Search

Background: Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) face several physical, emotional, and psychological challenges throughout treatment. Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an effective but toxic treatment, with an increased risk for toxicities in patients with low skeletal muscle mass (SMM). Consequently, these patients are anticipated to experience greater treatment-related difficulties. We aimed to explore the experiences of patients with HNSCC and low SMM regarding cisplatin-based CRT., Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted, interviewing seven patients 3 months after CRT using a topic guide. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews was conducted, to create a multi-dimensional understanding of patients' experiences during and after cisplatin-based CRT., Results: Prior to CRT themes included pre-treatment information, expectations towards treatment and trial, psychosocial circumstances, and supporting network. During CRT themes included toxicities, psychosocial impact, and supporting network. After CRT themes included reflection on period during CRT, psychosocial circumstances, informal support from networks and healthcare workers, and ongoing toxicities., Conclusion: Most patients experience cisplatin-based CRT as a life-changing and distressing life event but cope through various strategies and supporting networks. Tailored counseling, ideally with on-demand consultations, is recommended. No differences were noted in patients' perceptions of their cisplatin regimen., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Despite promising outcomes of treatment with anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 agents in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy (PDC) in the first-line setting, a significant unmet medical need remains in patients with PD-L1-unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: This multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study comprising dose-confirmation and dose-expansion parts investigated the combination of spartalizumab and various PDC regimens, with or without canakinumab, in treatment-naïve patients with PD-L1-unselected, metastatic NSCLC. The primary objectives were to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of spartalizumab, with or without canakinumab, in combination with PDC in the dose-confirmation part and antitumor activity of spartalizumab in the dose-expansion part., Results: The MTD/RDE of spartalizumab was 300 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) when administered with either gemcitabine (1250 mg/m 2 )/cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 ) (group A; no dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs]), pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 )/cisplatin (group B; 2 DLTs: grade 2 posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and grade 4 hyponatremia), or paclitaxel (200 mg/m 2 )/carboplatin area under the curve 6 min*mg/mL (group C; 1 DLT: grade 4 neutropenic colitis). The RDE of canakinumab combined with spartalizumab and pemetrexed/cisplatin (group E; no DLTs) was 200 mg Q3W (no dose-expansion part was initiated). No new safety signals were identified. In groups A, B, C, and E, the overall response rates were 57.6%, 55.3%, 51.5%, and 57.1%, respectively. Group B compared with other groups had the longest median progression-free survival (10.4 months vs. 6.2-7.5 months), overall survival (29.7 months vs. 16.1-21.0 months), and duration of response (30.1 months vs. 6.0-8.2 months)., Conclusions: The combination of spartalizumab and PDC, with or without canakinumab, was well tolerated across treatment groups. The antitumor activity across treatment groups was comparable with that of pembrolizumab and pemetrexed combination. Canakinumab did not appear to improve the antitumor activity when combined with spartalizumab, pemetrexed and cisplatin., Trial Registration: The trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov with identifier no. NCT03064854. Date of Registration: 06 February 2017., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of using a multigene signature to tailor individualised adjuvant therapy for patients with operable triple negative breast cancer., Design: Randomised, multicentre, open label, phase 3 trial., Setting: 7 cancer centres in China between 3 January 2016 and 17 July 2023., Participants: Female patients aged 18-70 years with early triple negative breast cancer after definitive surgery., Interventions: After risk stratification using the integrated signature, patients at high risk were randomised (1:1) to receive an intensive adjuvant treatment comprising four cycles of docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin (arm A; n=166) or a standard treatment of four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of docetaxel (arm B; n=170). Patients at low risk received the same adjuvant chemotherapy as arm B (arm C; n=168)., Main Outcome Measures: The primary endpoint was disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat analysis for arm A versus arm B. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival for arm C versus arm B, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and safety., Results: Among the 504 enrolled patients, 498 received study treatment. At a median follow-up of 45.1 months, the three year disease-free survival rate was 90.9% for patients in arm A and 80.6% for patients in arm B (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28 to 0.95; P=0.03). The three year recurrence-free survival rate was 92.6% in arm A and 83.2% in arm B (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.98; P=0.04). The three year overall survival rate was 98.2% in arm A and 91.3% in arm B (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.54; P=0.27). The rates of disease-free survival (three year disease-free survival 90.1% v 80.6%; hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.98; P=0.04), recurrence-free survival (three year recurrence-free survival 94.5% v 83.2%; 0.42, 0.22 to 0.81; P=0.007), and overall survival (three year overall survival 100% v 91.3%; 0.14, 0.03 to 0.61; P=0.002) were significantly higher in patients in arm C than in those in arm B with the same chemotherapy regimen. The incidence of grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events were 64% (105/163), 51% (86/169), and 54% (90/166) for arms A, B, and C, respectively. No treatment related deaths occurred., Conclusions: The multigene signature showed potential for tailoring adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with operable triple negative breast cancer. Intensive regimens incorporating gemcitabine and cisplatin into anthracycline/taxane based therapy significantly improved disease-free survival with manageable toxicity., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02641847., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at https://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the National Key Research and Development Project of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, SHDC Municipal Project for Developing Emerging and Frontier Technology in Shanghai Hospitals, and CSPC Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Shijiazhuang, China, for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Pemetrexed is combined with cisplatin to treat cancer. Whether pemetrexed-cisplatin combination chemotherapy exacerbates cisplatin nephrotoxicity is unclear. Here, we investigated kidney injury in mice administered a non-lethal low-dose regimen of pemetrexed or cisplatin alone and compared it with a pemetrexed-cisplatin combination., Methods: Mice were randomly divided into four groups and administered intraperitoneally the experimental drugs solubilized in captisol (sulfobutylether β-cyclodextrin). Group 1 received captisol, Group 2 pemetrexed (10 mg/kg), Group 3 cisplatin (1 mg/kg), and Group 4 pemetrexed (10 mg/kg) plus cisplatin (1 mg/kg). The mice were treated every other day for two weeks, three times per week. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined on the third day after the last treatment, followed by a necropsy., Results: Whereas the relative kidney weight was comparable in the control vs. pemetrexed or cisplatin alone group, it was significantly increased in the combination group. Mice treated with cisplatin and pemetrexed-cisplatin combination exhibited reduced GFR. The pemetrexed-cisplatin combination caused significant increases in the plasma or urinary levels of kidney injury biomarkers, renal lipid peroxidation, and nitrosative stress compared with pemetrexed or cisplatin alone. Histopathology revealed that pemetrexed or cisplatin alone had minimal effects on the kidneys. By contrast, the pemetrexed-cisplatin combination caused tubular degeneration, dilatation, and granular casts. Live-cell imaging showed that the pemetrexed-cisplatin combination caused more severe apoptosis of primary renal epithelial cells than individual concentrations., Conclusions: These findings suggest that combining pemetrexed and cisplatin causes oxidative kidney damage at individual doses that do not cause significant nephrotoxicity. Hence, the renal function of patients undergoing treatment with the pemetrexed-cisplatin combination needs extensive monitoring., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy is considered a metastatic disease in GBC; however, some surgical series of radical surgery with enlarged RPLN who underwent RPLN dissection have shown results marginally inferior to those without enlarged RPLN. Radiological RPLN comprises a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC. There is dilemma in the intent of treatment to be offered in such cases. We are reporting our series of outcome of GBC with RPLN treated with first-line CT followed by consolidation CTRT., Materials and Methods: Non-metastatic locally advanced GBC with good performance status (KPS ≥ 80) were initiated on first-line CT (cisplatin-gemcitabine), and thereafter, responders were evaluated by CECT-angiography and PET-CT scan for resectability. If found unresectable, they were offered consolidation CTRT to a dose of 45 Gy by conventional fractionation (3D-CRT technique) along with concurrent capecitabine at 1250 mg/m 2 to GBC and regional lymphatics including RPLN. Thereafter, boost dose of 9 Gy/5# was given to GBC only. Response assessment was done using CECT abdomen by RECIST criteria v 1.1. Outcomes (overall survival) of the two groups (RPLN vs non-RPLN) were computed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and chi-square tests using SPSS v 20., Results: Among 189 patients of advanced non-metastatic GBC recruited from 2011 to 2022, 80 had RPLN. The demographic features of both groups were comparable. Overall, 68% of the patients were women, 30% underwent upfront stenting for obstructive jaundice, and 90% had T3 and T4 disease. Only 10% had undergone upfront laparoscopic staging and had pathologically proven RPLN. Forty percent of the patients received four cycles of CT only and 50% of the patients received six cycles or more and 33% received CTRT. By RECIST criteria, 10% vs 16% achieved complete response (CR), 39% vs 41% achieved partial response (PR), 16% vs 15% achieved stable disease (SD), 2.7% vs 6% had disease progression (PD), and 14.5% vs 3.7% were non-evaluable in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. 12% vs 6% could undergo radical surgery in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group (p = 0.03). The median OS was 9 months (95% CI 7.6-10.3 months) vs 10 months (95% CI 8-9.8 months) (p = NS) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. In those who received CT only, the median OS was 7 months vs 8 months, while in those who received CT followed by CTRT, the median OS was 14 months vs 13 months (p = 0.65) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively., Conclusions: Based on this analysis, we conclude that RPLN constitutes a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC and has outcomes similar to those without RPLN if treated with radical intent. RPLN should not be considered a metastatic disease and should be treated with radical intent., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Locally advanced cervical cancer is treated with chemoradiotherapy (standard of care), but many patients still relapse and die from metastatic disease. We investigated chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy to determine whether induction chemotherapy improves both progression-free survival and overall survival., Methods: The INTERLACE trial was a multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial done at 32 medical centres in Brazil, India, Italy, Mexico, and the UK. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO 2008 stage IB1 disease with nodal involvement, or stage IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIB, or IVA disease) were randomly assigned (1:1), by minimisation, using a central electronic system, to standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (once-a-week intravenous cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 for 5 weeks with 45·0-50·4 Gy external beam radiotherapy delivered in 20-28 fractions plus brachytherapy to achieve a minimum total 2 Gy equivalent dose of 78-86 Gy) alone or induction chemotherapy (once-a-week intravenous carboplatin area under the receiver operator curve 2 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 for 6 weeks) followed by standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Stratification factors were recruiting site, stage, nodal status, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy, age, tumour size, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival within the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01566240, and EUDRACT, 2011-001300-35., Findings: Between Nov 8, 2012, and Nov 17, 2022, 500 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy alone group (n=250) or the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group. Of 500 patients, 354 (70%) had stage IIB disease and 56 (11%) stage IIIB disease. Pelvic lymph nodes were positive in 215 (43%) patients. 230 (92%) patients who received induction chemotherapy had at least five cycles. Median interval between induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy was 7 days. Four or more cycles of cisplatin were given to 212 (85%) participants in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group and to 224 (90%) of participants in the chemoradiotherapy alone group. 462 (92%) participants received external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy with a median overall treatment time of 45 days. After a median follow-up of 67 months, 5-year progression-free survival rates were 72% in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group and 64% in the chemoradiotherapy alone group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·65 (95% CI 0·46-0·91, p=0·013). 5-year overall survival rates were 80% in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group and 72% in the chemoradiotherapy alone group, with an HR of 0·60 (95% CI 0·40-0·91, p=0·015). Grade 3 or greater adverse events were reported in 147 (59%) of 250 individuals in the induction chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy group versus 120 (48%) of 250 individuals in the chemoradiotherapy alone group., Interpretation: Short-course induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer., Funding: Cancer Research UK and University College London-University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GE reports consulting fees from MSD and Eisai; payment or honoraria from Eisai and GSK; support for attending meeting from MSD; and participation on Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for GSK, MSD, and Eisai, outside the submitted work. JAL reports grants from AstraZeneca and Merck/MSD; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, GSK, Artios Pharma, Merck/MSD, VBL Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Nuvation, Immagene, Incyte, Immunogen/AbbVie, and Novocure; payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD/Merck, Clovis Oncology, and GSK; participation on Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Mersana and SutroBio; and leadership role on the European Society for Medical Oncology's Clinical Practice Guidelines—Gynaecological Cancer—until December, 2023, past Vice President role for the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, until 2021, and Chair for National Ovarian Cancer Audit Committee, outside the submitted work. MM reports payment or honoraria from MSD, Eisai, GSK, Roche, and Medscape; support for attending meetings or travel from Daiichi Sanko; and past role as a Chair of Cervical Cancer Research Network (until September 2021), outside the submitted work. AM reports participation on data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Cannariabio (on an ovarian cancer trial, since 2023) and executive committee member role with the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (since 2024), outside the submitted work. AH reports honoraria for educational activities from AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, Ipsen, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Serono, MSD, UCB, Kyowa Kirin, Servier, Sobi, Pfizer, and Roche, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

A platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for refractory cervical cancer (CC). However, the recurrence of disease and the occurrence of metastasis remain prevalent. We observed the long-term efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and CCRT in refractory CC. A total of 62 patients with refractory CC were enrolled in this study from January 2016 to December 2019. The NACT regimen included bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), docetaxel (75 mg/m2), and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), administered tri-weekly for 2 cycles. The CCRT regimen included bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), administered tri-weekly for 2 cycles. A dose of 45-50 Gy was prescribed for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), while 30-35 Gy in 4-5 fractions was prescribed for brachytherapy (BT). Among the patients, 21 patients (33.9%) were at stages IIB-IIIB, 8 patients (12.9%) were at stage IIIC1, 19 patients (30.6%) were at stage IIIC2, and 14 patients (22.6%) were at stage IVB. Pelvic, para-aortic, supraclavicular, and inguinal lymph node metastases were discovered in 41 patients (66.1%). The median follow-up was 49.8 months (12.3-82.7 months). The median tumor volumes pre-treatment, after NACT, and before BT were 84.64 ± 53.15 cm3, 1.64 ± 13.15 cm3, and 0 ± 1.5 cm3, respectively. Complete clinical response (cCR) rates after NACT and EBRT were 35.5% and 66.1%, respectively. Four years after the diagnosis, the overall survival (OS) rate was 78.6%, the local region-free survival (LRFS) rate was 91.3%, the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 70.6%, and the distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate was 81.4%. A total of 29 patients (46.8%) experienced grade 3/4 hematological toxicity, 3 patients (4.8%) experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities, and none experienced grade 5 adverse events. Bevacizumab combined with NACT and CCRT significantly improved cCR and OS in refractory CC with acceptable toxicity.

Introduction: Cisplatin is one of the most effective chemotherapeutic drugs used in oral cancer treatment, but systemic administration has side effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of iontophoresis on the enhancement of cisplatin release from cisplatin-encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles., Methods: The effect of different mass ratios of chitosan to tripolyphosphate (TPP) (5:1, 10:1, 15:1, 20:1) on the encapsulation efficiency of cisplatin was investigated. Uptake of cisplatin-encapsulated chitosan by cells was observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The cell viability at different cisplatin concentrations was examined using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Three iontophoresis methods, namely constant-current chronopotentiometry (CCCP), cyclic chronopotentiometry (CCP), and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), were used to enhance cisplatin release from cisplatin-encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles. In addition, mouse oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines were implanted into the mouse oral mucosa to induce oral cancer. The effects of enhanced cisplatin release by CCCP, CCP, and DPV on tumor suppression in mice were evaluated. Tumors and lymph nodes were isolated for hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry staining including Ki-67 and pan CK after sacrifice. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was conducted to quantify the platinum content within the tumors., Results: The results showed that nanoparticles with a mass ratio of 15:1 exhibited the highest cisplatin encapsulation efficiency (approximately 15.6%) and longest continued release (up to 35 days) in phosphate buffered saline with a release rate of 100%. Cellular uptake results suggested that chitosan nanoparticles were delivered to the cytoplasm via endocytosis. The results of the MTT assay revealed that the survival rate of cells decreased as the cisplatin concentration increased. The CCP (1 mA, on:off = 1 s: 1 s) and DPV (0-0.06 V) groups were the most effective in inhibiting tumor growth, and both groups exhibited the lowest percentage of Ki-67 positive and pan CK positive., Conclusion: This study is the first to investigate and determine the efficacy of DPV in enhancing in vivo drug release from nanoparticles for the treatment of cancer in animals. The results suggest that the CCP and DPV methods have the potential to be combined with surgery for oral cancer treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 Chen et al.)

This research was intended to compare the clinical efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in conjunction with lenvatinib and PD1 inhibitors to first-line systemic chemotherapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC). The research enrolled advanced ICC patients who underwent HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD1 inhibitor(n = 51) or first-line systemic chemotherapy(cisplatin + gemcitabine, n = 39) between July 2020 to January 2023 in Zhongshan People's Hospital.Their clinical outcomes were assessed through measurement of parameters encompassing objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median duration of response (mDOR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). In accordance with the RECIST1.1, the ORR in the HAIC + L + P and SC groups was 43.1% and 20.5%, while the DCR was 90.2% and 69.2%, respectively (P = 0.04 and = 0.02, respectively). The change in the maximum diameter of intrahepatic target lesions in patients before and after treatment and the diameter of intrahepatic tumors in the HAIC + L + P group were sharply smaller versus the SC group ( P < 0.001). The HAIC + L + P group had prolonged mOS (16.8 months vs. 11.0 months, P = 0.01) and mPFS (12.0 months vs. 6.9 months, P < 0.01) in comparison with the SC group. Compared to first-line systemic chemotherapy(cisplatin + gemcitabine), HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors contributes to improvement of tumor response and prolongation of OS and PFS in advanced ICC patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The functionalization approach for nanomaterials is of great importance for their application in drug delivery systems. Herein, an approach based on block copolymer installation into polymer nanogels was newly developed. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-incorporated polymer nanogels were prepared by a two-step dispersion/precipitation polymerization. Poly(methacrylic acid)- block -poly(3-fluorophenylboronic acid methacrylamide) (PMAA- b -PFPBMA) prepared by two-step reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization was installed into the polymer nanogels via boronate ester formation. Furthermore, cisplatin as a cancer therapeutic drug was successfully loaded on the block copolymer-installed polymer nanogels, and cell death was achieved by using the resulting cisplatin-loaded nanogels. We believe that the functionality of the nanogels can be changed by varying the installed block copolymer, leading to the functionalization approach of polymer nanogels based on block copolymer installation, which will be of great utility in many fields.

Purpose: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with an SN-38 payload, approved for patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progressed after platinum (PT)-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). Here, we report results from Cohort 2 of TROPHY-U-01 trial, evaluating the efficacy and safety of SG in patients with mUC., Methods: TROPHY-U-01 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label phase II study. Cohort 2 includes patients with LA or mUC who have had progression or recurrence after a CPI and were cisplatin-ineligible at study initiation. Patients received SG 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per central review; secondary end points were clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) per central review and safety., Results: Cohort 2 included 38 patients (61% male; median age 72.5 years; 66% visceral metastases [29% liver]; 50% received previous PT-based chemotherapy as previous [neo]adjuvant therapy]). At a median follow-up of 9.3 months, ORR was 32% (95% CI, 17.5 to 48.7), CBR 42% (95% CI, 26.3 to 59.2), median DOR 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 13.3), median PFS 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3), and median overall survival 13.5 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 15.6). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 87% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (34%), anemia (24%), leukopenia (19%), fatigue (18%), and diarrhea (16%)., Conclusion: SG monotherapy demonstrated a relatively high ORR with rapid responses; this was feasible with a manageable toxicity profile in cisplatin-ineligible patients who had progression after CPI therapy. Limitations include a moderate sample size and lack of random assignment. These results warrant further evaluation of SG alone and in combinations in patients with LA/mUC.

Choriocarcinoma is characterized as the most aggressive malignant alternation of gestational trophoblastic neoplasm; however, this illness is a curable malignancy. Although a rarity, this disease affects a female patient's life and causes a fatal condition. Choriocarcinoma is a life-threatening disease since it is initially insidious and can rapidly lead to masive hemorrhage, even death. Choriocarcinoma should be suspected in childbearing-age women with the high-risk scores according to FIGO. The study aims to report a severe case of widespread metastatic choriocarcinoma to optimize the treatment with multiagent chemotherapy and a multidisciplinary cooperation at our center. A G1P0 20-year-old woman was referred to the hospital for suspicion of metastatic choriocarcinoma after self-stopping chemotherapy because of the COVID-19 pandemic. During hospitalization, the tumor metastasized and presented profuse intraabdominal hemorrhage. The patient underwent immediate surgical intervention to control bleeding, and a definitive diagnosis was accurately established by the histopathological examination. After surgery, the EMA/CO regimen was administered as the first line of treatment, despite the patient being in a coma and requiring a ventilator machine. After 6 cycles of the EMA/CO regimen, her serum β-hCG level decreased to 8 mUI/mL, however, her β-hCG concentration was not down to a negative value. Thus, the patient received paclitaxel/cisplatin alternating with paclitaxel/etoposide (TP/TE regimen) for complete remission following 2 cycles. The delays in choriocarcinoma treatment are prognostic factors for worse outcomes, whereas chemotherapy may be considered a suitable treatment even in a patient's coma, thus improving a prognosis substantially.

Background: Muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treatment combines systemic therapy and radical cystectomy (RC) or local (chemo-)radiotherapy. Response to systemic therapy is an important outcome predictor but is difficult to assess pre-operatively., Methods: We analyzed multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in consecutive MIBC patients receiving cisplatin-based neo-adjuvant chemotherapy at our institution. Two readers, blinded for pathological outcome, independently scored mpMRI before and after 2 and 4 cycles using both a qualitative 3-step method and nacVI-RADS. We analyzed accuracy of mpMRI scores to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) and inter-observer agreement., Results: We analyzed 46 patients receiving NAC, 6 patients did not undergo RC after NAC and were excluded. Eleven out of 40 (28%) patients showed a pCR. mpMRI could be assessed in over 90% of patients. Radiologic complete response (rCR) using both methods was significantly associated with pCR, with an overall specificity of 96% and sensitivity of 36% and a high inter-observer agreement. rCR as assessed by the 3-step score was significantly associated with disease free survival (DFS) benefit., Conclusion: The use of nacVI-RADS can predict pCR after NAC with high specificity but low sensitivity and a high inter-observer agreement. A 3-step score adds value in determining local residual disease, rCR assessed by this method could correlate with DFS benefit. mpMRI scores should be prospectively assessed in future trials of multimodal management of MIBC and can be a predictive asset in routine clinical management., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Current treatment options for patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer are limited and associated with high morbidity. Therefore, it is important to develop new and safe treatment strategies for this vulnerable patient group., Primary Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer., Study Hypothesis: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is oncologically safe, potentially more effective than primary chemoradiation in establishing long lasting locoregional control, and associated with an improved quality of life., Trial Design: This study is a multicenter, prospective, phase II randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the standard treatment arm (primary chemoradiation, consisting of a tumor dose of 64.5 Gy in 30 fractions of external beam radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin for 6 weeks) or the experimental treatment arm (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel in a 3 weekly scheme, followed by surgery)., Major Inclusion/exclusion Criteria: Eligible patients must have a histologically confirmed primary or recurrent locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages Ib-Iva; Lesions larger than 2 cm in size or stromal invasion larger than 1 mm (T1b or higher), any status of lymph node involvement (any N), no distant metastasis including pelvic lymph nodes (M0)) with the size or localization of the tumor requiring treatment through primary chemoradiation or extensive surgery. Patients with documented metastases of the pelvic lymph nodes will be excluded from participation in this study., Primary Endpoint: Locoregional control at 24 months., Sample Size: 98 patients will be included in the study., Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results: Expected complete accrual in 2028 with presentation of results by 2030., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05905315., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Rationale: Gastric large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma that arises from the stomach and with high malignancy. Patients with gastric LCNEC usually have a poor prognosis. The standard treatment plan has not been established and its curative effect is poor. The present study described 2 cases diagnosed with gastric LCNEC and reviewed in depth the literature to improve our understanding more about this uncommon tumor and further to provide more experience to diagnose and treat this disease., Patient Concerns: The present study reported 2 cases of gastric LCNEC in male patients aged 51 and 73 years old, respectively. Both patients had epigastric discomfort, pain, acid reflux and heartburn. The medical history was unremarkable., Diagnoses: The ulcerative lesion located at gastric was examined in the 2 patients by taking the esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGO), computed tomography (CT) and digital gastrointestinal radiography (GI), that both were suspected gastric malignancy. Endoscopic biopsies of the tumor led to the initial diagnosis of gastric cancer. Postoperative pathological and immunohistochemical examinations of the surgical specimens confirmed that 1 case had mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) and the other had LCNEC., Interventions: Both patients underwent surgical resection and received etoposide-cisplatin combination chemotherapy following surgery., Outcomes: The operation was successful. Both patients had uneventful recoveries following surgery, and had been followed-up regularly. The general condition was satisfactory, and no tumor metastasis was observed at present., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Hearing loss (HL) is associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes among patients with medulloblastoma. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with severe HL and to evaluate the generalizability of a published HL calculator among patients treated with passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) and cisplatin., Methods: We identified patients aged 3-21 years who were treated at our centers between 2007 and 2022. Audiograms were graded using the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) Boston scale. Time to grades 3-4 HL was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: Seventy-nine patients were treated with PSPT at a median age of 7.5 years (range: 3.1-21.1). The mean cochlear dose (Dmc) (±SD) was 31.5 ± 8.5 Gy, and the cumulative cisplatin dose was 295 ± 50 mg/m2. Fifty-nine patients (75%) received amifostine. Patients completed a median of 9 audiograms (range: 4-22) with a median audiogram follow-up of 49 months (range: 6-177). Twenty-seven patients (34%) had grades 3-4 HL. In adjusted Cox models, only higher Dmc (HR = 1.12, 95% CI:1.06-1.18) was associated with grades 3-4 HL. The predicted 3-year incidence of grades 3-4 HL was 40.0% (95% CI: 21.3-66.3) and 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4-93.7) for children with Dmc ≥36 Gy and age at radiotherapy ≥7 and <7 years, respectively (P = .042). It was 8.9% (95% CI: 2.3-31.6) and 15.6% (95% CI: 5.3-41.1) for children with Dmc <36 Gy and age at radiotherapy ≥7 and <7 years, respectively (P = .78)., Conclusions: Children <7 years at radiotherapy with a Dmc ≥36 Gy are at higher risk for HL., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with high-dose cisplatin (CDDP) is the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Although dosing is based on body surface area (BSA), some patients experience CDDP-related adverse events (AEs). We aimed to evaluate the impact of relative CDDP dose to skeletal muscle mass (SMM) on chemotherapy-associated AEs in patients with HNSCC undergoing CRT with high-dose CDDP., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent CRT with high-dose CDDP (80-100 mg/m2, triweekly) between 2010 and 2023. SMM was measured as the cross-sectional muscle area at the third cervical vertebra (C3-SMM) using computed tomography; the skeletal muscle index (SMI) was defined as SMM normalized by squared height. The CDDP index was defined as the prescribed CDDP dose divided by SMI. CDDP-related AEs were assessed during the first cycle using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0., Results: Overall, 306 patients were identified. The CDDP index cutoff value best associated with grade ≥ 3 AEs was 10.312. Grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicities exhibited stronger association with high CDDP index value than with low CDDP index value (26.9% vs 16.3%, P = .033). Multivariate analysis revealed that high CDDP index value and creatinine clearance < 70 mL/minute were predictive factors for grade ≥ 3 AEs (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, P = .008; OR 3.68, P = .002, respectively)., Conclusion: The CDDP index based on C3-SMM was an independent predictive factor for grade ≥ 3 CDDP-related AEs. C3-SMM is potentially more useful than BSA for determining the optimal CDDP dose in patients with HNSCC., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Acute kidney injury (AKI) constitutes a severe condition characterized by a sudden decrease in kidney function. Utilizing lineage-restricted stem/progenitor cells, directly reprogrammed from somatic cells, is a promising therapeutic option in personalized medicine for serious and incurable diseases such as AKI. The present study describes the therapeutic potential of induced nephron progenitor cell-sourced molecules (iNPC-SMs) as a cell-free strategy against cisplatin (CP)-induced nephrotoxicity, employing hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel-mediated local delivery to minimize systemic leakage and degradation. iNPC-SMs exhibited anti-apoptotic effects on HK-2 cells by inhibiting CP-induced ROS generation. Additionally, the localized biodistribution facilitated by hydrogel-mediated iNPC-SM delivery contributed to enhanced renal function, anti-inflammatory response, and renal regeneration in AKI mice. This study could serve as a 'proof of concept' for injectable hydrogel-mediated iNPC-SM delivery in AKI and as a model for further exploration of the development of cell-free regenerative medicine strategies.

Programmed death 1 blockade (tislelizumab) has been approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma but not as part of neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In this multicenter single-arm trial (ChiCTR2000037670), 65 participants with cT2-4aN0M0 MIBC received neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab; 57 of them underwent radical cystectomy (RC). The primary endpoint of pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 50.9% (29/57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37.3-64.4%) and the pathologic downstaging (secondary endpoint) rate was 75.4% (43/57, 95% CI 62.2-85.9%) in participants undergoing RC. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses revealed three MIBC molecular subtypes (S): S1 (immune-desert) with activated cell-cycle pathway, S2 (immune-excluded) with activated transforming growth factor-β pathway and S3 (immune-inflamed) with upregulated interferon-α and interferon-γ response. Post hoc analysis showed pCR rates of 16% (3/19, S1), 77% (10/13, S2) and 80% (12/15, S3) (P = 0.006). In conclusion, neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin plus tislelizumab for MIBC was compatible with an enhanced pCR rate., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Purpose: Electrochemotherapy, clinically established for treating (sub)cutaneous tumors, has been standardized in the framework of the European Standard Operating Procedure on Electrochemotherapy (ESOPE). Due to common side effects of chemotherapeutic drugs, recent advances focus on non-cytotoxic agents, like calcium, to induce cell death (calcium electroporation). Therefore, this study aims to determine the efficacy of electrochemotherapy with bleomycin or cisplatin, or calcium electroporation on human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) in vitro using the ESOPE protocol., Methods: HepG2 cell viability was measured with a MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay after electrochemotherapy with the chemotherapeutic drugs bleomycin or cisplatin (0-20 µM), or after calcium electroporation (0-20 mM), to determine its efficacy on HepG2 cells in vitro using the ESOPE protocol (8 rectangular pulses, 1000 V/cm, 100 µs) compared to non-electroporated drug treatment., Results: Cell viability was significantly lower in electroporated samples, compared to their non-electroporated controls (27-75% difference). Electrochemotherapy with bleomycin and calcium electroporation, reached (almost) complete cell death (- 1 ± 3% and 2.5 ± 2%), in the lowest concentration of 2.5 µM and 2.5 mM, respectively. Electrochemotherapy with 2.5 µM cisplatin, significantly decreased cell viability to only 68% (± 7%)., Conclusion: Electrochemotherapy with bleomycin or cisplatin, or calcium electroporation were more effective in reducing the HepG2 cell viability in vitro using the ESOPE protocol compared to the non-electroporated drug treatments alone. When comparing electrochemotherapy, HepG2 cells are more sensitive to bleomycin than cisplatin, in similar concentrations. Calcium electroporation has the same effectiveness as electrochemotherapy with bleomycin, but calcium potentially has a better safety profile and several treatment advantages., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: In the era of immunotherapy, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is used clinically but lacks of high-level clinical evidence. This study aimed to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of NAIC followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with those of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by MIE., Methods: A prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted at Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 ) + cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 ) (toripalimab group) or paclitaxel + cisplatin alone (chemotherapy group) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles. After surgery, the toripalimab group received toripalimab (240 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 months). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). The pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life were also assessed., Results: Between May 15, 2020 and August 13, 2021, 252 ESCC patients ranging from T1N1-3M0 to T2-3N0-3M0 were enrolled for interim analysis, with 127 in the toripalimab group and 125 in the chemotherapy group. The 1-year EFS rate was 77.9% in the toripalimab group compared to 64.3% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39 to 1.00; P = 0.05). The 1-year OS rates were 94.1% and 83.0% in the toripalimab and chemotherapy groups, respectively (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.037). The patients in the toripalimab group had a higher pCR rate (18.6% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.001). The rates of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher morbidity were 9.8% in the toripalimab group and 6.8% in the chemotherapy group, with no significant difference observed (P = 0.460). The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs did not differ between the two groups (12.5% versus 12.4%)., Conclusions: The interim results of this ongoing trial showed that in resectable ESCC, the addition of perioperative toripalimab to NAC is safe, may improve OS and might change the standard treatment in the future., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Communications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based cancer immunotherapy has shown promise as a potential treatment in the clinic. It has been reported that anti-PD-L1 combined with cisplatin treatment can improve the antitumor effect. However, the therapeutic outcome is limited due to the abundance of tumor stroma in pancreatic cancer (PC), which prevented the penetration of cisplatin and anti-PD-L1 into tumor regions, thus impeding the effectiveness in the treatment of PC. In this study, a nanocarrier-mediated codelivery system of hyaluronidase and cisplatin was constructed, which can degrade the stroma and promote cisplatin and anti-PD-L1 to penetrate the tumor stroma into the deep tumor, so as to suppress PC effectively. When combined the cisplatin nanocarrier system BPEI-SS-Pt/HAase@CaP (BSP/H@CaP) with an immune checkpoint inhibitor to overcome the poor therapeutic outcome of PC, the results indicated that the therapeutic effect of BSP/H@CaP combined with anti-PD-L1 was better than that of BSP/H@CaP and single anti-PD-L1 group. Because the stroma is degrading, a higher amount of BPEI-SS-Pt and anti-PD-L1 can enter the tumor stroma and reach the inner depths of the tumor for immune stimulation, leading to a synergistically augmented chemotherapy and immunotherapy for PC. The above combination therapy is useful for clinical translation to overcome the treatment resistance of matrix-rich PC., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dose-dense gemcitabine and cisplatin (ddGC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)., Methods: Patients with locally advanced MIBC (cT2aN0M0-cT4N1M0) who received ddGC between December 2017 and December 2023 were included. Regimens of ddGC with pegfilgrastim were administered every 2 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by radical cystectomy. The pathological complete response (CR) (pT0N0) and objective response (OR) (

Chemoresistance largely hampers the clinical use of chemodrugs for cancer patients, combination or sequential drug treatment regimens have been designed to minimize chemotoxicity and resensitize chemoresistance. In this work, the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin was found to be enhanced by palbociclib pretreatment in HeLa cells. With the integration of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomic and N-glycoproteomic workflow, we found that palbociclib alone mainly enhanced the N-glycosylation alterations in HeLa cells, while cisplatin majorly increased the different expression proteins related to apoptosis pathways. As a result, the sequential use of two drugs induced a higher expression level of apoptosis proteins BAX and BAK. Those altered N-glycoproteins induced by palbociclib were implicated in pathways that were closely associated with cell membrane modification and drug sensitivity. Specifically, the top four frequently glycosylated proteins FOLR1, L1CAM, CD63, and LAMP1 were all associated with drug resistance or drug sensitivity. It is suspected that palbociclib-induced N-glycosylation on the membrane protein allowed the HeLa cell to become more vulnerable to cisplatin treatment. Our study provides new insights into the mechanisms underlying the sequential use of target drugs and chemotherapy drugs, meanwhile suggesting a high-efficiency approach that involves proteomic and N-glycoproteomic to facilitate drug discovery., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Preoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) followed by surgery has been considered a standard treatment for patients with stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) based on the results of a phase III trial (JCOG9907) in Japan. Subsequently, the phase III NExT trial (JCOG1109) revealed the survival benefit of the neoadjuvant DCF regimen, which adds docetaxel to FP, and it became a standard treatment. However, the long-term results and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant DCF therapy in the real world are unknown., Methods: We retrospectively investigated 50 patients with ESCC treated with neoadjuvant DCF therapy from July 2012 to December 2017 at The University of Tokyo Hospital., Results: Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 32.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.0-NA] and 10.0 months (95% CI 6.3-15.6), respectively. Median OS [not reached (95% CI 31.5-NA) vs. 21.4 months (95% CI 13.5-33.0); p = 0.028] and PFS [83.3 months (95% CI 6.4-NA) vs. 7.4 months (95% CI 6.0-12.8] were significantly longer in patients with an objective response than in non-responders. Of 44 surgical cases, median PFS tended to be longer in pathological lymph node metastasis-negative patients. Conversely, survival did not differ according to cStage (II/III vs. IV) or the average relative dose intensity (ARDI, ≥ 85% vs. < 85%)., Discussion: The response to neoadjuvant DCF therapy could predict patient prognosis. Additionally, pN+ tended to increase the recurrence risk, whereas cStage and ARDI did not influence survival., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose/objectives: NRG/RTOG 0436 evaluated cetuximab added to chemoradiation (CRT) for non-operative esophageal cancer management. PRO objectives assessed improvement in the FACT-Esophageal cancer subscale (ECS), version 4, with cetuximab, and if improved ECS correlated with clinical complete response (cCR)., Materials/methods: Patients were randomized to cisplatin/paclitaxel/radiation ± cetuximab. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with a 420 patient target, which also provided 82% power to detect ≥ 15 increase in the proportion of cetuximab patients with ECS improvement from baseline to 6-8 weeks post-CRT; α = 0.05, using a χ 2 test. Improvement in ECS and its Swallowing and Eating Indices (SI, EI) was defined as 5, 4 and 2 point increases, respectively, from baseline to 6-8 weeks post-CRT. Univariate logistic regression assessed if cCR was associated with improved ECS., Results: This study was stopped early for not meeting a pre-specified OS endpoint and did not show survival benefit. Of 420 planned patients, 344 enrolled and 281 consented to PROs. ECS was completed by 261 (93%) at baseline, 173 (66%) 6-8 weeks post-CRT, and 117 (64%) at 1 year. At 6-8 weeks, patients receiving CRT + Cetuximab didn't have improved ECS; they experienced a lower proportion of improvement compared to standard CRT (37% vs. 53%; P = 0.04). The proportion of CRT patients with improvement in SI was 9% higher than with cetuximab, but not statistically significant (39% vs. 30%, P = 0.22). There was no association between treatment and EI. When examining ECS scores at 1 year by cCR vs. residual disease, a higher proportion of cCR patients improved, but not statistically significant (48% vs. 45%, P = 0.74)., Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to CRT for the nonoperative management of esophageal cancer did not improve PROs., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: We previously demonstrated the applicability of the concept of "platinum sensitivity" in recurrent endometrial cancer. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely incorporated into endometrial cancer treatment, the debate continues regarding treatment options in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. In this study, we assessed the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data from the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study., Methods: Among the 279 participants in the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study wherein platinum-based chemotherapy was re-administered for managing recurrent endometrial cancer between January 2005 and December 2009, 130 (47%) responded to chemotherapy. We compared the relationship between platinum-free interval and duration of secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data., Results: In 40 patients (31%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded the platinum-free interval. The duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 12 months in 51 patients (39%) [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 14/48 (29%); 12-23 months, 18/43 (42%); 24-35 months, 8/19 (42%); ≥ 36 months, 11/20 (55%)]. In particular, in eight patients (6%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 36 months [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 3/48 (6%); 12-23 months, 0/19 (0%); 24-35 months, 2/19 (11%); ≥ 36 months, 3/20 (15%)]., Conclusions: Re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent endometrial cancer may result in a long-term response exceeding the platinum-free interval in some patients. Even in the current situation, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced, re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy is worth considering., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Multi-nozzle nebulisers for pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) are implemented in clinical practice to improve the homogeneity of tissue drug delivery. Nonetheless, the advantages of such devices over one-nozzle nebulisers have not been demonstrated thus far. In this study, we compared the performance of multi- and one-nozzle nebulisers by conducting physical and ex vivo pharmacological experiments., Methods: The one-nozzle nebuliser Capnopen® and the multi-nozzle nebuliser were the subjects of this study. In physical experiments, the aerosol droplet size was measured by laser diffraction spectroscopy. Spatial spray patterns were depicted on blotting paper. Pharmacological experiments were performed on the enhanced inverted bovine urinary bladder model, demonstrating real-time tissue drug delivery, aerosol sedimentation and homogeneity of doxorubicin and cisplatin tissue distribution., Results: The multi-nozzle nebuliser had a sixfold greater aerosolisation flow and a threefold greater angle of aerosolisation than Capnopen®. The aerosol particle size and distribution range were higher than that of Capnopen®. Spray patterns on blotting paper were more extensive with the multi-nozzle nebuliser. Real-time tissue drug delivery with the multi-nozzle nebuliser was over 100 ml within 1 min, and the aerosol sedimentation was 48.9% ± 21.2%, which was not significantly different from that of Capnopen®. The doxorubicin and cisplatin tissue concentrations were greater with Capnopen®. Although there was no significant difference in the homogeneity of doxorubicin distribution between the two devices, the homogeneity of cisplatin distribution was significantly higher with Capnopen®., Conclusion: The multi-nozzle PIPAC nebuliser did not fulfil expectations. Even though the surface spray patterns were broader with the multi-nozzle nebuliser, the tissue drug homogeneity and concentration were greater with Capnopen®., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

We previously reported that tumors harboring any one of four gene mutations (ATM, RB1, FANCC, or ERCC2) were likely to respond to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC), resulting in cancer-free surgical specimens at the time of cystectomy (pT0). Here, we report our validation of this finding. Using the CARIS 592 Gene Panel (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA), we analyzed 105 pre-NAC tumor specimens from a large multicenter trial (S1314) of either neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC), or dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, Adriamycin, and cisplatin (DDMVAC). We found that a mutation in any one of these four genes predicted for pT0 at surgery (odds ratio = 5.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.05, 14.02; two-sided p = 0.0006). The biomarker was better at predicting the presence of disease (negative predictive value for pT0 86%; 95% CI 73%, 94%) than the absence of disease (positive predictive value for pT0 48%; 95% CI 35%, 62%). There was no evidence of an interaction between the treatment arm (DDMVAC vs GC) and the genetic variant in terms of pT0. When combined with clinical assessment, these findings help inform patient selection for bladder preservation after cisplatin-based chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. GETUG-13 established that switching patients with poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors with an unfavorable marker decline to intensified chemotherapy resulted in improved outcomes. Here, we report the GETUG-13 long-term efficacy and toxicity. Two hundred and sixty-three patients with International Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group poor prognosis received one cycle of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP): 51 with a favorable tumor marker decline continued with three cycles of BEP (Fav-BEP) and 203 with an unfavorable decline were randomly treated with three BEP (Unfav-BEP) cycles or a dose-dense regimen (Unfav-dose-dense; two cycles of paclitaxel-BEP-oxaliplatin + two cycles of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and bleomycin). The median follow-up was 7.1 years (range, 0.3-13.3). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 58.9% in the Unfav-dose-dense arm and 46.7% in the Unfav-BEP arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.97]; P = .036). Five-year overall survival rates were 70.9% and 61.3% (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.46 to 1.20]; P = .22). Side effects evolved favorably, with only three patients in the Unfav-dose-dense arm reporting grade 3 motor neurotoxicity at 1 year and no reported toxicity over grade 1 after year 2. Salvage high-dose chemotherapy plus a stem-cell transplant was used in 8% in the Unfav-dose-dense arm and 17% in the Unfav-BEP arm ( P = .035). Long-term outcomes suggest a sustained benefit of intensified chemotherapy in terms of PFS and numerically better survival, with a minimal toxicity and reduced use of salvage high-dose chemotherapy plus stem-cell transplant.

Cisplatin and amphotericin B are both known to be potentially nephrotoxic. We describe acute kidney injury due to the combination of Liposomal amphotericin B and cisplatin in an adolescent with osteosarcoma. Acute kidney injury (peak creatinine 431 µmol/L) consistent with drug-induced acute tubulointerstitial nephritis was observed a few days after concomitant administration of cisplatin and amphotericin B. Kidney function nearly normalised during follow-up. The timing of the concomitant administration of amphotericin B and cisplatin led us to presume that the combination was the cause of renal failure, and we conclude that concurrent administration of cisplatin and amphotericin B should be avoided., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of adding concurrent chemotherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with an intermediate risk (stage II and T3N0M0)., Methods: A multicenter phase II randomized trial was conducted in intermediate-risk NPC patients. Enrolled patients were previously untreated and aged ranged from 18 to 70 years without severe coexisting diseases. Patients were randomly assigned to receive IMRT alone or IMRT+concurrent chemotherapy (CC; three cycles of 80 mg/m 2 cisplatin every 3 weeks). Primary endpoint was defined as 3‑year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicity. We registered this study with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (CliCTR1800017132; registered July 13, 2018, study start July 13, 2018)., Results: From November 2015 to July 2019, 42 patients with stage II and T3N0M0 NPC were enrolled; 20 patients received IMRT alone while 22 patients received IMRT+CC. After a median of 58 months of follow-up, we estimated the 3‑year PFS rates as 90% (IMRT group) and 86.4% (IMRT+CC group; hazard ratio 1.387, 95% confidence interval 0.240-8.014; P = 0.719). The 3‑year PFS, OS, and cumulative DMFS and LRRFS showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the IMRT group displayed a lower incidence of nausea/vomiting, leucopenia, and dry mouth than the IMRT+CC group., Conclusion: Adding CC to IMRT provided no survival benefit but increased treatment-associated toxicities in patients with intermediate-risk NPC., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Objective: To characterize changes in body composition following cytotoxic chemotherapy for germ cell carcinoma of the testis (GCT) and quantify associations between body composition metrics and chemotherapy-associated adverse events (AEs) and post-retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) complications., Materials and Methods: This retrospective multi-center study included 216 men with GCT treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or RPLND (2005-2020). We measured body composition including skeletal muscle (SMI), visceral adipose (VAI,), subcutaneous adipose (SAI), and fat mass (FMI) indices on computed tomography. We quantified chemotherapy-associated changes in body composition and evaluated associations between body composition and incidence of grade 3 + AEs and post-RPLND complications on multivariable logistic regression analyses., Results: One hundred and eighty-two men received a median of 3 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Following chemotherapy, median change in SMI was -6% (P = <.0001), while VAI, SAI, and FMI increased by +13% (P = <.0001), +11% (P = <.0001), and +6% (P = <.0001), respectively. Seventy-nine patients (43%) experienced at least one grade 3 + AE. A decrease in SMI following chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of grade 3 + AEs (P = .047). One hundred and 3 men with a median age of 28.5 years (IQR 23-35.5) underwent RPLND of whom 22 (21.3%) experienced at least 1 grade 3 + post-RPLND complication. No baseline body composition metrics were associated with post-RPLND complications., Conclusion: In men with GCT of the testis, chemotherapy was associated with 6% loss of lean muscle mass and gains in adiposity. Lower skeletal muscle was associated with a higher incidence of chemotherapy-associated AEs. Body composition was not associated with the incidence of post-RPLND complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Sarah Psutka serves on an advisory board for Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Immunity Bio, CG Oncology, Merck; Research funded by the National Institute on Aging, the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network; Global PI for SunRISE-4; Janssen; Florian Fintelmann receives research support from Pfizer, serves as a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, and has a patent for “patient risk stratification based on body composition derived from computed tomography images sing machine learning” (patent number: WO2019051358A1). The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The association between recurrence timing and prognosis in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify this association using multicenter prospective clinical trial data., Methods: Among 162 patients enrolled in a NAC phase II study comparing the efficacy of cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel with cisplatin and fluorouracil plus adriamycin, 64 patients with recurrence after R0 resection were included in this study. We evaluated the association between recurrence timing and overall survival after recurrence (OSr), along with clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence timing and OSr., Results: Among 64 patients, 46 (71.9%) and 59 (92.2%) experienced recurrence within 1 and 2 years after surgery, respectively. Groups based on recurrence timing, including ≤ 6, 6-12, and > 12 months, had median OSr of 3.6, 13.9, and 13.4 months, respectively. The prognosis was significantly poorer for patients with recurrence ≤ 6 months after surgery than for other patients (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed pathological lymph node staging as an independent factor associated with early recurrence (odds ratio: 3.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-8.02, P = 0.0045). On the other hand, multivariate analysis for factors associated with OSr revealed pT (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.91, 95%CI 1.26-2.88, P = 0.0022), early recurrence (HR: 6.88, 95%CI 2.68-17.6, P < 0.001), and treatment after recurrence, with both local treatment (HR: 0.47, 95%CI 0.22-0.98, P = 0.043) and chemotherapy (HR: 0.25, 95%CI 0.11-0.58, P = 0.0011) as independent prognostic factors., Conclusion: Patients with advanced esophageal cancer experiencing recurrence within 6 months after esophagectomy following NAC have an extremely poor prognosis, suggesting that an advanced pN stage is associated with early recurrence., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.)

Nephrotoxicity is one of the most important complications in cancer patients under treatment with cisplatin-containing regimens. Curcumin, as the most important active component of Curcuma longa, is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compound. In this clinical trial, we assessed the preventive effect of nano-curcumin oral formulation against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in cancer patients. In this triple-blind clinical trial 30 cancer patients on cisplatin were randomly included in the treatment group, receiving nano-curcumin 40 mg capsules ( n  = 15) or the placebo group ( n  = 15) twice a day during four chemotherapy courses. Kidney function was measured at the beginning of the study and then at the end of each course of chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in acute kidney injury occurrence rate and creatinine and blood urine nitrogen serum levels between the treatment and placebo groups at the end of each chemotherapy course ( P value >0.05). Just at the end of the first course, the difference was close to significant ( P  = 0.055). We also found no difference in mortality and recurrence rate in an average 30-month follow-up. Nano-curcumin in the prescribed dose and duration was not effective in preventing cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in cancer patients in comparison with the placebo. Further studies with larger sample size using different doses and duration of nano-curcumin are recommended., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with flourouracil and mitomycin is the standard treatment for squamous cell carcinomas of the anus (SCCA), however the associated acute toxicity often hinders compliance. Although weekly cisplatin is a well-established treatment for other squamous cell carcinomas, it has not been explored in SCCA., Purpose: To investigate if radiotherapy (RT) with weekly cisplatin is a feasible option for SCCA and to report the acute toxicity., Material/methods: Patients were treated with RT and weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 between 1998-2020. Retrospective data from medical records (n=65) and prospectively collected data from an observational study (n=51) comprising physician assessed toxicity (NCI-CTCAE 4.0), patient-reported outcomes (EORTC-QlQC30 + CR29) baseline, mid-therapy, end of treatment and 2-4 weeks post-treatment were included. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: We included 116 patients. T-stages were T1:4%, T2: 71%, T3: 17%, T4: 8% and 47% has N+ disease. RT doses were 53.75-64 Gy/45-51.2 Gy and the mean cumulative dose of cisplatin was 307.5 mg. The median overall treatment time was 43 days. Within 6 months after CRT 88.9 % had complete response. The median follow-up time was 4.5 years and 5-year DFS and OS were 77% (95%CI 68.7;84.5%) and 86.4% (95%CI 78.3;91.7%), respectively. Hospitalization occured in 20% with 2.6% being admitted due to febrile neutropenia. Hematological toxicity was low with 13.7% grade 3 and 3.9% grade 4. Anal pain, skin, gastrointestinal and urogenital toxicity were mild., Conclusion: RT and weekly cisplatin for SCCA showed good outcome results and an acceptable acute toxicity profile., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: At the first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-671 trial, adding perioperative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved event-free survival in participants with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report overall survival and health-related quality of life outcomes from the second interim analysis., Methods: KEYNOTE-671 was a global phase 3 trial done at 189 medical centres. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) with resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) NSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1) to four cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery and 13 cycles of adjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks) or to four cycles of neoadjuvant placebo (administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery and 13 cycles of adjuvant placebo (administered intravenously every 3 weeks). Randomisation was done centrally using an interactive response technology system and was stratified by disease stage, PD-L1 expression, histology, and geographical region in blocks of four. Participants, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignments; local pharmacists were unmasked to support treatment preparation. The dual primary endpoints were overall survival and event-free survival evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03425643, and is ongoing but closed to enrolment., Findings: Between May 11, 2018, and Dec 15, 2021, 797 participants were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab group (n=397) or the placebo group (n=400). Median study follow-up at the second interim analysis was 36·6 months (IQR 27·6-47·8). 36-month overall survival estimates were 71% (95% CI 66-76) in the pembrolizumab group and 64% (58-69) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·56-0·93]; one-sided p=0·0052; threshold, one-sided p=0·0054). Median event-free survival was 47·2 months (95% CI 32·9 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 18·3 months (14·8-22·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·59 [95% CI 0·48-0·72]). In the as-treated population, grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 179 (45%) of 396 participants in the pembrolizumab group and in 151 (38%) of 399 participants in the placebo group. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and three (1%) participants in the placebo group., Interpretation: The significant overall survival benefit of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone coupled with a manageable safety profile support the use of perioperative pembrolizumab in patients with resectable, early-stage NSCLC., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JDS, MCG, HW, ML, TK, MT, S-HL, K-NC, CD, MM, EE, GLM, OB, DR-A, JEC, SN, and SG report funding to their institution from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA to support conduct of this study. JDS, MCG, HW, ML, TK, MT, S-HL, K-NC, CD, MM, EE, GLM, OB, DR-A, JEC, SN, JY, AA, SMK, AS, and SG received medical writing and editorial support for the preparation of this manuscript from MSD. JDS additionally reports receiving grants to the institution from AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, BMS, CLS Therapeutics, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Pfizer, and Regeneron; receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, Roche, BMS, Novartis, Chemocentryx, Amgen, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Xenetic Biosciences, Regeneron, Eisai, and Pfizer; receiving payment for a speaking role from Peerview, OncLive, and Medscape; receiving support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Merck, and BMS; participating on a clinical trial safety monitoring board for AstraZeneca; and receiving equipment, materials, drugs, gifts, or other services via grant to the institution from Roche, MSD, BMS, and AstraZeneca. MCG additionally reports receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Abion, MSD International, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Mirati, Daiichi-Sankyo, Regeneron, Merck & Co, Blueprint, Janssen, Sanofi, AbbVie, BeiGene, Oncohost, Medscape, Gilead, Io Biotech, and Revolution Medicines; receiving payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Merck & Co, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Eli Lilly, and Regeneron; and receiving support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca. HW additionally reports research funding to the institution from Bayer, AstraZeneca, BMS, Genentech/Roche, MSD, Helsinn, SeaGen, and Xcovery; serving as a compensated advisory board member for Mirati, IOBiotech, OncoC4, and BeiGene; serving as an uncompensated advisory board member for MSD, Genentech/Roche, BMS, and AstraZeneca; serving as a past president of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC); and serving on the executive committee of ECOG-ACRIN. TK additionally reports research grants to the institution from AbbVie, Amgen, Arrivent, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, BluePrint, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Haihe, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Takeda; receiving honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho, and Takeda; receiving honoraria for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; and having a spouse who is an employee of Eli Lilly. MT additionally reports research grants to the institution from MSD, AstraZeneca KK, Bristol-Myers Squibb KK, Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Eli Lilly Japan, Novartis, MiRXES, and Johnson & Johnson Japan; receiving honoraria for lectures from Amgen KK, Johnson & Johnson Japan, Medtronic Japan, AstraZeneca KK, Eli Lilly Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Taiho Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb KK, Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Novartis, MSD, and Daiichi-Sankyo; serving as a participant on an advisory board for Bristol-Myers Squibb KK, AstraZeneca KK, MSD, Novartis, and MiRXES; and serving as a participant on a data safety monitoring board for Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. S-HL additionally reports research grants to the institution from MSD and receiving honoraria for a lecture from MSD. MM additionally reports receiving honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, or educational events from MSD, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi, Regeneron, BeiGene, Immedica, Novartis, and BMS; and receiving support to attend meetings or travel from MSD, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Roche. EE additionally reports receiving payment for expert testimony from MSD. OB additionally reports support for attending meetings or travel from MSD for ASCO 2023 and from AstraZeneca for ESMO 2023 and ASCO 2024; and participating as a compensated advisory board member for BMS, Roche, Takeda, MSD, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and MSD. DR-A additionally reports receiving honoraria for lectures from MSD, Roche, BMS, Novartis, Takeda, Lilly, and AstraZeneca; receiving support for attending meetings or travel from Roche, MSD, Novartis, and Sanofi; and participation on an advisory board from MSD, Regeneron, BMS, GSK, and Lilly. JEC additionally reports receiving research grants to the institution from AstraZeneca, BMS, Novartis, Genentech, Merck & Co, and BeiGene; and receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Lilly, Genentech, Merck & Co, Regeneron-Sanofi, Janssen, Guardant Health, Flame Biosciences, and Roche. SN additionally reports receiving honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Amgen, BeiGene, Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi, Takeda, Thermo Fisher, Janssen, Novartis, and Roche; and participating on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from AstraZeneca, Amgen, BeiGene, Pfizer, MSD, Sanofi, Takeda, Janssen, and Roche. JY additionally reports receiving salary for full-time employment from MSD. AA, SMK, and AS additionally report receiving salary for full-time employment from MSD and holding stock in Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

There is still room for improvement in first-line treatment of advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This trial firstly investigated efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic therapy (surufatinib) (200 mg, qd, po) plus anti-PD-1 treatment (toripalimab) (240 mg, d1, ivdrip) combined with etoposide (100 mg/m², d1-d3, iv, drip) and cisplatin (25 mg/m², d1-d3, ivdrip) for advanced SCLC as first-line treatment, which has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04996771. The four-drug regimen was conducted q3w for 4 cycles with maintenance therapy of surufatinib and toripalimab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety. All of the 38 patients were enrolled for safety analysis, while only 35 patients were enrolled for efficacy analysis since loss of efficacy evaluation in 3 cases after treatment. After a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the ORR was 97.1% (34/35), and the DCR and the tumor shrinkage rate were both 100% (35/35). The median PFS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.6 m-9.2 m) and the median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI: 12.1 m-30.1 m). The 12-month, 18-month, and 24-month OS rates were 66.94%, 51.39% and 38.54%. The occurrence rate of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 63.2% (24/38), including neutrophil count decreased (31.6%, 12/38), white blood cell count decreased (23.7%, 9/38) and platelet count decreased (10.5%, 4/38). No unexpected adverse events occurred. This novel four-drug regimen (surufatinib, toripalimab, etoposide plus cisplatin) revealed impressive therapeutic efficacy and tolerable toxicities., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: This qualitative study explored patients' experiences and perceptions of the SCOPE2 trial. SCOPE2 examined radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT)., Setting: Recruitment at five clinical sites in England and Wales, UK., Participants: SCOPE2 trial participants were invited to take part in interviews from across five clinical sites. Participants self-selected to take part in up to three interviews across four different time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 2-3 months, 3-6 months or 6 months+ after baseline. There were five female and five male interview participants., Interventions: Participants were randomised to standard dose dCRT prescribed carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/capecitabine, or an escalated dose dCRT prescribed carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/capecitabine., Methods: This qualitative study used semistructured longitudinal interviews to explore the impact of treatment on patient outlook and quality of life and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interview data were thematically analysed., Results: 10 patients participated in 16 longitudinal interviews. Three participants were accompanied by companions. Participants experienced side-effects from radiotherapy and chemotherapy including nausea, throat pain, difficulties eating and regaining appetite, thrombosis and fatigue, although most of these symptoms gradually improved. Participants required more ongoing information and support regarding treatment side-effects and cancer status in order to improve their overall quality of life. Best practice examples involved key contacts providing practical advice and signposting support., Conclusion: Participants of the SCOPE2 trial reported short and longer-term side-effects from chemoradiotherapy, but these usually lessened over time. Participants attempted to be positive about their survival prospects by readjusting their expectations, priorities and lifestyles. Providing patients with ongoing opportunities to discuss detailed and timely information regarding treatment side-effects, aftercare and cancer status could improve the overall health and well-being of patients during oesophageal cancer trials and pathways., Trial Registration Number: NCT02741856; ISRCTN: 97125464., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Patients with relapsed primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumor have low cure rates with salvage chemotherapy or surgery. The authors report survival outcomes of patients who received high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) at Indiana University., Methods: The prospectively maintained Indiana University germ cell tumor database identified 32 patients with primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumor who progressed after first-line cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy and received HDCT and PBSCT between 2006 and 2021. Therapy included two consecutive courses of HDCT consisting of 700 mg/m 2 carboplatin and 750 mg/m 2 etoposide, each for 3 consecutive days, and each followed by PBSCT. A second course was not given if the patient experienced progressive disease or prohibitive toxicity. Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Medians with 95% confidence intervals were also calculated along with 2-year probabilities., Results: The median age at HDCT was 30 years (range, 18-61 years). With a median follow-up of 4.7 years (range, 1-14 years), the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 31% (95% confidence interval, 16%-47%), and the 2-year overall survival rate was 35% (95% confidence interval, 19%-52%). At last follow-up, nine patients (28%) remained without evidence of disease, including two platinum-refractory patients and two patients who were receiving HDCT as third-line therapy. There were three treatment-related deaths., Conclusions: Salvage HDCT and PBSCT is an active combination in patients who have relapsed primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumor with curative potential and prolonged survival, including in platinum-refractory and third-line settings. The authors recommend this approach for initial salvage chemotherapy in this patient population., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Objective: Nivolumab, recently proven in a phase 3 clinical trial (CheckMate 901) to enhance survival when combined with gemcitabine-cisplatin for advanced urothelial carcinoma. This study aimed to assess its cost-effectiveness against gemcitabine-cisplatin alone, from US and Chinese payers' perspectives., Methods: A partitioned survival model was established to assess the life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin alone as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Univariate, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the model's robustness. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed., Results: Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin and gemcitabine-cisplatin achieved survival benefits of 4.238 life-years and 2.979 life-years for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, respectively. Compared with gemcitabine-cisplatin, nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin resulted in ICERs of $116,856/QALY in the US and $51,997/QALY in China. The probabilities of achieving cost-effectiveness at the current willingness-to-pay thresholds were 77.5% in the US and 16.5% in China. Cost-effectiveness could be reached if the price of nivolumab were reduced to $920.87/100mg in China. Subgroup analyses indicated that the combination had the highest probability of cost-effectiveness in patients under 65 or with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score of 0 in the US and China., Conclusion: Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma results in longer life expectancy than gemcitabine-cisplatin, but is not cost-effective in China at current price. However, cost-effectiveness is likely to be achieved in most patient subgroups in the US., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Xiang, Huang, Gan, Wang, Ding, Wu, Xing and Liu.)

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of GP and TPF sequential chemotherapy regimens in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC)., Methods: From 2005 to 2016, a total of 408 LA-NPC patients treated with GP or TPF sequential chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively included. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to balance the baseline variables. Survival outcomes and acute toxicities were compared between both groups., Results: A total of 230 patients were selected by 1:1 PSM. At a median follow-up of 91 months, no significant differences were observed between the matched GP and TPF groups regarding 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregionally relapse-free survival (83.4% vs. 83.4%, P = 0.796; 75.6% vs. 68.6%, P = 0.301; 86.7% vs. 81.1%, P = 0.096; and 87.4% vs. 87.2%, P = 0.721). Notable disparities in adverse effects were identified, with higher incidences of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in the GP group while grade 3/4 leukopenia and neutropenia in the TPF group. Though not recorded in our cohort, combined with the FAERS database, thrombotic adverse reactions are a concern for the GP regimen, while the TPF regimen requires vigilance for life-threatening adverse reactions such as septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and laryngeal edema., Conclusion: No significant difference in long-term outcomes was observed between the GP and TPF sequential chemotherapy regimens for LA-NPC. Differences in adverse effects should be noted when choosing the regimen., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The interim analysis of the randomized phase 3 ESCORT-1st study demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for camrelizumab-chemotherapy than placebo-chemotherapy in untreated advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we present the final analysis of this study and investigate potential indicators associated with OS., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive camrelizumab (200 mg) or placebo, both in combination with up to six cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 ) and cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 ). All treatments were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS assessed by the independent review committee., Findings: As of April 30, 2022, the median OS was significantly longer in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group compared to the placebo-chemotherapy group (15.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.0-18.4] vs. 12.6 months [95% CI 11.2-13.8]; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70 [95% CI 0.58-0.84]; one-sided p < 0.0001), with 3-year OS rates of 25.6% and 12.8% in the two groups, respectively. The 2-year PFS rates were 20.4% in the camrelizumab-chemotherapy group and 3.4% in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Adverse events were consistent with those reported in the interim analysis. Higher PD-L1 expression correlated with extended OS, and multivariate analysis identified sex and prior history of radiotherapy as independent indicators of OS., Conclusions: The sustained and significant improvement in efficacy with camrelizumab-chemotherapy compared to placebo-chemotherapy, along with the absence of accumulating or delayed toxicities, supports the long-term use of camrelizumab-chemotherapy as a standard therapy in untreated advanced/metastatic ESCC., Funding: This study was funded by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests L.W. reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Innovent, and Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. Z.S., W.Z., and L.S. are employees of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: First-line therapy options in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are based on the ABC-02 trial regimen (gemcitabine/cisplatin [G/C]). The NIFE trial examined nanoliposomal irinotecan/fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI/FU/LV) as alternative first-line therapy in advanced CCA., Methods: NIFE is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II study that aimed at detecting efficacy comparable with the standard treatment. Patients with advanced CCA were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (arm A) or G/C (arm B). Stratification parameters were intrahepatic versus extrahepatic CCA, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG; 0/1). Arm A was designed as a Simon's optimal two-stage design and arm B served as a randomized control group. The primary goal was to exclude an inferior progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months of only 40%, while assuming a rate of 60% on G/C population., Results: Between 2018 and 2020, overall 91 patients were randomly assigned to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (n = 49) or G/C (n = 42). The NIFE trial formally met its primary end point with a 4-month PFS rate of 51% in patients receiving nal-IRI/FU/LV. The median PFS was 6 months (2.4-9.6) in arm A and 6.9 months (2.5-7.9) in arm B. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 months (10.6-20.3) in arm A and 13.6 months (6.5-17.7) in arm B. The exploratory comparison of study arms suggested a numerical but statistically not significant advantage for nal-IRI/FU/LV (hazard ratio for PFS, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.38] and for OS, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.50]). Analysis for stratification parameters revealed no differences for sex and ECOG, but for tumor localization. The objective response rate was 24.5% with nal-IRI/FU/LV and 11.9% with G/C. No unexpected toxicities occurred. AEs related to nal-IRI/FU/LV were mainly GI and to G/C hematologic., Conclusion: Treatment of advanced CCA with nal-IRI/FU/LV demonstrated efficacy in first-line therapy without new safety findings and merits further validation.

Purpose: Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) is an established salvage regimen for germ cell tumors (GCT) on the basis of a phase II trial, but efficacy on a large patient cohort including patients with unfavorable risk features and long-term outcomes has not been reported. Herein, we report updated treatment efficacy and long-term follow-up with TIP., Patients and Methods: Patients with GCT who received TIP after cisplatin-based chemotherapy were eligible. Favorable response (complete response or partial response with negative tumor markers), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates, relapse, and toxicity were determined. Disease was reclassified according to the International Prognostic Factor Study Group (IPFSG) score., Results: Of the 104 patients, 87 had favorable risk factors and 17 had at least one unfavorable factor by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria. Ten patients were treated for a second gonadal primary GCT. With a median follow-up of 8.9 years, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 66% (95% CI, 55 to 74) and 69% (95% CI, 59 to 77), respectively. Among 87 patients with favorable-risk disease, 69 (79%) achieved a favorable response with 5-year PFS and OS rates of 67% (95% CI, 56 to 76) and 72% (95% CI, 61 to 80), respectively. Among 17 patients with MSKCC unfavorable-risk disease, 13 (76%) achieved a favorable response with 5-year PFS and OS rates of 59% (95% CI, 33 to 78) and 56% (95% CI, 28 to 76), respectively. After IPFSG reclassification, 5-year PFS and OS rates for patients with ≤intermediate-risk disease were 75% (95% CI, 50 to 89) and 73% (95% CI, 55 to 85), respectively., Conclusion: TIP is an effective second-line regimen for patients with GCT. Similar outcomes were observed in patients with favorable- and unfavorable-risk disease. The randomized TIGER trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02375204) comparing TIP with high-dose chemotherapy will determine the optimal second-line treatment approach.

Background: Pembrolizumab plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil administered as first-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer patients has shown a better objective response and survival than conventional chemotherapy with less severe hematological adverse events. The safety and efficacy of this regimen were evaluated in patients with T4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)., Methods: Eight consecutive patients with T4b ESCC received this regimen according to KEYNOTE-590 as induction, and they were evaluated after 1-3 courses. The programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) was also evaluated before chemotherapy. Efficacy for the primary lesion was evaluated by our original formula for the tumor reduction rate., Results: The numbers of patients with partial response (PR), stable disease, and progressive disease (PD) were 5, 1, and 2, respectively. The tumor reduction rate ranged from 69 to 87% in PR patients, and all PR patients had relief from T4b. Two patients underwent conversion surgery with R0 resection. PD-L1 CPS was over 90 in 2 PR patients, but under 10 in 2 other PR patients. PD-L1 CPS was under 10 in PD patients. One patient had hyperprogression, resulting in an esophago-pulmonary fistula. Greater than grade 3 adverse events were bleeding gastric ulcer in one patient (12.5%), neutropenia without G-CSF in 3 patients (37.5%), and hypopotassemia in 1 patient (12.5%). No patient had febrile neutropenia., Conclusions: Marked tumor reduction was confirmed in 62.5% of patients with pembrolizumab plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with less adverse events. This regimen could be administered as induction chemotherapy for patients with T4b ESCC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

No study has comprehensively examined associated factors (adverse health outcomes, health behaviors, and demographics) affecting cognitive function in long-term testicular cancer survivors (TC survivors). TC survivors given cisplatin-based chemotherapy completed comprehensive, validated surveys, including those that assessed cognition. Medical record abstraction provided cancer and treatment history. Multivariable logistic regression examined relationships between potential associated factors and cognitive impairment. Among 678 TC survivors (median age = 46; interquartile range [IQR] = 38-54); median time since chemotherapy = 10.9 years, IQR = 7.9-15.9), 13.7% reported cognitive dysfunction. Hearing loss (odds ratio [OR] = 2.02; P = .040), neuropathic pain (OR = 2.06; P = .028), fatigue (OR = 6.11; P < .001), and anxiety/depression (OR = 1.96; P = .029) were associated with cognitive impairment in multivariable analyses. Being on disability (OR = 9.57; P = .002) or retired (OR = 3.64; P = .029) were also associated with cognitive decline. Factors associated with impaired cognition identify TC survivors requiring closer monitoring, counseling, and focused interventions. Hearing loss, neuropathic pain, fatigue, and anxiety/depression constitute potential targets for prevention or reduction of cognitive impairment in long-term TC survivors., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)