Search

Proton beam therapy offers the advantage of precise delivery with limited damage to the healthy tissue and is being tested in the management of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, the dosages tested are empirical and not based on preclinical studies.In this study we evaluated the effects of varying doses of proton beam radiation on choroidal endothelial cells (CECs) and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) using clonogenic assay to determine differential sensitivity.Each cell type has different efficiency to replicate (plating efficiency (PE)). PE of CEC (RF/6A) and RGC (RGC-5) grown in culture flasks was determined by plating 250 cells each (without any treatment) and counting the number of colonies after 13 days. Radiation induced sensitivity was determined by exposing the semi-confluent RF/6A and RGC-5 cells to proton beam at the doses of 0 (control), 2, 4, 8 and 12 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE). The ability of the cells to repair and replicate to form colonies were analyzed 13 days after radiation with crystal violet stain and the survival ratio was calculated. The significance of survival was analyzed using ANOVA (Graphpad Instat.3).The PE of CEC and RGC was 12.96 ± 0.29% and 40.7 ± 1.48%, respectively. A survival ratio of CEC at 2, 4, 8 and 12 CGE proton radiation was 66.0 ± 8.6%, 44.3 ± 6.5%, 7.6 ± 0.3% and 1.14 ± 0.06% on exposure to 2, 4, 8 and 12 CGE proton radiation, respectively, p 0.01). Survival ratio of RGC was 71.1 ± 22.4% (p = 0.05), 40.2 ± 7.9%, 8.89 ± 2.6% and 0.78 ± 0.31% at 2, 4, 8 and 12 CGE dosages (p 0.001).CEC showed dose-dependent decrease in survival rate with values attaining significance at all radiation dosages. In contrast, RGC was comparatively radio resistant and were able to replicate at lower doses and sensitive at higher doses after proton beam radiation.Since CECs proliferate during neovascularization, this clonogenic assay is a useful assay to assess the sensitivity of CEC to radiation. This study identified that CEC were more sensitive to proton beam radiation than RGC at all doses. This may provide a therapeutic window for administration of proton beam radiation in the management of AMD.

Purpose: The authors we evaluate the uncertainty in proton therapy dose distribution for prostate cancer due to organ displacement, varying penumbra width of proton beams, and the amount of rectal gas inside the rectum. Methods and Materials: Proton beam treatment plans were generated for ten prostate patients with a minimum dose of 74.1 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) to the planning target volume (PTV) while 95% of the PTV received 78 CGE. Two lateral or lateral oblique proton beams were used for each plan. The authors we investigated the uncertainty in dose to the rectal wall (RW) and the bladder wall (BW) due to organ displacement by comparing the dose-volume histograms (DVH) calculated with the original or shifted contours. The variation between DVHs was also evaluated for patients with and without rectal gas in the rectum for five patients who had 16 to 47 cc of visible rectal gas in their planning computed tomography (CT) imaging set. The uncertainty due to the varying penumbra width of the delivered protons for different beam setting options on the proton delivery system was also evaluated. Results: For a 5 mm anterior shift, the relative change in the RW volume receiving 70 CGE dose (V{submore » 70}) was 37.9% (5.0% absolute change in 13.2% of a mean V{sub 70}). The relative change in the BW volume receiving 70 CGE dose (V{sub 70}) was 20.9% (4.3% absolute change in 20.6% of a mean V{sub 70}) with a 5 mm inferior shift. A 2 mm penumbra difference in beam setting options on the proton delivery system resulted in the relative variations of 6.1% (0.8% absolute change) and 4.4% (0.9% absolute change) in V{sub 70} of RW and BW, respectively. The data show that the organ displacements produce absolute DVH changes that generally shift the entire isodose line while maintaining the same shape. The overall shape of the DVH curve for each organ is determined by the penumbra and the distance of the target in beam's eye view (BEV) from the block edge. The beam setting option producing a 2 mm sharper penumbra at the isocenter can reduce the magnitude of maximal doses to the RW by 2% compared to the alternate option utilizing the same block margin of 7 mm. The dose to 0.1 cc of the femoral head on the distal side of the lateral-posterior oblique beam is increased by 25 CGE for a patient with 25 cc of rectal gas. Conclusion: Variation in the rectal and bladder wall DVHs due to uncertainty in the position of the organs relative to the location of sharp dose falloff gradients should be accounted for when evaluating treatment plans. The proton beam delivery option producing a sharper penumbra reduces maximal doses to the rectal wall. Lateral-posterior oblique beams should be avoided in patients prone to develop a large amount of rectal gas.« less

Purpose To evaluate cervical spinal cord tolerance using equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis after proton-photon radiotherapy. Methods and material The 3D dose distributions were analyzed in 85 patients with cervical vertebral tumors. Mean follow-up was 41.3 months. The mean prescribed dose was 76.3 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE = proton dose × RBE 1.1). Dose constraints to the center and the surface of the cervical cord were 55–58 CGE and 67–70 CGE, respectively. Dose parameters, DVH and EUD, were calculated for each patient. The spinal cord toxicity was graded using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late effects scoring system. Results Thirteen patients experienced Grade 1–2 toxicity. Four patients had Grade 3 toxicity. For the dose range used in this study, none of the dosimetric parameters was found to be associated with the observed distribution of cord toxicities. The only factor significantly associated with cord toxicity was the number of surgeries before irradiation. Conclusion The data and our analysis suggest that the integrity of the normal musculoskeletal supportive tissues and vascular supply may be important confounding factors of toxicity at these dose levels. The results also indicate that the cervical spinal cord dose constraints used in treating these patients are appropriate for conformal proton-photon radiotherapy.

Prospective analysis of local tumor control, survival, and treatment complications in 44 consecutive patients treated with fractionated photon and proton radiation for a chordoma or chondrosarcoma of the skull base.Between December 1995 and December 1998, 45 patients with a median age of 55 years (14-85) were treated using a 201-MeV proton beam at the Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 34 for a chordoma and 11 for a chondrosarcoma. Irradiation combined high-energy photons and protons. Photons represented two-thirds of the total dose and protons one-third. The median total dose delivered within the gross tumor volume was 67 cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) (range: 60-70).With a mean follow-up of 30.5 months (range: 2-56), the 3-year local control rates for chordomas and chondrosarcomas were 83.1% and 90%, respectively, and 3-year overall survival rates were 91% and 90%, respectively. Eight patients (18%) failed locally (7 within the clinical tumor volume and 1 unknown). Four patients died of tumor and 2 others of intercurrent disease. In univariate analysis, young age at time of radiotherapy influenced local control positively (p0.03), but not in multivariate analysis. Only 2 patients presented Grade 3 or 4 complications.In skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas, the combination of photons with a proton boost of one-third the total dose offers an excellent chance of cure at the price of an acceptable toxicity. These results should be confirmed with a longer follow-up.

Purpose: This work investigates dose perturbations due to Self-expandable metal and polyester esophageal stents undergoing proton radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Methods: Five commercially available esophageal stents made of nitinol (Evolution, Wallflex and Ultraflex), stainless steel (Z-Stent) and polyester (Polyflex) were tested. Radiochromic film (GafChromic EBT3 film, Ashland, Covington, KY) wrapped around a stent and a 12cc syringe was irradiated with 2CGE (Cobalt Gray Equivalent) of proton beam in a custom fabricated acrylic phantom. An air-hollow syringe simulates the esophagus. Results: The Z-stent created the largest dose perturbations ranges from -14.5% to 6.1% due to the steel composition. The WallFlex, Evolution and Ultraflex stents produced the dose perturbation ranges of (−9.2%∼8.6%), (−6.8%∼5.7%) and (−6.2%∼6.2%), respectively. The PolyFlex stent contains the radiopaque tungsten markers located top, middle and bottom portions. When the focal cold spots induced by the markers were excluded in the analysis, the dose perturbation range was changed from (−11.6%∼6.4%) to (−0.6%∼5.0%). Conclusion: The magnitude of dose perturbation is related to material of a metallic stent. The non-metallic stent such as PolyFlex shows relatively lower dose perturbation than metallic stents except a radiopaque marker region. Overall Evolution and Ultraflex stent appear to be less dose perturbations. The largest dose perturbationsmore » (cold spots) were located at both edges of stents in distal area for the single proton beam irradiation study. The analysis of more than two proton beam which is more typical clinical beam arrangement would be necessary to minimize the doe perturbation effect in proton ratiotherapy.« less

Background and purpose : A comparative treatment planning study was undertaken between proton beam therapy (PBT) and intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) for patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), to assess the potential benefits and limitations of the two treatment m odalities. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed seven patients with recurrent NPC treated at our proton center with PBT from 2004 to 2007. Eclipse proton treatment planning system and Eclipse inverse treatment planning system for IMXT were employed. For each patient, the IMXT plan was optimized with nine evenly spaced coplanar fields. Three coplanar beam s and passive scattering mode were used for PBT. The dose prescription in cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) for gross tumor volume (GTV) was 66CGE and for planning target volume (PTV), 62.7CGE. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were used to evaluate the difference in dosimetric distributions for the target v olume and the organs at risk (OARs). Results: Optimal target volume coverage and similar target conformation were achieved in both PBT and IMXT. Median conformity index was 0.72 and 0.75 (p = 0.15) and median inhomogeneity coefficient was 0.14 and 0.10 (p = 0.08) for PBT and IMXT, respectively. Dose to OARs was significantly lower in PBT plans than IMXT. Median maximal dose to the brainstem was 27.89CGE(cobalt Gray equivalent) and 42.45Gy (p < 0.01), and the dose to 5% of the brainstem(D5) was 12.83CGE and 19.47Gy (p < 0.001 ), for PBT and IMXT, respectively. Median maximal dose to the spinal cord was 8.38CGE and 22.91Gy (p < 0.004), and the dose to 5% of the spinal cord was 2.18CGE and 13.62Gy (p < 0.001), for PBT and IMXT, respectively. Conclusions: The use of PBT, when compared with IMXT, resulted in similar levels of tumor conformation. PBT, however, exposed the OARs to a significantly lower dose, effectively s paring the brainstem, spinal cord, optic nerve and chiasm, temporal lobes and parotid glands. The superior dose distributions possible with PBT should translate into reduced morbidity and improved quality of life.

Purpose To compare treatment planning between combined photon–proton planning (CP) and proton planning (PP) for skull base tumors, so as to assess the potential limitations of CP for these tumors. Methods and Materials Plans for 10 patients were computed for both CP and PP. Prescribed dose was 67 cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) for PP; 45 Gy (photons) and 22 CGE (protons) for CP. Dose–volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), normal tissues (NT), and organs at risk (OARs) for each plan. Results were analyzed using DVH parameters, inhomogeneity coefficient (IC), and conformity index (CI). Results Mean doses delivered to the GTVs and CTVs with CP (65.0 and 61.7 CGE) and PP (65.3 and 62.2 Gy CGE) were not significantly different ( p > 0.1 and p = 0.72). However, the dose inhomogeneity was drastically increased with CP, with a mean significant incremental IC value of 10.5% and CP of 6.8%, for both the GTV ( p = 0.01) and CTV ( p = 0.04), respectively. The CI 80% values for the GTV and CTV were significantly higher with PP compared with CP. Compared with CP, the use of protons only led to a significant reduction of NT and OAR irradiation, in the intermediate-to-low dose (≤80% isodose line) range. Conclusions These results suggest that the use of CP results in levels of target dose conformation similar to those with PP. Use of PP significantly reduced the tumor dose inhomogeneity and the delivered intermediate-to-low dose to NT and OARs, leading us to conclude that this treatment is mainly appropriate for tumors in children.

Purpose A comparative treatment planning study has been undertaken between intensity modulated (IM) photon therapy and IM proton therapy (IMPT) in paraspinal sarcomas, so as to assess the potential benefits and limitations of these treatment modalities. In the case of IM proton therapy, plans were compared also for two different sizes of the pencil beam. Finally, a 10% and 20% dose escalation with IM protons was planned, and the consequential organ at risk (OAR) irradiation was evaluated. Methods and materials Plans for 5 patients were computed for IM photons (7 coplanar fields) and protons (3 coplanar beams), using the KonRad inverse treatment planning system (developed at the German Cancer Research Center). IMPT planning was performed assuming 2 different sizes of the pencil beam: IMPT with a beam of full width at half-maximum of 20 mm, and IMPT with a "mini-beam" (IMPT(M), full width at half-maximum = 12 mm). Prescribed dose was 77.4 Gy or cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) for protons to the gross tumor volume (GTV). Surface and center spinal cord dose constraint for all techniques was 64 and 53 Gy/CGE, respectively. Tumor and OAR dose-volume histograms were calculated. Results were analyzed using dose-volume histogram parameters, inhomogeneity coefficient, and conformity index. Results Gross tumor volume coverage was optimal and equally homogeneous with both IM photon and IM proton plans. Compared to the IM photon plans, the use of IM proton beam therapy leads to a substantial reduction of the OAR total integral dose in the low-level to mid-dose level. Median heart, lung, kidney, stomach, and liver mean dose and dose at the 50% volume level were consistently reduced by a factor of 1.3 to 25. Tumor dose homogeneity in IMPT(M) plans was always better than with IMPT planning (median inhomogeneity coefficient, 0.19 vs. 0.25). IMPT dose escalation (to 92.9 CGE to the GTV) was possible in all patients without exceeding the normal-tissue dose limits. Conclusions These results suggest that the use of IM photon therapy, when compared to IM protons, can result in similar levels of tumor conformation. IM proton therapy, however, reduces the OAR integral dose substantially, compared to IM photon radiation therapy. As a result, tumor dose escalation was always possible with IM proton planning, within the maximal OAR dose constraints. In IM proton planning, reducing the size of the proton pencil beam (using the "mini-beam") improved the dose homogeneity, but it did not have a significant effect on the dose conformity.

Object. After conventional doses of 55 to 65 Gy of fractionated irradiation, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) usually recurs at its original location. This institutional phase II study was designed to assess whether dose escalation to 90 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) with conformal protons and photons in accelerated fractionation would improve local tumor control and patient survival.Methods. Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this study. Eligibility criteria included age between 18 and 70 years, Karnofsky Performance Scale score of greater than or equal to 70, residual tumor volume of less than 60 ml, and a supratentorial, unilateral tumor.Actuarial survival rates at 2 and 3 years were 34% and 18%, respectively. The median survival time was 20 months, with four patients alive 22 to 60 months postdiagnosis. Analysis by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prognostic criteria or Medical Research Council indices showed a 5- to 11-month increase in median survival time over those of comparable conventionally treated patients. All patients developed new areas of gadolinium enhancement during the follow-up period. Histological examination of tissues obtained at biopsy, resection, or autopsy was conducted in 15 of 23 patients. Radiation necrosis only was demonstrated in seven patients, and their survival was significantly longer than that of patients with recurrent tumor (p = 0.01). Tumor regrowth occurred most commonly in areas that received doses of 60 to 70 CGE or less; recurrent tumor was found in only one case in the 90-CGE volume.Conclusions. A dose of 90 CGE in accelerated fractionation prevented central recurrence in almost all cases. The median survival time was extended to 20 months, likely as a result of central control. Tumors will usually recur in areas immediately peripheral to this 90-CGE volume, but attempts to extend local control by enlarging the central volume are likely to be limited by difficulties with radiation necrosis.

Purpose To evaluate the differential sensitivity of choroidal endothelial, retinal pigment epithelial, and retinal ganglion cells to escalating doses of proton beam radiation and to establish a safe dose range for the management of choroidal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design Laboratory investigation. Methods Proliferating simian choroidal endothelial cells (RF/6A), differentiated rat retinal ganglion cells (RGC-5), and serum-starved human retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19) were exposed to 2, 4, 8, and 12 cobalt gray equivalent of proton beam radiation and cell viability was quantified on day 9. Reactive oxygen species levels were analyzed. Results Significant decline of choroidal endothelial cell viability was noted as dose escalated from 4 to 8 cobalt gray equivalent with maximum effect observed at 12 cobalt gray equivalent. RGC-5 and ARPE-19 cell count decreased to 95% and 62.7% at 8 cobalt gray equivalent, respectively. Sub-analysis between 4 and 8 cobalt gray equivalent radiation revealed significant decrease in choroidal endothelial cell viability (43.1% at 7 cobalt gray equivalent and 32.3% at 8 cobalt gray equivalent of radiation). Correspondingly, RGC-5 and ARPE-19 cells did not show decrease in cell count or viability. Reactive oxygen species levels significantly increased in radiation-treated choroidal endothelial cells (8.3%-11.9%). Conclusions At 6-8 cobalt gray equivalent proton beam radiation, retinal ganglion and retinal pigment epithelial cells are preserved while choroidal endothelial cells are completely inhibited. This dosage offers optimum therapeutic safety window for treatment using proton beam radiation for exudative AMD.

Purpose: To describe a technique for partial breast irradiation with proton beam radiotherapy.Method and Materials: A breast patient post lumpectomy is fitted with a special brassiere to reproducibly support the ipsilateral breast while compressing the contralateral breast. The patient then lies prone in a PVC half cylindrical pipe, supported from shoulder up and below the abdomen by foam bead cushions. The air from the cushions is evacuated resulting in rigid immobilization. The breast area is then immobilized with a urethane based foaming agent producing custom immobilization of the ipsilateral breast. Next, the patient undergoes a treatment planningCT scan of the thorax. The physician contours the tumor bed to include surgical clips and then contours organs at risk. A 3D conformal treatment plan is then developed. For every treatment, the patient is fitted with the treatment brassiere, and positioned prone in the custom immobilization device. Orthogonal and treatment angle diagnostic x‐ray images are taken prior to treatment and are compared with the treatment planning DRRs to reproduce the treatment position according to the plan. The titanium clips are used in the alignment process. At least two fields are treated each day delivering a daily dose of 4.0 cobalt Gray equivalent, and a total dose of 40 cobalt Gray equivalent in 10 fractions. Results: 60 patients have been treated so far. Immobilization procedure is highly reproducible. A comparison with a photon plan demonstrates the clear advantage of a protontreatment to spare the organs at risk, including a significant decrease in skindose.Conclusion: The immobilization procedure provides an accurate and reproducible breast positioning, and minimizes respiratory motion. The procedure has been well tolerated by most patients treated so far. Protons provide significant normal tissue sparing as compared to photontreatments and the clinical results look encouraging.