darunavir/cobicistat (800/150 mg) once daily. Group 2 followed the same sequence starting with darunavir/cobicistat and concluding with dolutegravir. Each group underwent intensive PK sampling over 24 h on day 14 of each drug period and DTG/DRV/COBI concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods., Results: Twenty participants completed all PK phases. Thirteen were female and median age and BMI were 33.5 years and 27 kg/m2. Dolutegravir geometric mean ratios (GMR, DTG/DRV/COBI versus dolutegravir alone) and 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-24 and C24 were 1.01 (0.92-1.11), 0.95 (0.87-1.04) and 0.9 (0.8-1.0), respectively. Darunavir GMR (DRV/COBI/DTG versus darunavir/cobicistat alone) and 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-24 and C24 were 0.90 (0.83-0.98), 0.93 (0.86-1.00) and 0.93 (0.78-1.11), respectively. No grade 3 or 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were observed., Conclusions: Concentrations of dolutegravir and darunavir, when boosted with cobicistat, decreased by <10% during co-administration, suggesting this combination can be prescribed safely in the treatment of HIV-1, with no adjustment to current guideline-recommended dosages.

Background: Cobicistat (COBI), a CYP3A inhibitor, is a pharmacokinetic enhancer that increases exposures of the HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) atazanavir (ATV) and darunavir (DRV). The potential drug interaction between COBI-boosted PIs and hormonal contraceptives, which are substrates of intestinal efflux transporters and extensively metabolized by CYP enzymes, glucuronidation and sulfation, was evaluated., Methods: This was a Phase I, open-label, two cohort (n=18/cohort), fixed-sequence study in healthy females that evaluated the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between multiple-dose ATV+COBI or DRV+COBI and single-dose drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (EE). DDIs were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals of the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test (drospirenone/EE+boosted PI) versus reference (drospirenone/EE) using lack of DDI boundaries of 70-143%. Safety was assessed throughout the study., Results: 29/36 participants completed the study. Relative to drospirenone/EE alone, drospirenone area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC inf ) was 1.6-fold and 2.3-fold higher, and maximum observed plasma concentration (C max ) was unaltered, upon coadministration with DRV+COBI and ATV+COBI, respectively. EE AUC inf decreased 30% with drospirenone/EE + DRV+COBI and was unchanged with ATV+COBI + drospirenone/EE, relative to drospirenone/EE alone. Study treatments were generally well tolerated. The majority of adverse events were mild and consistent with known safety profiles of the compounds., Conclusions: Consistent with COBI-mediated CYP3A inhibition, drospirenone exposure increased following coadministration with COBI-containing regimens, with a greater increase with ATV+COBI. Thus, clinical monitoring for drospirenone-associated hyperkalaemia is recommended with DRV+COBI and ATV+COBI should not be used with drospirenone. Lower EE exposure with DRV+COBI may be attributed to inductive effects of DRV on CYP enzymes and/or intestinal efflux transporters (that is, P-gp) involved in EE disposition.

Objective: To evaluate elvitegravir and cobicistat pharmacokinetics during pregnancy compared with postpartum and in infant washout samples after delivery., Design: Nonrandomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter phase-IV prospective study of antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected pregnant women and their children in the United States., Methods: Intensive steady-state 24-h pharmacokinetic profiles after 150 mg of elvitegravir and 150 mg of cobicistat given orally in fixed dose combination once-daily were performed during the second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum. Infant washout samples were collected after birth. Elvitegravir and cobicistat were measured in plasma by a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry assay with a lower quantitation limit of 10 ng/ml. A two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α = 0.10) was employed for paired within-participant comparisons., Results: Thirty pregnant women taking elvitegravir and cobicistat once-daily enrolled in the study. Compared with paired postpartum data, elvitegravir AUC0-24 was 24% lower in the second trimester [n = 14, P = 0.058, geometric mean ratios (GMR) = 0.76, 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.0] and 44% lower in the third trimester (n = 24, P = 0.0001, GMR = 0.56, 90% CI 0.42-0.73), while cobicistat AUC0-24 was 44% lower in the second trimester (n = 14, P = 0.0085, GMR = 0.56, 90% CI 0.37-0.85) and 59% lower in the third trimester (n = 24, P < 0.0001, GMR = 0.41, 90% CI 0.30-0.57). Median cord blood elvitegravir concentration was 540.6 ng/ml and the median ratio of cord blood to maternal plasma elvitegravir concentrations was 0.91., Conclusion: Standard elvitegravir and cobicistat dosing during pregnancy results in significantly lower exposure which may increase the risk of virologic failure and mother-to-child transmission. Additional studies are needed to optimize elvitegravir and cobicistat dosing regimens in pregnant women.

Elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF) is specified in its package insert to be taken with food to obtain sufficient exposure of EVG. It has been reported that a nutritional protein-rich drink shows comparable pharmacokinetics (PK) of EVG to those with a standard breakfast. In this study, the PK profiles of EVG and COBI were evaluated by administration of a single dose of EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF, after ingestion of either a nutritional protein-rich drink, milk, or apple juice. The geometric means for C max and AUC inf of EVG following milk ingestion slightly decreased by 21% and 14%, respectively, and those following apple juice ingestion decreased by 67% and 61%, respectively, compared with a nutritional protein-rich drink. There were no differences in any PK parameters of COBI. Therefore, taking EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF after milk or apple juice ingestion appeared to be not appropriate. However, for plasma trough concentrations (C tau ), it is known that C tau is best correlated with the efficacy of EVG. The mean C 24 of EVG after milk ingestion was 620.6 ng/mL, which was more than 10-fold the protein binding-adjusted 95% inhibitory concentration. With all the above considerations, it was concluded that taking EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF with milk could be an option to maintain sufficient plasma concentrations of EVG., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir AF (Symtuza ® ) is the first protease inhibitor (PI)-based single-tablet regimen (STR) available for the treatment of adults and adolescents (aged ≥ 12 years) with HIV-1 infection. It combines the PI darunavir (which has a high genetic barrier to resistance) with the pharmacokinetic booster cobicistat and the nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (tenofovir AF), the latter being associated with less off-target tenofovir exposure than its predecessor tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF). Over 48 weeks in phase 3 trials, darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir AF was noninferior to darunavir/cobicistat plus emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in establishing virological suppression in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve adults and, likewise, was noninferior to an ongoing boosted PI, emtricitabine plus tenofovir DF regimen in preventing virological rebound in virologically-suppressed, ART-experienced adults. Resistance did not emerge to the STR components, with the exception being an emtricitabine resistance-associated mutation (RAM) [M184I/V] in one of seven recipients who experienced virological failure (although M184V was a minority variant at screening in this patient). Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir AF was generally well tolerated, with renal and bone profile improvements but less favourable effects on some lipids versus tenofovir DF-based regimens. Thus, although longer-term and cost-effectiveness data would be beneficial, darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir AF is a welcome addition to the STRs available for the treatment of adults and adolescents with HIV-1 infection, being the first to combine the high genetic resistance barrier of darunavir with the renal/bone profile of tenofovir AF, thus expanding the patient population for whom an STR may be suitable.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of lower respiratory tract infections in young children. Presatovir (previously GS-5806) is a novel, orally administered RSV fusion inhibitor with a favorable safety profile and proven antiviral efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies. In vitro, presatovir is a substrate of the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and hepatic uptake transporters organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 and OATP1B3 and is slowly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and CYP3A5. This study enrolled 64 healthy subjects to evaluate the effect of cyclosporine, a P-gp, BCRP, and OATP1B1/1B3 inhibitor; rifampin, a strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inducer; efavirenz, a moderate CYP3A4 inducer; and cobicistat, a potent CYP3A inhibitor, on presatovir pharmacokinetics. Presatovir plasma exposures (maximum observed plasma concentration [C max ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUC inf ]) were not affected by coadministration of cyclosporine, suggesting presatovir is not a sensitive substrate of P-gp, BCRP, or OATP1B1/1B3. As expected, based on the role of CYP3A in presatovir metabolism, presatovir exposure was increased by cobicistat (122% in AUC inf ), and decreased by rifampin (40.3% in C max and 82.5% in AUC inf ) and efavirenz (55.7% in AUC inf ). These data support coadministration of presatovir with inhibitors of P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1/1B3, or CYP3A, but not with moderate or strong CYP3A4 inducers. Presatovir was well-tolerated with the most common drug-related adverse events of dizziness (n = 12) and somnolence (n = 4) reported during efavirenz treatment., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Objectives: To determine the effect of etravirine on the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/cobicistat and vice versa. Safety and tolerability of this combination were also evaluated., Methods: Open-label, fixed-sequence trial in two cohorts of HIV-infected patients on therapy with darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg once daily (DRV cohort; n = 15) or etravirine 400 mg once daily (ETR cohort; n = 15). Etravirine or darunavir/cobicistat were added on days 1-14 and 1-7 in participants in the DRV or ETR cohort, respectively. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on days 0 and 14 in the DRV cohort, and on days 0 and 7 in the ETR cohort. Darunavir, cobicistat and etravirine pharmacokinetic parameters [AUC0-24, Cmax and trough concentrations in plasma (C24)] were calculated for each individual by non-compartmental analysis and were compared using linear mixed-effects models. Adverse events and HIV-1 RNA in plasma were monitored., Results: Etravirine co-administration decreased cobicistat AUC0-24, Cmax and C24 by 30%, 14% and 66%, respectively. Although darunavir AUC0-24 and Cmax were unchanged by etravirine, darunavir C24 was 56% lower for darunavir/cobicistat co-administered with etravirine relative to darunavir/cobicistat alone. Etravirine pharmacokinetics were unchanged by darunavir/cobicistat. Treatments were well tolerated, and HIV-1 RNA remained undetectable in all participants., Conclusions: Although etravirine pharmacokinetics was unchanged by darunavir/cobicistat, there was a significant decrease in cobicistat exposure and in darunavir C24 when darunavir/cobicistat was co-administered with etravirine. Boosting darunavir with ritonavir instead of with cobicistat may be preferred if darunavir is to be combined with etravirine in clinical practice.

This study investigated the effects of ingested meal types on the pharmacokinetics of elvitegravir (EVG), cobicistat (COBI), emtricitabine (FTC), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), and tenofovir (TFV) following a single administration of the single-tablet regimen (STR) of EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF (150/150/200/10 mg) in Japanese HIV-negative healthy subjects (n = 12). In this open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover study, the bioequivalence of the EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF STR following ingestion of a nutritional protein-rich drink with a reference treatment of taking a standard breakfast was evaluated. Administration under fasted conditions, no food intake, resulted in decreases in the mean AUC inf and C max of EVG by 50% and 57%, respectively, relative to the administration with a standard breakfast, whereas the systemic exposure of EVG with a nutritional protein-rich drink was comparable to that with a standard breakfast. The mean AUC inf and C max of COBI, FTC, TAF, and TFV were comparable regardless of meal intake or meal types. Although the package insert of the EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF STR states that the medication is recommended to be taken with food, this study provides an additional insight into HIV-1-infected patients that a light meal like a nutritional protein-rich drink can be an alternative to a standard meal., (© 2017, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Objective: To determine the transplacental pharmacokinetics of the HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor elvitegravir and of cobicistat, a cytochrome P450 inhibitor used as a pharmacoenhancer in antiretroviral therapy., Design and Methods: Maternal-to-fetal transfer across the term human placenta was investigated with the ex-vivo dually perfused cotyledon model, in seven open-circuit experiments and 10 closed-circuit (recirculating) experiments. Elvitegravir and cobicistat were added to a maternal perfusate containing 2 g/l of human serum albumin and antipyrine, as a marker to validate the cotyledon's viability. Elvitegravir and cobicistat concentrations were measured using ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry., Results: For elvitegravir, in open-circuit experiments the mean (±SD) fetal transfer rate (FTR) (fetal/maternal concentration at steady state from 30 to 90 min) was 19 ± 13% and the mean clearance index was 0.46 ± 0.21; in the closed-circuit model, after 3 h of perfusion the FTR was 20 ± 10% and the mean accumulation index was 12.28 ± 5.57. For cobicistat, in the open perfusions the FTR was 23 ± 13% and the mean clearance index was 0.63 ± 0.34; in the closed perfusions after 3 h the fetal-to-maternal ratio of cobicistat was 21 ± 11%. The mean accumulation index was 3.46 ± 2.19 CONCLUSION:: The two models concurred to show moderate placental transfer of elvitegravir and cobicistat across the placenta as well as elvitegravir accumulation in the placenta tissue. Whether this may lead to toxicities and modifications in fetal or placental metabolism requires clinical studies.

Background: The dose of tenofovir alafenamide is reduced from 25 to 10 mg daily when given with boosting agents. However, such dose reduction has never been adopted for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). In this study, we aim to quantify the effect of cobicistat (COBI) both on tenofovir concentrations and TDF durability in real life setting., Methods: HIV-positive patients receiving TDF-containing antiretroviral therapies with at least 1 assessment of tenofovir plasma trough concentrations were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed considering tenofovir concentration as the dependent variable and clinical characteristics as independent covariates. Subsequently, survival and Cox analyses were performed considering as the primary outcome TDF discontinuation for any reasons., Results: Patients were given TDF with protease inhibitors/ritonavir (n = 212), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (n = 176), integrase inhibitors (dolutegravir or raltegravir, n = 46), or with elvitegravir/COBI (ELV/COBI) (n = 76). By multivariate analysis, concomitant antiretroviral therapies resulted significantly associated with tenofovir levels, with the highest drug concentrations measured in patients given ELV/COBI. By survival analysis, we found that patients given TDF with ELV/COBI had the lowest rate of drug durability. Overall, these patients had a 2.3-fold increased risk to experience TDF discontinuation., Conclusions: Coadministration with COBI resulted in significantly higher tenofovir concentrations and higher TDF discontinuation compared with other antiretroviral regimens. Accordingly, the possibility that the lack of proper dose adjustment for TDF when given with COBI might have biased the safety comparisons with tenofovir alafenamide during registrative trials cannot be ruled out.

Background: As a simplification strategy for treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients who have achieved virologic suppression on a multi-drug, multi-class antiretroviral regimen, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of once-daily elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) with darunavir., Methods: A single arm, open-label 48-week study was conducted of regimen simplification to E/C/F/TDF plus darunavir 800 mg daily from stable therapy including two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, and an integrase inhibitor. Participants had plasma HIV viral load consistently < 200 copies/mL for ≥ 6 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min, and no genotypic resistance to major components of the study regimen. Plasma viral load was measured at weeks 2 and 4, then every 4 weeks throughout the study. Safety laboratory assessments were conducted at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. Antiretroviral drug concentrations were measured at baseline and once ≥ 2 weeks after the regimen change., Results: Ten HIV-infected adults (8 male and 2 female; median age 50.5 years) were enrolled. All maintained virologic suppression on the new regimen for 48 weeks. One subject experienced a decrease in eGFR from 62 mL/min at baseline to 52 mL/min at week 12; study medications were continued and his eGFR remained stable (50-59 mL/min) thereafter. No subjects discontinued study medications for renal function changes or other adverse events. Darunavir trough concentration were lower on the new regimen than on darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg (n = 5; p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Despite low darunavir trough concentrations, treatment simplification to a two-pill, once-daily regimen of E/C/F/TDF plus darunavir was safe and effective for 48 weeks among 10 selected treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. Trial registration The study protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02199613) on July 22, 2014.

Dabigatran etexilate (DE) is a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) probe substrate, and its active anticoagulant moiety, dabigatran, is a substrate of the multidrug and toxin extrusion protein-1 (MATE-1) transporter. The antiretroviral pharmacokinetic enhancers, ritonavir and cobicistat, inhibit both these transporters. Healthy volunteers received single doses of DE at 150 mg alone, followed by ritonavir at 100 mg or cobicistat at 150 mg daily for 2 weeks. DE was then given 2 h before ritonavir or cobicistat. One week later, DE was given simultaneously with ritonavir or cobicistat. No significant increases in dabigatran pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure or thrombin time (TT) measures were observed with the simultaneous administration of ritonavir. Separated administration of ritonavir resulted in a mean decrease in dabigatran PK exposure of 29% (90% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 40%) but did not significantly change TT measures. However, cobicistat increased dabigatran PK exposure (area under the concentration-versus-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum plasma concentration) by 127% each (90% CI, 81 to 173% and 59 to 196%, respectively) and increased TT measures (33% for the area-under-the-effect curve from time zero to 24 h [90% CI, 22 to 44%] and 51% for TT at 24 h [90% CI, 22 to 78%]) when given simultaneously with dabigatran. Similar increases were observed when cobicistat was administered separately by 2 h from the administration of dabigatran. In all comparisons, no significant increase in the dabigatran elimination half-life was observed. Therefore, it is likely safe to coadminister ritonavir with DE, while there is a potential need for reduced dosing and prudent clinical monitoring with the coadministration of cobicistat due to the greater net inhibition of intestinal P-gp transport and increased bioavailability. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01896622.)., (This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.)

Background: We investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of atazanavir/cobicistat and darunavir/cobicistat once daily over 72 h following drug intake cessation in plasma, saliva and urine., Methods: Healthy volunteers received a fixed-dose combination of 300/150 mg of atazanavir/cobicistat once daily for 10 days, followed by a 10 day washout period and then a fixed-dose combination of 800/150 mg of darunavir/cobicistat once daily for 10 days. Full PK profiles were assessed for each phase for 72 h following day 10 and parameters determined to the last measurable concentration in plasma, saliva and urine by non-compartmental methods., Results: Sixteen subjects completed the study. Geometric mean (GM) terminal elimination half-life values to 72 h of atazanavir and darunavir were 6.77 and 6.35 h, respectively. All subjects had atazanavir concentrations above the suggested minimum effective concentration of 150 ng/mL 24 h post-dose and 14/16 subjects had concentrations higher than this target at 30 h post-dose (GM of 759 and 407 ng/mL, respectively). Thirteen out of 16 subjects had darunavir concentrations higher than the target of 550 ng/mL at 24 h post-dose and 5/16 subjects had concentrations higher than the target at 30 h post-dose (GM of 1033 and 382 ng/mL, respectively). Cobicistat half-life to 72 h was 4.21 h with atazanavir and 3.62 h with darunavir. GM values 24 h after the observed dose ( C 24 ) for atazanavir and darunavir were 141 and 43 ng/mL, respectively, in saliva and 24857 and 11878 ng/mL, respectively, in urine. Concentration decay in saliva/urine mirrored plasma concentrations for both drugs., Conclusions: Different concentration decay patterns were seen for atazanavir and darunavir, which may be partially explained by cobicistat half-life (longer with atazanavir than darunavir). For the first time, we also measured drug PK forgiveness in saliva and urine, which represent easier markers of adherence., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Treatment of HIV-infected patients coinfected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis is challenging due to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between antiretrovirals (ARVs) and antituberculosis (anti-TB) drugs. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of cobicistat (COBI) or ritonavir (RTV) in modulating DDIs between darunavir (DRV) and rifampin (RIF) in a human hepatocyte-based in vitro model. Human primary hepatocyte cultures were incubated with RIF alone or in combination with either COBI or RTV for 3 days, followed by coincubation with DRV for 1 h. The resultant DRV concentrations were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, and the apparent intrinsic clearance (CL int.app. ) of DRV was calculated. Both RTV and COBI lowered the RIF-induced increases in CL int.app. in a concentration-dependent manner. Linear regression analysis showed that log 10 RTV and log 10 COBI concentrations were associated with the percent inhibition of RIF-induced elevations in DRV CL int.app. , where β was equal to -234 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -275 to -193; P < 0.0001) and -73 (95% CI = -89 to -57; P < 0.0001), respectively. RTV was more effective in lowering 10 μM RIF-induced elevations in DRV CL int.app. (half-maximal [50%] inhibitory concentration [IC 50 ] = 0.025 μM) than COBI (IC 50 = 0.223 μM). Incubation of either RTV or COBI in combination with RIF was sufficient to overcome RIF-induced elevations in DRV CL int.app. , with RTV being more potent than COBI. These data provide the first in vitro experimental insight into DDIs between RIF and COBI-boosted or RTV-boosted DRV and will be useful to inform physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to aid in optimizing dosing regimens for the treatment of patients coinfected with HIV and M. tuberculosis ., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.)

We investigated whether a fixed-dose combination tablet of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovirDF (Stribild) can be crushed and combined with enteral nutrition without influencing pharmacokinetics. This was an open-label, 3-period, single-dose, randomized, crossover trial in 24 healthy volunteers. Subjects received Stribild whole tablet with breakfast (reference), crushed/suspended Stribild + breakfast, crushed/suspended Stribild + enteral nutrition. Crushed/suspended Stribild + enteral nutrition was bioequivalent (90% confidence interval between 80% and 125%) with a whole Stribild tablet. Crushed/suspended Stribild + breakfast showed bioequivalence for the area under the curve (AUC0-32), but not for maximum concentration (Cmax) (considered not clinically relevant). Patients with swallowing difficulties or an enteral feeding tube can use crushed and suspended Stribild tablets.

Background: Atazanavir is boosted with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir. When combined with the CYP3A4 substrate daclatasvir, the daclatasvir dosage should be reduced from 60 to 30 mg once daily. Recently, cobicistat was licensed as a CYP3A booster and used with atazanavir., Objectives: To determine whether the fixed-dose combination of atazanavir/cobicistat has an influence on daclatasvir pharmacokinetics comparable to that of the separate agents atazanavir and ritonavir., Methods: A prospective, open-label, two-period, randomized, cross-over trial was performed in 16 healthy subjects (NCT02565888). Treatment consisted of 300/100 mg of atazanavir/ritonavir plus 30 mg of daclatasvir once daily (reference) and a second period of 300/150 mg of atazanavir/cobicistat plus 30 mg of daclatasvir once daily (test). A 24 h pharmacokinetic, steady-state curve was recorded for all drugs. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% CI were calculated for daclatasvir and atazanavir AUC τ  and C max to compare the effect of both treatments (test versus reference). Laboratory safety and adverse events were evaluated throughout the trial., Results: All 16 healthy subjects completed the study. Median (range) age and BMI were 48.5 (21-55) years and 24.5 (19.0-29.2) kg/m 2 , respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ritonavir and cobicistat were comparable to those in the literature. The GMRs (90% CI) of daclatasvir AUC τ and C max (test versus reference) were 101% (92%-111%) and 97% (89%-106%), respectively. Atazanavir GMRs (90% CI) of AUC τ and C max were 82% (75%-79%) and 74% (68%-81%), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported., Conclusions: Atazanavir/cobicistat and atazanavir/ritonavir had a similar influence on daclatasvir pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Daclatasvir at 30 mg once daily is the correct dose when combined with atazanavir/cobicistat., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose of Review: This review of recent published literature and data presented at scientific meetings on integrase stand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs) examines how these findings may impact on their future clinical use., Recent Findings: Elvitegravir (EVG), raltegravir (RAL) and dolutegravir (DTG) are InSTIs recommended as first-line options for treatment naive patients by the European AIDS Clinical Society, British HIV Association, International AIDS Society-USA and DHHS. InSTIs have gained a leading role in the management of HIV-1 because of increased viral suppression and maintaining undetectability with fewer side-effects.RAL 1200 mg once-daily (QD) has been shown to be noninferior to 400 mg BD, and the European Medicines Agency has approved QD RAL for review. RAL and DTG are not metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) resulting in fewer drug interactions and less toxicity risk in patients receiving direct-acting antivirals and other coadministered medications.EVG is currently available as a single tablet regimen and requires cobisistat, a pharmacokinetic booster and CYP3A inhibitor to allow QD dosing. EVG will soon be available in combination with tenofovir alfenamide, which is as efficacious as tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, but offers better renal and bone outcomes.DTG has a high genetic barrier to resistance and has been the subject of a number of simplification and treatment failure trials and shown promise. There are some emerging reports of neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal side-effects associated with DTG, which were not reported in clinical trials emphasizing the importance of real-life data.Carbotegravir, a long-acting InSTI, is currently in the pipeline of development., Summary: All three InSTIs have impressive data on efficacy, tolerability and safety. The unique differences of each InSTI's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics lend themselves to various clinical scenarios, enabling us as clinicians to provide better patient-centred care.

Background: The prodrug tenofovir alafenamide is associated with improved renal and bone safety compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. We aimed to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of this single-tablet, fixed-dose combination of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in HIV-infected, treatment-naive adolescents., Methods: We did a 48 week, single-arm, open-label trial in treatment-naive adolescents with HIV from ten hospital clinics in South Africa, Thailand, Uganda, and the USA. Eligible participants were aged 12-18 years, with plasma HIV-1 RNA of at least 1000 copies per mL, a CD4 count of at least 100 cells per μL, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 90 mL/min per 1·73 m 2 by the Schwartz formula, bodyweight of at least 35 kg, and an HIV-1 genotype with sensitivity to elvitegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. Participants received a single-tablet regimen once per day with food (administered by their parent or carer) containing 150 mg elvitegravir, 150 mg cobicistat, 200 mg emtricitabine, and 10 mg tenofovir alafenamide. Study visits to the clinic occurred at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48. The coprimary endpoints were the pharmacokinetic parameters of area under the curve (AUC) concentration at the end of the dosing interval (AUC tau ) for elvitegravir and the AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC last ) for tenofovir alafenamide, incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events, and all adverse events that emerged after treatment started (including data for bone mineral density). All participants who received one dose of study drug were included in the primary and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01854775., Findings: Between May 22, 2013, and July 22, 2014, we enrolled 50 participants, and all 50 received the assigned treatment; 24 participated in the intensive pharmacokinetic assessment. 48 patients completed the 48 weeks of treatment; two discontinued (one withdrew consent at week 8, one was lost to follow-up at week 12). The regimen was well tolerated and no discontinuations related to adverse events occurred. The mean AUC tau for elvitegravir was 23 840 ng × h per mL (coefficient of variation [CV] 25·5%), and the mean AUC last for tenofovir alafenamide was 189 ng × h per mL (CV 55·8%). Four participants (8%) had a serious adverse event, one of which (intermediate uveitis) was deemed related to the study regimen but resolved without treatment interruption. The most common study drug-related adverse events were nausea (in ten participants), abdominal pain (in six), and vomiting (in five). Exposures to the elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide regimen were similar to those previously noted in adults., Interpretation: The elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide regimen was well tolerated and achieved component plasma pharmacokinetic exposures similar to those in adults. Although non-comparative with a small sample size, these data support the use of this regimen in HIV-infected adolescents and its timely assessment in younger children., Funding: Gilead Sciences., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine is among the preferred regimens for first-line ART. A population approach was used to characterize the pharmacokinetics of elvitegravir and cobicistat and identify individual factors and co-medications influencing their disposition, taking into consideration the interaction between the two compounds., Methods: The study population included 144 HIV-infected individuals who provided 186 and 167 elvitegravir and cobicistat plasma concentrations, respectively. First, distinct NONMEM(®) analyses were conducted for elvitegravir and cobicistat, including individual demographic, clinical and genetic factors as potential covariates. Elvitegravir and cobicistat interaction was then assessed through different inhibitory models. Simulations based on the final model served to compare expected drug concentrations under standard and alternative dosage regimens., Results: Clearance with between-subject variability was 7.6 L/h [coefficient of variation (CV) 16.6%] and volume of distribution 61 L for elvitegravir and 16.0 L/h (CV 41.9%) and 88.3 L, respectively, for cobicistat. Concomitant administration of non-ritonavir-boosted atazanavir decreased elvitegravir clearance by 35%, likely due to UDP-glucuronosyl transferase (UGT) 1A1 inhibition. Concomitant administration of non-ritonavir-boosted atazanavir and ritonavir-boosted darunavir decreased cobicistat clearance by 47% and 27%, respectively. The final interaction model included cobicistat exposure (AUC0-24) on elvitegravir clearance. Simulations confirmed that a reduced elvitegravir dose of 85 mg co-administered with cobicistat and atazanavir produces a concentration-time course comparable to the standard regimen without atazanavir., Conclusions: Elvitegravir and cobicistat pharmacokinetic variability appears to be mainly explained by drug-drug interactions that may be encountered in routine clinical practice. In these cases, therapeutic drug monitoring and surveillance for potential toxicities would be justified., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Nearly all HIV PIs and the integrase inhibitor elvitegravir require a pharmacokinetic enhancer in order to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations at the desired dose and frequency. Whereas ritonavir has been the only available pharmacokinetic enhancer for more than a decade, cobicistat has recently emerged as an alternative boosting agent. Cobicistat and ritonavir are equally strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and consequently were shown to be equivalent pharmacokinetic enhancers for elvitegravir and for the PIs atazanavir and darunavir. Since cobicistat is a more selective CYP inhibitor than ritonavir and is devoid of enzyme-inducing properties, differences are expected in their interaction profiles with some co-medications. Drugs whose exposure might be altered by ritonavir but unaltered by cobicistat are drugs primarily metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 or drugs undergoing mainly glucuronidation. Thus, co-medications should be systematically reviewed when switching the pharmacokinetic enhancer to anticipate potential dosage adjustments., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Cobicistat and ritonavir are structurally distinct compounds that both potently inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, the metabolizing enzyme primarily responsible for the elimination of several antiretroviral medications, and, as such, are pharmacokinetic boosters for antiretroviral agents that require longer dosing intervals. Recently, cobicistat was approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in treatment-naive adults as a component of a single-tablet regimen consisting of cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir plus emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. While studies have demonstrated that boosting with either cobicistat or ritonavir results in comparable plasma exposure of the target antiretroviral agent, a better understanding of drug-drug interactions between cobicistat- and ritonavir-boosted antiretrovirals and other medications will inform treatment decisions in HIV-infected patients. In connection with their distinct structural properties, COBI and RTV differ with respect to their drug-drug interaction profiles. Compared with ritonavir, cobicistat lacks induction potential and is a more specific inhibitor of 3A and therefore, has reduced effects on other CYP isoforms. To date, more studies have assessed ritonavir drug-drug interactions with other medications than have assessed cobicistat drug-drug interactions. The objective of this article is to review the drug-drug interactions when cobicistat- or ritonavir-boosted elvitegravir, cobicistat, or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir are coadministered with antiretroviral therapies or drugs that are either substrates, inducers, or inhibitors of the CYP3A metabolic pathway, as well as with drugs that alter intra-gastric pH or are substrates of P-gp, in order to inform the proper use of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir.

Background: Cobicistat (COBI) is a pharmacoenhancer for antiretroviral therapy., Objective: The current study was designed to profile the metabolic pathways of COBI and to determine the enzymes that contribute to COBI metabolism., Method: We screened COBI metabolites in mice and human liver microsomes. We also used cDNAexpressed human cytochromes P450 (CYPs) to explore the role of human enzymes in COBI metabolism., Results: Twenty new and three known metabolites of COBI were identified in mouse urine and feces. These new metabolic pathways of COBI include glycine conjugation, N-acetyl cysteine conjugation, morpholine ring-opening, and thiazole ring-opening. Twelve of COBI metabolites were further confirmed in mouse and human liver microsomes, including nine new metabolites. Consistent with the previous report, CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 were determined as the major enzymes that contribute to COBI metabolism., Conclusion: This study provided a full map of COBI metabolism. These results can be used to manage CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions that are associated with COBI-containing regimens in human.

Purpose: This article reviews the clinical pharmacology, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability, drug interactions, and dosing and administration of cobicistat., Methods: Searches of MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1964 to February 2015 were conducted using the search terms cobicistat and GS-9350. Relevant information was extracted from the identified clinical trials and review articles. Abstracts from the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (2014-2015) and the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2013-2014) were also searched., Findings: Cobicistat is a PK enhancer lacking antiviral activity that, via selective cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A inhibition, inhibits the metabolism of certain antiretroviral medications and is used for prolonging their effect. Cobicistat has been studied as a booster of elvitegravir, a second-generation integrase inhibitor, and of the protease inhibitors atazanavir and darunavir. Data on its clinical efficacy and tolerability have been presented in 2 Phase II trials and in 9 Phase III trials, which reported durable efficacy in terms of achievement of sustained suppression of HIV-1 RNA levels to <50 copies/mL for at least 48 weeks. Cobicistat was generally well-tolerated in these studies. Cobicistat may increase serum creatinine levels via the inhibition of proximal renal tubular cell transporters and thus reduce estimated glomerular filtration rate, although it does not appear to affect actual glomerular filtration rate. Given the potent CYP3A inhibition by cobicistat, its coadministration with drugs metabolized by CYP3A may result in increased plasma concentrations of such agents. Moreover, as cobicistat is metabolized predominantly by CYP3A, plasma concentrations may increase or decrease on coadministration with CYP3A inhibitors or inducers, respectively., Implications: With potent durability through 48 weeks, a tolerability profile comparable to other first- and second-line antiretroviral therapies, and a convenient dosing schedule with low daily pill burden in fixed-dose combination tablets, cobicistat is a potential addition to the management of HIV infection as a PK enhancer. However, the effects of cobicistat on serum creatinine and its considerable drug-interaction potential may warrant additional monitoring., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

A current focus in HIV management is improving adherence by minimizing pill burden with convenient formulations, including fixed-dose combinations (FDCs). Darunavir, a HIV protease inhibitor, co-administered with low-dose ritonavir (800/100 mg once daily), is recommended in guidelines in combination with other antiretrovirals for HIV patients with no darunavir resistance-associated mutations. Cobicistat is an alternative agent to ritonavir for boosting plasma drug levels of darunavir among other antiretrovirals. Cobicistat is a more specific cytochrome P450 3A inhibitor than ritonavir without enzyme-inducing properties. This review describes the differing effects of cobicistat and ritonavir on metabolic enzymes, which explains their differing drug-drug interactions, and summarizes some of the studied drug-drug interactions for cobicistat. It also outlines the clinical development and data for a once-daily darunavir/cobicistat FDC. This FDC thus allows for a once-daily treatment regimen (including background antiretrovirals) with reduced pill burden.

This randomized, two-way crossover study evaluated the bioavailability of elvitegravir administered as the new individual tablet containing 150 mg and a cobicistat 150 mg tablet, concomitantly with a fixed-dose combination tablet containing 200 mg of emtricitabine and 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG + COBI + FTC/TDF), in comparison with a single-tablet regimen containing the same dose of each component (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF). Twenty-four healthy Japanese male subjects received the two different elvitegravir treatments, the separate-tablet or single-tablet regimen, once-daily for 10 days in each. The pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax , AUCtau , and Ctau ) of elvitegravir were investigated at Day 10 after each treatment, together with safety and tolerability. Relative to EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF, the geometric least-squares mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for elvitegravir Cmax and AUCtau were within the boundary of 0.8-1.25, while the upper limit of the 90% CI of GMR for Ctau was narrowly below the lack of bioequivalence boundary (0.79). No deaths, serious AEs, or drug-related AEs occurred. In conclusion, Cmax and AUCtau of elvitegravir met the strict definition of bioequivalence, indicating that the two regimens were essentially bioequivalent. Treatment with both regimens for 10 days appeared to be safe and well tolerated., (The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Published by The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Rezolsta® (darunavir/cobicistat) is the first boosted protease inhibitor in a fixed-dose combination to be approved for the treatment of HIV infection. It contains darunavir, a protease inhibitor with a well-known safety and efficacy profile, and the new pharmacokinetic enhancer cobicistat. The convenience of this combination makes boosted darunavir easier to take, thus improving adherence. Exposure to darunavir is equivalent when it is administered with cobicistat or with ritonavir. Darunavir/cobicistat-based antiretroviral therapy has shown considerable efficacy and good tolerability in several clinical trials. Data from the single-arm, open-label, phase III GS-US-216-130 trial showed virological efficacy rates comparable to those from ARTEMIS and ODIN. Darunavir/cobicistat was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild and consisted of gastrointestinal disturbances. Cobicistat inhibits transporters of creatinine in kidney tubules, thus causing a minimal and reversible reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate. Like ritonavir, cobicistat is a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor and, as such, shares most of its drug interactions. However, inhibition by cobicistat seems to be more specific than with ritonavir, and cobicistat has no inducer effect; therefore, differences in its drug interaction profile may be observed.

Background: Cobicistat (COBI) is an alternative pharmacoenhancer to ritonavir. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet containing atazanavir (ATV) and COBI has been developed for the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients., Methods: This open-label, single-centre, single-dose, crossover study, randomized 64 healthy subjects to one of eight treatment sequences. Under light meal conditions, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) to infinity (AUCINF) and AUC to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-T) for ATV and COBI administered as an FDC of ATV/COBI (300/150 mg) were compared to those following administration as separate agents given together; bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios fell within the predetermined range of 0.80, 1.25. ATV and COBI pharmacokinetic parameters following administration as the FDC or as separate agents were also compared under fasted conditions. The effect of food (light and high-fat meals) on the pharmacokinetics of ATV and COBI for the FDC was also assessed., Results: ATV and COBI administered in an FDC tablet were bioequivalent to the individual agents when given with a light meal. Under fasted conditions, pharmacokinetic parameters for ATV and COBI were similar for the individual components and the FDC. For the FDC, systemic exposure to ATV increased with a light meal compared to fasted conditions, and ATV concentration 24 h post-dose was similar with a light meal compared with a high-fat meal., Conclusions: ATV/COBI (300/150 mg) FDC tablet was bioequivalent to coadministration as separate agents with a light meal in healthy subjects. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01837719.