Search

miR-31 is a highly conserved microRNA that plays crucial roles in cell proliferation, migration and differentiation. We discovered that miR-31 and some of its validated targets are enriched on the mitotic spindle of the dividing sea urchin embryo and mammalian cells. Using the sea urchin embryo, we found that miR-31 inhibition led to developmental delay correlated with increased cytoskeletal and chromosomal defects. We identified miR-31 to directly suppress several actin remodeling transcripts, including β-actin, Gelsolin, Rab35 and Fascin. De novo translation of Fascin occurs at the mitotic spindle of sea urchin embryos and mammalian cells. Importantly, miR-31 inhibition leads to a significant a increase of newly translated Fascin at the spindle of dividing sea urchin embryos. Forced ectopic localization of Fascin transcripts to the cell membrane and translation led to significant developmental and chromosomal segregation defects, highlighting the importance of the regulation of local translation by miR-31 at the mitotic spindle to ensure proper cell division. Furthermore, miR-31-mediated post-transcriptional regulation at the mitotic spindle may be an evolutionarily conserved regulatory paradigm of mitosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Blastocyst stage transfer appears to improve pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluatethe pregnancy results between fresh cycle blastocyst stage embryo transfer and cleavage stage embryo transfer inpatients who undergo intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical trial study was conducted at the Infertility Research Centre of MiladHospital in Mashhad, Iran from 2018 to 2020 on 240 infertile women who presented for their first ICSI procedure.These patients were assigned to receive either cleavage embryo transfer (n=112) or blastocyst stage transfer (n=107).Pregnancy outcomes were measured in both groups.Results: There were no differences regarding age, body mass index (BMI), serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH),duration of infertility, and aetiology of infertility between the groups (P>0.05). There were more follicles, total oocytes,and metaphase II (M2) oocytes in the blastocyst stage group. Considerably more cleavage stage embryos weretransferred compared to the number of transferred blastocysts (P=0.001). The blastocyst group had more vitrified embryosthan the cleavage group (P=0.000). The rates of implantation (P=0.332), chemical pregnancy (P=0.165), clinicalpregnancy (P=0.694), and live births (P=0.727) were higher in the blastocyst group, but they were not significantlydifferent. The rate of abortion was also not significantly higher in the blastocyst group (P=0.296).Conclusion: Blastocysts transferred in the fresh cycle of an ICSI procedure may be more advantageous compared tocleavage stage embryo transfer (registration number: IRCT20181030041503N1).

Introduction: The utilization of frozen embryo transfer not only enhances reproductive outcomes by elevating the likelihood of live birth and clinical pregnancy but also improves safety by mitigating the risks associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancies. There has been an increasing debate in recent years regarding the advisability of making elective frozen embryo transfer the standard practice. Our study aims to determine the optimal choice between fresh and frozen embryo transfer, as well as whether the transfer should occur at the cleavage or blastocyst stage. Method: In this retrospective cohort study conducted in Taiwan, data from the national assisted reproductive technology (ART) database spanning from January 1st, 2013, to December 31st, 2017, were analyzed. The study included 51,762 eligible female participants who underwent ART and embryo transfer. Pregnancy outcomes, maternal complications, and singleton neonatal outcomes were evaluated using the National Health Insurance Database from January 1st, 2013, to December 31st, 2018. Cases were categorized into groups based on whether they underwent fresh or frozen embryo transfers, with further subdivision into cleavage stage and blastocyst stage transfers. Exposure variables encompassed clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, OHSS, pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus (DM), placenta previa, placental abruption, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), gestational age, newborn body weight, and route of delivery. Results: Frozen blastocyst transfers showed higher rates of clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live births (LBR) compared to fresh blastocyst transfers. Conversely, frozen cleavage stage transfers demonstrated lower rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth compared to fresh cleavage stage transfers. Frozen embryo transfers were associated with reduced risks of OHSS but were linked to ahigher risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension compared to fresh embryo transfers. Additionally, frozen embryo transfers were associated with a higher incidence of large for gestational age infants and a lower incidence of small for gestational age infants. Conclusion: The freeze-all strategy may not be suitable for universal application. When embryos can develop to the blastocyst stage, FET is a favorable choice, but embryos can only develop to the cleavage stage, fresh embryo transfer becomes a more reasonable option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Blastocyst stage transfer appears to improve pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the pregnancy results between fresh cycle blastocyst stage embryo transfer and cleavage stage embryo transfer in patients who undergo intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical trial study was conducted at the Infertility Research Centre of Milad Hospital in Mashhad, Iran from 2018 to 2020 on 240 infertile women who presented for their first ICSI procedure. These patients were assigned to receive either cleavage embryo transfer (n=112) or blastocyst stage transfer (n=107). Pregnancy outcomes were measured in both groups. Results: There were no differences regarding age, body mass index (BMI), serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), duration of infertility, and aetiology of infertility between the groups (P>0.05). There were more follicles, total oocytes, and metaphase II (M2) oocytes in the blastocyst stage group. Considerably more cleavage stage embryos were transferred compared to the number of transferred blastocysts (P=0.001). The blastocyst group had more vitrified embryos than the cleavage group (P=0.000). The rates of implantation (P=0.332), chemical pregnancy (P=0.165), clinical pregnancy (P=0.694), and live births (P=0.727) were higher in the blastocyst group, but they were not significantly different. The rate of abortion was also not significantly higher in the blastocyst group (P=0.296). Conclusion: Blastocysts transferred in the fresh cycle of an ICSI procedure may be more advantageous compared to cleavage stage embryo transfer (registration number: IRCT20181030041503N1). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the contribution of the cleavage stage morphological parameters to the prediction of blastocyst transfer outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 8383 single-blastocyst transfer cycles including 2246 fresh and 6137 vitrified-warmed cycles. XGboost, LASSO, and GLM algorithms were employed to establish models for assessing the predictive value of the cleavage stage morphological parameters in transfer outcomes. Four models were developed using each algorithm: all-in model with or without day 3 morphology and embryo quality-only model with or without day 3 morphology. Results: The live birth rate was 48.04% in the overall cohort. The AUCs of the models with the algorithm of XGboost were 0.83, 0.82, 0.63, and 0.60; with LASSO were 0.66, 0.66, 0.61, and 0.60; and with GLM were 0.66, 0.66, 0.61, and 0.60 respectively. In models 1 and 2, female age, basal FSH, peak E2, endometrial thickness, and female BMI were the top five critical features for predicting live birth; In models 3 and 4, the most crucial factor was blastocyst formation on D5 rather than D6. In model 3, incorporating cleavage stage morphology, including early cleavage, D3 cell number, and fragmentation, was significantly associated with successful live birth. Additionally, the live birth rates for blastocysts derived from on-time, slow, and fast D3 embryos were 49.7%, 39.5%, and 52%, respectively. Conclusions: The value of cleavage stage morphological parameters in predicting the live birth outcome of single blastocyst transfer is limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY QUESTION Are cumulative pregnancy rates better if supernumerary embryos are vitrified on Day 5/6 instead of Day 3? SUMMARY ANSWER The results do not show a significant difference in cumulative pregnancy rates between the Day 3 and Day 5/6 vitrification groups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Pregnancy and live birth rates following IVF or ICSI treatment are higher after extended embryo culture and blastocyst transfer (Day 5/6) compared to cleavage-stage (Day 3) transfer. Cumulative pregnancy rates from one oocyte retrieval (OR) cycle show no significant difference after fresh and frozen embryo transfers, but only one study has used vitrification for the cryopreservation of supernumerary embryos while four studies have used a slow freezing protocol. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Our prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in an academic centre between January 2018 and August 2020. Patients were randomized into vitrification Day 3 (n = 80) or Day 5/6 (n = 81) groups. The primary outcome was the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate (cOPR), considering only the first pregnancy for each couple. The power calculation revealed that 75 patients were required in each group, when assuming a 50% cOPR with four embryo transfers in the vitrification Day 3 group vs two transfers in the vitrification Day 5/6 group. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients <38 years undergoing their first or second OR cycles were randomized at the start of the first cycle. Up to two cycles were included in the analysis. A fresh embryo transfer was performed on Day 3. Supernumerary embryos (with ≥6 cells, <25% fragmentation, and equal blastomeres) or blastocysts (with expansion grade ≥2 with inner cell mass and trophectoderm score A/B) were vitrified on Day 3 or Day 5/6, respectively, and then transferred at a later date. A time-to-event analysis was performed with the patient's first ongoing pregnancy as the event of interest and the number of embryo transfers as the time component. The statistical comparison was performed by a Cox proportional hazards model. Cumulative costs of vitrification on Day 3 vs Day 5/6 were explored and compared using Mann–Whitney U tests. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE By December 2021, 233 transfers (96 fresh and 137 frozen) in 77 patients were performed in the vitrification Day 3 group and 201 transfers (88 fresh and 113 frozen) in 77 patients were performed in the vitrification Day 5/6 group. The time-to-event analysis did not show a difference between the two arms with regard to the patient's first ongoing pregnancy as the primary study outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1.25, 95% CI 0.82; 1.92, P = 0.30). The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after eight transfers (from one or two ORs) was 57% in the vitrification Day 3 group vs 58% in the vitrification Day 5/6 group. The median number of embryo transfers until a pregnancy was achieved was five vs four, respectively, in the vitrification Day 3 group vs the Day 5/6 group. Similar results were found for the secondary study outcome, i.e. clinical pregnancy with foetal heart rate (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.78; 1.80, P = 0.41). The cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (cCPR) after eight embryo transfers was 62% in the vitrification Day 3 group vs 59% in the vitrification Day 5/6 group. The median number of transfers until a pregnancy was achieved was four in both groups. The healthcare consumption pattern differed between the two groups and we observed higher costs for the vitrification Day 3 group compared to the vitrification Day 5/6 group, although these differences were not statistically significant. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although our power calculation revealed that only 75 patients were needed in each study group (β = 0.87, α < 0.05), the numbers were low. Also, different numbers of single and double embryo transfers were performed between the two groups, which may have affected the results. The cost analysis was performed on a subset of the patients and is therefore exploratory. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study shows no difference in the cumulative pregnancy rate nor costs after fresh and frozen embryo transfers of at most two sequential OR cycles between the Day 3 and Day 5/6 vitrification groups; however, obstetric and perinatal outcomes should be taken into account to determine the best strategy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded as an investigator-sponsored study of S.D. by Merck nv/sa Belgium, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and by Gedeon Richter Benelux (PA18-0162). The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04196036. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 15 January 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT 15 January 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During preimplantation development, single aneuploidies are more commonly tolerated than complex aneuploidies. Some studies have reported that blastocysts with aneuploid karyotypes on Day-3 embryo biopsy can exhibit a normal karyotype on Day-5 rebiopsy, suggesting that single aneuploidies may have a higher likelihood of presenting a normal karyotype on Day-5. The purpose of the current study was to assess the benefit of reanalyzing the karyotypes of Day-3 single aneuploid embryos on Day-5. Methods: Day-3 and Day-5 biopsies of preimplantation embryos were subjected to array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). A proof of concept case series study was conducted involving 13 Day-5 embryos from 4 couples across 3 ART centers, collected between October 2019 and June 2020. Each center provided one normal embryo and 3-4 embryos with single aneuploidy based on Day-3 aCGH results. The karyotype of each Day-5 embryo was compared with its corresponding Day-3 karyotype. Results: Among the 10 embryos with single aneuploidy on Day-3, 3 (30%) exhibited discordant karyotypes on Day-5, while the remaining 7 single aneuploid embryos and 3 normal embryos maintained the same karyotype from Day-3 to Day-5. None of the Day-3 single aneuploid embryos displayed a normal karyotype on Day-5. Conclusion: Contrary to previous reports suggesting the potential correction of single aneuploidies in some embryos, the findings of this study did not support such a possibility in the analyzed embryos. Genomic reanalysis of Day-3 single aneuploid embryos on Day-5 does not appear to be a reliable method for identifying euploid embryos suitable for transfer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY QUESTION Is embryo culture in a closed time-lapse system associated with any differences in perinatal and maternal outcomes in comparison to conventional culture and spontaneous conception? SUMMARY ANSWER There were no significant differences between time-lapse and conventional embryo culture in preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks), low birth weight (LBW, >2500 g) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for singleton deliveries, the primary outcomes of this study. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Evidence from prospective trials evaluating the safety of time-lapse incubation for clinical use show similar embryo development rates, implantation rates, and ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates when compared to conventional incubation. Few studies have investigated if uninterrupted culture can alter risks of adverse perinatal outcomes presently associated with IVF when compared to conventional culture and spontaneous conceptions. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This study is a Swedish population-based retrospective registry study, including 7379 singleton deliveries after fresh embryo transfer between 2013 and 2018 from selected IVF clinics. Perinatal outcomes of singletons born from time-lapse-cultured embryos were compared to singletons from embryos cultured in conventional incubators and 71 300 singletons from spontaneous conceptions. Main perinatal outcomes included PTB and LBW. Main maternal outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pregnancy hypertension and preeclampsia). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS From nine IVF clinics, 2683 singletons born after fresh embryo transfer in a time-lapse system were compared to 4696 singletons born after culture in a conventional incubator and 71 300 singletons born after spontaneous conception matched for year of birth, parity, and maternal age. Patient and treatment characteristics from IVF deliveries were cross-linked with the Swedish Medical Birth Register, Register of Birth Defects, National Patient Register and Statistics Sweden. Children born after sperm and oocyte donation cycles and after Preimplantation Genetic testing cycles were excluded. Odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR were calculated, adjusting for relevant confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the adjusted analyses, no significant differences were found for risk of PTB (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.87–1.41) and LBW (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66–1.14) or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; preeclampsia and hypertension (adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67–1.45 and adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.62–1.53, respectively) between time-lapse and conventional incubation systems. A significantly increased risk of PTB (adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08–1.60) and LBW (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08–1.72) was found for singletons born after time-lapse incubation compared to singletons born after spontaneous conceptions. In addition, a lower risk for pregnancy hypertension (adjusted OR 0.72 95% CI 0.53–0.99) but no significant difference for preeclampsia (adjusted OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68–1.12) was found compared to spontaneous conceptions. Subgroup analyses showed that some risks were related to the day of embryo transfer, with more adverse outcomes after blastocyst transfer in comparison to cleavage stage transfer. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study is retrospective in design and different clinical strategies may have been used to select specific patient groups for time-lapse versus conventional incubation. The number of patients is limited and larger datasets are required to obtain more precise estimates and adjust for possible effect of additional embryo culture variables. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Embryo culture in time-lapse systems is not associated with major differences in perinatal and maternal outcomes, compared to conventional embryo culture, suggesting that this technology is an acceptable alternative for embryo incubation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was financed by a research grant from Gedeon Richter. There are no conflicts of interest for all authors to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Embryo quality and quantity are key factors that determine the success of IVF-ET. Yet it is still unclear if, for those patients with only one good-quality embryo in an IVF cycle, the inclusion of a poor-quality embryo increases the procedure's success rate. This is a common question for both clinicians and patients in determining their course of treatment. The purpose of this work was to answer this intriguing question in the context of prognosis of patients undergoing fresh cycles with only one good-quality and more than one poor-quality cleavage-stage embryos. To control for confounding effects, we only included patients at similar age, body mass index (BMI), level of basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and endometrial thickness from January 2015 to June 2021. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to extract the matched pairs. Then we evaluated pregnancy outcome, including the rate of clinical pregnancy, live birth, embryo implantation, early miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy. We found that the clinical pregnancy rate (34.8 vs. 38.0%, p = 0.553), live birth rate (27.1 vs. 29.9%, p = 0.598), early miscarriage rate (18.1 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.171) and ectopic pregnancy rate (1.3 vs. 1.2%, p = 1.000) did not significantly differ between those two groups, notwithstanding significant difference of the implantation rate (34.8 vs. 21.3%, p <0.001). Our work indicates that, for prognosis patients at approximately 34 years old with only one good-quality embryo, having additional poor-quality embryos does not seem to help to improve ART success rates per intended embryo transfer. In conclusion, we found that simultaneous transfer of one good-quality and one poor-quality cleavage stage embryo does not improve pregnancy outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Does the late follicular phase progesterone (P4) and the P4-to-follicle-ratio affect the ploidy state of the biopsied embryos? A retrospective observational study conducted at ART Fertility Clinics Abu Dhabi and Muscat, including all stimulation cycles performed between January 2015 and December 2019. In total, 975 cycles were considered for this study. Inclusion criteria were ovarian stimulation due to primary/secondary infertility, patient's age between 18 and 45 years, ICSI as fertilization method, and patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Patients with testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and warmed oocytes were excluded. Our results have shown that progesterone had no effect on the euploid rate (p = 0.371). However, when adding the ratio of P4 to the number of follicles that were bigger than 10 mm in the last scan, a negative effect on the euploid rate (p < 0.05) was observed. This study was able to show that the use of only P4 is unable to predict ploidy outcomes. However, by including the number of follicles > 10 mm, a clear association was observed between P4/Foll ratio and euploid rate per cycle. The use of both parameters could aid clinicians in their decision to trigger a patient or continue stimulation. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm those results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Based on the fact that the follicular phase in the menstrual cycle has length variation, it has been assumed that the duration of oestrogen (E2) administration could also be variable; therefore, for the first time, this randomized clinical trial study was conducted to investigate and compare the duration of estradiol administration and the effect on pregnancy outcomes in the cleavage-stage frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle. We included women aged 20–40 with a normal uterus on hysteroscopy between September and December 2022 and who were divided randomly into three groups: group A [ n = 79; 8–11 days of oestrogen before progesterone (P4) supplementation], group B (n = 78; 12–14 days of oestrogen before P4 supplementation), and group C (n = 76; 15–18 days of estrogen before P4 supplementation). Serum levels for E2 on the initial progesterone day and P4 on the transfer day were measured. The effect of the duration of E2 administration on clinical pregnancy and pregnancy loss was investigated. We found no significant differences between the three groups in the clinical pregnancy rate (P = 0.696) and clinical abortion rate (P = 0.925) according to the duration of the E2. There was no significant difference in the E2, P4 levels, and endometrial thickness in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women. The mean of the E2 and P4 levels was 300.03 ± 22.21 and 25.36 ± 5.78, respectively. Our findings suggest that variation in the length of E2 administration (8–18 days) before progesterone initiation in day 3 FET cycles does not affect pregnancy outcome and transfer time can be flexibly arranged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine whether a single dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administered subcutaneously in addition to the regular progesterone supplementation could provide a better luteal support in antagonist protocol fresh embryo transfer cycles. Methods: This prospective, multicentric, cohort study included total 140 women, 70 in each group. Controlled ovarian stimulation was carried out as per fixed GnRH antagonist protocol. The trigger was given with hCG. In vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) was performed and day-3 embryos were transferred. Patients were divided into groups 1 and 2 based on computer generated randomization sheet. Six days following oocyte retrieval, group 1 received 0.2 mg decapeptyl subcutaneously in addition to regular progesterone support while group 2 received progesterone only. Luteal support was given for 14 days to both groups; if pregnancy was confirmed luteal support was continued till 12 weeks of gestation. The clinical pregnancy rate was the primary outcome. The implantation rate, miscarriage rate, live birth delivery rate, and multiple pregnancy rates were the secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 140 patients were analysed, 70 in each group. Clinical pregnancy rates (47.1% vs. 35.7%; P=0.17), implantation rates (23.4% vs. 18.1%, P=0.24), live birth delivery rates (41.4% vs. 27.1%, P=0.08), and multiple pregnancy rates (21.2% vs. 16.0%, P=0.74) were higher in group 1 than in group 2. Group 1 had a lower miscarriage rate than group 2 (5.7% vs. 8.6%; P=0.75). However, these differences were not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusions: Administration of a single dose of GnRH agonist in addition to regular natural micronized vaginal progesterone as luteal support in GnRH antagonist protocol cycles marginally improves implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and live birth delivery rates. However, more studies with higher sample sizes are needed before any conclusive statements about GnRH agonist as luteal phase support can be made.

The preimplantation period of life in mammals encompasses a tremendous amount of restructuring and remodeling of the embryonic genome and reprogramming of gene expression. These vast changes support metabolic activation and cellular processes that drive early cleavage divisions and enable the creation of the earliest primitive cell lineages. A major question in mammalian embryology is how such vast, sweeping changes in gene expression are orchestrated, so that changes in gene expression are exactly appropriate to meet the developmental needs of the embryo over time. Using the rhesus macaque as an experimentally tractable model species closely related to the human, we combined high quality RNA-seq libraries, in-depth sequencing and advanced systems analysis to discover the underlying mechanisms that drive major changes in gene regulation during preimplantation development. We identified the major changes in mRNA population and the biological pathways and processes impacted by those changes. Most importantly, we identified 24 key upstream regulators that are themselves modulated during development and that are associated with the regulation of over 1000 downstream genes. Through their roles in extensive gene networks, these 24 upstream regulators are situated to either drive major changes in target gene expression or modify the cellular environment in which other genes function, thereby directing major developmental transitions in the preimplantation embryo. The data presented here highlight some of the specific molecular features that likely drive preimplantation development in a nonhuman primate species and provides an extensive database for novel hypothesis-driven studies.

The interplay between transcription factors and chromatin dictates gene regulatory network activity. Germ layer specification is tightly coupled with zygotic gene activation and, in most metazoans, is dependent upon maternal factors. We explore the dynamic genome-wide interactions of Foxh1, a maternal transcription factor that mediates Nodal/TGF-β signaling, with cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) during mesendodermal specification. Foxh1 marks CRMs during cleavage stages and recruits the co-repressor Tle/Groucho in the early blastula. We highlight a population of CRMs that are continuously occupied by Foxh1 and show that they are marked by H3K4me1, Ep300, and Fox/Sox/Smad motifs, suggesting interplay between these factors in gene regulation. We also propose a molecular "hand-off" between maternal Foxh1 and zygotic Foxa at these CRMs to maintain enhancer activation. Our findings suggest that Foxh1 functions at the top of a hierarchy of interactions by marking developmental genes for activation, beginning with the onset of zygotic gene expression.

Objective: To investigate whether there is a difference in live-birth gender rates in blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FETs) compared with those in cleavage-stage FETs. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): All women with recorded live births who underwent FET at either the blastocyst or cleavage stage, reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology during 2004–2013. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was live-birth gender rates. Demographic criteria were also collected. The chi-square analyses were used for bivariate associations, and multiple logistic regression models were used for adjusted associations, with all two-sided P

Can day 3 embryo morphology serve as an independent criterion for optimal single blastocyst selection? This retrospective, single-centre cohort study included 1517 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) cycles conducted between October 2019 and July 2022. The live birth rate (LBR) and other clinical outcomes of SVBT cycles were evaluated, considering both good-quality and non-good-quality day 3 embryos. The associations of day 3 morphological characteristics, encompassing number of blastomeres and embryo grade, were assessed. Multivariable analyses were undertaken using multiple models adjusted for day of blastocyst development and blastocyst grade. Blastocysts from good-quality day 3 embryos had significantly higher LBR compared with those from non-good-quality embryos for both day 5 (51.5% versus 42.9%; P = 0.013) and day 6 (25.1% versus 17.6%; P = 0.018) blastocysts. LBR did not differ significantly with number of blastomeres on day 3, regardless of day of blastocyst development (day 5/6) or blastocyst grade. LBR varied significantly by day 3 embryo grade for both day 5 (48.0%, 51.5%, 46.6% and 32.7% for grades I, II, III and IV–V; P = 0.005) and day 6 (41.5%, 23.6%, 15.9% and 16.1% for grades I, II, III and IV–V; P = 0.001) blastocysts. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that non-good-quality embryos and lower morphological grade (IV–V) on day 3 were significantly and negatively correlated with LBR, while the number of blastomeres on day 3 was not an independent factor. When selecting blastocysts of equal quality for SVBT cycles, those with higher day 3 morphological scores are preferred. Day 3 morphological evaluation is a valuable supplement to conventional selection methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

We compared the clinical outcomes of vitrified–thawed cycles during in vitro fertilization (IVF) for frozen and thawed blastocysts compared to cleavage-stage embryos that were frozen, thawed and extended culture to the blastocyst stage. Between January 2014 and December 2016, 908 frozen-thawed cycles were included in the study. After removing cycles that met exclusion criteria, clinical outcomes for 355 cleavage-stage embryos with extended blastocyst culture (Group I) were compared with 279 frozen and thawed blastocysts (Group II). Cryo-survival rate of the two groups were similar (96.7% versus 95.0%). Implantation rates (28.9% versus 22.4%, p =.04) and clinical pregnancy rates (37.2% versus 27.9%, p =.03) were higher in Group I. Pregnancy, live birth and abortus rates were similar in both groups. Although overall abortus rates were similar in both groups, abortus rates before 12 weeks of gestation were higher in Group I, and chemical abortus rates were higher in Group II (p =.03, p =.04). Weeks of gestation at birth and birth weight were similar in both groups. The use of extended blastocyst culture of cleavage-stage embryos was not inferior to frozen and thawed blastocysts. Freezing at the cleavage-stage can provide similar cryo-survival rates than blastocyst vitrification. Vitrifying surplus or all embryos for storage at the cleavage-stage allows higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. But after abortus, live birth rates were similar in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare pregnancy outcomes between pregnancies following day 2, day 3, and days 5/6 fresh embryo transfer (ET). A retrospective cohort study including all pregnancies following fresh IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) ET cycles performed between January 2014 and December 2015 at Fertility and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Unit of the tertiary Soroka University Medical Center. The study groups consisted of 48, 72, 120, and 144 hours embryos. Pregnancies were confirmed by a serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin measurement. Data regarding patients' medical history, infertility workup, fertility treatment characteristics, and outcome, as well as obstetrical outcome, were collected from patients' medical records and IVF Laboratory database. Multiple regression models were constructed to control for confounders. Patients who underwent fertility preservation treatment, cycles of oocyte donation or in vitro maturation oocytes, and cases of preimplantation genetic testing were excluded. A total of 534 pregnancies following fresh IVF/ICSI ET on day 2 (n = 189, 35.4%), day 3 (n = 200, 37.5%), and days 5 or 6 (n = 145, 27.2%) were included. Live birth rate demonstrated a linear association to the developmental stage at ET with the highest rates in blastocysts and gradually lower in day 3 and day 2 ET (79.2, 65.8, and 60.6%, respectively, p =.001). A positive linear association was also observed between ET age and clinical pregnancy rate (77.3, 87.5, and 90.3% for days 2, 3, and 5/6, respectively, p =.002), as well as with combined pregnancy complication rate (29, 37.3, and 43.3%, p =.026). However, using multivariate logistic regression model controlling for ET age, maternal age, smoking, obesity, initial HCG level and peak E2 level, live birth rate was comparable between the study groups regardless of ET age. Pregnancy complications were comparable between the groups; however, a composite pregnancy complications variable was higher in the blastocyst pregnancies compared to cleavage embryos pregnancies. The common approach of blastocyst transfer, as high quality of the embryo, has not proven beneficial in terms of live birth rate. Moreover, cleavage stage embryos were not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. The current data suggest maternal age has an independent effect on live birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate systematically the neonatal outcomes of single delivery after embryo transfer at blastocyst and cleavage stages in the fresh cycles. Methods: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases (up to November 2020) to search the related studies on the neonatal outcomes of single birth after blastocyst and cleavage stage fresh embryo transfer. The evaluators screened the literature, evaluated the quality and extracted the data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis. Results: Thirteen studies were scrutinized for this meta-analysis. The overall showed that the incidences of very preterm birth (VPTB, RR=1.17, 95%CI: 1.08-1.26, P＜0.000 1) and large for gestational age (LGA, RR=1.11, 95%CI: 1.04- 1.19, P=0.002) were significantly increased, and the incidence of small for gestational age (SGA, RR=0.85, 95%CI: 0.78-0.93, P=0.000 6) was significantly decreased, in the single delivery after the blastocyst embryo transfer when compared with the embryo transfer at cleavage stage. There were no significant differences in the incidences of preterm birth (PTB, RR=1.10, 95%CI: 0.98-1.22, P=0.09), low birth weight (LBW, RR=1.00, 95%CI: 0.94-1.07, P=0.90) and very low birth weight (VLBW, RR=0.99, 95%CI: 0.89-1.10, P=0.88). Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of neonatal PTB in the blastocyst group was significantly higher than that in the cleavage-embryo group (RR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.23-1.33, P＜0.000 01). Conclusions: In the neonatal outcomes of single delivery in the fresh cycles, blastocyst transfer has the higher risks of VPTB and LGA and lower risk of SGA when compared with cleavage embryo transfer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeWe previously reported associations between trace concentrations of Hg, Cd and Pb in blood and urine and reproductive outcomes for women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Here we assess measurements in single follicular fluid (FF) specimens from 46 women as a presumably more relevant marker of dose for reproductive toxicity.MethodsFF specimens were analyzed for Hg, Cd and Pb using sector field-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (SF-ICP-MS). Variability sources were assessed by nested ANOVA. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate associations for square root transformed metals with IVF outcomes, adjusting for confounders.ResultsAn inverse association is detected for FF Pb and fertilization (relative risk (RR) = 0.68, P = 0.026), although positive for Cd (RR = 9.05, P = 0.025). While no other statistically significant associations are detected, odds ratios (OR) are increased for embryo cleavage with Hg (OR = 3.83, P = 0.264) and Cd (OR = 3.18, P = 0.644), and for embryo fragmentation with Cd (OR = 4.08, P = 0.586) and Pb (OR = 2.22, P = 0.220). Positive estimates are observed for Cd with biochemical (RR = 19.02, P = 0.286) and clinical pregnancies (RR = 38.80, P = 0.212), yet with very low precision.ConclusionsWe have identified associations between trace amounts of Pb and Cd in FF from a single follicle, and oocyte fertilization. Yet, the likelihood of biological variation in trace element concentrations within and between follicles, coupled with levels that are near the limits of detection suggest that future work should examine multiple follicles using a 'one follicle-one oocyte/embryo' approach. A larger study is merited to assess more definitively the role that these environmental factors could play with respect to egg quality in IVF programs.

Accurate knowledge of the live birth rate for cleavage stage embryos is essential to determine an appropriate number of embryos to transfer at once. Results from previous studies lack details needed for practical use. This is a mathematical analysis and model building study of day 3 cleavage stage embryo transfers. A total of 996 embryos were transferred in 274 fresh and 83 frozen embryo transfers. Embryo morphology was divided into 4 groups based on number of cells and fragmentation percentage. Each embryo transfer was modeled as an equation equating the sum of the live birth rates of the transferred embryos to the number of live births that resulted. The least squares solution to the system of embryo transfer equations was determined using linear algebra. This analysis was repeated for ages 35 to 42 years old at oocyte retrieval. The best fit live birth rates per embryo in the age group centered on 35 years old were 29%, 13%, 10%, and 9% for embryos in the 8-cell with ≤ 5% fragmentation, 8-cell with > 5% fragmentation, 9–12 cell, and 6–7 cell groups, respectively. Cleavage stage embryos with fewer than 6 cells on day 3 had very low best fit live birth rates close to 0% at age 39 years and were excluded from the primary analysis to prevent overfitting. These live birth rates can be used with a simple embryo transfer model to predict rates of single and multiple gestation prior to a planned cleavage stage embryo transfer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether selecting embryos for transfer after prolonged culture after thaw (18–24 h) has better pregnancy rates than selecting embryos for transfer after short culture after thaw (2–5 h). We performed a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial, evaluating 388 patients submitted to ART treatment who had embryos frozen on day-2 and subsequently transferred. All patients received the same endometrial priming with estradiol valerate followed by vaginal progesterone. Patients were randomized for Frozen embryo transfer 2–5 h after thaw (Group D2) or 18–24 h after thaw (Group D2/D3). The main Outcome Measure was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) at 20 weeks' gestation per embryo transfer. A total of 179 patients had embryos transferred 2–5 h after thaw and 209 patients had embryos transferred 18–24 h after thaw. The mean age in group D2 was 36 ± 4.4 and 36 ± 5.4 in group D2/D3. Ongoing pregnancy rate was 28% and 33.5% (p = 0.2) for groups D2 and D2/D3, respectively. These results suggest that increasing the culture time of embryos in one day to improve selection before transfer does not increase ongoing pregnancy rate. NCT03381001. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Increased cell contact is associated with greater developmental potential in embryos. • This association is strongest at the eight-cell stage. • Three-dimensional embryo analysis may provide new insights into embryo development. What can three-dimensional cell contact networks tell us about the developmental potential of cleavage-stage human embryos? This pilot study was a retrospective analysis of two Embryoscope imaging datasets from two clinics. An artificial intelligence system was used to reconstruct the three-dimensional structure of embryos from 11-plane focal stacks. Networks of cell contacts were extracted from the resulting embryo three-dimensional models and each embryo's mean contacts per cell was computed. Unpaired t-tests and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to statistically analyse mean cell contact outcomes. Cell contact networks from different embryos were compared with identical embryos with similar cell arrangements. At t4, a higher mean number of contacts per cell was associated with greater rates of blastulation and blastocyst quality. No associations were found with biochemical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage or ploidy. At t8, a higher mean number of contacts was associated with increased blastocyst quality, biochemical pregnancy and live birth. No associations were found with miscarriage or aneuploidy. Mean contacts at t4 weakly correlated with those at t8. Four-cell embryos fell into nine distinct cell arrangements; the five most common accounted for 97% of embryos. Eight-cell embryos, however, displayed a greater degree of variation with 59 distinct cell arrangements. Evidence is provided for the clinical relevance of cleavage-stage cell arrangement in the human preimplantation embryo beyond the four-cell stage, which may improve selection techniques for day-3 transfers. This pilot study provides a strong case for further investigation into spatial biomarkers and three-dimensional morphokinetics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In assisted reproductive technology, it is important to choose high quality embryos for embryo transfer. The aim of the present study was to determine the grade A embryo count and factors related to it in infertile women. Materials and Methods: This historical cohort study included 996 infertile women. The main outcome was the number of grade A embryos. Zero-Inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression and Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial (ZINB) regression were used to model the count data as it contained excessive zeros. Stata software, version 13 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Results: After adjusting for potential confounders, results from the ZINB model show that for each unit increase in the number 2 pronuclear (2PN) zygotes, we get an increase of 1.45 times as incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.69, P=0.001) in the expected grade A embryo count number, and for each increase in the cleavage day we get a decrease 0.35 times (95% CI: 0.20-0.61, P=0.001) in expected grade A embryo count. Conclusion: There is a significant association between both the number of 2PN zygotes and cleavage day with the number of grade A embryos in both ZINB and ZIP regression models. The estimated coefficients are more plausible than values found in earlier studies using less relevant models.

Study Question: Are perinatal outcomes different between singleton live births conceived from fresh blastocyst transfer and those following the transfer of fresh cleavage-stage embryos?Summary Answer: Fresh blastocyst transfer does not increase risks of preterm birth (PTB), low/high birth weight or congenital anomaly and does not alter the sex ratio at birth or prejudice the chance of having a healthy baby.What Is Known Already: Extended embryo culture is currently considered the best option for embryo selection, but concerns have been raised about increased risks of preterm delivery and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) babies.Study Design, Size, Duration: We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on data from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) anonymised and cycle-based dataset in the UK between 1999 and 2011.Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: Baseline characteristics were compared between in vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) blastocyst-stage and cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles using the χ2 test for categorical/dichotomised covariates and the Mann-Whitney test for continuous covariates. Statistical significance was set at <0.005. Poisson regression and multinomial logistic regression were used to establish relationships between perinatal outcomes and blastocyst-stage embryo transfer or cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Risk ratios (RRs), adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and their 99.5% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as a measure of strength of associations. Results were adjusted for clinically relevant covariates. A sub-group analysis included women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI treatment. The level of significance was set at <0.05, and 95% CIs were calculated in the sub-group analysis.Main Results and the Role Of Chance: Of a total of 67 147 IVF/ICSI cycles, 11 152 involved blastocyst-stage embryo(s) and 55 995 involved cleavage-stage embryo(s). The two groups were comparable with regards to the risk of PTB (aRR, 1.00; 99.5% CI, 0.79-1.25), very-preterm birth (VPTB) (aRR, 1.00; 99.5% CI, 0.63-1.54), very-low birth weight (VLBW) (aRR, 0.84; 99.5% CI, 0.53-1.34), low birth weight (LBW) (aRR, 0.92; 99.5% CI, 0.73-1.16), high birth weight (HBW) (aRR, 0.94; 99.5% CI, 0.75-1.18) and very-high birth weight (VHBW) (aRR, 1.05; 99.5% CI, 0.66-1.65). The risk of congenital anomaly was 16% higher in the blastocyst-stage group than in the cleavage-stage group, but this was not statistically significant (aRR, 1.16; 99.5% CI, 0.90-1.49). The chance of having a healthy baby (born at term, with a normal birth weight and no congenital anomalies) was not altered by extended culture (aRR, 1.00; 99.5% CI, 0.93-1.07). Extended culture was associated with a marginal increase in the chance having a male baby in the main cycle-based analysis (aRR, 1.04; 99.5% CI, 1.01-1.09) but not in the sub-group analysis of women undergoing their first cycle of treatment (aRR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.08). In the sub-group analysis, the risk of congenital anomalies was significantly higher after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.12-1.81).Limitations, Reasons For Caution: This study is limited by the use of observational data and inability to adjust for key confounders, such as maternal smoking status and body mass index (BMI), which were not recorded in the HFEA dataset. As the main analysis was cycle-based and we were unable to link cycles within women undergoing more than one IVF/ICSI cycle, we undertook a sub-group analysis on women undergoing their first treatment cycle.Wider Implications Of the Findings: Our findings should reassure women undergoing blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. For the first time, we have shown that babies born after blastocyst transfer have a similar chance of being healthy as those born after cleavage-stage embryos transfer.Study Funding/competing Interest(s): The research activity of Dr Nicola Marconi was funded by the scholarship 'A. Griffini-J. Miglierina', Fondazione Comunitaria del Varesotto, Provincia di Varese, Italy. The authors do not have any competing interests to disclose.Trial Registration Number: N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Today, most IVF programs have moved to blastocyst transfer but there is still uncertainty regarding when to transfer if there are only one or two embryos at the cleavage stage. The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy rate of day 3 transfers vs. blastocyst stage transfers in patients who had only one or two embryos on day 3. We conducted a retrospective study of 102 patients with one or two cleavage stage embryos that had their embryos transferred on day 3 and 429 patients had their embryos cultured to day 5 for transfer. The number of mature oocytes (4.0 vs 4.6, p = NS) and number of cleavage stage embryos on day 3 was similar in the two groups (1.3 vs. 1.5, p = NS). The clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval (22% vs. 24.6%, p= NS) and the ongoing pregnancy rate per retrieval (20% vs. 20.2%, p = NS) was comparable between the groups. Fifty seven (13.2%) of the patients had cleavage embryo arrest and did not have an embryo to transfer on day 5. We conclude that the cumulative pregnancy rate is the same for patients with 1–2 cleavage stage embryos regardless of whether the embryo is transferred on day 3 or day 5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Limited studies on the benefits of blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age (AMA) (≥40 years) have been reported. Our objective was to find whether blastocyst-stage embryo transfer improves pregnancy and live birth rates in women ≥40 years who have 3 or more good-quality cleavage-stage embryos., Methods: All fresh in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles performed from January 2020 to December 2021 in AMA women that progressed to transfer were considered for analysis. We compared fresh and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates in AMA women of those who had a cleavage-stage transfer, while meeting the criteria for extended culture (≥3 high-quality embryos, group 1), and those who underwent blastocyst transfer (group 2). Demographic parameters, stimulation, embryology, fresh and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates, and clinical miscarriage rates were compared., Results: During the study period, 255 cycles were analyzed including group 1 (n = 99) and group 2 (n = 156). Group 1 participants were older and had a greater number of embryos for transfer. Fresh and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates per transfer were higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (23.4% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.04; 25.5% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.03), while overall miscarriage rates were higher in group 1 than group 2 (51.7% vs. 25%, P = 0.01)., Conclusions: Blastocyst culture provides a benefit to AMA women who have at least 3 good-quality embryos on day 3 resulting in significantly higher fresh and cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates and lower miscarriage compared to cleavage-stage transfers., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective：To investigate the outcome and its influence factors of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Methods：A total of 483 FET cycles were retrospectively analyzed, in our Center from January to December in 2016. According to the pregnancy success or not, those cycles were divided into the pregnancy group (253 cycles) and the non-pregnancy group (230 cycles). The basic clinical data, pregnancy outcome and the influence factors between two groups were compared. Results：The mean age of the pregnancy group was significantly less than that of the non-pregnancy group, while the number of optimal embryo for FET in the pregnancy group was more (both P＜0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the influence factors of FET outcome included age (OR=0.715, 95%CI: 0.550-0.930, P=0.012), embryo quality (OR=1.780, 95%CI: 1.323-2.395, P=0.000) and type of embryo (OR=1.737, 95%CI: 1.076 -2.805, P =0.024). Conclusions：Younger age, blastula transfer, optimal embryo transplantation were more conductive to the planting success rate and the clinical pregnancy rate of FET cycles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Shortly after the implementation of comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) techniques for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), the discussion about the transition from day 3 to blastocyst stage biopsy was initiated. Trophectoderm biopsy with CCS is meant to overcome the limitations of cleavage-stage biopsy and single-cell analysis. The aim of this study was to assess the results obtained in our PGT-A programme after the implementation of this new strategy. Comparisons between the results obtained in 179 PGT-A cycles with day 3 biopsy (D+3) and fresh embryo transfer, and 204 cycles with trophectoderm biopsy and deferred (frozen–thawed) embryo transfer were established. Fewer embryos were biopsied and a higher euploidy rate was observed in the trophectoderm biopsy group. No differences in implantation (50.3% vs. 61.4%) and clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (56.1% vs. 65.3%) were found. Although the mean number of euploid embryos per cycle did not differ between groups (1.5 ± 1.7 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8), the final number of euploid blastocysts available for transfer per cycle was significantly higher in the trophectoderm biopsy group (1.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8). This factor led to an increased cumulative live birth rate in this last group (34.1% vs. 44.6%). Although both strategies can offer good results, trophectoderm biopsy offers a more robust diagnosis and the intervention is less harmful for the embryos so more euploid blastocysts are finally available for transfer and/or vitrification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Is there a difference in implantation and pregnancy rates between embryos transferred electively at cleavage or blastocyst stage in infertile women ≤ 38 years with at least four zygotes on day 1 post retrieval?Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in a single tertiary care hospital with a sample size of 194 patients in each arm for a total population of 388 women. Patients less than 39 years of age with more than three fertilized oocytes and less than four previous assisted reproductive technology (ART) attempts were inclusion criteria.Results: The two groups were similar for age, years of infertility, indication to treatment, basal antimüllerian hormone and FSH, number of previous ART cycles, primary or secondary infertility, type of induction protocol, days of stimulation, total gonadotrophin dose, and estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) levels at trigger. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of number of retrieved oocytes, inseminated oocytes, fertilization rate, canceled transfers (7.73% in blastocyst and 3.61% in cleavage stage group), and cycles with frozen embryos and/or oocytes. Although a higher number of fertilized oocytes were in the blastocyst stage group (6.18 ± 1.46 vs 5.89 ± 1.54, p = 0.052), a statistically greater number of embryos/randomized cycle were transferred at cleavage stage (1.93 ± 0.371) compared with the number of transferred blastocysts (1.80 ± 0.56), probably due to the number of embryos not reaching blastocyst stage (3.09%). The implantation rate (28.37 vs 25.67%), pregnancy rate per cycle (36.06 vs38.66%), transfer (39.66 vs 40.11%), spontaneous abortions (19.72% vs 12.00%), delivery rate per cycle (27.84 vs 32.99%), and transfer (30.17 vs 34.22%) were not significantly different between the blastocyst and cleavage stage groups. The twin delivery rate was higher in the blastocyst stage group, although not significant (42.59 vs 28.12%). The mean numbers of frozen blastocyst (2.30 ± 1.40 vs 2.02 ± 1.00) and frozen oocytes (7.09 ± 3.55vs 6.79 ± 3.26) were not significantly different between the two groups.Conclusions: Fresh blastocyst-stage transfer versus cleavage-stage transfer did not show any significant difference in terms of implantation and pregnancy rate in this selected group of patients. A high twin delivery rate in both groups (35.59%) was registered, and although not significant, they were higher in the blastocyst transfer group (42.59 vs 28.12%). Our conclusion supports considering single embryo transfer (SET) policy, even in cleavage stage in patients younger than 39 years with at least four zygotes.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02639000 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assessment of embryo quality in order to choose the embryos that most likely result in pregnancy is the critical goal in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The current trend in human in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET) protocols is to decrease the rate of multiple pregnancies after multiple embryo transfer with maintaining the pregnancy rate at admissible levels (according to laboratory standards). Assessment of morphological feathers as a reliable non-invasive method that provides valuable information in prediction of IVF/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome has been frequently proposed in recent years. This article describes the current status of morphological embryo evaluation at different pre-implantation stages.

Background and Objective: During the last few years, a trend has been noted towards embryos being transferred at the blastocyst stage, which has been associated with improved rates regarding implantation and clinical pregnancy in comparison to cleavage stage embryo transfers. There is a limited number of studies investigating this notion in oocyte donation cycles employing cryopreserved embryos. The aim of this study is to evaluate the implantation potential and clinical pregnancy rates between the day 3 cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryo transfers in oocyte donation cycles employing vitrified embryos. Methods: This is a retrospective evaluation of oocyte donation frozen−thawed transfers completed in our clinic from January 2017 to December 2017. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was conducted for all oocytes. Following fertilization, all embryos were cryopreserved either at the cleavage or blastocyst stage. Embryo transfer of two embryos was performed under direct sonographic guidance in all cases. Results: Our results confirmed a 55.6% clinical pregnancy (CP) resulting from day 3 embryo transfers, a 68.8% CP from day 5, and 71.4% CP from day 6. Significantly improved pregnancy rates were related to embryo transfers at the blastocyst stage when compared to cleavage stage transfers (68.9% and 55.6% respectively, p = 0.016). The risk with regards to multiple pregnancies was similar. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that in oocyte donation cycles employing vitrified embryos, embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage is accompanied with a significant improvement in pregnancy rates and merits further investigation.

Objective: This systematic review sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of vitrification at the cleavage stage and blastocyst stage for embryo transfer in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART ) treatment. Methods: We searched for related comparative studies published in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 2017. The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and embryo implantation rate (IR). Secondary outcomes were multiple pregnancy rate (MPR), miscarriage rate (MR), live birth rate (LBR), and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR). The Mantel-Haenszel fixed effects model and random effects model were used to analyze the summary risks ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eight studies with more than 6590 cycles were included in our meta-analysis. Seven studies were observational retrospective comparative studies. One was a prospective study. Overall, the current study summarizes information from 6590 vitrification warming cycles (cleavage stage n = 4594; blastocysts n = 1996). There was no difference in the primary outcome clinical pregnancy rate (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.90-1.04; fixed effects model; I = 21%), whereas vitrified blastocyst transfer was significantly superior to vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfer regarding the implantation rate (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74-0.97; random effects model; I = 43). Regarding the secondary outcomes, no differences were found in the multiple pregnancy rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.79-1.82; fixed effects model; I = 22), live birth rate (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.98-1.16; fixed effects model; I = 0), and ongoing pregnancy rate (RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.92-1.120; fixed effects model; I = 0), whereas a higher miscarriage rate was observed with vitrified blastocyst transfer (RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45-0.93; random effects model; I = 23). Conclusion: In summary, this meta-analysis shows that vitrification at any stage has no detrimental effect on clinical outcome. Blastocyst transfer will still remain a favorable and promising option in ART. Due to the small sample evaluated in the pool of included studies, large-scale, prospective, and randomized controlled trials are required to determine if these small effects are clinically relevant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine if zona pellucida thickness variation (ZPTV) is associated with implantation and if this relationship changes with use of assisted hatching (AH). Methods: Day 3 embryos from single or double embryo transfers (DETs) performed between 2014 and 2016 were included. ZPTV was assessed by examining photographs taken before transfer using an automated image processing platform to segment the zona pellucida (ZP) with an active contour technique. One hundred points were obtained of ZP thickness (ZPT) of each embryo to calculate ZPTV ([maximum ZPT-mean ZPT]/mean ZPT). Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of implantation by tertile of ZPTV. Maternal age and AH were adjusted for a priori . Other cycle and embryo characteristics were adjusted for if they altered the continuous effect estimate by >10%. Results: There was no statistically significant association between ZPTV and implantation across tertiles although embryos with greater ZPTV showed a trend of decreased implantation (Tertile 2 (T2) versus Tertile 1 (T1), OR = 0.80, CI = 0.50-1.28; Tertile 3 (T3) versus Tertile 1 (T3), OR = 0.75, CI = 0.47-1.20). While similar nonsignificant trends for the association between ZPTV and implantation were observed across tertiles after stratification of embryos hatched or not, embryos with the greatest ZPTV had slightly higher odds for implantation when AH was utilized (T3 vs. T1: with AH, OR = 0.89, CI = 0.49-1.62; without AH, OR = 0.61, 0.29-1.27). Conclusion: ZPTV was not associated with implantation after day 3 transfer. This finding did not vary by use of AH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]