Search

Albertas Ulys, Narimantas Evaldas Samalavicius, Saulius Cicenas, Tadas Petraitis, Mantas Trakymas, Dmitrij Sheinin, Leonid GatijatullinInstitute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Santariskiu, Vilnius, LithuaniaAbstract: Prevalence of pulmonary sequestration accounts for up to 6.4% of all congenital pulmonary malformations. We report on a 40-year-old woman who underwent excision of an aberrant solid retroperitoneal mass in the left subdiaphragmatic area. The mass was identified to be an extralobar pulmonary sequestration. The diagnosis could be made without surgery by percutaneous tissue biopsy and imaging. We encourage keeping in mind pulmonary sequestration anomaly presenting as an aberrant retroperitoneal mass. The aim of this case report is to increase awareness about the condition and review the criteria for its definitive diagnosis and treatment.Keywords: retroperitoneal aberrant mass, extralobar pulmonary sequestration

Abstract Background Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) is a rare manifestation of lung cancer. The mechanisms by which pneumothorax occurs in lung cancer is not clear, resulting in different views being expressed. Case presentation Here we present a case in which pneumothorax occurred as a first manifestation of lung cancer. The chest x-ray of a 68 year old man revealed a right partial pneumothorax. VATS was then performed: the visceral pleura lying over segment S3 was destroyed and air leaks were found in this section. Pathologic examination of the biopsy specimen revealed non-small cell carcinoma. Thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis was performed. Conclusion Spontaneous pneumothorax in association with lung cancer is rarely seen. Pneumothorax can be the first sign of lung cancer. The most common possibility for SP complicating lung cancer is the tumor necrosis mechanism or, in separate cases, rupture of the emphysematous bullae. Lung cancer should always be considered as a possible cause of SP in elderly patients or in heavy smokers.

Abstract Background Coexistent lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis is an urgent problem of thoracic surgery presenting a challenging task for diagnosis and surgical treatment. Materials and methods From 1990 to 2005, 2218 patients with lung cancer underwent surgical treatment in Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University. In 46 (2.1%) patients coexistence of lung cancer and tuberculosis was found. Central lung cancer was diagnosed in 37 (80.4%) and peripheral – in 9 (19.6%) patients. Epidermoid cancer was diagnosed in 24 (52.2%) patients, adenocarcinoma – in 10 (21.7%) and adenoepidermoid carcinoma – in 12 (26.1%) patients. Stage I cancer was diagnosed in 12 (26.1%), stage II – in 11 (23.9%), and stage IIIA – in 23 (50%) patients. Results Pneumonectomy was performed in 18 (39.2%), lobectomy in 10 (21.7%), bilobectomy in 10 (21.7%), segmentectomy in 8 (17.4%) patients. Postoperative surgical complications were observed in 9 (19.5%) patients, non-surgical complications occurred in 19 patients (41.3%). Six patients (13.04%) died. Combined treatment was applied to 23 (50%) patients. Conclusion Coexistence of tuberculosis and lung cancer in thoracic surgery is fairly rare. This combination was diagnosed only in 46 cases (2.1%) out of 2218 operated lung cancer patients. Epidermoid carcinoma and stage IIIA disease was diagnosed in 50% of patients. Postoperative surgical complications occurred in 9 patients (19.5%) with lung cancer and tuberculosis. Six patients (13%) died in postoperative period. Surgery is the method of choice in treatment of combination of tuberculosis and lung cancer. Median survival of these patients was 28 ± 2 months.

BACKGROUND: Erlotinib, docetaxel, and pemetrexed are approved for the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but no head-to-head data from large clinical trials are available. We undertook the Tarceva In Treatment of Advanced NSCLC (TITAN) study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of second-line erlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with refractory NSCLC. METHODS: TITAN was an international, randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study that was done at 77 sites in 24 countries. Chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic NSCLC received up to four cycles of first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy, after which patients with disease progression during or immediately after chemotherapy were offered enrolment into TITAN. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a minimisation method to ensure balanced stratification, to receive erlotinib 150 mg/day or chemotherapy (standard docetaxel or pemetrexed regimens, at the treating investigators' discretion), until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. Patients were stratified by disease stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, smoking history, and region of residence. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. TITAN was halted prematurely because of slow recruitment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00556322. FINDINGS: Between April 10, 2006, and Feb 24, 2010, 2590 chemotherapy-naive patients were treated with first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy, of whom 424 had disease progression and were enrolled into TITAN. 203 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and 221 were assigned to receive chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 27·9 months (IQR 11·0-36·0) in the erlotinib group and 24·8 months (12·1-41·6) in the chemotherapy group. Median overall survival was 5·3 months (95% CI 4·0-6·0) with erlotinib and 5·5 months (4·4-7·1) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0·96, 95% CI 0·78-1·19; log-rank p=0·73). The adverse-event profile of each group was in line with previous studies. Rash (98/196 [50%] in the erlotinib group vs 10/213 [5%] in the chemotherapy group for all grades; nine [5%] vs none for grade 3 or 4) and diarrhoea (36 [18%] vs four [2%] for all grades; five [3%] vs none for grade 3 or 4) were the most common treatment-related adverse events with erlotinib, whereas alopecia (none vs 23 [11%] for all grades; none vs one [<1%] for grade 3/4) was the most common treatment-related adverse event with chemotherapy. INTERPRETATION: No significant differences in efficacy were noted between patients treated with erlotinib and those treated with docetaxel or pemetrexed. Since the toxicity profiles of erlotinib and chemotherapy differ, second-line treatment decisions should take into account patient preference and specific toxicity risk profiles. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent type of lung cancer, with extensively characterized mutational spectra. Several biomarkers (such as EGFR , BRAF , KRAS gene mutations, etc.) have emerged as predictive and prognostic markers for NSCLC. Unfortunately, the quality of the available tumor biopsy and/or cytology material is not always adequate to perform the necessary molecular testing, prompting the search for alternatives. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) found in plasma is emerging as a highly promising avenue or a supplementary method for assessing the efficacy of cancer treatments. This is especially valuable in instances where conventional biopsy specimens, like formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE), or freshly frozen tumor tissues prove inadequate for conducting molecular pathology analyses subsequent to the initial diagnostic procedures. By leveraging cfDNA from plasma, clinicians gain an additional tool to gauge the effectiveness of cancer therapies, thereby enhancing their ability to optimize tailored treatment strategies. In this study, 51 Lithuanian females with NSCLC were analyzed, with adenocarcinoma being the predominant pathology diagnosis in 40 cases (78%). Target mutations were identified in 38 out of 51 patients (74.5%) in tumor tissue samples, while in plasma samples, they were identified in only 10 patients' samples (19.6%). Even though we did not have enough voluminous plasma samples in our study, gene mutations were detected in plasma from ten women, three of whom were diagnosed with early stages of lung cancer (stages I and II). For these patients, the following mutations were detected: deletion in exon 19 of the EGFR gene and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TP53 and MET genes. All other women were diagnosed with stages III or IV of lung cancer. This indicates that the later stages of cancer contribute more cfDNA in plasma, making extraction less complicated.

Background: The development of drug resistance and high mortality rates are the major problems observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Biomarkers indicating and predicting disease development towards these unfavorable directions are therefore on high demand. Many studies have demonstrated that changes in miRNAs expression may be associated with a response to treatment and disease prognosis, thus suggesting its potential biomarker value for a broad spectrum of clinical applications. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression level of miR-181a-5p, miR-630, and its targets in NSCLC tumor tissue and plasma samples; and to analyze its association with NSCLC patient's response to treatment and disease prognosis., Methods: The study was performed in 89 paired tissue specimens and plasma samples obtained from NSCLC patients who underwent surgical treatment at the Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology of the National Cancer Institute. Analysis of miR-181a-5p and miR-630 expression was performed by qRT-PCR using TaqMan miRNA specific primers. Whereas BCL2, LMO3, PTEN, SNAI2, WIF1 expression levels were identified with KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Kit. Each sample was examined in triplicate and calculated following the 2- ΔΔC t method. When the p-value was less than 0.05, the differences were considered statistically significant., Results: It was found that miR-181a-5p and miR-630 expression levels in NSCLC tissue and plasma samples were significantly decreased compared with control samples. Moreover, patients with low miR-181a-5p expression in tumor tissue and plasma had longer PFS rates than those with high miRNA expression. Decreased miR-630 expression in tumor was statistically significantly associated with better NSCLC patients' OS. In addition, the expression of miR-181a-5p, as well as miR-630 in tumor tissue, are the statistically significant variables for NSCLC patients' OS. Moreover, in NSCLC patient plasma samples circulating miR-181a-5p can be evaluated as significant independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS., Conclusions: Our findings indicate the miR-181a-5p and miR-630 expression levels have the potential to prognose and predict and therefore improve the treatment individualization and the outcome of NSCLC patients. Circulating miR-181a-5p has the potential clinical value as a non-invasive biomarker for NSCLC., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) has been identified with a great variation of mutations that can be surveyed during disease progression. The aim of the study was to identify and monitor lung cancer-specific mutations incidence in cell-free DNA as well as overall plasma cell-free DNA load by means of targeted next-generation sequencing. Sequencing libraries were prepared from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolated from 72 plasma samples of 41 patients using the Oncomine Lung cfDNA panel covering hot spot regions of 11 genes. Sequencing was performed with the Ion Torrent™ Ion S5™ system. Four genes were detected with highest mutation incidence: KRAS (43.9% of all cases), followed by ALK (36.6%), TP53 (31.7%), and PIK3CA (29.3%). Seven patients had co-occurring KRAS + TP53 (6/41, 14.6%) or KRAS + PIK3CA (7/41, 17.1%) mutations. Moreover, the mutational status of TP53 as well an overall cell-free DNA load were confirmed to be predictors of poor progression-free survival (HR = 2.5 [0.8-7.7]; p = 0.029 and HR = 2.3 [0.9-5.5]; p = 0.029, respectively) in NSCLC patients. In addition, TP53 mutation status significantly predicts shorter overall survival (HR = 3.4 [1.2-9.7]; p < 0.001). We demonstrated that TP53 mutation incidence as well as a cell-free DNA load can be used as biomarkers for NSCLC monitoring and can help to detect the disease progression prior to radiological confirmation of the status.

Background: Osimertinib is standard of care for EGFR -mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The efficacy of the drug in patients with mutations other than the common deletion in exon 19 and L858R in exon 21 is largely unknown., Methods: We identified patients with uncommon EGFR -mutations from two prospective clinical phase II, single-arm studies for previously treated patients and untreated patients, respectively, and pooled data for this analysis. All patients received treatment with osimertinib 80 mg daily until radiological progression or death. The primary endpoint of both trials was objective response rate (ORR), with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and intracranial efficacy as key secondary endpoints. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) was analysed before and two weeks after treatment initiation in the first line cohort., Results: Of 299 enrolled patients in the two trials, 21 patients with uncommon mutations were identified; 12 patients had a single mutation (G719X or L861Q), one patient had L861Q and an exon 20 insertion, and 8 patients had compound mutations with G719X and either L861Q or S768I. Three of the 10 pretreated patients had the T790M resistance mutation. ORR was 47.6% and disease control rate (DCR) 85.7%. The median duration of response (DoR) was 7.9 months. Among 11 patients treated with osimertinib in first line, ORR was 63.6% vs. 30.0% of 10 previously treated patients. The median PFS was 5.5 months in both groups. Patients with G719X-compound mutations had a higher response rate (62.5% vs. 38.5%), a longer median PFS (13.7 vs. 3.5 months) and median OS (29.3 vs. 7.5 months) than patients with other mutations. Most first line treated patients (81.8%) displayed a reduction in ctDNA after two weeks of treatment., Conclusions: Osimertinib demonstrates activity in patients with uncommon EGFR -mutations, and especially for G719X-compound mutations., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-21-995/coif). IJZE has received honoraria for lectures or advisory boards for Novartis and Boehringer-Ingelheim. ÅH has received honoraria for lectures or advisory boards to her institution, from AstraZeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Bayer, BMS and Roche. SC has received honoraria for lectures for Pfizer, Roche and AstraZeneca. JK has received grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer-Ingelheim and honoraria for lectures or advisory boards from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Sanofi and Roche. BHG has received honoraria for lectures and advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Takeda, Roche, MSD and Janssen. OTB has received honoraria for lectures or advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, MSD, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim and grants from Astra Zeneca. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Osimertinib is effective for relapsed T790M-positive patients with brain metastases. The high brain permeability suggests that also such patients without T790M could benefit. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of osimertinib on brain metastases in both T790M-positive and -negative patients., Methods: The TREM-study was an investigator-initiated phase II, single-arm, multi-institutional clinical trial conducted in Northern Europe. Patients with resistance to prior EGFR-TKIs received osimertinib until radiological progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Baseline brain scans were performed in patients with known or suspected brain metastases and repeated every 8-12 weeks. We assessed intracranial efficacy in patients with baseline brain metastases., Results: Brain metastases were detected in 48/199 patients at baseline. Of these, 63% were T790M-positive, 27% -negative and 10% had unknown T790M-status. The majority (73%) of the patients had received prior whole brain radiotherapy and additionally 8% had received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Brain scans were available for review for 42 patients. The intracranial progression free survival was 39.7 versus 3.5 months for T790M + and T790M- patients, respectively ( p  < 0.001). The overall intracranial disease control rate (iDCR) was 81%, and for T790M + and T790M- patients the DCR was 89% versus 55%, respectively. The estimated risk of CNS progression was 0.8% at 6 months and 6% at 12 months for T790M-positive patients, and 14% and 17% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, for the T790M-negative., Conclusion: This subgroup analysis confirms CNS efficacy of osimertinib in patients with the T790M resistance mutation, while other treatment options should be considered for EGFR-TKI relapsed T790M-negative patients with brain metastases.

The pandemic spread of the COVID-19 virus significantly affected daily life, but the highest pressure was piled on the health care system. Our aim was to evaluate an impact of COVID-19 pandemic management measures on cancer services at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of Lithuania. We assessed the time period from 1 February 2020 to 31 December 2020 and compared it to the same period of 2019. Data for our analysis were extracted from the NCI Hospital Information System (HIS) and the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF). Contingency table analysis and ANOVA were performed. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected the cancer services provided by NCI. Reductions in diagnostic radiology (-16%) and endoscopy (-29%) procedures were accompanied by a decreased number of patients with ongoing medical (-30%), radiation (-6%) or surgical (-10%) treatment. The changes in the number of newly diagnosed cancer patients were dependent on tumor type and disease stage, showing a rise in advanced disease at diagnosis already during the early period of the first lockdown. The extent of out-patient consultations (-14%) and disease follow-up visits (-16%) was also affected by the pandemic, and only referrals to psychological/psychiatric counselling were increased. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the structure of cancer services by fostering the application of modified systemic anticancer therapy or hypofractionated radiotherapy. The most dramatic drop occurred in the number of patients participating in cancer prevention programs; the loss was 25% for colon cancer and 62% for breast cancer screening. Marked restriction in access to preventive cancer screening and overall reduction of the whole spectrum of cancer services may negatively affect cancer survival measures in the nearest future.

Objectives: In non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib is approved in the presence of the T790 M resistance mutation. We assessed the efficacy of osimertinib in both T790M-positive and T790M-negative patients., Materials and Methods: The TREM-study is an investigator-initiated, multi-centre, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial conducted in five Northern European countries. Patients with progression on at least one previous EGFR-TKI were assigned to treatment with 80 mg of osimertinib daily until radiological progression or death. Patients were included regardless of the presence of T790 M. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR)., Results: Of 199 included patients, 120 (60 %) were T790M-positive, 52 (26 %) were T790M-negative and 27 (14 %) had unknown T790M-status. 24 % had brain metastases and 15 % had an ECOG performance status of 2. Overall ORR was 48 % (95 % CI, 41 %-55 %), 60 % (51 %-69 %) for T790M-positive patients and 28 % (15 %-41 %) for T790M-negative patients, p < 0.001. ORR for patients with co-occurring del19 vs L858R was 61 % vs 32 %, p = 0.001. Duration of response was similar between the T790M-positive and -negative groups (11.8 vs 10.7 months, p = 0.229). Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.9 months (95 % CI, 7.4-10.5), and 10.8 vs 5.1 months for T790M-positive vs -negative patients (HR 0.62, p = 0.007). Median overall survival (OS) was 17.9 months (95 % CI, 14.4-21.3). For T790M-positive vs -negative median OS was 22.5 vs 13.4 months, (HR 0.55, p = 0.002)., Conclusions: This study confirms the efficacy of osimertinib for T790M-positive patients. There was also clinically significant activity of osimertinib in a proportion of T790M-negative patients., Clinical Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02504346)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest IJZE, ÅH, SE and SC have nothing to disclose. AM has received grants from AstraZeneca. KHH has received honoraria for lectures or advisory boards for Takeda, Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre and BMS. JK has received honoraria for lectures or advisory boards from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD and Roche. BHG has received honoraria for lectures and advisory boards for AstraZeneca. OTB has received grants from Roche and Pfizer., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)