Search

A microlensing survey by Sumi et al. (2011) exhibits an overabundance of short-timescale events (STEs; t_E<2 days) relative to what is expected from known stellar populations and a smooth power-law extrapolation down to the brown dwarf regime. This excess has been interpreted as a population of ~Jupiter-mass objects that outnumber main-sequence stars by nearly twofold; however the microlensing data alone cannot distinguish between events due to wide-separation (a>~10 AU) and free-floating planets. Assuming these STEs are indeed due to planetary-mass objects, we aim to constrain the fraction of these events that can be explained by bound but wide-separation planets. We fit the observed timescale distribution with a lens mass function comprised of brown dwarfs, main-sequence stars, and stellar remnants, finding and thus corroborating the initial identification of an excess of STEs. We then include a population of bound planets that are expected not to show signatures of the primary lens (host) in their microlensing light curves and that are also consistent with results from representative microlensing, radial velocity, and direct imaging surveys. We find that bound planets alone cannot explain the entire STE excess without violating the constraints from the surveys we consider and thus some fraction of these events must be due to free-floating planets, if our model for bound planets holds. We estimate a median fraction of STEs due to free-floating planets to be f=0.67 (0.23-0.85 at 95% confidence) when assuming "hot-start" planet evolutionary models and f=0.58 (0.14-0.83 at 95% confidence) for "cold-start" models. Assuming a delta-function distribution of free-floating planets of mass m_p=2 M_Jup yields a number of free-floating planets per main-sequence star of N=1.4 (0.48-1.8 at 95% confidence) in the "hot-start" case and N=1.2 (0.29-1.8 at 95% confidence) in the "cold-start" case., Comment: 13 pages, 9 figures. Submitted to AAS Journals. Comments welcome

Considering a sample of 31 exoplanetary systems detected by gravitational microlensing, we investigate whether or not the estimated distances to these systems conform to the Galactic distribution of planets expected from models. We derive the expected distribution of distances and relative proper motions from a simulated microlensing survey, correcting for the dominant selection effects that affect the planet detection sensitivity as a function of distance, and compare it to the observed distribution using Anderson-Darling (AD) hypothesis testing. Taking the relative abundance of planets in the bulge to that in the disk, $f_{\rm bulge}$, as a model parameter, we find that our model is only consistent with the observed distribution for $f_{\rm bulge}<0.54$ (for a $p$-value threshold of 0.01) implying that the bulge may be devoid of planets relative to the disk. Allowing for a dependence of planet abundance on metallicity and host mass, or an additional dependence of planet sensitivity on event timescale does not restore consistency for $f_{\rm bulge}=1$. We examine the distance estimates of some events in detail, and conclude that some parallax-based distance estimates could be significantly in error. Only by combining the removal of one problematic event from our sample and the inclusion of strong dependences of planet abundance or detection sensitivity on host mass, metallicity and event timescale are we able to find consistency with the hypothesis that the bulge and disk have equal planet abundance., Comment: Revised following referee's report. 12 pages, 7 figures, 1 table

We present the first study to synthesize results from five different exoplanet surveys using three independent detection methods: microlensing, radial velocity, and direct imaging. The constraints derived herein represent the most comprehensive picture of the demographics of large-separation (>~ 2 AU) planets orbiting the most common stars in our Galaxy that has been constructed to date. We assume a simple, joint power-law planet distribution function of the form d^2N_{pl}/[dlog(m_p)dlog(a)] = A(m_p/M_{Sat})^{alpha}(a/2.5 AU)^{beta} with an outer cutoff radius of the separation distribution function of a_{out}. Generating populations of planets from these models and mapping them into the relevant observables for each survey, we use actual or estimated detection sensitivities to determine the expected observations for each survey. Comparing with the reported results, we derive constraints on the parameters {alpha, beta, A, a_{out}} that describe a single population of planets that is simultaneously consistent with the results of microlensing, RV, and direct imaging surveys. We find median and 68% confindence intervals of alpha = -0.86^{+0.21}_{-0.19} (-0.85^{+0.21}_{-0.19}), beta = 1.1^{+1.9}_{-1.4} (1.1^{+1.9}_{-1.3}), A = 0.21^{+0.20}_{-0.15} dex^{-2} (0.21^{+0.20}_{-0.15} dex^{-2}), and a_{out} = 10^{+26}_{-4.7} AU (12^{+50}_{-6.2} AU) assuming "hot-start" ("cold-start") planet evolutionary models. These values are consistent with all current knowledge of planets on orbits beyond ~2 AU around M dwarfs., Comment: 33 pages, 30 figures. Submitted to ApJ. Comments welcome

In contrast to radial velocity surveys, results from microlensing surveys indicate that giant planets with masses greater than the critical mass for core accretion ($\sim 0.1~M_{\rm Jup}$) are relatively common around low-mass stars. Using the methodology developed in the first paper, we predict the sensitivity of M-dwarf radial velocity (RV) surveys to analogs of the population of planets inferred by microlensing. We find that RV surveys should detect a handful of super-Jovian ($>M_{\rm Jup}$) planets at the longest periods being probed. These planets are indeed found by RV surveys, implying that the demographic constraints inferred from these two methods are consistent. We combine the results from both methods to estimate planet frequencies spanning wide regions of parameter space. We find that the frequency of Jupiters and super-Jupiters ($1\lesssim m_p\sin{i}/M_{\rm Jup}\lesssim 13$) with periods $1\leq P/{\rm days}\leq 10^4$ is $f_{\rm J}=0.029^{+0.013}_{-0.015}$, a median factor of 4.3 ($1.5-14$ at 95% confidence) smaller than the inferred frequency of such planets around FGK stars of $0.11\pm 0.02$. However, we find the frequency of all giant planets with $30\lesssim m_p\sin{i}/M_{\oplus}\lesssim 10^4$ and $1\leq P/{\rm days}\leq 10^4$ to be $f_{\rm G}=0.15^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$, only a median factor of 2.2 ($0.73-5.9$ at 95% confidence) smaller than the inferred frequency of such planets orbiting FGK stars of $0.31\pm 0.07$. For a more conservative definition of giant planets ($50\lesssim m_p\sin{i}/M_{\oplus}\lesssim 10^4$), we find $f_{\rm G'}=0.11\pm 0.05$, a median factor of 2.2 ($0.73-6.7$ at 95% confidence) smaller than that inferred for FGK stars of $0.25\pm 0.05$. Finally, we find the frequency of all planets with $1\leq m_p\sin{i}/M_{\oplus}\leq 10^4$ and $1\leq P/{\rm days}\leq10^4$ to be $f_p=1.9\pm 0.5$., Comment: 27 pages, 10 figures, part 2 of a 2-paper series submitted to ApJ. For a brief video summarizing this 2-paper series, please see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbNCWASAjsQ

Motivated by the order-of-magnitude difference in the frequency of giant planets orbiting M dwarfs inferred by microlensing and radial velocity (RV) surveys, we present a method for comparing the statistical constraints on exoplanet demographics inferred from these methods. We first derive the mapping from the observable parameters of a microlensing-detected planet to those of an analogous planet orbiting an RV-monitored star. Using this mapping, we predict the distribution of RV observables for the planet population inferred from microlensing surveys, taking care to adopt reasonable priors for, and properly marginalize over, the unknown physical parameters of microlensing-detected systems. Finally, we use simple estimates of the detection limits for a fiducial RV survey to predict the number and properties of analogs of the microlensing planet population such an RV survey should detect. We find that RV and microlensing surveys have some overlap, specifically for super-Jupiter mass planets ($m_p \gtrsim 1~M_{\rm Jup}$) with periods between $\sim 3-10~$years. However, the steeply falling planetary mass function inferred from microlensing implies that, in this region of overlap, RV surveys should infer a much smaller frequency than the overall giant planet frequency ($m_p\gtrsim 0.1~M_{\rm Jup}$) inferred by microlensing. Our analysis demonstrates that it is possible to statistically compare and synthesize data sets from multiple exoplanet detection techniques in order to infer exoplanet demographics over wider regions of parameter space than are accessible to individual methods. In a companion paper, we apply our methodology to several representative microlensing and RV surveys to derive the frequency of planets around M dwarfs with orbits of $\lesssim 30~$years., Comment: 21 pages, 5 figures, part 1 of a 2-paper series submitted to ApJ. For a brief video summarizing this 2-paper series, please see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbNCWASAjsQ

I examine the position of the ice line in circumbinary disks heated by steady mass accretion and stellar irradiation and compare with the critical semi-major axis, interior to which planetary orbits are unstable. There is a critical binary separation, dependent on the binary parameters and disk properties, for which the ice line lies within the critical semi-major axis for a given binary system. For an equal mass binary comprised of 1 M$_{\odot}$ components, this critical separation is $\approx 1.04 $AU, and scales weakly with mass accretion rate and Rosseland mean opacity ($\propto [\dot{M}\kappa_R]^{2/9}$). Assuming a steady mass accretion rate of $\dot{M} \sim 10^{-8} {\rm M_{\odot} yr^{-1}}$ and a Rosseland mean opacity of $\kappa_R\sim 1 {\rm cm^2 g^{-1}}$, I show that $\gtrsim 80%$ of all binary systems with total masses $M_{\rm tot} \lesssim 4.0 M_{\odot}$ have ice lines that lie interior to the critical semi-major axis. This suggests that rocky planets should not form in these systems, a prediction which can be tested by looking for planets around binaries with separations larger than the critical separation with \emph{Kepler} (difficult) and with microlensing., Comment: 5 pages, 3 figures. Submitted to ApJL

We report the detection of eighteen Jovian planets discovered as part of our Doppler survey of subgiant stars at Keck Observatory, with follow-up Doppler and photometric observations made at McDonald and Fairborn Observatories, respectively. The host stars have masses 0.927 < Mstar /Msun < 1.95, radii 2.5 < Rstar/Rsun < 8.7, and metallicities -0.46 < [Fe/H] < +0.30. The planets have minimum masses 0.9 MJup < MP sin i <3 MJup and semima jor axes a > 0.76 AU. These detections represent a 50% increase in the number of planets known to orbit stars more massive than 1.5 Msun and provide valuable additional information about the properties of planets around stars more massive thantheSun., Comment: ApJS accepted. The \rotate command prevented proper compilation. As a result Tables 19 and 21 do not fit onto the page, causing the final columns (S_HK, Nobs, respectively) to be omitted