Search

Introduction: Many stroke patients initially present to non-stroke center hospitals. However, the delivery of Emergency Department (ED)-based acute stroke care at smaller, non-academic (i.e., community) EDs is less well-described than for larger, academic hospitals. Hypothesis: There is wide variation in community EDs’ performance on acute stroke care delivery measures. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort of stroke patients from EDs participating in the Emergency Quality Network (E-QUAL) stroke collaborative, a national stroke quality improvement project targeted to community EDs. Sites used ICD10 codes to identify ischemic stroke patients and submitted data using a web-based submission portal. EDs with data from at least 20 patients were included. For each site, we calculated median door-to-imaging (DTI), door-to-needle (DTN), and door-in-door-out (DIDO) times among transferred patients and ED length of stay (LOS) among admitted patients. We also determined the proportions of eligible patients arriving with 3.5 hours of last known well who received thrombolysis within 4.5 hours, of patients with documentation of severity assessment performance and of dysphagia screening. We used descriptive statistics to illustrate variation. Results: Of the 54 participating EDs, data were available for 45, and 28 included ≥ 20 patients. Of included EDs, median annual ED volume was 34,648 (IQR 21,250-47,120) and 40% were rural. Performance varied on DTI, DIDO among transferred patients, and LOS among admitted patients (Table). Performance was more consistent on documentation of severity assessment and dysphagia screening. Conclusions: Performance on stroke care delivery measures varied between these community EDs and data in the literature from larger hospitals that typically participate in national registries. Future efforts to improve emergency stroke care delivery should consider unique factors impacting care at smaller, community EDs.

Study Objective: Though select inpatient-based performance measures exist for the care of patients with nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), Emergency Departments (EDs) lack measurement instruments designed to support and improve care processes in the hyperacute phase. To address this, we propose a set of measures applying a syndromic (rather than diagnosis-based) approach informed by performance data from a national sample of community EDs participating in the Emergency Quality Network Stroke Initiative (E-QUAL). Methods: We convened a workgroup of experts in acute neurologic emergencies. The group considered the appropriate use case for each proposed measure (internal quality improvement [QI], benchmarking, or accountability) and examined data from E-QUAL-participating EDs to consider the validity and feasibility of proposed measures. The initially conceived set included 14 measure concepts of which 7 were selected for inclusion in the measure set after review of data and further deliberation. To inform the process, we collected data from E-QUAL participating EDs. EDs used a web-based portal to submit data from chart reviews on patients with ICH during 2020-2021. Descriptive statistics characterize performance and identify variation. Results: Proposed measures include 2 for QI, benchmarking, and accountability, 3 for QI and benchmarking and 2 for QI only (Table). Of the E-QUAL participating EDs, 35 had sufficient case volume (≥25) and were included for review of preliminary performance data. Median annual ED volume was 44,000 (IQR 31,337-67,000) and 16 (48%) reported typically transferring patients with ICH. The Table includes available performance data. Conclusion: Application of these measures may identify opportunities for improvement and focus QI resources on evidence-based targets. The proposed measures warrant further development and validation to support broader implementation and advance national healthcare quality goals.