Search

Background: Healthcare utilization for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is high, but stratifying patients' risk of hospitalization at initial evaluation is challenging. We examined the association between health status at PAD presentation and risk of (1) combined all-cause hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits and (2) all-cause hospital admissions., Methods: Patients with claudication enrolled at US sites in the PORTRAIT registry were included. Health status was assessed using the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ), a PAD-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Crude overall and cause-specific hospital admissions and ED visits were reported by PAQ overall summary score (PAQ-OS) ranges (0-24, 25-49, 50-74, and 75-100). Kaplan-Meier survival and unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models examined the association between baseline PAQ scores and (1) combined all-cause hospital admissions or ED visits and (2) all-cause hospital admissions over 12 months., Results: Of 796 patients, 349 (44%) had a hospital admission or ED visit over 12 months. Patients in the lowest (PAQ-OS = 0-24) versus the highest range (PAQ-OS = 75-100) had higher rates of 12-month (53.3% vs 22.4%) hospital admission and ED visits. In the adjusted model, each 10-point decrease in PAQ-OS was associated with a higher risk of all-cause hospital admission and ED visits (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2, p < 0.0010) and all-cause hospital admission (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2, p < 0.0010) at 12 months., Conclusion: PAD-specific health status is associated with an increased risk of healthcare utilization. Baseline health status may help stratify risk in patients with PAD, although replication and further validation of results are necessary., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Mena-Hurtado reports unrestricted research grants from Philips and Shockwave and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Cook, Medtronic, and Optum Labs. Dr Smolderen reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Merck, Shockwave, and Johnson & Johnson; she is a consultant for Optum Labs, Cook, Tegus, Twill, Inc., and Abbott Vascular. Dr Spertus is a consultant to Bayer, Janssen, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Terumo, and United Healthcare; he receives grant support from Janssen and MyoKardia; he holds the copyright to the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Objective: A critical goal in the care of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is to optimize their health status; that is, their symptoms, function, and quality of life. Social support has been proposed to be a predictor of disease-specific health status in patients with PAD. However, the prevalence of low perceived social support, the association with health status outcomes, and the interaction with other biopsychosocial variables, is unknown. Our aim was to assess the association of baseline perceived social support with health status at 12 months in patients with PAD., Methods: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Related Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories (PORTRAIT) registry, which enrolled patients with PAD in the United States, the Netherlands, and Australia from 2011 to 2015, was used. Perceived social support was assessed at baseline with the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Social Support Inventory (ESSI), and disease-specific (Peripheral Artery Disease Questionnaire [PAQ]) and generic health status (Euro-Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale [VAS] and EQ-5D-3L Index) questionnaires were assessed at baseline and 12 months. Low social support was defined as a score of ≤3 on two items and an ESSI score of ≤18. A hierarchical mixed level linear regression model adjusting for biopsychosocial variables was used to assess the association between low perceived social support and the ESSI score with health status at 12 months., Results: A total of 949 patients were included (mean age, 67.64 ± 9.32 years; 37.9% female), with low social support being present in 18.2%. Patients with low social support were more likely to not be married or to be living alone (50.0% vs 77.5%; P < .001); have more financial constraints; have more depressive, stress, and anxiety symptoms; and have lower disease-specific and generic health status at baseline and at 12 months. In the unadjusted model, low social support was associated with a -7.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], -10.97 to -3.07) point reduction in the PAQ, -7.43 (95% CI, -10.33 to -4.54) in the VAS, and -0.06 (95% CI, -0.09 to -0.03) in the EQ-5D-3L Index. Adjusting for biopsychosocial factors minimally attenuated these associations (PAQ: -6.52; 95% CI, -10.55 to -2.49; P = .002; VAS: -5.39; 95% CI, 8.36 to -2.42; P < .001; EQ-5D-3L Index: -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.01; P = .022). The ESSI per-point score was associated with a decrease of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.18-0.85; P = .003) in PAQ and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.12-0.61; P = .004) in the VAS., Conclusions: Among patients with PAD, low social support was frequent and associated with a lower health status at 1 year independent of other biopsychosocial variables. Improving social support could improve health status and outcomes in PAD., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: As the role of social determinants in carotid artery stenting (CAS) outcomes remains unclear, we investigated the association between the Distressed Community Index (DCI) (zip-code based) and post-CAS mortality/stroke outcomes., Methods: We analyzed patients undergoing CAS from 2015 to 2019 using the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Quality Initiative database. Patients were grouped based on high (DCI ⩾ 60) and low (DCI < 60) community distress. We analyzed 36-month mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox regression, and 36-month stroke using cumulative incidence function curves and Fine-Gray models., Results: The final cohort included 8717 patients (3032 DCI ⩾ 60), with a mean DCI score of 46.2 (± 28.5) and mean age of 74.7 (± 7.8) years. Most participants were men (64.3%), White (92.7%), and non-Hispanic/Latino (97.7%). There was no significant difference in the 36-month mortality incidence between high and low community distress groups (25.6% vs 23.5%, p = 0.22), and no significant association between high community distress and mortality (unadjusted HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.90-1.21; adjusted HR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.89-1.17). The high community distress group experienced an elevated 36-month stroke incidence (26.8% vs 22.4%, p = 0.048), but no significant association with stroke was observed (unadjusted sub-HR: 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.24; adjusted sub-HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.92-1.16)., Conclusion: Our cohort showed underrepresentation in terms of sex, race, and ethnicity, with a skewed DCI distribution towards lower community distress. Contrary to what we know about community distress, no independent association between higher community distress and post-CAS stroke/mortality risk was found. Future work must examine whether accessibility barriers and selective CAS allocation explain our results., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Mena-Hurtado reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Shockwave, Abbott, and Merck; he is a consultant for Abbott Vascular and Cook. Dr Smolderen reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Shockwave, Abbott, and Merck; she is a consultant for Cook and Happify. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Patients with peripheral artery disease face high amputation and mortality risk. When assessing vascular outcomes, consideration of mortality as a competing risk is not routine. We hypothesize standard time-to-event methods will overestimate major amputation risk in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and non-CLTI. Methods : Patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention from 2017 to 2018 were abstracted from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry and stratified by mean age (⩾ 75 vs < 75 years). Mortality and amputation data were obtained from Medicare claims. The 2-year cumulative incidence function (CIF) and risk of major amputation from standard time-to-event analysis (1 - Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression) were compared with competing risk analysis (Aalen-Johansen and Fine-Gray model) in CLTI and non-CLTI. Results : A total of 7273 patients with CLTI and 5095 with non-CLTI were included. At 2-year follow up, 13.1% of patients underwent major amputation and 33.4% died without major amputation in the CLTI cohort; 1.3% and 10.7%, respectively, in the non-CLTI cohort. In CLTI, standard time-to-event analysis overestimated the 2-year CIF of major amputation by 20.5% and 13.7%, respectively, in patients ⩾ 75 and < 75 years old compared with competing risk analysis. The standard Cox regression overestimated adjusted 2-year major amputation risk in patients ⩾ 75 versus < 75 years old by 7.0%. In non-CLTI, the CIF was overestimated by 7.1% in patients ⩾ 75 years, and the adjusted risk was overestimated by 5.1% compared with competing risk analysis. Conclusions : Standard time-to-event analysis overestimates the incidence and risk of major amputation, especially in CLTI. Competing risk analyses are alternative approaches to estimate accurately amputation risk in vascular outcomes research., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Mena-Hurtado reports unrestricted research grants from Abbott, Merck, and Shockwave and is a consultant for Cook, Novo Nordisk, and Terumo. Dr Smolderen reports unrestricted research grants from Abbott, Shockwave, and Johnson & Johnson; she is a consultant for Cook, Terumo, Novo Nordisk, and Happify. The other authors report no competing interests.

Purpose of Review: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a growing global epidemic. Women with PAD are at elevated risk of experiencing psychosocial stressors that influence the diagnosis, management, and course of their illness due to unique sex- and gender-based factors., Recent Findings: We review existing evidence for increased psychosocial risk in women with PAD with a focus on mood disorders, chronic stress, pain experiences, substance use disorders, health behaviors and illness perceptions, and healthcare access. We discuss how these factors exacerbate PAD symptomatology and lead to adverse outcomes. Existing gaps in women's vascular care are reviewed and potential solutions to bridge these gaps through psychosocial care integration are proposed. Current care paradigms for women's vascular care do not adequately screen for and address psychosocial comorbidities. Clinician education, integration of evidence-based psychological care strategies, implementation of workflows for the management of individuals with PAD and mental health comorbidities, reform to reimbursement structures, and further advocacy are needed in this space. This review provides a construct for integrated behavioral health care for women with PAD and advocates for further integration of care., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Identifying predictors of generic and disease-specific health status outcomes in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease who undergo femoral-popliteal peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for claudication remains an understudied area. We aimed to identify important predictors of health status after PVI as the foundation for risk-based approaches to deploying therapies that improve patient outcomes., Method: Baseline characteristics of 468 participants with claudication and femoral/popliteal stenosis treated with either the Stellarex paclitaxel-based drug-coated balloon or plain balloon angioplasty from 2013 to 2019 were included. The study examined 59 baseline variables and aimed to identify the most important predictors of generic (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D visual analog scale [VAS]) and disease-specific (Walking Impairment Questionnaire [WIQ]) health status at 1 year. A random forest model was used to generate a rank variables based on their importance in predicting 1-year health status., Results: Among included patients, mean ± standard deviation age was 68.3 ± 9 years with 67.9% and 87% being male and White, respectively. Baseline mean EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D VAS, and WIQ were 0.7 ± 0.3, 64.6 ± 16.0, and 30.7 ± 22.1, respectively. The most important variables for predicting EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D VAS, and WIQ were a history of deep venous thrombosis, chronic lung disease, and hypertension, respectively., Conclusions: Among patients undergoing PVI for claudication, comorbidities were the most important predictors of future health status, underscoring the need for an integrated approach for peripheral artery disease management. Utilization of machine learning approaches can facilitate development of models to inform risk-based approaches to treatment., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To analyze the impact of noninvasive and early invasive treatments on health status in patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) without and with chronic total occlusions (CTOs) after 12 months of follow-up., Methods: Using the international (the United States, the Netherlands, and Australia) observational longitudinal Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories registry, we included patients with recent PAD symptoms between June 2011 and December 2015. We assessed the PAD-specific health status at initial visit and the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up using the Peripheral Arterial Questionnaire. On a propensity matched-weighted cohort, we compared patients' characteristics by CTO status and treatment groups as early invasive (revascularization in the 3 months) vs noninvasive (exercise, medical therapies, or smoking cessation). We then assessed the health status trajectory over 12 months, as a three-way interaction between CTO status, treatment groups, and months, using a multilevel generalized linear regression model for repeated measures adjusted for baseline health status with random effects at the site and patient levels., Results: We included 581 participants, with a mean age of 66.62 ± 9.33 years, 34.3% female, and 90.8% White, of whom 353 (60.8%) were without and 228 (39.2%) had a CTO lesion. Respectively, 96 (27.2%) and 70 (30.7%) patients underwent early invasive treatment (d = 0.07). Although patients with CTO were more likely to have lower resting ABI, multilevel disease, and to experience severe claudication vs their counterparts (|d| ≥ 0.20), patient health status at baseline with CTO was not different from those without CTO, with mean summary scores of 45.14 ± 20.26 vs 45.90 ± 21.24 (d = 0.04), respectively. The trajectory did not differ by CTO status (interaction CTO status × month; P = .517) and was higher in early invasive vs noninvasive treatment (treatment × month; P < .001), regardless of CTO status (CTO status × treatment; P = .981 and CTO status × treatment × month; P = .264). The score increased over time with the largest improvement occurring at 3 months in both noninvasive (non-CTO, +7.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.03-11.60] and CTO, +9.27 95% CI, 4.45-14.09) and early invasive (non-CTO, +26.17 [95% CI, 20.06-32.28] and CTO, +24.52 [95% CI, 17.40-31.64] groups. The mean score in CTO vs non-CTO groups did not differ at each timepoint, with a 12-month mean score of 70.26 (95% CI, 67.87-74.65) vs 71.17 (95% CI, 65.91-76.44) (P = .99) in the noninvasive treatment and 84.93 (95% CI, 78.90-90.97) vs 79.20 (95% CI, 72.77-86.14) (P = .31) in the early invasive treatment., Conclusions: Patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing early revascularization exhibited better health status over time vs those undergoing noninvasive treatment strategy, irrespective of the presence of CTOs. The degree of the improvement was greater in the 3 months after the initial visit, especially in patients undergoing early revascularization., Competing Interests: Disclosures C.M.-H. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Shockwave, Abbott, and Merck; he is a consultant for Abbott, Terumo, and Cook. K.S. reports unrestricted research grants Philips, Shockwave, Abbott, J&J, and Merck; she is a consultant for Cook, Terumo, and Happify., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Variation in the care management of repairs for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms between centers and physicians, such as procedural volumes, may explain differences in mortality outcomes. First, we quantified the center and physician variability associated with 30- and 90-day mortality risk after ruptured open surgical repair (rOSR) and ruptured endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR). Second, we explored wheter part of this variability was attributable to procedural volume at the center and physician levels., Methods: Two cohorts including rOSR and rEVAR procedures between 2013 and 2019 were analyzed from the Vascular Quality Initiative database. Thirty- and 90-day all-cause mortality rates were derived from linked Medicare claims data. The median odds ratio (MOR) (median mortality risk from low- to high-risk cluster) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (variability attributable to each cluster) for 30- and 90-day mortality risks associated with center and physician variability were derived using patient-level adjusted multilevel logistic regression models. Procedural volume was calculated at the center and physician levels and stratified by quartiles. The models were sequentially adjusted for volumes, and the difference in ICCs (without vs with accounting for volume) was calculated to describe the center and physician variability in mortality risk attributable to volumes., Results: We included 450 rOSRs (mean age, 74.5 ± 7.6 years; 23.5% female) and 752 rEVARs (76.4 ± 8.4 years; 26.1% female). After rOSRs, the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 32.9% and 38.7%, respectively. No variability across centers and physicians was noted (30- and 90-day MORs ≈1 and ICCs ≈0%). Neither center nor physician volume was associated with 30-day (P = .477 and P = .796) or 90-day mortality (P = .098 and P = .559). After rEVAR, the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 21.3% and 25.5%, respectively. Significant center variability (30-day MOR, 1.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33-2.22]; ICC, 11% [95% CI, 2%-36%]; and 90-day MOR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.37-2.09]; ICC, 10% [95% CI, 3%-30%]), but negligeable variability across physicians (30- and 90-day MORs ≈1 and ICCs ≈0%) were noted. Neither center nor physician volume were associated with 30-day (P = .076 and P = .336) or 90-day mortality risk (P = .066 and P = .584). The center variability attributable to procedural volumes was negligeable (difference in ICCs, 1% for 30-day mortality; 0% for 90-day mortality)., Conclusions: Variability in practice from center to center was associated with short-term mortality outcomes in rEVAR, but not for rOSR. Physician variability was not associated with short-term mortality for rOSR or rEVAR. Annualized center and physician volumes did not significantly explain these associations. Further work is needed to identify center-level factors affecting the quality of care and outcomes for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms., Competing Interests: Disclosures C.M.-H. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Shockwave, Abbott, and Merck; he is a consultant for Abbott, Terumo, and Cook. K.G.S. reports unrestricted research grants Philips, Shockwave, Abbott, J&J, and Merck; she is a consultant for Cook and Happify., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Nutritional status plays a complex role in the pathophysiology and outcomes of chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). Undernutrition may be a modifiable risk factor. Given the variability in nutritional status concepts in CLTI outcomes studies, a systematic review examining the association between undernutrition and outcomes in patients with CLTI was conducted., Data Sources: A systematic literature search of nine databases (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database [AMED], CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases) was conducted up to 23 May 2023., Review Methods: Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, and case control studies of patients with CLTI conducted after 1982 that reported the effect size for a nutritional status measure and the outcomes of death, amputation, or a composite of the two. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and quality assessment, with a third independent reviewer resolving conflicts., Results: A total of 6 818 citations were screened, with 49 observational studies (31 from Japan) included in the review. The mean patient age ranged from 56.0 - 86.9 years. Most included patients were undergoing revascularisation. Unidimensional indicators of undernutrition (including low serum albumin, low body mass index, and zinc deficiency) as well as multidimensional measures (such as nutritional screening tool scores indicating undernutrition) were found to be associated with a statistically significant increased risk of death, amputation, and composite events in most studies. Effect sizes of the association were generally larger when multidimensional nutritional screening tools were used. However, the quality of evidence was poor, and certainty of evidence very low., Conclusion: Undernutrition is consistently associated with an increased risk of death and amputation in patients with CLTI, regardless of the measure used. Broader efforts to understand the framework of nutritional status and validation of nutritional screening tools in CLTI populations are needed., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Tailoring resources of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) to those who stand to gain the most would allow for more equitable and value-based care. One way of evaluating the benefit of PVIs in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease is evaluating their health status and identifying predictors of health status response 12 months after the intervention., Methods: Patients who underwent femoropopliteal PVI between March 2005 and August 2008 from the Zilver PTX randomized trial and single-arm study were combined into a single cohort for secondary data analysis. The preprocedural and 12-month health status was assessed by the EuroQol-5D-3 L (EQ-5D). First, we evaluated the 12-month EQ-5D Index (per 1-unit increase), adjusted for treatment condition and patient characteristics using a linear regression. Second, using the minimally clinically important difference threshold for the EQ-5D Index, we identified 12-month nonresponders (worsened or no change) vs responders (improved) and conducted an adjusted logistic regression model., Results: A total of 513 patients were included (mean age: 67.8 ± 9.2 years; 25.1% female), with 17.8% U.S. and 82.2% non-U.S. global enrollment sites. The minimally clinically important difference for the EQ-5D was 0.058. For 12-month health status after PVI, a total of 57.9% improved, 31.4% experienced no change, and 10.7% worsened, relative to their preprocedural health status. Patients who were more likely to be nonresponders were more likely to have a history of carotid artery disease or were located at a U.S. enrolling center., Conclusions: The majority of patients reported improved or stable health status after femoral-popliteal PVI. Approximately 4 in 10 patients were nonresponders, with the highest risk for nonresponse including individuals with existing carotid disease or those undergoing PVIs in the U.S. vs non-U.S., Competing Interests: Disclosures C.M.-H. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips and Shockwave and is a consultant for Cook and Terumo. K.G.S. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Merck, Shockwave, and Johnson & Johnson. She is a consultant for Cook, Terumo, and Happify. The remaining authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Comorbid chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse outcomes for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, comparative effectiveness data are limited for lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in patients with CLTI and CKD. We aimed to evaluate (1) 30-day all-cause mortality and amputation and (2) 5-year all-cause mortality and amputation for LEB vs PVI in patients with comorbid CKD., Methods: Individuals who underwent LEB and PVI were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative with Medicare claims-linked outcomes data. Propensity scores were calculated using 13 variables, and a 1:1 matching method was used. The mortality risk at 30 days and 5 years in LEB vs PVI by CKD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, with interaction terms added for CKD. For amputation, cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray models were used to account for the competing risk of death, with interaction terms for CKD added., Results: Of 4084 patients (2042 per group), the mean age was 71.0 ± 10.8 years, and 69.0% were male. Irrespective of CKD status, 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.42, P = .78) was similar for LEB vs PVI, but LEB was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation (sub-HR [sHR]: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44-0.97, P = .04). CKD status, however, did not modify these results. Similarly, LEB vs PVI was associated with a lower risk of 5-year mortality (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, P < .001) but no difference in 5-year amputation (sHR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.89-1.20, P = .67). CKD status did not modify these results., Conclusions: Regardless of CKD status, patients had a lower risk of 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day amputation with LEB vs PVI. Results may help inform preference-sensitive treatment decisions on LEB vs PVI for patients with CLTI and CKD, who may commonly be deemed too high risk for surgery., Competing Interests: Disclosures C.M.-H. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips and Shockwave, and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Cook, Medtronic, and Terumo. K.G.S. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Merck, Shockwave, and Johnson & Johnson, and she is a consultant for Terumo, Cook, and Twill Inc. All other authors have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Chronic venous disease is a common condition and has a significant impact on patients' health status. Validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess health status are needed to measure health status. This state-of-the-art review summarizes the current validation evidence for disease-specific PROMs for chronic venous disease and provides a framework for their use in the clinical setting., Methods: A literature search in OVID Embase and Medline was conducted to identify relevant English-language studies of chronic venous disease that used disease-specific PROMs between January 1, 1993, and June 30, 2022. Abstracts and titles from identified studies were screened by four investigators, and full-text articles were subsequently screened for eligibility. Data on validation of disease-specific PROMs was abstracted from each included article. Classical test theory was used as a framework to examine a priori defined validation criteria for content validity, reliability (construct validity, internal reliability, and test-retest reliability), responsiveness, and expansion of the validation evidence base (use in randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research, cultural or linguistic translations, predictive validity, or establishing the minimal clinically important difference threshold, defined as smallest amount an outcome or measure is perceived as a meaningful change to patients). The PROMs were categorized into three groups based on the manifestations of disease of the population for which they were developed. The overall validity of each PROM was assessed across three stages of validation including content validity (phase 1); construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness (phase 2); and expansion of the validation evidence base (phase 3)., Results: Of 2338 unique studies screened, 112 studies (4.8%) met inclusion criteria. The eight disease-specific PROMs identified were categorized into three groups: (1) overall chronic venous disease (C1 to C6); (2) C1 to C4 disease; and (3) C5 to C6 disease. Assessed by group, the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire met criteria for validation at all three phases for patients with C1 to C4 disease, and the Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire met criteria for validation at all three phases for patients with C5 to C6 disease. There were no PROMs that met all criteria for validation for use in overall chronic venous disease (C1 to C6)., Conclusions: Of the eight PROMs assessed in this review, only two met prespecified criteria at each phase for validation. The Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire and Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire should be considered for use in patients with chronic venous disease without venous ulcers and with venous ulcers, respectively., Competing Interests: Disclosures C.M.-H. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips and Shockwave and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Cook, Medtronic, and Optum Labs. K.G.S. reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Merck, Shockwave, and Johnson & Johnson; is a consultant for Optum Labs, Cook, Tegus, Twill Inc, and Abbott Vascular., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: As a key treatment goal for patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD), improving health status has also become an important end point for clinical trials and performance-based care. An understanding of patient factors associated with 1-year PAD health status is lacking in patients with PAD., Methods: The health status of 1073 consecutive patients with symptomatic PAD in the international multicenter PORTRAIT (Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) registry was measured at baseline and 1 year with the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ). The association of 47 patient characteristics with 1-year PAQ scores was assessed using a random forest algorithm. Variables of clinical significance were retained and included in a hierarchical multivariable linear regression model predicting 1-year PAQ summary scores., Results: The mean age of patients was 67.7 ± 9.3 years, and 37% were female. Variables with the highest importance ranking in predicting 1-year PAQ summary score were baseline PAQ summary score, Patient Health Questionnaire-8 depression score, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 anxiety score, new onset symptom presentation, insurance status, current or prior diagnosis of depression, low social support, initial invasive treatment, duration of symptoms, and race. The addition of 19 clinical variables in an extended model marginally improved the explained variance in 1-year health status (from R 2 0.312 to 0.335)., Conclusions: Patients' 1-year PAD-specific health status, as measured by the PAQ, can be predicted from 10 mostly psychosocial and socioeconomic patient characteristics including depression, anxiety, insurance status, social support, and symptoms. These characteristics should be validated and tested in other PAD cohorts so that this model can inform risk adjustment and prediction of PAD health status in comparative effectiveness research and performance-based care., Competing Interests: Disclosures J.A.S. is a consultant to Bayer, Janssen, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Terumo, and United Healthcare. He receives grant support from Janssen and MyoKardia. He holds the copyright to the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. He also serves on the Board of Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Kansas City. E.S. is supported by NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL150290), Food & Drug Administration, BD, Boston Scientific, Cook, CSI, Laminate Medical, Medtronic, and Philips. He is a consultant for Abbott, Bayer, BD, Boston Scientific, Cook, CSI, Inari, Infraredx, Janssen, Medtronic, Philips, Shockwave, and VentureMed. K.G.S. reports unrestricted research grants from Cardiva Medical Inc, Cook Medical, Inc, Merck & Co, Inc, Shockwave Medical Inc, and Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. She is a consultant for Optum Labs, Inc, and Abbott Laboratories. C.M-H. reports grant funding from Shockwave Medical, Inc and is a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Cook Medical, Inc, and Optum Labs, Inc. The other authors do not have conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) face a high long-term mortality risk. Identifying novel mortality predictors and risk profiles would enable individual health care plan design and improved survival. We aimed to leverage a random survival forest machine-learning algorithm to identify long-term all-cause mortality predictors in patients with CLTI undergoing peripheral vascular intervention., Methods and Results: Patients with CLTI undergoing peripheral vascular intervention from 2017 to 2018 were derived from the Medicare-linked VQI (Vascular Quality Initiative) registry. We constructed a random survival forest to rank 66 preprocedural variables according to their relative importance and mean minimal depth for 3-year all-cause mortality. A random survival forest of 2000 trees was built using a training sample (80% of the cohort). Accuracy was assessed in a testing sample (20%) using continuous ranked probability score, Harrell C-index, and out-of-bag error rate. A total of 10 114 patients were included (mean±SD age, 72.0±11.0 years; 59% men). The 3-year mortality rate was 39.1%, with a median survival of 1.4 years (interquartile range, 0.7-2.0 years). The most predictive variables were chronic kidney disease, age, congestive heart failure, dementia, arrhythmias, requiring assisted care, living at home, and body mass index. A total of 41 variables spanning all domains of the biopsychosocial model were ranked as mortality predictors. The accuracy of the model was excellent (continuous ranked probability score, 0.172; Harrell C-index, 0.70; out-of-bag error rate, 29.7%)., Conclusions: Our random survival forest accurately predicts long-term CLTI mortality, which is driven by demographic, functional, behavioral, and medical comorbidities. Broadening frameworks of risk and refining health care plans to include multidimensional risk factors could improve individualized care for CLTI.

Background: The use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) decreases the risk of death and amputation and may decrease hospital readmissions. The variability of GDMT prescription across sites and operators and the proportionality of risk is not well understood. We aimed to study the association between variability of GDMT prescription at the site and operator level and outcomes (including 90-day readmissions and 24-month all-cause mortality and major amputation)., Methods: We examined GDMT discharge rates in PVIs performed between 2017 and 2018 using Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative registry. GDMT included a statin, antiplatelet therapy, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE-i/ARB) if hypertensive. Quartiles (Q1-4) of GDMT rates were documented by operators and sites and variability was quantified using median odds ratios (MOR) and intraclass correlation (ICC). The association between lower GDMT rates (per 10%) by sites and operators with 90-day readmission were calculated using logistic regression, and with 24-month mortality and major amputation using parametric survival model. Models were adjusted for patient-level factors and included sites and operators nested within sites as 2 random effects., Results: GDMT rates for 17,147 patients across 223 sites and 1,263 operators ranged from 0% to 38% (Q1, MOR 1.43, 95%CI 1.39-1.47, P ≤ .001) to 57%-100% (Q4, MOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.44-1.51, P ≤ .001). Four percent of variance in GDMT use was explained by sites (ICC 3.9, 95%CI 2.9-5.3) and operators (ICC 4.1, 95%CI 3.1-5.4). A dose-response relationship was noted between lower GDMT rates and increased risk of 90-day readmission risk by sites (P = .021) and operators (P < .001). Lower GDMT prescription by site was associated with higher risk of 24-month mortality (HR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.02-1.13) and major amputation (HR = 1.08, 95%CI 1.01-1.15). Similar associations were found for GDMT use by provider (mortality HR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.08 and amputation HR = 1.04, 95%CI 1.00-1.08)., Conclusion: Both at the operator and health system level, there was significant variability in GDMT prescription following PVI, proportionally translating into risk for readmission, mortality, and major amputation. Targeted quality efforts should prioritize both operator and site levels to improve GDMT use and outcomes for patients undergoing PVI., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Dr. Smolderen reports unrestricted research grants from Cardiva Medical Inc., Cook Medical, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Shockwave Medical Inc., and Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson&Johnson. She is a consultant for Optum Labs, Inc., and Abbott Laboratories. Dr. Mena-Hurtado reports grant funding from Shockwave Medical, Inc. and is a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Cook Medical, Inc., Optum Labs, Inc. All other authors report no disclosures or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) have high mortality rates after revascularization. Risk stratification for short-term outcomes is challenging. We aimed to develop machine-learning models to rank predictive variables for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI)., Methods: Patients undergoing PVI for CLTI in the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative were included. Sixty-six preprocedural variables were included. Random survival forest (RSF) models were constructed for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality in the training sample and evaluated in the testing sample. Predictive variables were ranked based on the frequency that they caused branch splitting nearest the root node by importance-weighted relative importance plots. Model performance was assessed by the Brier score, continuous ranked probability score, out-of-bag error rate, and Harrell's C-index., Results: A total of 10,114 patients were included. The crude mortality rate was 4.4% at 30 days and 10.6% at 90 days. RSF models commonly identified stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF), age, urgent procedures, and need for assisted care as the most predictive variables. For both models, eight of the top 10 variables were either medical comorbidities or functional status variables. Models showed good discrimination (C-statistic 0.72 and 0.73) and calibration (Brier score 0.03 and 0.10)., Conclusion: RSF models for 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality commonly identified CKD, dementia, CHF, need for assisted care at home, urgent procedures, and age as the most predictive variables as critical factors in CLTI. Results may help guide individualized risk-benefit treatment conversations regarding PVI., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Mena-Hurtado reports unrestricted research grants from Philips and Shockwave, and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Cook, Medtronic, and Optum Labs; Dr Smolderen reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Merck, Shockwave, and Johnson & Johnson; she is a consultant for Optum Labs, Cook, Tegus, Twill Inc., and Abbott Vascular. The other authors report no competing interests.

Background: National quality reporting efforts after revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) are ongoing. Validation of endpoints are necessary in national quality registries., Objectives: This study sought to examine the interrater reliability for the endpoint of major amputation at 1 year in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry and the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative registry (VQI-VISION) against electronic health record (EHR) review., Methods: Surgical or endovascular revascularization procedures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, in the VQI registry and VQI-VISION for 2 academic health systems were queried. Major amputation data were abstracted by trained data collectors for the VQI and derived from Current Procedural Terminology codes for VQI-VISION. Cases underwent protocolized adjudication for the endpoint of major amputation by EHR review. Paired tests were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity. Spearman's ρ and Cohen's κ were used to evaluate interrater reliability., Results: Amputation endpoints for 1,936 revascularizations were examined. Compared with major amputation data in EHR review, the sensitivity for the VQI registry was 35.9% and the specificity was 99.4% (ρ = 0.53; κ = 0.48). For VQI-VISION, sensitivity was 67.7% and specificity was 98.9% (ρ = 0.75; κ = 0.74). For any amputation in VQI data, sensitivity was 35.3% and specificity was 99.3% (ρ = 0.53; κ = 0.46), and for VQI-VISION, they were 71.6% and 97.7%, respectively (ρ = 0.75; κ = 0.74)., Conclusions: Almost two-thirds of the amputations in the VQI registry and one-third of amputations in VQI-VISION were missing at 1 year compared against adjudicated EHR review. In preparing for national reporting systems for major amputation tracking, data collection system reform is needed., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The VISION registry was supported by a Food and Drug Administration grant (U01FD006936 [to Dr Goodney]). Drs Smolderen and Mena are supported by National Institutes of Health grants 1R21AT012430-01 and 1R01HL163640-01A1. Dr Goodney is supported by a research grant from the American Heart Association (SRFN #18SFRN33900147). Dr Smolderen has received unrestricted research grants from Philips, Abbott, Merck, and Johnson & Johnson; and has served as a consultant for Optum Labs and Abbott, Happify, and Haemonetics. Dr Mena-Hurtado has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Cook, Medtronic, Cardinal Health, and Optum Labs. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) and microvascular disease (MVD) are highly prevalent conditions that share common risk factors. This observational study aimed to characterize patients with both conditions and determine the impact of comorbid PAD/MVD on outcomes., Methods and Results: Patients admitted across 31 states January 2011 through December 2018 with a primary or secondary diagnosis of PAD or MVD were included from the National Readmissions Database and weighted to approximate a national sample. Those age <18 years or with nonatherosclerotic leg injuries were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 groups: PAD-only, MVD-only, or comorbid PAD/MVD. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate associations with major and minor amputations, major adverse cardiac events, and in-hospital mortality. Cox regression was used to evaluate associations with readmission within 1 year. The PAD group was used as reference. The final cohort included 33 972 772 admissions: 9.1 million with PAD, 21.3 million with MVD, and 3.6 million with both. Annual admissions for PAD/MVD increased to >500 000 in 2018. Major and minor amputations increased ≈50% for PAD/MVD between 2011 and 2018. Compared with PAD-only, PAD/MVD was associated with a higher risk for major amputation (odds ratio [OR], 1.30 [95% CI, 1.28-1.32]), minor amputation (OR, 2.15 [95% CI, 2.12-2.18]), major adverse cardiac events (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.03-1.04]), in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.05-1.09]), and readmission (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.02-1.02]) after adjustment for baseline factors., Conclusions: Comorbid MVD is present in a large and growing number of patients with PAD and is associated with augmented risk for adverse outcomes. Further prospective research is merited to understand this vulnerable population.

Objective: There is a relative lack of comparative effectiveness research on revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We examined the association between lower extremity bypass (LEB) vs peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for CLTI and 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality and 30-day and 5-year amputation., Methods: Patients undergoing LEB and PVI of the below-the-knee popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries between 2014 and 2019 were queried from the Vascular Quality Initiative, and outcomes data were obtained from the Medicare claims-linked Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database. Propensity scores were calculated on 15 variables using a logistic regression model to control for imbalances between treatment groups. A 1:1 matching method was used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and hierarchical Cox proportional hazards regression with a random intercept for site and operator nested in site to account for clustered data compared 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality between groups. Thirty-day and 5-year amputation were subsequently compared using competing risk analysis to account for the competing risk of death., Results: There was a total of 2075 patients in each group. The overall mean age was 71 ± 11 years, 69% were male, and 76% were white, 18% were black, and 6% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics in the matched cohort were balanced between groups. There was no association between all-cause mortality over 30 days and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 2.3% vs 2.3% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value = .906; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.44; P-value = .80). All-cause mortality over 5 years was lower for LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence, 55.9% vs 60.1% by Kaplan Meier; log-rank P-value < .001; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70-0.86; P-value < .001). Accounting for competing risk of death, amputation over 30 days was also lower in LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 1.9% vs 3.0%; Fine and Gray P-value = .025; subHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95; P-value = .025). There was no association between amputation over 5 years and LEB vs PVI (cumulative incidence function, 22.6% vs 23.4%; Fine and Gray P-value = .184; subHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.05; P-value = .184)., Conclusions: In the Vascular Quality Initiative-linked Medicare registry, LEB vs PVI for CLTI was associated with a lower risk of 30-day amputation and 5-year all-cause mortality. These results will serve as a foundation to validate recently published randomized controlled trial data, and to broaden the comparative effectiveness evidence base for CLTI., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: One-fifth of the patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) experience depression and stress. Depression and stress may impact patients' abilities to be physically active, a key recommendation for supporting overall PAD management to improve symptoms and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. We aimed to study interrelationships between 1-year longitudinal trajectories of depression, stress, and physical activity following a PAD diagnosis., Methods: Patients with new or worsening PAD symptoms enrolled at 10 US PORTRAIT study (Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) vascular specialty clinics (CT, LA, MI, MO, NC, OH, and RI) were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months between June 2, 2011 and December 3, 2015. Depressive symptoms were measured with the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire, perceived stress with the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale and physical activity with items from the INTERHEART study. Path analysis was used to examine the longitudinal relationship between depression and physical activity and perceived stress and physical activity., Results: A total of 766 patients were included (mean age of 68.2 [±9.4] years; 57.7% male). Overall, 17.8% reported significant depressive symptoms, 36.0% experienced increased perceived stress, and 44.1% were sedentary upon PAD diagnosis. A decrease in physical activity preceded a rise in subsequent depressive symptoms (β ranges -0.45 [95% CI, -0.80 to -0.09]; -0.81 [95% CI, -1.19 to 0.42]) over the course of 1 year. Low physical activity scores at the initial presentation were followed by high perceived stress at 3 months (β=-0.44 [95% CI, -0.80 to -0.07])., Conclusions: In symptomatic PAD, a decrease in physical activity was followed by an increased risk of depressive symptoms and perceived stress at subsequent intervals over the course of 1 year following PAD diagnosis and treatment. Integrated behavioral health approaches for PAD, addressing physical activity and managing depression or distress, are indicated as collective PAD treatment goals., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Smolderen reports unrestricted research grants from Philips, Merck, Shockwave, and Johnson & Johnson; she is a consultant for Optum Labs, Cook, Tegus, Twill Inc. and Abbott Vascular. Dr Spertus reports research grants from Janssen, Bristol Meyers Squibb, and Abbott Vascular; consulting for Janssen, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Bayer, United Healthcare, Terumo, Merck, Imbria Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Aventis; serving on the board of directors for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas City; and owning the copyright to the KCCQ, SAQ, and PAQ. Dr Mena-Hurtado reports unrestricted research grants from Abbott Vascular, Philips, and Shockwave and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Cook, Optum Labs. The other authors report no conflicts.

Introduction: Community distress is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease; however, its impact on clinical outcomes after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) is uncertain. The Distressed Communities Index (DCI) is a composite measure of community distress measured at the zip code level. We evaluated the association between community distress, as measured by the DCI, and 24-month mortality and major amputation after PVI., Methods: We used the Vascular Quality Initiative database, linked with Medicare claims data, to identify patients who underwent initial femoropopliteal PVI between 2017 and 2018. DCI scores were assigned using patient-level zip code data. The primary outcomes were 24-month mortality and major amputation. We used time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine an optimal DCI value to stratify patients into risk categories for 24-month mortality and major amputation. Mixed Cox regression models were constructed to estimate the association of DCI with 24-month mortality and major amputation., Results: The final cohort consisted of 16,864 patients, of whom 4734 (28.1%) were classified as having high community distress (DCI ≥70). At 24 months, mortality was elevated in patients with high community distress (30.7% vs 29.5%, P = .02), as was major amputation (17.2% vs 13.1%, P <.001). After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, a 10-point higher DCI score was associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.03) and major amputation (hazard ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.04)., Conclusions: High community distress is associated with increased risk of mortality and major amputation after PVI., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We sought to determine the 1-year outcomes of patients receiving successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures comparing subintimal versus intraplaque wire tracking patterns., Background: CTO PCI utilizes both intraluminal and subintimal wire tracking to achieve successful percutaneous revascularization. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can be used to precisely determine the path of wire tracking., Methods: From 2014 to 2016, data from patients undergoing CTO PCI were collected in a single-center database. The primary composite endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) defined as cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR)., Results: In total 157 patients with successful CTO PCI and concomitant IVUS imaging completed 1-year follow-up. Subintimal tracking was detected in 53.5% of cases and those patients had a higher incidence of prior PCI, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, and higher J-CTO score. At 1-year, the unadjusted rate of TVF in the subintimal tracking group was higher than the intraplaque group (17.9 vs. 6.9%, HR 2.74, 95% CI 1.00-7.54, P = 0.04), driven by numerically higher rates of TVR and peri-procedural MI. After multivariable adjustment, no significant differences in the rates of the TVF between subintimal vs. intraplaque groups were present at 1-year (TVF: HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.38-6.00, P = 0.55). Landmark analysis excluding in-hospital events showed no significant differences in TVF to 1-year., Conclusions: IVUS-detected subintimal tracking was observed in over half of successful CTO PCI cases and correlated with baseline and angiographic factors that contributed to the overall rate of TVF at 1-year., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: We hypothesized that the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) 1α in vascular smooth muscle contributes to the development of atherosclerosis, and links intravascular pressure to this process., Approach and Results: Transverse aortic constriction was used to create high-pressure vascular segments in control, apolipoprotein E (ApoE)(-/-), smooth muscle-HIF1α(-/-), and ApoE(-/-)×smooth muscle-HIF1α(-/-) double-knockout mice. Transverse aortic constriction selectively induced atherosclerosis in high-pressure vascular segments in young ApoE(-/-) mice on normal chow, including coronary plaques within 1 month. Concomitant deletion of HIF1α from smooth muscle significantly reduced vascular inflammation, and attenuated atherosclerosis., Conclusions: HIF1α in vascular smooth muscle plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, and may provide a mechanistic link between blood pressure, vascular inflammation, and lipid deposition., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor CRFR2 is expressed widely in peripheral tissues and in the vasculature, although its functional roles in those tissues have only recently begun to be elucidated. Previously we found that genetic deletion of CRFR2 resulted in profound postnatal hypervascularization in mice, characterized by both an increase in total vessel number and a dramatic increase in vessel diameter. These data strongly suggested that ligands for CRFR2 act to limit tissue vascularity, perhaps as a counterbalance to factors that promote neovascularization. Urocortin 2 (Ucn2) is a specific ligand for the CRFR2. We hypothesized that activation of CRFR2 by Ucn2 might thus suppress tumor vascularization and consequently limit tumor growth. Here, we show that viral-mediated expression of Ucn2 strikingly inhibits the growth and vascularization of Lewis Lung Carcinoma Cell (LLCC) tumors in vivo. Further, we found that this effect on tumor growth inhibition was independent of whether exposure to Ucn2 occurred before or after establishment of measurable tumors. In vitro, Ucn2 directly inhibited the proliferation of LLCC, suggesting that the tumor-suppressing effects of CRFR2 activation involve a dual mechanism of both a direct inhibition of tumor cell cycling and the suppression of tumor vascularization. These results establish that Ucn2 inhibits tumor growth, suggesting a potential therapeutic role for CRFR2 ligands in clinical malignancies.