Search

Adenocarcinoma; Napabucasin; Pancreatic cancer Adenocarcinoma; Napabucasin; Càncer de pàncrees Adenocarcinoma; Napabucasin; Cáncer de páncreas Background Compared with normal cells, tumour cells contain elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Increased levels of the antioxidant protein NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) correlate negatively with the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Napabucasin is an investigational, orally administered ROS generator bioactivated by NQO1. Methods In the open-label, phase 3 CanStem111P study (NCT02993731), adults with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) were randomised (1:1) to napabucasin plus nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine or nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). In exploratory analyses, OS was evaluated in the subgroup of patients with tumours positive for pSTAT3 (biomarker-positive). Findings Between 30 January 2017 and 20 February 2019, a total of 1779 patients were screened across 165 study sites in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, and the US. Of the 565 and 569 patients randomised to the napabucasin and control treatment arms, respectively, 206 and 176 were biomarker-positive. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS in the napabucasin and control treatment arms was 11.4 (10.5–12.2) and 11.7 (10.7–12.7) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93–1.23). Due to the lack of OS improvement in the napabucasin arm, CanStem111P was terminated due to futility. In the biomarker-positive subgroup, no difference between treatment arms was found for OS. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 85.4% and 83.9% of napabucasin-treated and control-treated patients, respectively. The incidence of gastrointestinal-related grade ≥3 events was higher with napabucasin (diarrhoea: 11.6% vs 4.9%; abdominal pain: 10.0% vs 4.8%). Interpretation Our findings suggested that although the addition of napabucasin to nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine did not improve efficacy in patients with previously untreated mPDAC, the safety profile of napabucasin was consistent with previous reports. CanStem111P represents the largest cohort of patients with mPDAC administered nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine in the clinical trial setting. Our data reinforce the value of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as a platform for novel therapeutics approaches in mPDAC. This study was supported by Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc.

Supplementary Table from Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Paclitaxel ± Napabucasin in Pretreated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Supplementary Data from Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Paclitaxel ± Napabucasin in Pretreated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Supplementary Figure from Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Paclitaxel ± Napabucasin in Pretreated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Purpose:To compare napabucasin (generator of reactive oxygen species) plus paclitaxel with paclitaxel only in patients with second-line advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.Patients and Methods:In the double-blind, phase III BRIGHTER study (NCT02178956), patients were randomized (1:1) to napabucasin (480 mg orally twice daily) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 3 of 4 weeks) or placebo plus paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.Results:Overall, 714 patients were randomized (napabucasin plus paclitaxel, n = 357; placebo plus paclitaxel, n = 357). 72.1% were male, 74.6% had gastric adenocarcinoma, and 46.2% had peritoneal metastases. The study was unblinded following an interim analysis at 380 deaths. The final efficacy analysis was performed on 565 deaths (median follow-up, 6.8 months). No significant differences were observed between napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel for OS (6.93 vs. 7.36 months), PFS (3.55 vs. 3.68 months), ORR (16% vs. 18%), or DCR (55% vs. 58%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 69.5% and 59.7% of patients administered napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel, respectively, with grade ≥3 diarrhea reported in 16.2% and 1.4%, respectively.Conclusions:Adding napabucasin to paclitaxel did not improve survival in patients with pretreated advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Consistent with previous reports, the safety profile of napabucasin was driven by manageable gastrointestinal events; grade ≥3 diarrhea occurred at a higher frequency with napabucasin plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel.

Purpose: To compare napabucasin (generator of reactive oxygen species) plus paclitaxel with paclitaxel only in patients with second-line advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: In the double-blind, phase III BRIGHTER study (NCT02178956), patients were randomized (1:1) to napabucasin (480 mg orally twice daily) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 3 of 4 weeks) or placebo plus paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results: Overall, 714 patients were randomized (napabucasin plus paclitaxel, n = 357; placebo plus paclitaxel, n = 357). 72.1% were male, 74.6% had gastric adenocarcinoma, and 46.2% had peritoneal metastases. The study was unblinded following an interim analysis at 380 deaths. The final efficacy analysis was performed on 565 deaths (median follow-up, 6.8 months). No significant differences were observed between napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel for OS (6.93 vs. 7.36 months), PFS (3.55 vs. 3.68 months), ORR (16% vs. 18%), or DCR (55% vs. 58%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 69.5% and 59.7% of patients administered napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel, respectively, with grade ≥3 diarrhea reported in 16.2% and 1.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Adding napabucasin to paclitaxel did not improve survival in patients with pretreated advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Consistent with previous reports, the safety profile of napabucasin was driven by manageable gastrointestinal events; grade ≥3 diarrhea occurred at a higher frequency with napabucasin plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel.

To compare napabucasin (generator of reactive oxygen species) plus paclitaxel with paclitaxel only in patients with second-line advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.In the double-blind, phase III BRIGHTER study (NCT02178956), patients were randomized (1:1) to napabucasin (480 mg orally twice daily) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for 3 of 4 weeks) or placebo plus paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.Overall, 714 patients were randomized (napabucasin plus paclitaxel, n = 357; placebo plus paclitaxel, n = 357). 72.1% were male, 74.6% had gastric adenocarcinoma, and 46.2% had peritoneal metastases. The study was unblinded following an interim analysis at 380 deaths. The final efficacy analysis was performed on 565 deaths (median follow-up, 6.8 months). No significant differences were observed between napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel for OS (6.93 vs. 7.36 months), PFS (3.55 vs. 3.68 months), ORR (16% vs. 18%), or DCR (55% vs. 58%). Grade {greater than or equal to}3 adverse events occurred in 69.5% and 59.7% of patients administered napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel, respectively, with grade {greater than or equal to}3 diarrhea reported in 16.2% and 1.4%, respectively.Adding napabucasin to paclitaxel did not improve survival in patients with pretreated advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Consistent with previous reports, the safety profile of napabucasin was driven by manageable gastrointestinal events; grade {greater than or equal to}3 diarrhea occurred at a higher frequency with napabucasin plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel.

4147 Background: Retrospective studies of phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3, a regulator of gene expression) in cancer-lineage cells have suggested it is a biomarker of poor prognosis. We analyzed data from 3 phase 3 RCTs (BRIGHTER [T1; NCT02178956], CO.23 [T2; NCT01830621], CanStem111P [T3; NCT02993731]) to evaluate the prognostic impact of pSTAT3 on OS in GI cancer patients (pts). Methods: pSTAT3 was evaluated in archival tumor tissue from pts with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (T1), colorectal cancer (T2), or pancreatic cancer (T3) who received standard of care in the control arms (CTL) of their respective trials. pSTAT3 positive (+) or negative (−) status was determined by detecting pSTAT3 in both tumor and tumor microenvironment (TME) cells in a laboratory-developed immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay (T1; T2), later developed into the investigational pSTAT3 IHC D3A7 assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) (T3). The positivity cutoff requires a sample have both a TME score of 2 and ≥5% of tumor cells staining positively for pSTAT3. Pre-analytical variables (eg, specimen collection, handling, and processing), tumor indication, and slight differences in the assays used for each study may contribute to relative differences in evaluable rates between studies. In an exploratory analysis, OS was compared in pSTAT3+ vs pSTAT3− pts via an unstratified log-rank test. Results: In each study, intent-to-treat pts with evaluable pSTAT3 results were considered pSTAT3-evaluable. This abstract includes pSTAT3-evaluable pts randomized to the CTL arms (T1: n/N=248/357, 69.5%; T2: n/N=110/144, 76.4%; T3: n/N=243/569, 42.7%). Baseline characteristics are presented in the table. Median (m) OS was shorter in pts with pSTAT3+ tumors across all studies (T1 hazard ratio [HR]=1.32 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.74]; T2 HR=2.40 [1.50, 3.83]; T3 HR=1.08 [0.77, 1.50]). Conclusions: In pSTAT3-evaluable populations from 3 RCTs across GI cancers, CTL pts with pSTAT3+ (vs pSTAT3−) tumors had shorter mOS. These results suggest that pSTAT3 positivity may be a biomarker of poor clinical outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT02178956; NCT01830621; NCT02993731. [Table: see text]

4110Background: NAPA is an oral investigational agent, hypothesized to inhibit cancer stemness pathways, including STAT3 pathway implicated in cancer stem-cell viability. We report updated data in ...

4106 Background: Cancer stem cells are fundamentally important for resistance to therapy, recurrence and metastasis. Napabucasin is a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in development identified by its ability to inhibit STAT3-driven gene transcription and spherogenesis of cancer stem cells (Li et al, PNAS 112(6):1839, 2015). Preclinical studies suggest that napabucasin sensitizes heterogeneous cancer cells to chemotherapy and targeted agents. Methods: A phase Ib/II multi-center study in mPDAC pts was performed to confirm the RP2D, PK profile and evidence of anticancer activity of napabucasin in combination with nabPTX and Gem. Pts received napabucasin 240 mg BID with weekly nabPTX 125 mg/m2 and gem 1000 mg/m2for 3 out of every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD) or other discontinuation criterion. Results: Of 71 intent to treat (ITT) pts enrolled, 49 (69%) were treatment-naïve and 22 (31%) received neoadjuvant treatment. There were no significant PK interactions, dose-limiting or unexpected toxicities. Most common adverse events (AEs) included grade 1 diarrhea/cramping, nausea and fatigue with grade 3 AEs noted in 12 pts: fatigue (8), electrolyte imbalance (2), diarrhea (1), dehydration (1), nausea (1) and weight loss (1). Among pts who received RECIST evaluation (60), disease control (DCR; CR+PR+SD) was observed in 55 (92%), with 1 CR (2%) and 26 PR (43%) (31 - 78% regression). Of 11 pts with non-evaluable disease, treatment stopped due to compliance (4), consent withdrawal (3), clinical PD (1), toxicity (1), insurance (1) and death (1). Among 71 ITT pts, DCR was observed in 55 (77%), with 1 CR (1.4%) and 26 PR (37%). Maturing median progression free survival and overall survival (OS) in ITT pts is >7.1 and >10.4 m, respectively. Conclusions: This study showed that napabucasin can be combined with nabPTX and gem, with encouraging signs of efficacy in mPDAC now being confirmed in a phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT02231723. [Table: see text]

4128Background: BB608 (aka napabucasin, BBI-608) is an oral first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that works by targeting Stat3-driven gene transcription. Preclinical anti-tumor activity was obs...

284 Background: BBI-608 is an oral first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that works by blocking STAT3-mediated transcription of cancer stemness genes. Potent anti-CSC activity was observed in vitro and in vivo, in mono- and combination therapy. In phase I studies, BBI-608 was generally well tolerated with encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity. Methods: A phase Ib open label, multi-center study in pts with mPDAC was performed to determine RP2D, safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-cancer activity of BBI-608 in combination with Gemcitabine and nab-PTX. BBI-608 was administered at 240 mg BID in combination with Gemcitabine 125 mg/m2 and nab-PTX 1000 mg/m2administered weekly for 3 out every 4 weeks until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criterion was met. Results: 31 pts were enrolled and received BBI-608 in combination with Gemcitabine and nab-PTX for a total sum of 83 study cycles. 25 of 31 pts (80.6%) were treatment-naïve and 6 pts (19.4%) received 1 prior line of systemic therapy. Most common adverse events included grade 1 diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and fatigue. Combination treatment was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicity observed and safety profile similar to that of each agent individually. One patient experienced grade 3 event of dehydration related to protocol therapy which resolved with hydration. Of the 8 pts enrolled in the RP2D determination portion of the study, 7 pts were evaluable for response with disease control (PR + SD) was observed in 7/7 pts (100%). Tumor regression was observed in 6/7 (85.7%) with 3 PR (41.3%, 37.6% and 33.3% regression) and 3 SD (25.8%, 21.1%, and 19.9% regression). The median progression free survival was 7.8 months with PR or SD of > 6 months in 6/8 pts (75%). Conclusions: This phase Ib study demonstrated that BBI-608 at 240 mg BID can be safely combined with Gemcitabine and nab-PTX. Encouraging anti-tumor activity with durable response was observed in pts with mPDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02231723.