Search

Background: Laboratory Automation (LA) is an innovative technology that is currently available for microbiology laboratories. LA can be a game changer by revolutionizing laboratory workflows through efficiency improvement and is also effective in the organization and standardization of procedures, enabling staff requalification. It can provide an important return on investment (time spent redefining the workflow as well as direct costs of instrumentation) in the medium to long term., Methods: Here, we present our experience with the WASPLab ® system introduced in our lab during the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the impact due to the system by comparing the TAT recorded on our samples before, during, and after LA introduction (from 2019 to 2021). We focused our attention on blood cultures (BCs) and biological fluid samples (BLs)., Results: TAT recorded over time showed a significant decrease: from 97 h to 53.5 h (Δ43.5 h) for BCs and from 73 h to 58 h (Δ20 h) for BLs. Despite the introduction of the WASPLab ® system, we have not been able to reduce the number of technical personnel units dedicated to the microbiology lab, but WASPLab ® has allowed us to direct some of the staff resources toward other laboratory activities, including those required by the pandemic., Conclusions: LA can significantly enhance laboratory performance and, due to the significant reduction in reporting time, can have an effective impact on clinical choices and therefore on patient outcomes. Therefore, the initial costs of LA adoption must be considered worthwhile.

This study is a critical analysis of certain amplification assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections which have demonstrated that the plasmid-free variant of C. trachomatis is frequently responsible for infection in our patients. Specifically, we evaluated the performance of the strand displacement amplification (SDA) assay in detecting either C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae in 1,190 clinical samples, both urogenital and ocular, from 1,005 consecutive patients. The results obtained with the BDProbeTec ET System were compared with three referenced amplification methods for C. trachomatis (detecting the 16S rRNA gene, the omp1 gene and the plasmid of C. trachomatis) and with both the culture method as well as an amplification assay followed by genetic identification performed using the MicroSeq 500 16S ribosomal DNA-based system for N. gonorrhoeae. The sensitivity of SDA (76%) in detecting C. trachomatis is significantly low when compared with that of other molecular techniques employing 16S rDNA or omp1 as a target. The specificity of the methods for detecting C. trachomatis was excellent, ranging from 99.4 to 100%. Furthermore, the results of SDA in detecting N. gonorrhoeae also provided excellent results (100% specificity and sensitivity).