Search

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a serious progressive disease with a substantial impact on global health that affects ∼10% of the world's population. However, CKD remains largely under-recognized. Effective actions to slow disease progression and improve outcomes depend on timely detection and diagnosis before a further decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The aim of the REVEAL-CKD study is to assess the prevalence of, and factors associated with, undiagnosed early (stage 3) CKD. METHOD REVEAL-CKD is a multi-national, multi-regional observational study using secondary data from electronic medical records and claims databases. In this analysis, we extracted data regarding patient demographics, laboratory tests, diagnoses and treatments from an Italian electronic medical record database, the Italian Longitudinal Patients Database (IQVIA, Italy). The Italian Longitudinal Patients Database consists of anonymised patient records collected from routine visits to general practitioners and represents ∼900 general practitioners and 1.2 million patients across Italy. The study cohort included patients aged ≥18 years between 2015–21 with two consecutive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) results ≥30 and 90 and ≤730 days apart. The date of the second qualifying eGFR was defined as the index date. Patients with no presence of a CKD diagnostic code recorded any time before their first qualifying eGFR and up to 6 months after their second qualifying eGFR were considered to be undiagnosed. The prevalence of undiagnosed CKD was calculated as the ratio of undiagnosed patients to all patients who met the study inclusion criteria. RESULTS The study cohort included 65 676 patients who met the eGFR criteria for stage 3 CKD. The mean age at index date was 79 years (standard deviation: 9 years) and 58% were female. The overall prevalence of undiagnosed CKD was 77.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76.6–77.3]. The prevalence of undiagnosed CKD was greater in patients with stage 3a CKD (83.0%) compared with those with stage 3b CKD (64.8%). Female patients and those aged > 65 years showed a higher prevalence of undiagnosed CKD, and the prevalence of undiagnosed CKD ranged from 66.6% to 75.7% in patients with pre-existing comorbidities (Table 1). In patients who were undiagnosed at the index date (n = 52 533), 15.5% (n = 8152) were diagnosed with CKD after the index date, with a median time to diagnosis of 404 days (IQR: 389–418 days); 84.5% (n = 44 381) remained undiagnosed. CONCLUSION This study indicates that a high proportion of patients with stage 3 CKD are undiagnosed by their general practitioners, with inequity noted for females and older patients. Underdiagnosis of CKD persisted in those with known risk factors for CKD such as diabetes, heart failure and hypertension. With the availability of targeted evidence-based therapies to decrease the risk of disease progression and improve patient outcomes, there is a clear need to proactively detect, diagnose and intervene in patients with early-stage CKD.

Background/objective: Although biosimilar drugs may be cheaper to purchase than reference biological products, they may not be the most cost-effective treatment to achieve a desired outcome. The an...

Purpose The angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan has been recently associated with sprue-like enteropathy (SLE), a gastrointestinal condition characterized by intestinal malabsorption (IM) and severe diarrhea. Whether the increased risk of SLE is substance-specific or a class effect involving all ARBs is uncertain. The aim of this study is to assess the risk of enteropathy associated with ARBs and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-i) by using data from large administrative and claim databases. Methods We obtained data from Italian local health-care units and a large German claim database and included patients treated with olmesartan, other ARBs, and ACE-i. In the absence of a specific diagnosis code for SLE, International Classification of Diseases codes for IM were used. Analysis implemented a Poisson regression with robust error variance procedure, which allowed accounting for different clusters (local health-care units and countries) and correctly estimating the standard error for the relative risk of rare event occurrence. Results Patients were divided into 3 groups: olmesartan (25.591, 5.5%), other ARBs (104.901, 22.5%), and ACE-i patients (334.951, 72.0%). Baseline characteristics were similar overall. The incidence of unspecified IM in ACE-i patients was not different compared with that of olmesartan, whereas a higher rate ratio was observed when comparing ARB patients with the olmesartan group (RR: 2.50, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.19, P .01). When International Classification of Diseases codes for coeliac disease were included, no differences were observed. Conclusions We could not confirm previous findings of a higher risk of malabsorption in olmesartan-only patients, and drug-induced enteropathy should be considered the result of exposure to the class of ARBs rather than a specific drug-related effect.

To investigate the possible relationship between the use of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) or Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE-i) and unspecified intestinal malabsorption (IM) within the Italian and German real-life context.a retrospective cohort of patients with a new unspecified IM diagnosis during the period 1 January 2010-31 December 2013 was extracted from Italian IMS Health Longitudinal Patient Database and German IMS Disease Analyzer. Only patients with at least one prescription of ARB or ACE-i medication during the 6 months preceding the IM diagnosis were included and then followed up for 12 months to assess treatment exposure.After stratification by year and molecule, the proportion of patients experiencing an unspecified IM diagnosis on total patients receiving ARBs or ACE-i ranged from 0% to 0.14%, showing no relevant differences between molecules and no time trends.this study indicates that ACE-i or ARBs were rarely associated to an unspecified IM diagnosis. No relevant difference between each specific ACE-i and ARB was highlighted.

The assessment of cognition is an important part of major depressive disorder (MDD) evaluation and a crucial issue is the physicians' perception of cognitive dysfunction in MDD that remains nowadays a little known matter. The present study aims at investigating the understanding of neurologists' perception about cognitive dysfunction in MDD. An on-line survey addressed to 85 Italian neurologists in the period between May and June 2015 was performed. The questionnaire comprised three sections: the first section collecting information on neurologists' socio-demographic profile, the second investigating cognitive symptoms relevance in relation with different aspects and the third one explicitly focusing on cognitive symptoms in MDD. Cognitive symptoms are considered most significant among DSM-5 symptoms to define the presence of a Major Depressive Episode in a MDD, to improve antidepressant therapy adherence, patients' functionality and concurrent neurological condition, once resolved. Furthermore, an incongruity came to light from this survey: the neurologists considered cognitive symptoms a not relevant aspect to choose the antidepressant treatment in comparison with the other DSM-5 symptoms on one side, but they declared the opposite in the third part of the questionnaire focused on cognitive symptoms. Cognitive symptoms appeared to be a relevant aspect in MDD and neurologists have a clear understanding of this issue. Nevertheless, the discrepancy between neurologists' perception on cognitive symptoms and the antidepressant treatment highlights the feeling of an unmet need that could be filled increasing the awareness of existing drugs with pro-cognitive effects.

The aim of this study is to compare discontinuation risk and health care resource utilization between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in newly treated patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Based on administrative databases of five Italian Local Healthcare Units, all patients with a discharge diagnosis of NVAF between 2011 and 2014 were selected. Among them, the incident users of NOACs and VKAs in 2014 were followed-up to from the first prescription date to the occurrence of anyone of the following events: a 90-day gap in therapy, switch to a different molecule or add-on of a different molecule into the regimen, death of patient, end of follow-up (December 2015). All-cause hospitalizations, outpatient visits and examinations within the persistence period were also evaluated. The final cohort was composed of 2909 and 765 incident users of VKA and NOACs, respectively. Cox regression to model time to non-persistence within 12 months showed a 62% reduction in risk of drug discontinuation in NOAC patients compared to VKA patients (HR,0.38 [0.33-0.44]). In the adjusted analyses with warfarin as reference, apixaban patients (HR, 0.35 [0.24-0.50]) had the lowest risk of non-persistence, followed by rivaroxoban (HR, 0.42 [0.33-0.54]) and dabigatran users (HR, 0.51 [0.43-0.61]). The mean total numbers of all-cause hospitalization records in 12-month persistent patients were significantly less in NOACs users compared with VKA users (0.36 vs 0.47, p-value:0.03). Similarly, the differences in the mean numbers of all-cause visits and examinations were statistically significant between VKA and NOAC patients, who registered on average 2.33 vs 1.84 visits (p-value: 0.01) and 24.4 vs 9.2 exams referrals (p-value:0.0001), respectively. NOACs showed a better profile in terms of both resource utilization and persistence compared with VKAs. In particular, apixaban returned the lowest risk of discontinuation than dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Background Primary biliary cholangitis is an autoimmune disease affecting the interlobular bile ducts. Limited information is available on its epidemiology and treatment in Italy. Aims To describe primary biliary cholangitis epidemiology and investigate treatment patterns for Italian patients with this disease. Methods Electronic medical records from 900 general practitioners (part of the QuintilesIMS™ Longitudinal Patient Databases) were examined. Demographics were compared with those from the Italian National Institute of Statistics dataset. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, biliary cirrhosis code 571.6 was used for diagnosis, and data on comorbidities, concomitant medications, medical examinations, specialist referrals, and treatments were collected. Results This dataset was representative of the Italian population. Point prevalence of primary biliary cholangitis was calculated as 27.90 per 100,000 and incidence as 5.31 per 100,000 inhabitants/year. Some associations between the disease and comorbidities were sex specific. The most common laboratory assays requested were for liver enzymes, and the majority of patients were not referred to a specialist. Ursodeoxycholic acid was the most common therapy. Conclusion This can be used as a benchmark for monitoring and identifying unmet needs to improve treatment in Italy.

Factors predicting prescriptions of triple therapy were investigated in a large group of general practitioners in Italy. In the population treated by identified general practitioners, a cohort of newly diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients was extracted from IMS Health Longitudinal Database during the period 2010–2013. From the diagnosis, 1-year follow-up was evaluated. Thirty-two thousand forty-six newly diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients were evaluated (57.7% male, mean age 67 years). During 2 years prior to diagnosis less than 13% of patients were requested with a pulmonology evaluation and less than 5% with a spirometry; 65.1% cases were prescribed with a respiratory drug, which in 9.6% of cases was inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist fixed-dose combination. Two thousand and twenty eight patients (6.3% of the newly diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients) were treated with triple therapy during the first year of follow-up, whose 858 (42.3%) starting immediately, and 762 (37.6%) following an initial treatment with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist fixed-dose combination. Being older, being requested with pulmonologist evaluation or spirometry, being prescribed with a inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist fixed-dose combination at diagnosis resulted independent predictors of triple therapy use., Chronic lung disease: ensuring correct prescriptions for early-stage disease An improved education program for doctors promoting correct use of medication for chronic lung disease is needed in Italy. Current guidelines state that inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) should be reserved for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but it appears that doctors do not always follow this advice. Fabiano Di Marco, at San Paolo Hospital—Università degli Studi di Milano, and co-workers analyzed data from 32,046 COPD patients newly-diagnosed by family doctors in Italy between 2010 and 2013. When the researchers followed up on patients after 1 year, 2028 (6.3%) of newly-diagnosed patients were being treated with triple inhaled therapy incorporating ICSs—42% of these patients had started triple therapy immediately upon diagnosis. Being an older male and having been prescribed with a ICS/LABA FDC at diagnosis were strong predictors of triple therapy use within 1 year from the diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was the evaluation of the adherence level to GOLD guidelines for the COPD patients’ treatment in the Italian GPs setting, observing the time trend on ICS therapies’ pharmacoutilization, specifically in mild and moderate COPD patients, which is considered inappropriate by GOLD guidelines. Moreover, a pharmacoeconomic analysis has been implemented in order to evaluate the economical burden of the improper management of COPD.METHODS: The retrospective GPs database study has analyzed patients with at least one diagnosis of COPD during the periods January 2005 – December 2008 (Cohort 1) and January 2009 – December 2011 (Cohort 2), who had a reported value of VEMS, at least one prescription of a drug from ATC R03 class within two months from the date of spirometric exam and aged 40 or more. Disease severity has been defined according to 2008 GOLD guidelines. Comparison between the cohorts has been implemented to verify possible variations in guideline adherence. Furthermore, an economical analysis has been developed in order to highlight saves obtained by following GOLD guidelines and the total inappropriate therapies’ costs.RESULTS: The first cohort involved 2,103 COPD patients, while the second cohort included 1,647 subjects. Reduction of ICS therapies has been shown between the two cohorts, with a decrease of 8.4% for mild patient and 1.6% for moderate patients; considering all the disease severities, the reduction was about 4%. Pharmacoeconomic analysis on mild and moderate patients has pointed out that about 50% of the total ICS treatments (814,692 € on 1,658,164 €) is related to the ICS element, and so considered inappropriate costs.CONCLUSION: Economic differences between the two periods have highlighted a minor mean costs for Cohort 2, underlining an improvement in the adherence to the GOLD guidelines in the last period.

Salvatore Gizzo,1 Juan A Garcia-Velasco,2 Franca Heiman,3 Claudio Ripellino,3 Klaus Bühler4 1Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rey Juan Carlos University Madrid, Madrid, Spain; 3IMS Health Information Solutions Italy Srl, Milan, Italy; 4Centre for Gynaecology, Endocrinology, and Reproductive Medicine, Ulm and Stuttgart, Germany Objectives: To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation comparing the originator follitropin alfa (Gonal-f®) to the biosimilar (Bemfola®) in the Italian and Spanish contexts, with an assessment of the German and UK backgrounds. Methods: Starting from the study by Rettenbacher et al, a cost-effectiveness model was developed in the Italian and Spanish contexts. Clinical data on subjects, doses of gonadotropin, pregnancies, live-born children, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were used to feed the model. Costs related to drugs, hospitalizations, specialist visits, and examinations were retrieved from Italian and Spanish tariffs. Gonadotropin acquisition costs for Germany and the UK were also taken into account to expand the economical assessment to the other countries. The evaluation was done based on the National Health Service perspective. Sensitivity analyses, both univariate and probabilistic, as long as scenario analyses, tested the robustness of the model. Results: Originator follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) costs were €3,663 and €6,387 in Italy and Spain, respectively, whereas biosimilar FSH costs were €3,483 and €6,342. The efficacy was found to be 0.52 for the originator and 0.47 for the biosimilar. The average cost per live birth was estimated to be €7,044 and €12,283 for the originator FSH and €7,411 and €13,494 for the biosimilar for Italy and Spain, respectively. Furthermore, the originator FSH generated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €3,600 for Italy and €900 for Spain compared to the biosimilar. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results of the base case model. Conclusion: This analysis indicated that the originator FSH is a cost-efficient treatment strategy for Italian and Spanish health services compared to the biosimilar and it would be worthwhile extending this evaluation to other countries. Keywords: FSH, follitropin alfa, biosimilar, infertility

Claudio Mencacci,1 Eugenio Aguglia,2 Giovanni Biggio,3 Lodovico Cappellari,4 Guido Di Sciascio,5 Andrea Fagiolini,6 Giuseppe Maina,7 Alfonso Tortorella,8 Pablo Katz,9 Claudio Ripellino9 1Department of Mental Health, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, 2Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, University of Catania, Catania, 3Department of Experimental Biology and Center of Excellence for the Neurobiology of Drug Dependence, University of Cagliari, Calgiari, 4Department of Mental Health, Camposampiero Hospital, Padova, 5Department of Psychiatry, Policlinico Hospital, Bari, 6Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Siena and Department of Mental Health, University of Siena Medical Center, Siena, 7Department of Neurosciences, University of Torino, Torino, 8Department of Mental Health, University of Naples SUN, Naples, 9CSD Medical Research Srl, Milan, Italy Background: Major depression is a commonly occurring, seriously impairing, and often recurrent mental disorder. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are the treatments most commonly used for major depressive disorder. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of SSRIs and SNRIs in the treatment of major depressive disorder in two Italian regional settings, ie, Veneto and Sardinia. Methods: A decision analytic model was adapted from the Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency to reflect current clinical practice in the treatment of major depressive disorder in the most significant Italian regions. This adaptation was possible as a result of collaboration with an expert panel of Italian psychiatrists and health economists. The population comprised patients with a first diagnosis of major depressive disorder and initiating one SSRI or SNRI drug for the first time. The time frame used was 12 months. Efficacy and utility data for the model were retrieved from the literature and validated by the expert panel. Local data were used for resource utilization and for treatment costs based on the perspective of each regional health service. Scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. Results: Base case analysis showed that escitalopram is associated with the largest health gain (in quality-adjusted life years) and a lower total cost at one year for Sardinia (except for sertraline, against which it was cost-effective) and for Veneto, and therefore dominates the other treatment strategies, given that more quality-adjusted life years are achieved at a lower total cost. Scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses support the robustness of the model. Conclusion: The results indicate that escitalopram is the most cost-effective pharmacologic treatment strategy for both regional health services compared with all SSRIs and all SNRIs used in the first-line treatment of major depressive disorder. Keywords: antidepressants, major depressive disorder, cost-effectiveness quality of life, Italy

BACKGROUND: chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) has been commonly reported as one of the most distressing adverse effects among treated patients with cancer. Inadequately treated, CINV can lead to increased resource utilization and severely impair patients' daily functioning and quality of life. Direct costs include acquisition cost of antiemetic drugs and rescue medication, administration devices, add-on treatments, such as hydration, and additional patient care, that is, nursing and physician time, unscheduled office visits, emergency room admissions, and, in some cases, extended hospitalization or readmission. There are many reports on the cost-effectiveness of antiemetic drugs, but information on the total cost per patient associated with CINV is limited. The costs associated with severe CINV episodes are considered responsible for the most significant part of the expenditures. SCOPE: The aim of this study was to investigate the management of CINV episodes in three European health-care environments and to estimate direct costs associated with severe CINV episodes. METHODS: An online survey addressed to Italian, German, and French oncologists and oncology nurses was performed. The survey included 41 questions about the management and the resource utilization for patients experiencing any CINV episode during the 6-month period preceding the survey. Furthermore, the cost associated with severe CINV episode management was estimated by adopting the National Health Service's perspective. FINDINGS: A large proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy experienced a CINV episode (34.4% in Italy, 50.2% in France, and 40.4% in Germany); among those, 8.8% in Italy, 11.6% in France, and 19.2% in Germany experienced a severe CINV episode. Compared with Italy, Germany and France presented a greater hospitalization rate following an unplanned visit to the oncology ward or an emergency room access due to CINV. In Italy, the mean cost per patient with a severe CINV episode resulted in approximately €389, about half of the mean cost in France (€750) and a third of the mean cost in Germany (€1,017). CONCLUSIONS: Severe CINV episodes requiring hospitalization, day hospital, or hospitalization extension involve a significant cost for the National Health Services; additional studies should be conducted in order to evaluate potential ways to offset these expenses.

Background Gonadotropins are protein hormones which are central to the complex endocrine system that regulates normal growth, sexual development, and reproductive function. There is still a lively debate on which type of gonadotropin medication should be used, either human menopausal gonadotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone. The objective of the study was to perform a systematic review of the recent literature to compare recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone to human menopausal gonadotropin with the aim to assess any differences in terms of efficacy and to provide a cost evaluation based on findings of this systematic review. Methods The review was conducted selecting prospective, randomized, controlled trials comparing the two gonadotropin medications from a literature search of several databases. The outcome measure used to evaluate efficacy was the number of oocytes retrieved per cycle. In addition, a cost evaluation was performed based on retrieved efficacy data. Results The number of oocytes retrieved appeared to be higher for human menopausal gonadotropin in only 2 studies while 10 out of 13 studies showed a higher mean number of oocytes retrieved per cycle for recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone. The results of the cost evaluation provided a similar cost per oocyte for both hormones. Conclusions Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone treatment resulted in a higher oocytes yield per cycle than human menopausal gonadotropin at similar cost per oocyte.

Introduction Bipolar disorder is a chronic disease characterized by periods of mania or hypomania, depression, or a combination of both (mixed state). Because bipolar disorder is one of the leading causes of disability, it represents an important economic burden on society. Asenapine (ASE) is a new second-generation antipsychotic developed and approved for the treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar disorder. The objective of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of ASE compared to olanzapine (OLA) in the treatment of patients experiencing mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in the context of the Italian National Health Service (NHS). Methods A pharmacoeconomic model was developed to simulate the management of Italian bipolar I patients with mixed episodes over a 5-year time horizon by combining clinical parameters with resource utilization. An expert panel of Italian psychiatrists and health economists was responsible for adapting a UK model to the Italian context. The primary outcome measure of the economic evaluation was the incremental cost effectiveness ratio, where effectiveness is measured in terms of quality adjusted life-years gained. Scenario analyses, sensitivity analyses, and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to test the robustness of the model. Results This pharmacoeconomic model showed that ASE resulted to be dominant over OLA; in fact, ASE was associated with lower direct costs (derived largely by the savings from hospitalizations avoided) and also generated a better quality of life. Results were robust to changes in key parameters; both scenario analyses and sensitivity analyses demonstrated model reliability. Conclusions Results from this study suggest that the management of bipolar I patients with mixed episodes using ASE as alternative to OLA can lead to cost saving for the Italian NHS and improve patients quality of life. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-014-0139-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Enrico Papaleo,1 Carlo Alviggi,2 Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo,3,4 Claudio Pisanelli,5,6 Claudio Ripellino,7 Salvatore Longobardi,8 Pier Luigi Canonico91Centro Scienze della Natalità, Gynecological-Obstetrics Department, San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; 2Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University “Federico II” of Naples, Naples, Italy; 3Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 4SAVE Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milan, Italy; 5ACO San Filippo Neri, Rome, Italy; 6Società Italiana Di Farmacia Ospedaliera, Milan, Italy; 7CSD Medical Research Srl, Milan, Italy; 8Medical Department, Merck Serono SpA, Rome, Italy; 9Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy Background: Hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women are characterized by ovarian functionality deficiency, caused by low concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). To recover reproduction functionality, recommended therapies for ovarian induction involve injections of FSH and LH medications. Objective: Since important differences exist between recombinant and urinary gonadotropin therapies in terms of efficacy and cost, the objective of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model to compare recombinant FSH (rFSH) + recombinant LH (rLH) and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-HMG). Methods: A Markov model was developed, considering three cycles of therapy; probability of pregnancy and miscarriage were considered, and the efficacy was evaluated in terms of pregnancy occurrence. The perspective of the model was that of the Italian Health Service, so only direct cost (drugs, specialist visits, patient examinations, and hospitalizations) were included. Results: rFSH + rLH is associated with a higher total cost (€3,453.50) and higher efficacy (0.87) compared with HP-HMG (€2,719.70 and 0.50). rFSH + rLH generated an incremental cost effectiveness ratio equal to €2,007.30 compared to HP-HMG; the average cost per pregnancy is estimated to be €3,990.00 for recombinant strategy and €5,439.80 for urinary strategy. Results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis were consistent with the abovementioned findings. Conclusion: Despite the higher acquisition cost in comparison to HP-HMG, rFSH + rLH resulted in a higher pregnancy rate, which makes it the recommended choice when considering cost-effectiveness of LH in supporting FSH-induced follicular gonadotropins in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women. Keywords: HP-HMG, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, gonadotropin

Atypical antipsychotics are the main treatment for a large number of psychiatric illnesses, with fewer extrapyramidal effects than conventional antipsychotics. However, it has been suggested that their use is associated with increased risk of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus.The risk of metabolic adverse effects associated with asenapine was assessed in comparison with that associated with olanzapine using real-world data.This study was a retrospective analysis based on data extracted from the Italian and Spanish Cegedim Strategic Data Longitudinal Patient-Data databases. Patients with asenapine or olanzapine prescriptions were retrieved from September 2010 to December 2012 using strict inclusion criteria to guarantee minimization of confounders. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia were identified by using ICD9 codes and by antidiabetic and dyslipidemic drug prescriptions. The presence or absence of the metabolic condition was compared before and after treatment, and between cohorts.The retrospective analysis showed a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes with asenapine than with olanzapine (2.2 vs 3.5%, respectively; p value: 0.0002) and of developing dyslipidemia (2.8 vs 6.8%, respectively; p value: 0.0001).Asenapine is associated with a lower risk of metabolic adverse effects than olanzapine, demonstrating its improved safety profile.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and disabling condition across the world. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are the most commonly used antidepressants. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness [€ per quality-adjusted life year (QALY)] of all SSRIs and all SNRIs for the treatment of MDD in Italy. A decision analytic model was adapted from the Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits agency model to reflect current clinical practice in the treatment of MDD in the largest Italian regions. This adaptation was possible thanks to the collaboration of an expert panel of Italian psychiatrists and health economists. The model evaluated patients with a first diagnosis of MDD and initiating an SSRI or an SNRI for the first time. The time horizon was 12 months. Efficacy and utility data for the model were retrieved from the literature and validated by the expert panel. Local data were considered for resource utilization and for treatment costs based on each regional health service perspective. Population-weighted regional data were used to define a national model. Scenario simulations, one-way sensitivity analyses, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to test the robustness of the model. The base case analysis showed that escitalopram was associated with a lower total cost (€ 1,562) and a larger health gain (QALYs) at 1 year (0.732) per patient and dominated the other treatment strategies since more QALYs were achieved at a lower total cost. Sensitivity analyses support the robustness of the model. The results indicate that escitalopram is the most cost-effective pharmacological treatment strategy for the Italian health service compared with other SSRIs and all SNRIs used in the first-line treatment of MDD.

Background Depression has a lifetime prevalence of 10%-25% among women and 5%-12% among men. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most used and the most cost-effective treatment for long-term major depressive disorder. Since the introduction of generic SSRIs, the costs of branded drugs have been questioned. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness (€ per quality-adjusted life year [QALY]) of escitalopram (which is still covered by a patent) compared with paroxetine, sertraline, and citalopram, the patents for which have expired. Methods A decision analytic model was adapted from the Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical benefits agency model to reflect current clinical practice in the treatment of depression in Italy in collaboration with an expert panel of Italian psychiatrists and health economists. The population comprised patients with a first diagnosis of major depressive disorder and receiving for the first time one of the following SSRIs: escitalopram, sertraline, paroxetine, and citalopram. The time frame used was 12 months. Efficacy and utility data for the original model were validated by our expert panel. Local data were considered for resource utilization and for treatment costs based on the Lombardy region health service perspective. Several scenario simulations, oneway sensitivity analyses, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to test the robustness of the model. Results The base case scenario showed that escitalopram had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €4395 and €1080 per QALY compared with sertraline and paroxetine, respectively. Escitalopram was dominant over citalopram, which was confirmed by most one-way sensitivity analyses. The escitalopram strategy gained 0.011 QALYs more than citalopram, 0.008 more than paroxetine, and around 0.007 more than sertraline. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that ICER values for escitalopram were centered around €1100 and €4400 per QALY compared with paroxetine and sertraline, respectively. Although there is no official cost-effectiveness threshold in Italy, the value of €25,000 per QALY could be acceptable. All ICER values retrieved in all analyses were lower than this threshold. Conclusion The findings from this cost-effectiveness analysis indicate that escitalopram could be accepted as a cost-effective strategy for the Lombardy region health service compared with the other SSRIs studied. The present assessment is based on ICER values resulting from this analysis, which are lower than the thresholds proposed by health care authorities in other European Union countries. These benefits are driven by the effectiveness of escitalopram, which result in an improved health-related quality of life, a higher probability of sustained remission, and better utilization of health care resources. The study results are robust and in line with other pharmacoeconomic analyses comparing escitalopram with other SSRIs.

Introduction Switching from any statin to another non-equipotent lipid lowering treatment (LLT) may cause a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increase and has been associated with a higher probability of negative cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of switching from rosuvastatin to any other LLT on clinical outcomes in primary care. Methods This was a retrospective analysis based on data from IMS Health Longitudinal Patient Database, which is a general practice database including information of more than 1.0 million patients representative of the Italian population by age, and medical conditions. Patients that started on rosuvastatin (10–40 mg/day) between January 2011 and December 2013 were considered. The date of the first prescription was defined as the index date (ID). The observation period lasted from the ID to September 2015 or until LLT discontinuation, or the occurrence of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or death. Results The primary end point of the study was the occurrence of an AMI during the observation period. The final study population included 10,368 patients. During the observation period, 2452 (23.6%) patients were switched from rosuvastatin to another LLT. The majority of patients (55.6%) were switched to atorvastatin, followed by simvastatin (24.9%), simvastatin/ezetimibe combination (10.0%) and other statins (9.5%). Female gender (HR, hazard ratio, 1.10, 95% CI, confidence interval, 1.02–1.19, p = 0.04) and the presence of chronic kidney disease (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16–1.86, p = 0.05) were associated with a higher probability of switch. During the observation period, 113 patients experienced an AMI (incidence of 6.7 AMI/1000 patient-years). Multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazards method, including switching as a time-dependent covariate, demonstrated that changing from rosuvastatin to another LLT was an independent predictor of AMI (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4–3.5, p = 0.001). Conclusion We conclude that switching from rosuvastatin to another non-equipotent LLT may impart an increased risk of AMI and should be avoided. Funding AstraZeneca SpA.