Search

Simple Summary The study goal is to demonstrate that oocyte cryopreservation is a feasible and efficient option for fertility preservation in cancer patients through the comparison of in vitro fertilization treatments in nononcological patients. The preservation of fertility in cancer patients is a crucial aspect of modern reproductive medicine. Amenorrhea and infertility often occur after cancer therapy, worsening the quality of life. Cryopreservation of oocytes in young cancer patients is a therapeutic option for preserving fertility. A prospective study was conducted on 508 cancer patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation to preserve fertility between 1996 and 2021 including the COVID-19 pandemic period. Patients underwent ovarian stimulation, followed by egg retrieval, and oocytes were cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification. Sixty-four thawing/warming cycles were performed. Survival, fertilization, pregnancy, and birth rate over the thawing/warming cycles were obtained. The data were compared with those from a group of 1042 nononcological patients who cryopreserved supernumerary oocytes. An average of 8.8 +/- 6.9 oocytes were retrieved per cycle, and 6.1 +/- 4.2 oocytes were cryopreserved. With their own stored oocytes, 44 patients returned to attempt pregnancy. From a total of 194 thawed/warmed oocytes, 157 survived (80%). In total, 100 embryos were transferred in 57 transfer/cycles, and 18 pregnancies were achieved. The pregnancy rate per transfer and pregnancy rate per patient were 31% and 41%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between oncological patients and nononcological patients. A total of 15 babies were born from oncological patients. Children born showed normal growth and development. One minor malformation was detected.

Introduction: In Italy, the transport of cryopreserved biological material is controlled by several Decrees (Legislative Decree No. 191/2007 and No. 16/2010 and Health Ministry's Decree of October 10, 2012). Given the nature of their applications, the transport of reproductive cells has peculiar quality and safety requirements that must be applied universally, minimizing the chance of error. To standardize the cross-border shipping procedure to meet the quality, traceability, and safety criteria for cells and tissues, it is appropriate to establish a unified process using the same tools, forms, and communication channels. Methods: A working group has been created by SIERR. This "FOCUS Group" was constituted by representatives from Italian-assisted reproductive technology centers and sperm banks who worked together to define joint procedural steps and create specific forms to support the movement of cryopreserved samples. Results: The FOCUS Group identified the critical steps in the communication procedures between Italian centers and created the related forms: patient authorization, request from the recipient center, critical checks carried out by both sending and recipient centers, start of samples transfer, collection, transport and taking responsibility of the biological material, acknowledgment of samples arrival, and acknowledgement of any adverse event that occurred. Discussion: Indications on shipping between tissue institutions and legal responsibilities are important points and a working protocol with shared transport forms has been defined. Standard Operating Procedures are necessary in light of the increasingly widespread movement of biological samples between the various countries, and represent a valid means of support for the patients who could have a higher awareness of safety and traceability during each stage of gamete transport.