Search

BACKGROUND: With the growing opioid epidemic across the US, in-hospital utilization of opioids has garnered increasing attention. Using a national cohort, this study sought to characterize trends, outcomes, and factors associated with in-hospital opioid overdose (OD) following major elective operations. METHODS: We identified all adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations entailing select elective procedures in the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Patients who experienced in-hospital opioid overdose were characterized as OD (others: Non-OD). The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital OD. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were developed to evaluate the association between in-hospital OD and mortality, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and non-home discharge. RESULTS: Of an estimated 11,096,064 hospitalizations meeting study criteria, 5375 (0.05 %) experienced a perioperative OD. Compared to others, OD were older (66 [57-73] vs 64 [54-72] years, p

ObjectiveTo determine the effects of ESRT (an iteratively adapted and tailored MBI) on perceived stress, executive cognitive function, psychosocial well-being (ie, burnout, mindfulness), and pro-inflammatory gene expression in surgical (ESRT-1) and mixed specialty (ESRT-2) PGY-1 volunteers.Summary of background and dataTailored MBIs have proven beneficial in multiple high-stress and high-performance populations. In surgeons, tailored MBIs have been shown to be feasible and potentially beneficial, but whether mindfulness-based cognitive training can improve perceived stress, executive function, well-being or physiological distress in surgical and nonsurgical trainees is unknown.MethodsIn 2 small single-institution randomized clinical trials, ESRT, a tailored mindfulness-based cognitive training program, was administered and iteratively adapted for first-year surgical (ESRT-1, 8 weekly, 2-hour classes, n = 44) and mixed specialty (ESRT-2, 6 weekly, 90-minute classes, n = 45) resident trainees. Primary and secondary outcomes were, respectively, perceived stress and executive function. Other prespecified outcomes were burnout (assessed via Maslach Burnout Inventory), mindfulness (assessed via Cognitive Affective Mindfulness Scale - Revised), and pro-inflammatory gene expression (assessed through the leukocyte transcriptome profile "conserved transcriptional response to adversity").ResultsNeither version of ESRT appeared to affect perceived stress. Higher executive function and mindfulness scores were seen in ESRT-1, and lower emotional exhaustion and depersonalization scores in ESRT-2, at pre-/postintervention and/or 50-week follow-up (ESRT-1) or at 32-week follow-up (ESRT-2), compared to controls. Pooled analysis of both trials found ESRT-treated participants had reduced pro-inflammatory RNA expression compared to controls.ConclusionsThis pilot work suggests ESRT can variably benefit executive function, burnout, and physiologic distress in PGY-1 trainees, with potential for tailoring to optimize effects.

Background: Timing of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis (VTEPPx) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is complex given concerns for potential worsening of hemorrhage. While timing of VTEPPx for TBI patients is known to vary at the patient level, to our knowledge, variation at the hospital level and correlation with quality metrics have not been quantified in a cohort of nonneurosurgical patients., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of the Trauma Quality Improvement database from 2018 to 2021. The primary outcome was variation in VTEPPx timing. This was ascertained by empirical Bayesian methodology using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included the association of risk-adjusted VTEPPx timing and hospital characteristics such as volume and risk-adjusted mortality, which was assessed through Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). Risk-adjusted mortality was similarly calculated using multilevel mixed-effects modeling., Results: Of 132,028 patients included in the current study, 38.7% received care at centers in the earliest quartile of VTEPPx timing, classified as Early (others labeled Delayed). Patients receiving care at Early centers presented with severe TBI at a similar rate to Delayed (17.4% vs. 19.0%; absolute standardized mean difference, 0.04). Early center patients more commonly received unfractionated heparin as opposed to low-molecular-weight heparin compared with Delayed (40.5% vs. 27.6%; absolute standardized mean difference, 0.28). At the center level, 12% of observed variation in VTEPPx was attributable to differential hospital practices. Overall trauma volume (r = -0.22, p < 0.001) and TBI volume (r = -0.19, p < 0.001) were inversely associated with risk-adjusted VTEPPx timing. In addition, centers initiating VTEPPx earlier had lower overall (r = 0.17, p < 0.001) and TBI-related mortality (r = 0.17, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: There is significant center-level variation in timing of VTEPPx among TBI patients. Earlier VTEPPx was associated with improved center outcomes overall and among TBI patients, supporting usage of VTEPPx timing as a holistic measure of quality., Level of Evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: With the growing opioid epidemic across the US, in-hospital utilization of opioids has garnered increasing attention. Using a national cohort, this study sought to characterize trends, outcomes, and factors associated with in-hospital opioid overdose (OD) following major elective operations., Methods: We identified all adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations entailing select elective procedures in the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Patients who experienced in-hospital opioid overdose were characterized as OD (others: Non-OD ). The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital OD. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were developed to evaluate the association between in-hospital OD and mortality, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and non-home discharge., Results: Of an estimated 11,096,064 hospitalizations meeting study criteria, 5375 (0.05 %) experienced a perioperative OD. Compared to others, OD were older (66 [57-73] vs 64 [54-72] years, p < 0.001), more commonly female (66.3 vs 56.7 %, p < 0.001), and in the lowest income quartile (26.4 vs 23.2 %, p < 0.001). After adjustment, female sex (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.68, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 1.47-1.91, p < 0.001), White race (AOR 1.19, CI 1.01-1.42, p = 0.04), and history of substance use disorder (AOR 2.51, CI 1.87-3.37, p < 0.001) were associated with greater likelihood of OD. Finally, OD was associated with increased LOS (β +1.91 days, CI [1.60-2.21], p < 0.001), hospitalization costs (β +$7500, CI [5900-9100], p < 0.001), and greater odds of non-home discharge (AOR 2.00, CI 1.61-2.48, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Perioperative OD remains a rare but costly complication after elective surgery. While pain control remains a priority postoperatively, protocols and recovery pathways must be re-examined to ensure patient safety., Competing Interests: The authors of this manuscript have no related conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2024 The Authors.)