2 results on '"Claire Questienne"'
Search Results
2. Safety and efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa versus alglucosidase alfa in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (COMET): a phase 3, randomised, multicentre trial
- Author
-
Stella Mazurová, John W. Day, Mazen M. Dimachkie, Sónia Tizon, Anna Kostera-Pruszczyk, Tahseen Mozaffar, Joel Charrow, Chafic Karam, Ricardo Maré, Jean-Baptiste Noury, Dewi Guellec, Jorge Alonso-Pérez, Acary Souza Bulle Oliveira, Loren D M Pena, Tianyue Zhou, Sergey Illarioshkin, Nathan Thibault, Marcelo Rugiero, Can Ebru Bekircan-Kurt, Lauren Chase, Monica Sciacco, Mamatha Pasnoor, Jenny Billy, Mark Tarnopolsky, Fabien Zagnoli, Marie Wencel, Sevim Erdem-Ozdamar, Erin Hatcher, Madoka Mori, Céline Tard, Nicolas Mavroudakis, Emmanuelle Salort-Campana, Antonio Toscano, Shafeeq Ladha, Angela Genge, Ans T. van der Ploeg, Michela Guglieri, Judith Johnson, Fanny Duval, Loïc Danjoux, Christopher Hug, Robert D. Henderson, Robert Neel, Luca Solera, Aleksandra Nadaj-Pakleza, Silvia Boschi, Nizar Chahin, Maurizio Gualtiero Moggio, Peter Young, Priya S. Kishnani, Yin-Hsiu Chien, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Claire Questienne, Francoise Bouhour, Gabriela A Niizawa, Ekaterina Fedotova, Tiziana Enrica Mongini, Harmke A. van Kooten, Vera Malinova, Sina Helms, Shahram Attarian, Patrick Deegan, Guilhem Sole, Hamilton Cirne, Ludwig Gutmann, Kenneth I. Berger, Laura Carrera Garcia, N A M E van der Beek, Stephanie Dearmey, Suzara Souto Lopes, Anna Potulska-Chromik, Joao Lindolfo Borges, Yesim Parman, Michaela Riedl, Sergey A. Klyushnikov, Olivier Huynh-Ba, Gauthier Remiche, Paula R. Clemens, Andrea Swenson, Stephan Wenninger, Miriam Hufgard-Leitner, Eugen Mengel, Kristina An Haack, Eve Gandolfo, David Reyes-Leiva, Jean-Baptiste Davion, Chester Whitley, Young Chul Choi, Patricia Altemus, Maria Judit Molnar, Perry B. Shieh, Matthias Vorgerd, Julia B Hennermann, Cheryl Smith, Volker Straub, Lauren Noll, Pascal Laforet, Andres Nascimento Osorio, Clarisa Maxit, Anne-Catherine Aubé-Nathier, Ozlem Goker-Alpan, Olimpia Musumeci, Louisa Müller-Miny, Tarekegn Hiwot, Jacqui Langton, Christopher Nance, Daniel Natera-de Benito, Jeffrey Statland, Nicola Longo, Vivien Pautot, Zoltan Grosz, Thomas Stulnig, Matthias Boentert, Anne-Katrin Guettsches, Chong Yew Tan, Erik Ortega, Derralynn Hughes, Hacer Durmus Tekce, Mark Roberts, Lenka Linková, Amel Karaa, Hani Kushlaf, Anthony Behin, Margarida Ramos Lopes, Jordi Diaz-Manera, Alessia Pugliese, Paulo Victor Sgobbi Souza, Carrie Bailey, Jennifer B Avelar, Hirofumi Komaki, Frederic Taithe, Benedikt Schoser, Sabine Specht, Kathryn E Brown, Gerson Carvalho, and Pediatrics
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,Walking ,FEV1/FVC ratio ,stomatognathic system ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Double-Blind Method ,Internal medicine ,Statistical significance ,Child, Preschool ,Enzyme Replacement Therapy ,Humans ,Treatment Outcome ,Glycogen Storage Disease Type II ,alpha-Glucosidases ,medicine ,Respiratory function ,Adverse effect ,education ,Child ,Preschool ,Alglucosidase alfa ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Standard treatment ,virus diseases ,Enzyme replacement therapy ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Summary Background Pompe disease is a rare, progressive neuromuscular disorder caused by deficiency of acid α-glucosidase (GAA) and accumulation of lysosomal glycogen. We assessed the safety and efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa, a recombinant human GAA enzyme replacement therapy specifically designed for enhanced mannose-6-phosphate-receptor targeting and enzyme uptake aimed at increased glycogen clearance, compared with the current approved standard of care, alglucosidase alfa, in patients with late-onset Pompe disease. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial at 55 sites in 20 countries. We enrolled individuals (aged ≥3 years) with enzymatically confirmed late-onset Pompe disease who had never received treatment. We used a centralised treatment allocation system to randomly allocate participants to either avalglucosidase alfa or alglucosidase alfa. Participants and investigators were unaware of their treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to week 49 in upright forced vital capacity percent (FVC%) predicted. We used a hierarchical fixed sequential testing strategy, whereby non-inferiority of avalglucosidase alfa compared with alglucosidase alfa was assessed first, with a non-inferiority margin of 1·1. If non-inferiority was seen, then superiority was tested with a 5% significance level. The key secondary objective was effect on functional endurance, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Safety was assessed, including treatment-emergent adverse events and infusion-associated reactions. The modified intent-to-treat population was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses. The safety population was the analysis population for safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02782741 . We report results of the 49-week primary analysis period. Findings Between Nov 2, 2016, and March 29, 2019, 100 participants were randomly allocated avalglucosidase alfa (n=51) or alglucosidase alfa (n=49). Treatment with avalglucosidase alfa resulted in a least-squares mean improvement in upright FVC% predicted of 2·89% (SE 0·88) compared with 0·46% (0·93) with alglucosidase alfa at week 49 (difference 2·43% [95% CI −0·13 to 4·99]). Non-inferiority was shown because the lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference far exceeded the predefined non-inferiority margin but did not exclude 0 (p=0·0074). Superiority was not reached (p=0·063), so formal testing was stopped, as per the testing hierarchy. Improvements were also seen in the 6MWT with avalglucosidase alfa compared with alglucosidase alfa, with greater increases in distance covered (difference 30·01 m [95% CI 1·33 to 58·69]) and percent predicted (4·71% [0·25 to 9·17]). Treatment-emergent adverse events potentially related to treatment were reported in 23 (45%) of 51 participants in the avalglucosidase alfa group and in 24 (49%) of 49 in the alglucosidase alfa group, and infusion-associated reactions were reported in 13 (26%) participants in the avalglucosidase alfa group and 16 (33%) in the alglucosidase alfa group. Of the five trial withdrawals, all in the alglucosidase alfa group, four were due to adverse events, including two infusion-associated reactions. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in eight (16%) participants who received avalglucosidase alfa and in 12 (25%) who received alglucosidase alfa. One participant treated with alglucosidase alfa died because of acute myocardial infarction determined to be unrelated to treatment. Antidrug antibody responses were similar in both groups. High and persistent titres (≥12 800) and neutralising antibodies were more common with alglucosidase alfa (in 16 [33%] participants) than with avalglucosidase alfa (ten [20%]). Interpretation We consider that this study provides evidence of clinically meaningful improvement with avalglucosidase alfa therapy over alglucosidase alfa in respiratory function, ambulation, and functional endurance, with no new safety signals reported. An open-label extended-treatment period is ongoing to confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa, with the aim for this therapy to become the new standard treatment in late-onset Pompe disease. Funding Sanofi Genzyme.
- Published
- 2021
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.