Search

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused graduate medical education (GME) programs to pivot to virtual interviews (VIs) for recruitment and selection. This systematic review synthesizes the rapidly expanding evidence base on VIs, providing insights into preferred formats, strengths, and weaknesses. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO, MedEdPublish, and Google Scholar were searched from 1 January 2012 to 21 February 2022. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, full texts, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument. Findings were reported according to Best Evidence in Medical Education guidance. RESULTS: One hundred ten studies were included. The majority (97%) were from North America. Fourteen were conducted before COVID-19 and 96 during the pandemic. Studies involved both medical students applying to residencies (61%) and residents applying to fellowships (39%). Surgical specialties were more represented than other specialties. Applicants preferred VI days that lasted 4-6 h, with three to five individual interviews (15-20 min each), with virtual tours and opportunities to connect with current faculty and trainees. Satisfaction with VIs was high, though both applicants and programs found VIs inferior to in-person interviews for assessing 'fit.' Confidence in ranking applicants and programs was decreased. Stakeholders universally noted significant cost and time savings with VIs, as well as equity gains and reduced carbon footprint due to eliminating travel. CONCLUSIONS: The use of VIs for GME recruitment and selection has accelerated rapidly. The findings of this review offer early insights that can guide future practice, policy, and research.

Objective\ud \ud We aim to validate four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) peak velocity tracking methods for measuring the peak velocity of mitral inflow against Doppler echocardiography.\ud \ud \ud \ud Method\ud \ud Fifty patients were recruited who had 4D flow CMR and Doppler Echocardiography. After transvalvular flow segmentation using established valve tracking methods, peak velocity was automatically derived using three-dimensional streamlines of transvalvular flow. In addition, a static-planar method was used at the tip of mitral valve to mimic Doppler technique.\ud \ud \ud \ud Results\ud \ud Peak E-wave mitral inflow velocity was comparable between TTE and the novel 4D flow automated dynamic method (0.9 ± 0.5 vs 0.94 ± 0.6 m/s; p = 0.29) however there was a statistically significant difference when compared with the static planar method (0.85 ± 0.5 m/s; p = 0.01). Median A-wave peak velocity was also comparable across TTE and the automated dynamic streamline (0.77 ± 0.4 vs 0.76 ± 0.4 m/s; p = 0.77). A significant difference was seen with the static planar method (0.68 ± 0.5 m/s; p = 0.04). E/A ratio was comparable between TTE and both the automated dynamic and static planar method (1.1 ± 0.7 vs 1.15 ± 0.5 m/s; p = 0.74 and 1.15 ± 0.5 m/s; p = 0.5 respectively). Both novel 4D flow methods showed good correlation with TTE for E-wave (dynamic method; r = 0.70; P < 0.001 and static-planar method; r = 0.67; P < 0.001) and A-wave velocity measurements (dynamic method; r = 0.83; P < 0.001 and static method; r = 0.71; P < 0.001). The automated dynamic method demonstrated excellent intra/inter-observer reproducibility for all parameters.\ud \ud \ud \ud Conclusion\ud \ud Automated dynamic peak velocity tracing method using 4D flow CMR is comparable to Doppler echocardiography for mitral inflow assessment and has excellent reproducibility for clinical use.

Background: The reproducibility of mitral regurgitation (MR) quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging using different software solutions remains unclear. This research aimed to investigate the reproducibility of MR quantification between two software solutions: MASS (version 2019 EXP, LUMC, Netherlands) and CAAS (version 5.2, Pie Medical Imaging). Methods: CMR data of 35 patients with MR (12 primary MR, 13 mitral valve repair/replacement, and ten secondary MR) was used. Four methods of MR volume quantification were studied, including two 4D-flow CMR methods (MRMVAV and MRJet) and two non-4D-flow techniques (MRStandard and MRLVRV). We conducted within-software and inter-software correlation and agreement analyses. Results: All methods demonstrated significant correlation between the two software solutions: MRStandard (r=0.92, pLVRV (r=0.95, pJet (r=0.86, pMVAV (r=0.91, pJet and MRMVAV, compared to each of the four methods, were the only methods not to be associated with significant bias. Conclusions: We conclude that 4D-flow CMR methods demonstrate equivalent reproducibility to non-4D-flow methods but greater levels of agreement between software solutions.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of probiotics for infantile colic in infants younger than four months of age.

Funder: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), OBJECTIVES: The management of severe aortic stenosis mandates consideration of aortic valve intervention for symptomatic patients. However, for asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis, recent randomised trials supported earlier intervention. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate all the available data comparing the two management strategies. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception until 10 January 2022. The search key terms were 'asymptomatic', 'severe aortic stenosis' and 'intervention'. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of two published randomised trials, AVATAR and RECOVERY, included 302 patients and showed that early intervention resulted in 55% reduction in all-cause mortality (HR=0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.86; I2 0%) and 79% reduction in risk of hospitalisation for heart failure (HR=0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.96; I2 15%). There was no difference in risk of cardiovascular death between the two groups (HR=0.36, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.78; I2 78%). Additionally, meta-analysis of eight observational studies showed improved mortality in patients treated with early intervention (HR=0.38, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.56; I2 77%). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides evidence that, in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis, early intervention reduces all-cause mortality and improves outcomes compared with conservative management. While this is very encouraging, further randomised controlled studies are needed to draw firm conclusions and identify the optimal timing of intervention. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022301037.

ObjectivesTo summarise the published evidence on the gastrointestinal manifestations of COVID-19 in children and to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms.MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and the WHO’s database of publications on novel coronavirus. We included English language studies that had described original demographic and clinical characteristics of children diagnosed with COVID-19 and reported on the presence or absence of gastrointestinal symptoms. Meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. The pooled prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms was expressed as proportion and 95% CI.ResultsThe search identified 269 citations. Thirteen studies (nine case series and four case reports) comprising data for 284 patients were included. Overall, we rated four studies as having a low risk of bias, eight studies as moderate and one study as high risk of bias. In a meta-analysis of nine studies, comprising 280 patients, the pooled prevalence of all gastrointestinal symptoms was 22.8% (95% CI 13.1% to 35.2%; I2=54%). Diarrhoea was the most commonly reported gastrointestinal symptom followed by vomiting and abdominal pain.ConclusionsNearly a quarter of children with COVID-19 have gastrointestinal symptoms. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the gastrointestinal manifestation of COVID-19.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020177569.

Thiopurines are proven agents in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. While pancreatitis is recognised as an adverse event associated with therapy, the effect size and morbidity of thiopurine-induced pancreatitis is not known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the risk of pancreatitis with azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) within Crohn’s disease. We searched six electronic databases from inception to 29 October 2019. The primary outcomes measures were the occurrence of pancreatitis. We calculated pooled OR with corresponding 95% CIs for risk of pancreatitis. A number needed to harm analysis was performed. The search identified 4418 studies, of which 25 randomised controlled trials met the criteria for inclusion. The number of patients treated with azathioprine to cause an episode of pancreatitis was 36 (induction of remission) and 31 (maintenance of remission).The risk of pancreatitis in patients receiving azathioprine across all contexts was 3.80%, compared with a control risk of 0.2% (placebo) and 0.5% (5-aminosalicylic acid agents). There was no difference seen between 6-MP and placebo, although this was a low certainty result due to imprecision from very low event numbers and patient numbers. There is a probably increased occurrence of pancreatitis when azathioprine is used in Crohn’s disease (moderate certainty), with incidence overall approximately 3.8%. Most cases are mild and resolve on cessation of therapy and no mortality was reported. There was no increased occurrence seen when using 6-MP, although this is a low certainty finding. PROSPERO prior to the study (CRD42019138065).

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the need to develop teaching innovations that provide safe, authentic clinical encounters which facilitate experiential learning. In tandem with the dissemination of teleconsultation and online teaching, this pilot study describes, evaluates and justifies a multi-camera live-streaming teaching session to medical students from the clinical environment.Multiple audio and video inputs capturing an outpatient clinic setting were routed through Open Broadcast Software (OBS) to create a customised feed streamed to remote learners through a videoconferencing platform. Sessions were conducted between September 2020 and March 2021. Twelve students sequentially interacted with a patient who held an iPad. Higher quality Go-Pro cameras captured the scene, allowing students to view the consultation from the patient and doctor's perspective. A consultant then conducted a 'gold standard' patient consultation observed by students. A faculty member remotely facilitated the session, providing pre-clinic teaching and debriefing. The equipment required with costing for a standard and low-cost version is described, as well as a set-up schematic and overview of ideal conditions and barriers encountered during trials.All students completed a post-participation questionnaire, rating the overall quality of the sessions as 9.7/10. The quality of online facilitation, utility of observing peers' and consultant interaction with the patient, opportunity for peer-to-peer learning and availability of multiple camera angles were particularly valued by students.This innovation permits an authentic clinical interaction to be experienced by multiple students remotely, promoting equitable access to high-quality teaching, while maintaining the safety of students and patients.

Background\ud The novel coronavirus disease was declared a pandemic in March 2020, which necessitated adaptations to medical education. This systematic review synthesises published reports of medical educational developments and innovations that pivot to online learning from workplace-based clinical learning in response to the pandemic. The objectives were to synthesise what adaptations/innovation were implemented (description), their impact (justification), and ‘how’ and ‘why’ these were selected (explanation and rationale).\ud \ud Methods\ud The authors systematically searched four online databases up to December 21, 2020. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full-texts, performed data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias. Our findings are reported in alignment with the STORIES (STructured apprOach to the Reporting in healthcare education of Evidence Synthesis) statement and BEME guidance.\ud \ud Results\ud Fifty-five articles were included. Most were from North America (n = 40), and nearly 70% focused on undergraduate medical education (UGME). Key developments were rapid shifts from workplace-based learning to virtual spaces, including online electives, telesimulation, telehealth, radiology, and pathology image repositories, live-streaming or pre-recorded videos of surgical procedures, stepping up of medical students to support clinical services, remote adaptations for clinical visits, multidisciplinary team meetings and ward rounds. Challenges included lack of personal interactions, lack of standardised telemedicine curricula and need for faculty time, technical resources, and devices. Assessment of risk of bias revealed poor reporting of underpinning theory, resources, setting, educational methods, and content.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud This review highlights the response of medical educators in deploying adaptations and innovations. Whilst few are new, the complexity, concomitant use of multiple methods and the specific pragmatic choices of educators offers useful insight to clinical teachers who wish to deploy such methods within their own practice. Future works that offer more specific details to allow replication and understanding of conceptual underpinnings are likely to justify an update to this review.

Doppler echocardiography (TTE) remains the imaging modality of choice for the assessment of mitral inflow and left ventricular diastolic function, despite its limitations. Four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) offers time-resolved cross-sectional velocity data, which can be used to investigate transvalvular peak velocity through the mitral valve. This would not suffer from the in-plane motion and angle-dependence of pulse-wave echocardiography. Objective We aim to validate a novel time-resolved, automated dynamic 4D flow CMR peak velocity tracking method for measuring the peak velocity of mitral inflow against TTE. Method Patients recruited to EurValve programme (n=22) underwent TTE and 4D flow CMR. Peak E-wave and A-wave velocities were recorded. This work was done in collaboration with the industry leader in 4D flow CMR (PIE Medical Imaging). Transvalvular flow segmentation was done using established valve tracking methods and the generated 3D streamlines were investigated for seeking the peak velocity inside the left ventricular cavity during diastole. Reproducibility analyses were carried out in 10 cases. Results The peak E-wave mitral inflow velocity was comparable between the novel 4D flow method and TTE (1.09 ± 0.29 m/s and 1.10 ± 0.37 m/s respectively; p=0.60). The mean A-wave peak velocity was also comparable across both methods (0.94 ± 0.40 m/s and 0.86 ± 0.29 m/s respectively; p=0.38). The automated 4D flow method also showed good correlation with TTE for both E-wave (r=0.54; p=0.01) and A-wave (r=0.55; p=0.03) with minimal and non-significant bias between the two modalities (bias=0.01 m/s; p=0.91 and −0.08 m/s; p=0.91). This novel automated method demonstrated excellent reproducibility (Coefficient of variability 2.67% for peak E-wave mitral inflow velocity; Coefficient of variability 1.93% for peak A-wave mitral inflow velocity). Conclusion We present a novel automated time-resolved transvalvular peak velocity assessment solution that can be used clinically for mitral inflow assessment and would circumvent the limitations of pulse-wave doppler echocardiography. Future studies are warranted to explore the diagnostic and prognostic advantages of our novel automated technique for mitral inflow assessment.

Background\ud The COVID-19 pandemic spurred an abrupt transition away from in-person educational activities. This systematic review investigated the pivot to online learning for nonclinical undergraduate medical education (UGME) activities and explored descriptions of educational offerings deployed, their impact, and lessons learned.\ud \ud Methods\ud The authors systematically searched four online databases and conducted a manual electronic search of MedEdPublish up to December 21, 2020. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, performed data extraction and assessed risk of bias. A third author resolved discrepancies. Findings were reported in accordance with the STORIES (STructured apprOach to the Reporting in healthcare education of Evidence Synthesis) statement and BEME guidance.\ud \ud Results\ud Fifty-six articles were included. The majority (n = 41) described the rapid transition of existing offerings to online formats, whereas fewer (n = 15) described novel activities. The majority (n = 27) included a combination of synchronous and asynchronous components. Didactics (n = 40) and small groups (n = 26) were the most common instructional methods. Teachers largely integrated technology to replace and amplify rather than transform learning, though learner engagement was often interactive. Thematic analysis revealed unique challenges of online learning, as well as exemplary practices. The quality of study designs and reporting was modest, with underpinning theory at highest risk of bias. Virtually all studies (n = 54) assessed reaction/satisfaction, fewer than half (n = 23) assessed changes in attitudes, knowledge or skills, and none assessed behavioral, organizational or patient outcomes.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud UGME educators successfully transitioned face-to-face instructional methods online and implemented novel solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although technology’s potential to transform teaching is not yet fully realized, the use of synchronous and asynchronous formats encouraged virtual engagement, while offering flexible, self-directed learning. As we transition from emergency remote learning to a post-pandemic world, educators must underpin new developments with theory, report additional outcomes and provide details that support replication.

Background Chronic total occlusions (CTO) are a frequent angiographic finding. Viability of CTO-subtended myocardium is dependent on the presence of an adequate collateral circulation. At rest, collateral supply may be sufficient to avert ischaemia and maintain normal systolic function. However, it remains unclear whether CTO-subtended myocardium may be considered truly normal, or whether subtle functional abnormalities may be present at rest. Purpose To determine whether, in the absence of infarction and hibernation, CTO-subtended myocardium remains functionally normal or whether abnormalities of strain and/or mechanical dispersion may be present at rest. Methods In a retrospective, single centre, observational study, we studied patients with ≥1 angiographically-diagnosed CTO referred for clinical stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and compared healthy volunteers (HVs) with a normal stress CMR scan. CMR imaging comprised functional and scar assessment with qualitative [visual] evaluation of infarction and segmental wall motion. Patients with infarction and/or wall motion score index (WMSI) ≥1 were excluded from further analysis. In remaining CTO subjects and HVs, segmental peak systolic longitudinal strain and circumferential strain were analysed (in 3 long-axis planes and 3 short-axis planes, respectively) and mechanical dispersion for both orientations was computed. Image analysis was performed using Medis (QStrain) software blinded to all clinical information. Results From a total of 389 patients with ≥1 angiographically-diagnosed CTO, 68 had normal WMSI and no infarction (63.0±11.7 years, 79.4% male, LVEF 62.6±4.5%). Fifty HVs (61.1±7.0 years, 74.0% males, LVEF 61.1±5.3%) were also studied. The majority of CTO patients had concomitant coronary artery disease in at least one non-CTO vessel (n=37, 54.4%). GLS was lower in CTO patients than HVs (−21.8%±1.5% versus −24.0±1.1%; p Conclusion Subclinical changes in left ventricular dynamics are present at rest in CTO patients with fully viable myocardium and no evidence of resting regional wall abnormality. Further study is warranted to evaluate the potential association between mechanical dispersion and arrhythmic events in CTO. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): NIHR Clinician Scientist Award (CS-2018-18-ST2-007 to J.R.A.) and Research Professorship award (RP-2017-08-ST2-007 to G.P.M.). Figure 1. Strain analysis. CTO vs HVFigure 2. Mechanical dispersion. CTO vs HV

AimsThe levels of abstraction, vast vocabulary and high cognitive load present significant challenges in undergraduate histopathology education. Self-determination theory describes three psychological needs which promote intrinsic motivation. This paper describes, evaluates and justifies a remotely conducted, post-COVID-19 histopathology placement designed to foster intrinsic motivation.Methods90 fourth-year medical students took part in combined synchronous and asynchronous remote placements integrating virtual microscopy into complete patient narratives through Google Classroom, culminating in remote, simulated multidisciplinary team meeting sessions allowing participants to vote on ‘red flag’ signs and symptoms, investigations, histological diagnoses, staging and management of simulated virtual patients. The placement was designed to foster autonomy, competence and relatedness, generating authenticity, transdisciplinary integration and clinical relevance. A postpositivistic evaluation was undertaken with a validated preplacement and postplacement questionnaire capturing quantitative and qualitative data.ResultsThere was a significant (pConclusionsFostering autonomy, competence and relatedness in post-COVID-19, remote educational designs can promote intrinsic motivation and authentic educational experiences. Ensuring transdisciplinary clinical integration, the appropriate use of novel technology and a focus on patient narratives can underpin the relevance of undergraduate histopathology education. The presentation of normal and diseased tissue in this way can serve as an important mode for the acquisition and application of clinically relevant knowledge expected of graduates.

Objectives Four-dimensional flow CMR allows for a comprehensive assessment of the blood flow kinetic energy of the ventricles of the heart. In comparison to standard two-dimensional image acquisition, 4D flow CMR is felt to offer superior reproducibility, which is important when repeated examinations may be required. The objective was to evaluate the inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of blood flow kinetic energy assessment using 4D flow of the left ventricle in 20 healthy volunteers across two centres in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Data description This dataset contains 4D flow CMR blood flow kinetic energy data for 20 healthy volunteers with no known cardiovascular disease. Presented is kinetic energy data for the entire cardiac cycle (global), the systolic and diastolic components, in addition to blood flow kinetic energy for both early and late diastolic filling. This data is available for reuse and would be valuable in supporting other research, such as allowing for larger sample sizes with more statistical power for further analysis of these variables.

Background The first UK wave of COVID-19 led to the temporary suspension of medical school placements. Medical students were offered paid employment through a COVID Responder Scheme (CRS). We aimed to qualitatively assess the experience of those who participated in this scheme in comparison to traditional clinical attachments. Summary of work A bespoke questionnaire was designed to explore key themes identified through theme selection, literature review and consensus. Following piloting and validation, the questionnaire was circulated to students recruited to the CRS. A grounded theory analytic framework was used to analyse data. A modified-Delphi consensus process was used to reach a consensus on ‘what makes you feel most valued as a medical student’. Summary of results 36 students (46.2% response rate) responded. 86.1% of respondents felt their contribution was worthwhile. 65% reported being significantly more integrated into a team than in their university attachments. Concerns prior to starting CRS work included availability of PPE and the ability to contribute effectively, but refreshingly these concerns did not present as challenges. The steep learning curve of experiential learning alongside virtual teaching commitments proved difficult to juggle when facing physical, mental and emotional fatigue from long hours working busy clinical shifts. Respondents cited the educational benefit of the CRS throughout the survey. Recognition and commendation were highly effective in providing a sense of value ahead of renumeration. 44.4% of respondents were concerned about their future training and a reduction in clinical exposure. Discussion The majority of respondents reported CRS work as worthwhile, with reasons including increased responsibility for patient care and a sense of contribution to the clinical team. This in turn led to autonomous practice and task accountability, which further integrated them into the team and developed their clinical confidence. A student’s sense of value was strongly linked to being identified in emotional responses from colleagues and patients ahead of financial renumeration, suggesting scope for improvement within unpaid attachments / rotations. Conclusion There is an opportunity to take value from the COVID-19 medical student experience to improve undergraduate medical education through and beyond the pandemic.

Background Covid-19 has had a seismic impact on medical training, in ways that are continually being realised. In response to the call to establish a ‘new normal’, we performed a detailed evaluation and thematic analysis of recent trainee experiences, which identifies the priorities for developing an innovative training framework that is adaptable during the peaks and troughs of a pandemic. Methods A 14-item survey was sent to junior doctors at a large teaching hospital. Data was analysed using a grounded theory framework and cycles of open and axial coding allowed for identification of emergent themes. Explanatory models were developed using inductive analysis to postulate thematic relationships. Results 137 junior doctors responded to the survey. Respondents across all grades reported benefits to themselves, clinical teams and the profession. A notable benefit to junior trainees was the greater consultant support, fostering a more supportive work environment. Respondents also identified several challenges to working practice, including the availability of suitable PPE, burnout and the general pressures on physical and mental wellbeing. Discussion Trainees’ perceived value was inferred typically from how ‘busy’ they were, possibly as postgraduate training is largely competence based. Educational bodies should attempt to highlight the equal value of non-technical skills, such as mentorship and problem-solving for a rounded curriculum. Trainees highlighted the inequity of opportunities due to sometimes inappropriate redeployment, suggesting that educational bodies should strive to develop personalised training programmes. Covid-19 has shown that a sense of personal physical and psychological safety to be of paramount importance to trainees.

Coronary artery bypass grafting is a key cardiac surgery procedure and is the main treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The most frequently used conduit for this procedure is the long saphenous vein (LSV). The technique of harvesting the LSV has evolved over the last 30 years from total open harvesting to endoscopic with minimal access technique. The most important determining factor for success in coronary artery surgery is the graft patency rate. The literature evidence behind each technique has been reported at different levels and there is an ongoing debate about which technique can provide optimum vein patency over the long term. This literature review aims to summarize the current evidence, the implications involved with the use of each technique for harvesting LSV and the patency rate at variable follow-up intervals.

Summary A best evidence topic in cardiovascular surgery was written in accordance to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR), is local anaesthetic (LA) superior to general anaesthetic in terms of perioperative outcomes? Altogether, 630 publications were found using the reported search protocol, of which 3 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type and primary outcomes were tabulated. The 3 included studies are systematic reviews with meta-analyses, with no randomized trials identified. Within the studies, there is a degree of heterogeneity in terms of surgical case-mix (elective or emergency EVAR or both) and anaesthetic technique (LA, regional anaesthetic, local-regional anaesthetic and general anaesthetic). With 1 study not providing pooled estimates, the second study demonstrated statistical significance in favour of local-regional anaesthetic within the elective setting in terms of mortality [pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52–0.95; P = 0.02], morbidity (pooled OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.96; P = 0.0006) and total length of hospital admission (pooled mean difference: −1.53, 95% CI −2.53 to −0.53; P = 0.00001). The third study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant mortality benefit with LA (pooled OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.21–1.41; P = 0.211). While the results of these studies fail to provide a clear answer to a complex surgical problem, it would be appropriate, in the light of current evidence, to recommend LA as non-inferior to general anaesthetic in both emergency and elective settings.

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, is postoperative music therapy effective in reducing pain and anxiety? Altogether, 153 papers were found using the reported search method, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Six of the included studies were randomized trials, with 1 further non-randomized trial. The specific music protocols utilized widely varied, ranging from 1 short session on day 1 postoperatively to multiple sessions per day over a 72-h period. Most therapies involved music of a relaxing type, typically between 50 and 60 dB. All 7 studies reported on pain, with 4 demonstrating significant differences in pain score; however, 3 of these were not associated with reduction in analgesia requirements. Five studies reported on anxiety, with 2 demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in levels of anxiety. These results need to be contextualized by the small number of participants within each study and the heterogeneity in the therapy protocols utilized. The current best available evidence fails to support the benefits of music therapy as an effective non-pharmacological option in reducing pain and anxiety following open-heart surgery. While there is scarce evidence demonstrating efficacy, the current literature contains very small-sample-sized studies in utilizing music therapy protocols which in turn have wide range of variability in terms of duration, frequency, timing in the postoperative period and specific choice of music utilized in each protocol.

Objectives\ud This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:\ud To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatments used for intractable constipation in children.

Background Rates of oropharyngeal (OP) cancer are increasing and mortality is related to stage at diagnosis. Early diagnosis is vital to improving patient outcomes.Aim To describe current general practice pathways and time intervals in OP cancer and: a) compare to current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance to refer from general practitioners (GPs) to general medical dentists (dentists); and b) referral pathways for pharyngeal cancers.Design and setting A ten-year retrospective study of patients diagnosed with OP cancer in one suburban general practice in England using GP notes, including secondary care correspondence.Results There were 12 cases of OP cancer; six oral and six pharyngeal. There were marked differences in referral pathways and time intervals for people with visible, or palpable, oral cancers and those with non-visible, or impalpable, pharyngeal cancers. No one had GP to dentist referral. General practice 'safety-netting' or follow-up was not commonly recorded.Conclusion GPs are pivotal in diagnosing symptomatic OP cancers. General practice and dental teams encountering symptoms of uncertain aetiology (for example, pharyngitis) should offer safety-netting to shorten patient intervals to re-attendance. Pathways for oral cancer referral were usually clear and linear. Pathways for pharyngeal cancer were usually complex, with much longer time intervals in primary and secondary care, and would benefit from a single national referral pathway to ENT.

Background: Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an emerging technique used for intra-cardiac blood flow assessment. The role of 4D flow cardiovascular MRI in the assessment of trans-valvular flow in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not previously been assessed. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, image quality, and internal validity of 4D flow cardiovascular MRI in the quantification of trans-valvular flow in patients with AF. Methods: Patients with AF and healthy controls in sinus rhythm underwent cardiovascular MRI, including 4D flow studies. Quality assurance checks were done on the raw data and streamlines. Consistency was investigated by trans-valvular flow assessment between the mitral valve (MV) and the aortic valve (AV). Results: Eight patients with AF (88% male, mean age 62±13 years, mean heart rate (HR) 83±16 beats per minute (bpm)) were included and compared with ten healthy controls (70% male, mean age 41±20 years, mean HR 68.5±9 bpm). All scans were of either good quality with minimal blurring artefacts, or excellent quality with no artefacts. No significant bias was observed between the AV and MV stroke volumes in either healthy controls (–4.8, 95% CI –15.64 to 6.04; P=0.34) or in patients with AF (1.64, 95% CI –4.7 to 7.94; P=0.56). A significant correlation was demonstrated between MV and AV stroke volumes in both healthy controls (r=0.87, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.97; P=0.001) and in AF patients (r=0.82, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.97; P=0.01). Conclusions: In patients with AF, 4D flow cardiovascular MRI is feasible with good image quality, allowing for quantification of trans-valvular flow.

BackgroundIn people with COVID-19, hypoxia at the time of admission is known to be related to mortality. Monitoring of oxygen saturations (SpO2) is therefore an increasingly common part of community-based care, with the aim of improving the identification of adults who are deteriorating. We set out to investigate whether rigid SpO2 triggers, or absolute change in SpO2, is more indicative of deterioration in COVID-19.MethodsA prospective, uncontrolled, open-label study in a large UK general practice was conducted between May and November 2020. Participants recorded twice daily oximetry and symptom diary for 14 days after test-confirmed COVID-19. Primary outcomes were the proportion of people whose SpO2 dropped to ≤ 94% and ≤ 92%, the average maximum reduction in SpO2, and admission to hospital. We also investigated the relationship between MRC Dyspnoea scale, modified Roth score, and SpO2 through correlation analyses.Results52 participants were recruited, following which 41 participants completed the study. The average age was 45.9 years with 63.4% identifying as female. The mean maximum reduction in SpO2 was 2.8%. The average time to maximum reduction in SpO2 was 6.4 days. Nine participants (22.0%) had a reduction in SpO2 to ≤94%. Three of these had a reduction in SpO2 to ≤92%, for which all three were admitted to hospital. Modified Roth score and SpO2 were weakly positively correlated (.31). MRC dyspnoea scale score and SpO2 were moderately negatively correlated (-.53).ConclusionsA reduction in SpO2 to ≤92% was found to be highly predictive for admission to hospital. Modified Roth score or MRC dyspnoea scale scores should not be used as proxy measures for oximetry. This study contributes to the ongoing narrative around community-based oximetry and provides insight and recommendations for those currently engaging in or planning to roll out similar schemes.Strengths and limitations of this studyThis study is pragmatically designed to answer an important clinical question in primary care.This study focused on previously published values of SpO2 for triggering escalation of care and therefore provides answers based on current clinical practice.11 of the 52 patients who were recruited into the study did not return their oximeter or oximetry diary at the end of the study period.We did not validate the accuracy or reliability of the oximetry / symptom diaries, as these were self-completed by the participants themselves.Other than admission to hospital and mortality within the study period, no other clinical outcomes have been recorded.Funding statementThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Competing interestsJane Wilcock has no competing interests to declare.Ciaran Grafton-Clarke has no competing interests to declare.Tessa Coulson has no competing interests to declare.