Search

Antimicrobial prophylaxis is widely recommended for pregnant women who have preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Erythromycin prophylaxis was used during an initial period (control) and then changed to intravenous amoxicillin for 48 h, followed by 5 days of oral amoxicillin along with a single dose of azithromycin (case). Healthcare records were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome was latency (between membrane rupture and delivery) and the secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, maternal high dependency unit (HDU) admission, and several laboratory parameters. There were 78 women in the case group (amoxicillin and azithromycin) and controls were selected on a 1:1 ratio. There was no statistically significant difference between cases and controls with respect to group B Streptococcus or E.coli carriage, previous preterm birth, assissted fertility and parity. No babies had a positive blood culture with Group B Streptococcus. There was a longer latency to delivery for those prescribed amoxicillin and azithromycin (median = 5.5 days), compared with controls on erythromycin (median = 2 days, p <.001). There was no difference in the mode of delivery or maternal HDU admission. Given the potential sequelae of preterm birth, this warrants further prospective investigation in a randomised control trial. What is already known on this subject? Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended for women who have preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM). It has been shown to increase latency of delivery. However there are different regimens recommended in North America (amoxicillin and a macrolide) and the United Kingdom (macrolide monotherapy). What do the results of this study add? This study has shown that in our population, women who were prescribed the PPROM regimen of amoxicillin with azithromycin had a longer median latency from time of rupture of membranes to delivery, than women in a historical control group who were prescribed erythromycin monotherapy. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This retrospective study has shown that there may be a difference in latency between different antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens for PPROM. A randomised control trial, with sufficient patient numbers, is needed to determine the best regimen for prophylaxis, and would allow harmonisation of international guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this project was to assess the implementation of a quality improvement project regarding the introduction of on-site influenza PCR testing in a stand-alone obstetric hospital.Methods: As part of a quality improvement project on the management of influenza in obstetric patients, the Xpert Flu assay (Cepheid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) was introduced on-site and it replaced the previous method of PCR testing which was off-site. The main outcome measures were duration of antimicrobials, rate of admission and administration of oseltamavir in the emergency department.Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in the pre-intervention period and 45 patients were included in the post-intervention period. Following the introduction of the test, there was a statistically significant reduction seen in commencement of antimicrobials (76% pre- and 33% post-intervention), and also rate of admission (88% pre- and 45% post-intervention) while there was a statistically significant improvement in the commencement of oseltamavir in the emergency department (72% pre-and 95% post-intervention) (p < .01 for all outcomes).Conclusion: Introduction of on-site rapid influenza PCR testing can lead to a significant improvement in patient management and should be considered for introduction to other sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]