Search

Your search keyword '"Cobelli, O. De"' showing total 12 results
Start Over Author "Cobelli, O. De"
12 results on '"Cobelli, O. De"'

1. Effect of inguinal lymph node dissection in lymph node negative patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis

Author

Tappero, S., Piccinelli, M., Barletta, F., Panunzio, A., Garcia, C.C., Incesu, R.B., Tian, Z., Parodi, S., Dell'Oglio, P., Cobelli, O. de, Briganti, A., Antonelli, A., Chun, F.K.H., Graefen, M., Saad, F., Shariat, S.F., Suardi, N.R., Borghesi, M., Terrone, C., and Karakiewicz, P.I.

Subjects
Urology, Lymph node dissection, Inguinal lymph nodes, Penile neoplasms
Abstract

Introduction: The survival benefit of inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) vs no ILND in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP) and the absence of lymph node invasion is unclear. We addressed this uncertainty within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER 2000-2018) database. Material and methods: We identified lymph node negative SCCP patients who either underwent ILND (pN0) or clinical examination only (cN0). We tested for the effect of ILND vs no ILND on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in Kaplan-Meier plots, univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, in a pT stage-specific fashion, before and after 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM). Sensitivity analyses were conducted according to historical and contemporary treatment periods as well as geographic regions. Results: Of 2520 SCCP patients, 369 (15%) underwent ILND (pN0) vs 2151 (85%) did not (cN0). The pN0 vs cN0 distribution according to pT stages was as follows: 80 (7%) vs 1092 (93%) in pT1b, and 289 (21%) vs 1059 (79%) in pT2-3. At 36 months, CSM-free survival in pT2-3 stage was 89% in ILND vs 74% in no ILND patients (multivariable hazard ratio: 0.42, CI 0.30-0.60, p < 0.001). This result was confirmed in sensitivity analyses, and after 1:3 PSM. The same analyses could not be completed in pT1b stage due to insufficient number of observations and events. Conclusions: In pT2-3 stage SCCP, a significantly lower CSM was recorded in lymph node negative patients treated with ILND than in their clinical lymph node negative counterparts who did not undergo ILND.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Impact of surgical approach and resection technique on the risk of Trifecta Failure after partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses

Author

Campi, R., Maida, F. Di, Lane, Brian R., Cobelli, O. De, Sanguedolce, F., Hatzichristodoulou, G., Antonelli, A., Noyes, S., Mari, A., Grosso, A.A., Rodriguez-Faba, O., Keeley, F.X., Langenhuijsen, J.F., Musi, G., Klatte, T., Roscigno, M., Akdogan, B., Furlan, M., Karakoyunlu, N., Marszalek, M., Capitanio, U., Volpe, A., Brookman-May, S., Gschwend, J.E., Smaldone, M.C., Uzzo, R.G., Carini, M., Kutikov, A., Minervini, A., Campi, R., Maida, F. Di, Lane, Brian R., Cobelli, O. De, Sanguedolce, F., Hatzichristodoulou, G., Antonelli, A., Noyes, S., Mari, A., Grosso, A.A., Rodriguez-Faba, O., Keeley, F.X., Langenhuijsen, J.F., Musi, G., Klatte, T., Roscigno, M., Akdogan, B., Furlan, M., Karakoyunlu, N., Marszalek, M., Capitanio, U., Volpe, A., Brookman-May, S., Gschwend, J.E., Smaldone, M.C., Uzzo, R.G., Carini, M., Kutikov, A., and Minervini, A.

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the outcomes of open vs robotic partial nephrectomy (PN), focusing on predictors of Trifecta failure in patients with highly complex renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We queried the prospectively collected database from the SIB International Consortium, including 507 consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated at 16 high-volume referral centres, to select those with highly complex (PADUA score ≥10) tumors undergoing PN. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection or resection according to the SIB score. Trifecta was defined as achievement of negative surgical margins, no acute kidney injury and no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 postoperative surgical complications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of Trifecta failure. RESULTS: 113 patients were included. Patients undergoing open PN (n = 47, 41.6%) and robotic PN (n = 66, 58.4%) were comparable in baseline characteristics. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection and resection in 46.9%, 34.0% and 19.1% of open PN, and in 50.0%, 40.9% and 9.1% of robotic PN (p = 0.28). Trifecta was achieved in significantly more patients after robotic PN (69.7% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, surgical approach (open vs robotic, OR: 2.62; 95%CI: 1.11-6.15, p = 0.027) and tumor complexity (OR for each additional unit of the PADUA score: 2.27; 95%CI: 1.27-4.06, p = 0.006) were significant predictors of Trifecta failure, while RT was not. The study is limited by lack of randomization; as such, selection bias and confounding cannot be entirely ruled out. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor complexity and surgical approach were independent predictors of Trifecta failure after PN for highly complex renal masses.

Published
2022

3. Predictors of Positive Surgical Margins after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors: Insights from a Large Multicenter International Prospective Observational Project (The Surface-Intermediate-Base Margin Score Consortium)

Author

Maida, F. Di, Campi, R., Lane, Brian R., Cobelli, O. De, Sanguedolce, F., Hatzichristodoulou, G., Antonelli, A., Grosso, A.A., Noyes, S., Rodriguez-Faba, O., Keeley, F.X., Langenhuijsen, J.F., Musi, G., Klatte, T., Roscigno, M., Akdogan, B., Furlan, M., Simeone, C., Karakoyunlu, N., Marszalek, M., Capitanio, U., Volpe, A., Brookman-May, S., Gschwend, J.E., Smaldone, M.C., Uzzo, R.G., Kutikov, A., Minervini, A., Maida, F. Di, Campi, R., Lane, Brian R., Cobelli, O. De, Sanguedolce, F., Hatzichristodoulou, G., Antonelli, A., Grosso, A.A., Noyes, S., Rodriguez-Faba, O., Keeley, F.X., Langenhuijsen, J.F., Musi, G., Klatte, T., Roscigno, M., Akdogan, B., Furlan, M., Simeone, C., Karakoyunlu, N., Marszalek, M., Capitanio, U., Volpe, A., Brookman-May, S., Gschwend, J.E., Smaldone, M.C., Uzzo, R.G., Kutikov, A., and Minervini, A.

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: To explore predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM) after robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) in a large multicenter international observational project, harnessing the Surface-Intermediate-Base (SIB) margin score to report the resection technique after PN in a standardized way. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated with PN from September 2014 to March 2015 at 16 tertiary referral centers and included in the SIB margin score International Consortium were prospectively collected. For the present study, only patients treated with robotic PN were included. Uni- and multivariable analysis were fitted to explore clinical and surgical predictors of PSMs after PN. RESULTS: Overall, 289 patients were enrolled. Median (IQR) preoperative tumor size was 3.0 (2.3-4.2) cm and median (IQR) PADUA score was 8 (7-9). SIB scores of 0-2 (enucleation), 3-4 (enucleoresection) and 5 (resection) were reported in 53.3%, 27.3% and 19.4% of cases, respectively. A PSM was recorded in 18 (6.2%) patients. PSM rate was 4.5%, 11.4% and 3.6% in case of enucleation, enucleoresection and resection, respectively. Patients with PSMs had tumors with a higher rate of contact with the urinary collecting system (55.6% vs. 27.3%; p < 0.001) and a longer median warm ischemia time (22 vs. 16 min; p = 0.02) compared with patients with negative surgical margins, while no differences emerged between the two groups in terms of other tumor features (i.e., pathological diameter, PADUA score). In multivariable analysis, only enucleoresection (SIB score 3-4) versus enucleation (SIB score 0-2) was found to be an independent predictor of PSM at final pathology (HR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.25-7.63; p = 0.04), while resection (SIB score 5) was not. Conclusions: In our experience, enucleoresection led to a higher risk of PSMs as compared to enucleation. Further studies are needed to assess the differential impacts of resection technique and surgeon's experience on margin sta

Published
2022

4. Impact of Trifecta definition on rates and predictors of 'successful' robotic partial nephrectomy for localized renal masses: results from the Surface-Intermediate-Base Margin Score International Consortium

Author

Campi, R., Grosso, A.A., Lane, Brian R., Cobelli, O. De, Sanguedolce, F., Hatzichristodoulou, G., Antonelli, A., Noyes, S., Di Maida, F., Mari, A., Rodriguez-Faba, O., Keeley, F.X., Langenhuijsen, J.F., Musi, G., Klatte, T., Roscigno, M., Akdogan, B., Furlan, M., Karakoyunlu, N., Marszalek, M., Capitanio, U., Volpe, A., Brookman-May, S., Gschwend, J.E., Smaldone, M.C., Uzzo, R.G., Kutikov, A., Minervini, A., Campi, R., Grosso, A.A., Lane, Brian R., Cobelli, O. De, Sanguedolce, F., Hatzichristodoulou, G., Antonelli, A., Noyes, S., Di Maida, F., Mari, A., Rodriguez-Faba, O., Keeley, F.X., Langenhuijsen, J.F., Musi, G., Klatte, T., Roscigno, M., Akdogan, B., Furlan, M., Karakoyunlu, N., Marszalek, M., Capitanio, U., Volpe, A., Brookman-May, S., Gschwend, J.E., Smaldone, M.C., Uzzo, R.G., Kutikov, A., and Minervini, A.

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Over the years, five different Trifecta score definitions have been proposed to optimize the framing of "success" in partial nephrectomy (PN) field. However, such classifications rely on different metrics. The aim of the present study was to explore how the success rate of robotic PN, as well as its drivers, vary according to the currently available definitions of Trifecta. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated with robotic PN at 16 referral centers from September 2014 to March 2015 were prospectively collected. Trifecta rate was defined for each of the currently available definitions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate possible predictors of "Trifecta failure" according to the different adopted formulation. RESULTS: Overall, 289 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among the definitions, Trifecta rates ranged between 66.4% and 85.9%. Multivariable analysis showed that predictors for "Trifecta failure" were mainly tumor-related (i.e. tumor's nephrometry) for those Trifecta scores relying on WIT as a surrogate metric for postoperative renal function deterioration (definitions 1,2), while mainly surgery-related (i.e. ischemia time and excision strategy) for those including the percentage change in postoperative eGFR as the functional cornerstone of Trifecta (definitions 3-5). CONCLUSIONS: There was large variability in rates and predictors of "unsuccessful PN" when using different Trifecta scores. Further research is needed to improve the value of the Trifecta metrics, integrating them into routine patient counseling and standardized assessment of surgical quality across institutions.

Published
2022

5. Reply by Authors - Impact of Resection Technique on Perioperative Outcomes and Surgical Margins after Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Masses

Author

Minervini, A., Campi, R., Lane, Brian R., Cobelli, O. De, Sanguedolce, F., Hatzichristodoulou, G., Antonelli, A., Noyes, S., Mari, A., Rodriguez-Faba, O., Keeley, F.X., Langenhuijsen, J.F., Musi, G., Klatte, T., Roscigno, M., Akdogan, B., Furlan, M., Karakoyunlu, N., Marszalek, M., Capitanio, U., Volpe, A., Brookman-May, S., Gschwend, J.E., Smaldone, M.C., Uzzo, R.G., Carini, M., Kutikov, A., Minervini, A., Campi, R., Lane, Brian R., Cobelli, O. De, Sanguedolce, F., Hatzichristodoulou, G., Antonelli, A., Noyes, S., Mari, A., Rodriguez-Faba, O., Keeley, F.X., Langenhuijsen, J.F., Musi, G., Klatte, T., Roscigno, M., Akdogan, B., Furlan, M., Karakoyunlu, N., Marszalek, M., Capitanio, U., Volpe, A., Brookman-May, S., Gschwend, J.E., Smaldone, M.C., Uzzo, R.G., Carini, M., and Kutikov, A.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 219890.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)

Published
2020

7. Case series on multiple prostate re-irradiation for locally recurrent prostate cancer: something ventured, something gained

Author

Volpe, S., primary, Jereczek-Fossa, B. A., additional, Zerini, D., additional, Rojas, D. P., additional, Fodor, C., additional, Vavassori, A., additional, Romanelli, P., additional, Vigorito, S., additional, Rondi, E., additional, Comi, S., additional, Cambria, R., additional, Cattani, F., additional, Dicuonzo, S., additional, Marco, P. De, additional, Beltramo, G., additional, Musi, G., additional, Cobelli, O. De, additional, Marvaso, G., additional, and Orecchia, R., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Intravesical Chemohyperthermia with Mitomycin C Versus Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for Adjuvant Treatment of Patients with Intermediate- and High-risk Non-Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Author

Arends, T.J.H., Nativ, O., Maffezzini, M., Cobelli, O. De, Canepa, G., Verweij, F., Moskovitz, B., Heijden, A.G. van der, Witjes, J.A., Arends, T.J.H., Nativ, O., Maffezzini, M., Cobelli, O. De, Canepa, G., Verweij, F., Moskovitz, B., Heijden, A.G. van der, and Witjes, J.A.

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Despite adjuvant intravesical therapy, recurrences in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are still high; therefore, new treatment options are needed. The use of chemohyperthermia (CHT) as an alternative treatment is expanding in Europe. To date, however, there has been a lack of prospective randomised data. OBJECTIVE: To compare CHT using mitomycin C (MMC) with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) as adjuvant treatment for intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 2002 and 2012, 190 NMIBC patients were randomised in this controlled, open-label, multicentre trial for 1-yr CHT (six weekly treatments and six maintenance treatments) and 1-yr BCG immunotherapy (six weekly treatments and three weekly maintenance treatments at months 3, 6, and 12). Patients and physicians giving the interventions were aware of assignment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00384891). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point was 24-mo recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses in all papillary NMIBC patients (n=147). Analyses were done with the log-rank test and Fisher exact test. All tests were two-sided. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The 24-mo ITT RFS was 78.1% in the CHT group compared with 64.8% in the BCG group (p=0.08). The 24-mo RFS in the PP analysis was 81.8% in the CHT group compared with 64.8% in the BCG group (p=0.02). Progression rates were <2% in both groups. Regarding the side-effects, no new safety concerns were identified. A concern is that this study closed prematurely and thus is underpowered. Furthermore, blinding of treatment for patients and physicians was impossible; this may have resulted in unavoidable bias. CONCLUSIONS: CHT is a safe and effective treatment option in patients with intermediate- and high-risk papillary NMIBC. A significantly higher 24-mo RFS in the CHT group was seen in the PP analysis. Based on the results ab

Published
2016

9. The use of mannitol in partial and live donor nephrectomy: an international survey

Author

Cosentino, M., Breda, A., Sanguedolce, F., Landman, J., Stolzenburg, J.U., Verze, P., Rassweiler, J., Poppel, H. van, Klingler, H.C., Janetschek, G., Celia, A., Kim, F.J., Thalmann, G., Nagele, U., Mogorovich, A., Bolenz, C., Knoll, T., Porpiglia, F., Alvarez-Maestro, M., Francesca, F., Deho, F., Eggener, S., Abbou, C., Meng, M.V., Aron, M., Laguna, P.M., Mladenov, D., D'Addessi, A., Bove, P., Schiavina, R., Cobelli, O. De, Merseburger, A.S., Dalpiaz, O., D'Ancona, F.C.H., Polascik, T.J., Muschter, R., Leppert, T.J., Villavicencio, H., Cosentino, M., Breda, A., Sanguedolce, F., Landman, J., Stolzenburg, J.U., Verze, P., Rassweiler, J., Poppel, H. van, Klingler, H.C., Janetschek, G., Celia, A., Kim, F.J., Thalmann, G., Nagele, U., Mogorovich, A., Bolenz, C., Knoll, T., Porpiglia, F., Alvarez-Maestro, M., Francesca, F., Deho, F., Eggener, S., Abbou, C., Meng, M.V., Aron, M., Laguna, P.M., Mladenov, D., D'Addessi, A., Bove, P., Schiavina, R., Cobelli, O. De, Merseburger, A.S., Dalpiaz, O., D'Ancona, F.C.H., Polascik, T.J., Muschter, R., Leppert, T.J., and Villavicencio, H.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 117852.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access), PURPOSE: Animal studies have shown the potential benefits of mannitol as renoprotective during warm ischemia; it may have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and is sometimes used during partial nephrectomy (PN) and live donor nephrectomy (LDN). Despite this, a prospective study on mannitol has never been performed. The aim of this study is to document patterns of mannitol use during PN and LDN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey on the use of mannitol during PN and LDN was sent to 92 high surgical volume urological centers. Questions included use of mannitol, indications for use, physician responsible for administration, dosage, timing and other renoprotective measures. RESULTS: Mannitol was used in 78 and 64 % of centers performing PN and LDN, respectively. The indication for use was as antioxidant (21 %), as diuretic (5 %) and as a combination of the two (74 %). For PN, the most common dosages were 12.5 g (30 %) and 25 g (49 %). For LDN, the most common doses were 12.5 g (36.3 %) and 25 g (63.7 %). Overall, 83 % of centers utilized mannitol, and two (percent or centers??) utilized furosemide for renoprotection. CONCLUSIONS: A large majority of high-volume centers performing PN and LDN use mannitol for renoprotection. Since there are no data proving its value nor standardized indication and usage, this survey may provide information for a randomized prospective study.

Published
2013

12. Disease-specific and general health-related quality of life in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: The Pros-IT CNR study

Author

Angelo, Porreca, Marianna, Noale, Walter, Artibani, Pier Francesco Bassi, Filippo, Bertoni, Sergio, Bracarda, Giario Natale Conti, Renzo, Corvò, Mauro, Gacci, Pierpaolo, Graziotti, Magrini, STEFANO MARIA, Vincenzo, Mirone, Rodolfo, Montironi, Giovanni, Muto, Stefano, Pecoraro, Umberto, Ricardi, Elvio, Russi, Andrea, Tubaro, Vittorina, Zagonel, Gaetano, Crepaldi, Stefania, Maggi, Pierfrancesco, Bassi, Stefano Maria Magrini, Anna Rita Alitto, Enrica, Ambrosi, Alessandro, Antonelli, Cynthia, Aristei, Michele, Barbieri, Franco, Bardari, Lilia, Bardoscia, Salvina, Barra, Sara, Bartoncini, Umberto, Basso, Carlotta, Becherini, Rita, Bellavita, Franco, Bergamaschi, Stefania, Berlingheri, Berruti, Alfredo, Marco, Borghesi, Roberto, Bortolus, Valentina, Borzillo, Davide, Bosetti, Giuseppe, Bove, Pierluigi, Bove, Maurizio, Brausi, Alessio, Bruni, Giorgio, Bruno, Eugenio, Brunocilla, Alberto, Buffoli, BUGLIONE DI MONALE E BASTIA, Michela, Consuelo, Buttigliero, Giovanni, Cacciamani, Michela, Caldiroli, Giuseppe, Cardo, Giorgio, Carmignani, Giuseppe, Carrieri, Emanuele, Castelli, Elisabetta, Castrezzati, Gianpiero, Catalano, Susanna, Cattarino, Francesco, Catucci, Francolini Dario Cavallini, Ofelia, Ceccarini, Antonio, Celia, Francesco, Chiancone, Tommaso, Chini, Claudia, Cianci, Antonio, Cisternino, Devis, Collura, Franco, Corbella, Matteo, Corinti, Paolo, Corsi, Fiorenza, Cortese, Luigi, Corti, Cosimo de Nunzio, Olga, Cristiano, Rolando, M D'Angelillo, Luigi Da Pozzo, Daniele, D'Agostino, Carolina, D'Elia, Matteo, Dandrea, Michele De Angelis, Paolo De Angelis, Ottavio De Cobelli, Bernardino De Concilio, Antonello De Lisa, Stefano De Luca, Agostina De Stefani, Chiara Lucrezia Deantoni, Esposti Claudio Degli, Anna, Destito, Beatrice, Detti, Nadia Di Muzio, Andrea Di Stasio, Calogero Di Stefano, Danilo Di Trapani, Giuseppe, Difino, Sara, Falivene, Giuseppe, Farullo, Paolo, Fedelini, Ilaria, Ferrari, Francesco, Ferrau, Matteo, Ferro, Andrei, Fodor, Francesco, Fontanta, Francesco, Francesca, Giulio, Francolini, Paolo, Frata, Giovanni, Frezza, Pietro, Gabriele, Maria, Galeandro, Elisabetta, Garibaldi, Pietro Giovanni Gennari, Alessandro, Gentilucci, Alessandro, Giacobbe, Laura, Giussani, Giuseppe, Giusti, Paolo, Gontero, Alessia, Guarneri, Cesare, Guida, Alberto, Gurioli, Dorijan, Huqi, Ciro, Imbimbo, Gianluca, Ingrosso, Cinzia, Iotti, Corrado, Italia, Pierdaniele La Mattina, Enza, Lamanna, Luciana, Lastrucci, Grazia, Lazzari, Fabiola, Liberale, Giovanni, Liguori, Roberto, Lisi, Frank, Lohr, Riccardo, Lombardo, Jon A, J Lovisolo, Giuseppe Mario Ludovico, Nicola, Macchione, Francesca, Maggio, Michele, Malizia, Gianluca, Manasse, Giovanni, Mandoliti, Giovanna, Mantini, Luigi, Marafioti, Luisa, Marciello, Alberto Mario Marconi, Antonietta, Martilotta, Salvino, Marzano, Stefano, Masciullo, Gloria, Maso, Adele, Massenzo, Ercole, Mazzeo, Luigi, Mearini, Serena, Medoro, Rosa, Molè, Giorgio, Monesi, Emanuele, Montanari, Franco, Montefiore, Giampaolo, Montesi, Giuseppe, Morgia, Gregorio, Moro, Giorgio, Muscas, Daniela, Musio, Paolo, Muto, Giovanni, Muzzonigro, Giorgio, Napodano, Carlo Luigi Augusto Negro, Mattia, Nidini, Maria, Ntreta, Marco, Orsatti, Carmela, Palazzolo, Isabella, Palumbo, Alessandro, Parisi, Paolo, Parma, Nicola, Pavan, Martina, Pericolini, Francesco, Pinto, Antonio, Pistone, Valerio, Pizzuti, Angelo, Platania, Caterina, Polli, Giorgio, Pomara, Elisabetta, Ponti, Antonio Benito Porcaro, Francesco, Porpiglia, Dario, Pugliese, Armin, Pycha, Giuseppe, Raguso, Andrea, Rampini, Donato Franco Randone, Valentina, Roboldi, Marco, Roscigno, Maria Paola Ruggieri, Giuseppe, Ruoppo, Roberto, Sanseverino, Anna, Santacaterina, Michele, Santarsieri, Riccardo, Santoni, Sarah, Scagliarini, Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti, Mauro, Scanzi, Marcello, Scarcia, Riccardo, Schiavina, Alessandro, Sciarra, Carmine, Sciorio, Tindaro, Scolaro, Salvatore, Scuzzarella, Oscar, Selvaggio, Armando, Serao, Sergio, Serni, Marco Andrea Signor, Mauro, Silvani, Giovanni, Silvano, Franco, Silvestris, Simeone, Claudio, Valeria, Simone, Girolamo, Spagnoletti, Matteo Giulio Spinelli, Luigi, Squillace, Vincenzo, Tombolini, Mariastella, Toninelli, Triggiani, Luca, Alberto, Trinchieri, Luca Eolo Trodella, Lucio, Trodella, Carlo, Trombetta, Lidia, Tronnolone, Marcello, Tucci, Daniele, Urzì, Riccardo, Valdagni, Maurizio, Valeriani, Maurizio, Vanoli, Elisabetta, Vitali, Alessandro, Volpe, Stefano, Zaramella, Guglielmo, Zeccolini, Giampaolo, Zini, Porreca, Angelo, Noale, Marianna, Artibani, Walter, Bassi, Pier Francesco, Bertoni, Filippo, Bracarda, Sergio, Conti, Giario Natale, Corvò, Renzo, Gacci, Mauro, Graziotti, Pierpaolo, Magrini, Stefano Maria, Mirone, Vincenzo, Montironi, Rodolfo, Muto, Giovanni, Pecoraro, Stefano, Ricardi, Umberto, Russi, Elvio, Tubaro, Andrea, Zagonel, Vittorina, Crepaldi, Gaetano, Maggi, Stefania, Gaetano, Crepaldi, Umberto, Basso, Luigi, Corti, D'Agostino, Daniele, Matteo, Dandrea, Davide, Bosetti, Gianpiero, Catalano, Ottavio, De Cobelli, Lucrezia, Deantoni Chiara, Nadia, Di Muzio, Ferro, Matteo, Andrei, Fodor, Pierdaniele, La Mattina, Emanuele, Montanari, Barbieri, Michele, Valentina, Borzillo, Chiancone, Francesco, Sara, Falivene, Paolo, Fedelini, Imbimbo, Ciro, Paolo, Muto, Sarah, Scagliarini, Giovanni, Muzzonigro, Enrica, Ambrosi, Alessandro, Antonelli, Lilia, Bardoscia, Stefania, Berlingheri, Alfredo, Berruti, Alberto, Buffoli, Michela, Buglione, Mauro, Scanzi, Elisabetta, Castrezzati, Paolo, Frata, Giulio, Francolini, Beatrice, Detti, Tommaso, Chini, Carlotta, Becherini, Olga, Cristiano, Cesare, Guida, Sara, Bartoncini, Consuelo, Buttigliero, Emanuele, Castelli, Devis, Collura, Stefano, De Luca, Pietro, Gabriele, Elisabetta, Garibaldi, Alessandro, Giacobbe, Paolo, Gontero, Alessia, Guarneri, Alberto, Gurioli, Francesco, Porpiglia, Franco, Randone Donato, Vittorio, Scagliotti Giorgio, Cynthia, Aristei, Rita, Bellavita, Isabella, Palumbo, Franco, Bardari, Augusto, Negro Carlo Luigi, Franco, Bergamaschi, Maria, Galeandro, Cinzia, Iotti, Giuseppe, Raguso, Paola, Ruggieri Maria, Giuseppe, Ruoppo, Marco, Borghesi, Eugenio, Brunocilla, Claudio, Degli Esposti, Giovanni, Frezza, Michele, Malizia, Maria, Ntreta, Alessandro, Parisi, Riccardo, Schiavina, Roberto, Bortolu, Giuseppe, Bove, Antonio, Cisternino, Carrieri, Giuseppe, Giuseppe, Difino, Oscar, Selvaggio, Maurizio, Brausi, Alessio, Bruni, Frank, Lohr, Ercole, Mazzeo, Enza, Lamanna, Calogero, Di Stefano, Giorgio, Bruno, Michela, Caldiroli, Ilaria, Ferrari, Laura, Giussani, Lovisolo Jon, A. J., Mario, Marconi Alberto, Giuseppe, Cardo, Mario, Ludovico Giuseppe, Marcello, Scarcia, Giorgio, Carmignani, Salvina, Barra, Dario, Cavallini Francolini, Franco, Corbella, Ofelia, Ceccarini, Luigi, Da Pozzo, Agostina, De Stefani, Corrado, Italia, Stefano, Masciullo, Valentina, Roboldi, Marco, Roscigno, Antonio, Celia, Bernardino, De Concilio, Claudia, Cianci, Francesco, Francesca, Giorgio, Pomara, Michele, Santarsieri, Fiorenza, Cortese, Andrea, Di Stasio, Franco, Montefiore, Armando, Serao, D'Elia, Carolina, Armin, Pycha, Dorijan, Huqi, Paolo, De Angeli, Nicola, Macchione, Francesco, Fontanta, Giorgio, Monesi, Antonello, De Lisa, Giuseppe, Giusti, Giorgio, Musca, Anna, Destito, Rosa, Molè, Danilo, Di Trapani, Francesco, Ferrau, Carmela, Palazzolo, Angelo, Platania, Anna, Santacaterina, Grazia, Lazzari, Fabiola, Liberale, Gregorio, Moro, Giovanni, Liguori, Nicola, Pavan, Francesca, Maggio, Marco, Orsatti, Giovanni, Mandoliti, Giampaolo, Montesi, Luigi, Marafioti, Antonietta, Martilotta, Adele, Massenzo, Luisa, Marciello, Salvino, Marzano, Caterina, Polli, Gloria, Maso, Serena, Medoro, Giuseppe, Morgia, Napodano, Giorgio, Pistone, Antonio, Roberto, Sanseverino, Mattia, Nidini, Paolo, Parma, Valerio, Pizzuti, Sciorio, Carmine, Scuzzarella, Salvatore, Tindaro, Scolaro, Porreca A, Noale M, Artibani W, Bassi PF, Bertoni F, Bracarda S, Conti GN, Corvò R, Gacci M, Graziotti P, Magrini SM, Mirone V, Montironi R, Muto G, Pecoraro S, Ricardi U, Russi E, Tubaro A, Zagonel V, Crepaldi G, Maggi S, Crepaldi G, Maggi S, Noale M, Porreca A, Artibani W, Bassi P, Bracarda S, Conti GN, Corvò R, Graziotti P, Russi E, Mirone V, Montironi R, Bertoni F, Gacci M, Magrini SM, Muto G, Pecoraro S, Ricardi U, Tubaro A, Zagonel V, Alitto AR, Ambrosi E, Antonelli A, Aristei C, Barbieri M, Bardari F, Bardoscia L, Barra S, Bartoncini S, Basso U, Becherini C, Bellavita R, Bergamaschi F, Berlingheri S, Berruti A, Borghesi M, Bortolus R, Borzillo V, Bosetti D, Bove G, Bove P, Brausi M, Bruni A, Bruno G, Brunocilla E, Buffoli A, Buglione M, Buttigliero C, Cacciamani G, Caldiroli M, Cardo G, Carmignani G, Carrieri G, Castelli E, Castrezzati E, Catalano G, Cattarino S, Catucci F, Cavallini FD, Ceccarini O, Celia A, Chiancone F, Chini T, Cianci C, Cisternino A, Collura D, Corbella F, Corinti M, Corsi P, Cortese F, Corti L, de Nunzio C, Cristiano O, D'Angelillo RM, Da Pozzo L, D'agostino D, D'Elia C, Dandrea M, De Angelis M, De Angelis P, De Cobelli O, De Concilio B, De Lisa A, De Luca S, De Stefani A, Deantoni CL, Degli EC, Destito A, Detti B, Di Muzio N, Di Stasio A, Di Stefano C, Di Trapani D, Difino G, Falivene S, Farullo G, Fedelini P, Ferrari I, Ferrau F, Ferro M, Fodor A, Fontanta F, Francesca F, Francolini G, Frata P, Frezza G, Gabriele P, Galeandro M, Garibaldi E, Gennari PG, Gentilucci A, Giacobbe A, Giussani L, Giusti G, Gontero P, Guarneri A, Guida C, Gurioli A, Huqi D, Imbimbo C, Ingrosso G, Iotti C, Italia C, La Mattina P, Lamanna E, Lastrucci L, Lazzari G, Liberale F, Liguori G, Lisi R, Lohr F, Lombardo R, Lovisolo JAJ, Ludovico GM, Macchione N, Maggio F, Malizia M, Manasse G, Mandoliti G, Mantini G, Marafioti L, Marciello L, Marconi AM, Martilotta A, Marzano S, Masciullo S, Maso G, Massenzo A, Mazzeo E, Mearini L, Medoro S, Molè R, Monesi G, Montanari E, Montefiore F, Montesi G, Morgia G, Moro G, Muscas G, Musio D, Muto P, Muzzonigro G, Napodano G, Negro CLA, Nidini M, Ntreta M, Orsatti M, Palazzolo C, Palumbo I, Parisi A, Parma P, Pavan N, Pericolini M, Pinto F, Pistone A, Pizzuti V, Platania A, Polli C, Pomara G, Ponti E, Porcaro AB, Porpiglia F, Pugliese D, Pycha A, Raguso G, Rampini A, Randone DF, Roboldi V, Roscigno M, Ruggieri MP, Ruoppo G, Sanseverino R, Santacaterina A, Santarsieri M, Santoni R, Scagliarini S, Scagliotti GV, Scanzi M, Scarcia M, Schiavina R, Sciarra A, Sciorio C, Scolaro T, Scuzzarella S, Selvaggio O, Serao A, Serni S, Signor MA, Silvani M, Silvano G, Silvestris F, Simeone C, Simone V, Spagnoletti G, Spinelli MG, Squillace L, Tombolini V, Toninelli M, Triggiani L, Trinchieri A, Trodella LE, Trodella L, Trombetta C, Tronnolone L, Tucci M, Urzì D, Valdagni R, Valeriani M, Vanoli M, Vitali E, Volpe A, Zaramella S, Zeccolini G, Zini G, Porreca, A., Noale, M., Artibani, W., Bassi, P. F., Bertoni, F., Bracarda, S., Conti, G. N., Corvo, R., Gacci, M., Graziotti, P., Magrini, S. M., Mirone, V., Montironi, R., Muto, G., Pecoraro, S., Ricardi, U., Russi, E., Tubaro, A., Zagonel, V., Crepaldi, G., Maggi, S., Alitto, A. R., Ambrosi, E., Antonelli, A., Aristei, C., Barbieri, M., Bardari, F., Bardoscia, L., Barra, S., Bartoncini, S., Basso, U., Becherini, C., Bellavita, R., Bergamaschi, F., Berlingheri, S., Berruti, A., Borghesi, M., Bortolus, R., Borzillo, V., Bosetti, D., Bove, G., Bove, P., Maurizio, B., Alessio, B., Giorgio, B., Eugenio, B., Alberto, B., Michela, B., Consuelo, B., Giovanni, C., Michela, C., Giuseppe, C., Giorgio, C., Emanuele, C., Elisabetta, C., Gianpiero, C., Susanna, C., Catucci, F., Dario, C. F., Ofelia, C., Antonio, C., Francesco, C., Tommaso, C., Claudia, C., Devis, C., Franco, C., Matteo, C., Paolo, C., Fiorenza, C., Luigi, C., Cosimo, N., Cristiano, O., D'Angelillo, R. M., Da Pozzo, L., D'Agostino, D., D'Elia, C., Dandrea, M., De Angelis, M., De Angelis, P., De Cobelli, O., De Concilio, B., De Lisa, A., De Luca, S., De Stefani, A., Deantoni, C. L., Degli, E. C., Destito, A., Detti, B., Di Muzio, N., Di Stasio, A., Di Stefano, C., Di Trapani, D., Difino, G., Falivene, S., Farullo, G., Fedelini, P., Ferrari, I., Ferrau, F., Ferro, M., Fodor, A., Fontanta, F., Francesca, F., Francolini, G., Frata, P., Frezza, G., Gabriele, P., Galeandro, M., Garibaldi, E., Gennari, P. G., Gentilucci, A., Giacobbe, A., Giussani, L., Giusti, G., Gontero, P., Guarneri, A., Guida, C., Gurioli, A., Huqi, D., Imbimbo, C., Ingrosso, G., Iotti, C., Italia, C., La Mattina, P., Lamanna, E., Lastrucci, L., Lazzari, G., Liberale, F., Liguori, G., Lisi, R., Lohr, F., Lombardo, R., Lovisolo, J. A. J., Ludovico, G. M., Macchione, N., Maggio, F., Malizia, M., Manasse, G., Mandoliti, G., Mantini, G., Marafioti, L., Marciello, L., Marconi, A. M., Martilotta, A., Marzano, S., Masciullo, S., Maso, G., Massenzo, A., Mazzeo, E., Mearini, L., Medoro, S., Mole, R., Monesi, G., Montanari, E., Montefiore, F., Montesi, G., Morgia, G., Moro, G., Muscas, G., Musio, D., Muto, P., Muzzonigro, G., Napodano, G., Negro, C. L. A., Nidini, M., Ntreta, M., Orsatti, M., Palazzolo, C., Palumbo, I., Parisi, A., Parma, P., Pavan, N., Pericolini, M., Pinto, F., Pistone, A., Pizzuti, V., Platania, A., Polli, C., Pomara, G., Ponti, E., Porcaro, A. B., Porpiglia, F., Pugliese, D., Pycha, A., Raguso, G., Rampini, A., Randone, D. F., Roboldi, V., Roscigno, M., Ruggieri, M. P., Ruoppo, G., Sanseverino, R., Santacaterina, A., Santarsieri, M., Santoni, R., Scagliarini, S., Scagliotti, G. V., Scanzi, M., Scarcia, M., Schiavina, R., Sciarra, A., Sciorio, C., Scolaro, T., Scuzzarella, S., Selvaggio, O., Serao, A., Serni, S., Signor, M. A., Silvani, M., Silvano, G., Silvestris, F., Simeone, C., Simone, V., Spagnoletti, G., Spinelli, M. G., Squillace, L., Tombolini, V., Toninelli, M., Triggiani, L., Trinchieri, A., Trodella, L. E., Trodella, L., Trombetta, C., Tronnolone, L., Tucci, M., Urzi, D., Valdagni, R., Valeriani, M., Vanoli, M., Vitali, E., Volpe, A., Zaramella, S., Zeccolini, G., Zini, G., Porreca, A, Noale, M, Artibani, W, Bassi, P, Bertoni, F, Bracarda, S, Conti, G, Corvò, R, Gacci, M, Graziotti, P, Magrini, S, Mirone, V, Montironi, R, Muto, G, Pecoraro, S, Ricardi, U, Russi, E, Tubaro, A, Zagonel, V, Crepaldi, G, Maggi, S, and Da Pozzo, L

Subjects
Male, 030232 urology & nephrology, Severity of Illness Index, Prostate cancer, 0302 clinical medicine, Quality of life, Activities of Daily Living, Diagnosis, Medicine, Age Factor, Prospective Studies, Prospective cohort study, Settore MED/36 - DIAGNOSTICA PER IMMAGINI E RADIOTERAPIA, Age Factors, Pros-IT CNR study, General Medicine, Health Survey, Middle Aged, Neoadjuvant Therapy, 3. Good health, Italy, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, lcsh:R858-859.7, Regression Analysis, Public Health, Human, Diagnosi, prostate cancer, survival, quality of life, medicine.medical_specialty, lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, Regression Analysi, 03 medical and health sciences, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Internal medicine, Severity of illness, Humans, Aged, Cancer staging, business.industry, Research, Environmental and Occupational Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Prostatic Neoplasms, Cancer, medicine.disease, Health Surveys, Comorbidity, Quality of Life, Prospective Studie, Settore MED/24, Prostatic Neoplasm, business, Sexual function
Abstract

Background The National Research Council (CNR) prostate cancer monitoring project in Italy (Pros-IT CNR) is an observational, prospective, ongoing, multicentre study aiming to monitor a sample of Italian males diagnosed as new cases of prostate cancer. The present study aims to present data on the quality of life at time prostate cancer is diagnosed. Methods One thousand seven hundred five patients were enrolled. Quality of life is evaluated at the time cancer was diagnosed and at subsequent assessments via the Italian version of the University of California Los Angeles-Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Results At diagnosis, lower scores on the physical component of the SF-12 were associated to older ages, obesity and the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities. Lower scores on the mental component were associated to younger ages, the presence of 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities and a T-score higher than one. Urinary and bowel functions according to UCLA-PCI were generally good. Almost 5% of the sample reported using at least one safety pad daily to control urinary loss; less than 3% reported moderate/severe problems attributable to bowel functions, and sexual function was a moderate/severe problem for 26.7%. Diabetes, 3+ moderate/severe comorbidities, T2 or T3-T4 categories and a Gleason score of eight or more were significantly associated with lower sexual function scores at diagnosis. Conclusions Data collected by the Pros-IT CNR study have clarified the baseline status of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. A comprehensive assessment of quality of life will allow to objectively evaluate outcomes of different profile of care.

Published
2018

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results