Search

Contains fulltext : 70088.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)

Contains fulltext : 53191.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access), The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of house dust mite impermeable covers on asthma-specific health-related quality of life in adult asthmatic patients that were trained in guided self-management. In a 2-year randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, information on the quality of life was collected. The improvement of Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score in the allergens-avoidance group (0.26) was comparable to the improvement in the placebo group (0.30) and not significant. HDM-impermeable covers for pillows, duvets, and mattresses did not result in improved health-related quality of life.

Contains fulltext : 58660.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access), BACKGROUND: Exposure to allergens plays a role in the development of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and in the chronic inflammatory response seen in asthmatic patients. House dust mites (HDMs) are an important source of allergen. Reduction of these allergens might lead to better lung function and reduction of asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The effect of HDM-impermeable covers on HDM allergen levels, peak flow values, and asthma symptoms were measured. Therefore a randomized clinical trial was carried out. METHODS: Fifty-two allergic asthmatic patients were randomly allocated to use the HDM-impermeable or placebo covers. During the study period, daily peak flow and asthma symptom scores were recorded. Dust samples were taken from the mattresses. RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction in HDM allergen levels on the mattresses after encasing them with HDM-impermeable covers (reduction of 87% of Der p 1 in micrograms per gram of dust; P <.001). Baseline symptoms were so low that no improvement could be established. Morning peak expiratory flow is significantly higher in the intervention group compared with that seen in the placebo group during the study period (beta=20.2; P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: HDM-impermeable covers significantly decreased the level of HDM allergens. Furthermore, morning peak flow was significantly increased during the intervention period. This study indicates that HDM allergen-avoidance measures might have beneficial effects on allergen reduction and asthma outcome.

Contains fulltext : 140849.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of inhalation device (Autohaler versus metered dose inhaler) and patients' subjective opinion towards the different devices, as well as daily frequency and duration of treatment on medication compliance. DESIGN: Prospective study measuring compliance in the same patients of the Autohaler twice daily with the metered dose inhaler twice daily, as well the Autohaler twice daily with the Autohaler four times daily. SETTING: Primary health care. SUBJECTS: 34 subjects with asthma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients preference and compliance. RESULTS: Patients preferred the Autohaler. The percentage of patients with a negative opinion towards the metered dose inhaler was 38% compared with 12% towards the Autohaler. The median values of the compliance rate of the Autohaler with twice and four times daily frequency were 90.8% (25-75th percentile 61.6-98.0%) and 78.5% (25-75th percentile 49.0%-91.2%), respectively (p < 0.001). The duration of treatment period had a significant negative influence on compliance when four times daily dosage frequency was prescribed (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the devices (metered dose inhaler and Autohaler) and the patients' opinion about the devices did not significantly contribute to the compliance rates. Compliance towards the medication treatment, however, is negatively influenced by a high daily frequency.

Item does not contain fulltext, Asthma patients evaluate the effect of medication treatment through the degree of their asthma symptoms, which might be affected by their ability to perceive these symptoms. It has been suggested that beta2-agonists may mask the effects of an increase in airway inflammation. This study compared the perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction during monotherapy with short- or long-acting beta2-agonists. Asthmatic patients (68 male and 60 female, mean age 35+/-11 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 86+/-15% of the reference value, provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) geometric mean 0.97 mg x mL(-1) (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-1.30)) were selected and randomly allocated to use either a short-acting (salbutamol, n=41) or long-acting beta2-agonist (formoterol, n=46) or placebo (n=41) for 12 weeks. Perception of dyspnoea provoked by histamine-induced bronchoconstriction was measured at the start and every 4 weeks thereafter. Subjects quantified their sensation of breathlessness during the challenge tests on a modified Borg scale at the start of the study and every 4 weeks thereafter. The sensitivity to changes in FEV1 was analysed by the linear regression slope (alpha) Borg versus % fall in FEV1. The absolute perceptual magnitude (PS20) was determined by the perception score at the 20% fall in FEV1. Although the geometric mean PC20 decreased significantly within the group using short-acting beta2-agonists (in the group with initial PC20 > or = 2 mg x mL(-1) there was a drop from 5.26-1.94 mg x mL(-1); p=0.013), repeated measurement analysis showed no difference in the course of time of perception (both slope alpha and PS20) between the three medication groups. This study showed that chronic use of short- or long-acting beta2-agonists in asthmatics for a period of 12 weeks, did not significantly change the perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction compared with placebo. Further investigation is required to est

Item does not contain fulltext, Regular use of beta2-agonists might result in increased bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) and decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1). It has been suggested that these possible detrimental effects are not a real deterioration of the disease, but that it might be only a transient (rebound) effect shortly after discontinuing this regular use. Moreover, these effects are thought to occur especially during short-acting and not during long-acting beta2-agonists use. The aim of this study was to invest gate whether a rebound effect (a pharmacological deterioration effect diminishing after several hours) in FEV1 and PC20 (concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 with regard to baseline) occurred after cessation of regular use of beta2-agonists, and whether this occurred both after short-acting and long-acting beta2-agonists. Allergic asthmatic patients (n = 134) were randomly allocated to the use of a short-acting (salbutamol), a long-acting beta2-agonist (formoterol) or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, double-dummy). No other asthma medication was allowed, including inhaled corticosteroids. At the start and every 4 weeks later FEV and PC20 were measured, each time at least 12 h after the last doses of study medication, which is in the possible rebound period. To investigate whether a (transient) rebound effect occurred, parameters were additionally measured at least 72 h later after discontinuation of the study medication. After 12 weeks of short-acting beta2-agonist use, a drop was seen in FEV1 from 85.6 (+/- 2.21)% predicted to 78.8 (+/- 2.9)% predicted, measured 15 h (median) after the last doses of medication. This was significantly different compared to placebo. When measured 168 h (median) later FEV1 recovered to 85.5 (+/- 2.4)% predicted, comparable to baseline. PC20 decreased with -1.17 (+/- 0.44) doubling dose after 12 weeks of short-acting beta2-agonist use, measured 15 h after the last doses of medication, which was significantly d

Item does not contain fulltext, The relationship between asthma medication and the perception of asthma symptoms is of interest for daily practice. Poor perception of asthma symptoms might influence patients' health care behavior and subsequently might lead to undertreatment and deterioration of their disease. This study investigated the influence of the chronic use of short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists, compared with the additional use of inhaled corticosteroids on the perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. Patients with asthma (33 male and 31 female, mean age 35 +/- 11 yr, FEV(1) 87 +/- 14% of the reference value, PC(20) geometric mean 1.08 mg/ml (95% CI: 0.76-1.52) were selected and randomly allocated to the use of either a short-acting beta(2)-agonists (salbutamol, n = 22) or a long-acting beta(2)-agonists (formoterol, n = 22) or placebo (n = 20), which has been used for 12 wk. This medication treatment was repeated exactly 1 yr later, with patients receiving the same medication plus an inhaled corticosteroid. Perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction was measured at the start of each treatment period and every 4 wk thereafter. Subjects quantified their sensation of respiratory discomfort during the challenge tests on a modified Borg scale. The perceptive "sensitivity" for changes in FEV(1) was analyzed by the linear regression slope (alpha) "Borg versus percentage fall in FEV(1)." The "absolute perceptual magnitude" was determined by the perception score at the 20% fall in FEV(1) (PS(20)). The additional use of inhaled corticosteroids during the second year resulted in an improved perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction (slope alpha) compared with the first year for only the long-acting beta(2)-agonists group (p value 0.036). This improvement was not observed for the "absolute perceptual magnitude" (PS(20)). The additional use of inhaled corticosteroids during chronic use of long-acting beta(2)-agonists improves the perceptive "sensitivity" for c

Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 29 september 2000, Promotores : Schayck, C.P. van, Folgering, H.T.M., Herwaarden, C.L.A. van Co-promotores : Zielhuis, G.A., Postma, D.S., Sterk, P.J., Wouters, E.F.M., Knottnerus, J.A., Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 147073.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 140967.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 26121___.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 26124___.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 23594___.PDF (publisher's version ) (Open Access)