Search

Objective: Exercise, yoga, and tai chi are commonly used complementary approaches for health and wellness. This review aims to synthesize the evidence for exercise, yoga, and tai chi in the outpatient treatment of major depressive disorder. Study Selection: A systematic search of the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials of exercise, yoga, and tai chi for major depressive disorder. Data Extraction: Standardized mean differences were calculated and meta-analyzed using a random effects multilevel modeling framework. Heterogeneity and subgroup analysis was conducted. Result(s): Twenty-five studies were included for final analysis (exercise: 15, yoga: 7, tai chi: 3). Overall, meta-analysis showed a moderate significant clinical effect. However, when only studies (6 studies) with the lowest risk of bias were included, the overall effect size was reduced to low to moderate efficacy. Overall quality of evidence was low. Heterogeneity and publication bias were high. Conclusion(s): The current meta-analysis of outpatient exercise, yoga, and tai chi for treatment of major depressive disorder suggests that adjunctive exercise and yoga may have small additive clinical effects in comparison to control for reducing depressive symptoms. The evidence for tai chi is insufficient to draw conclusions. The concerns with quality of studies, high heterogeneity, and evidence of publication bias preclude making firm conclusions.© Copyright 2020 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Objective: In the past two decades, newer psychotherapy treatments have emerged for the treatment of major depression. This review aimed to comprehensively synthesize the evidence for mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and positive psychotherapy (PPT) in treating a current episode of major depression. Method(s): A systematic search of the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials of MBCT, ACT, and PPT for major depression. Standardized mean differences were calculated with Hedges' g to complete random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochran Q statistic and I2 statistic. Subgroup analysis was conducted to further investigate heterogeneity. Result(s): A random-effects meta-analysis of 15 studies (MBCT, N=7; ACT, N=4; PPT, N=4) revealed that all three therapies showed efficacy in reducing symptoms of depression with a small favorable effect, compared with all control conditions (N=946; Hedges' g=0.34; 95% confidence interval=0.14, 0.54; p,0.001). Cochrane's Q statistic (Q=32, df=15, p=0.007) suggested significant heterogeneity (I2=53%). A mixed-effects model test for subgroup differences showed significant differences between active controls and treatment-as-usual controls (x2=15.3, df=1, p,0.001). Overall quality of evidence and publication bias were low. Conclusion(s): Meta-analysis shows that MBCT and ACT may be superior to inactive or treatment-as-usual controls and that PPT may be comparable to active controls for reducing symptoms of major depression after an acute course of therapy. However, the quality of the evidence was low. High-quality studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of these interventions.Copyright © 2021 Association for the Advancement of Psychotherapy Inc.. All rights reserved.