Search

BackgroundDeep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been widely applied and accepted in the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Despite numerous studies exploring the effects of DBS on the progression of neurodegenerative diseases and the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), there is a limited number of articles summarizing this research. The purpose of this study is to investigate the current trends, hot topics, and potential in research surrounding DBS therapy for PD, as well as to anticipate the challenges of such research.MethodsWe searched the Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC) for DBS research literature related to PD published from January 2014 to January 2024, utilized CiteSpace, VOS viewer, the bibliometric online analysis platform, Scimago Graphica, Microsoft Excel 2021, and R software version 4.2.3 for data analysis. And we conducted quantitative research on publications, citations, journals, authors, countries, institutions, keywords, and references, visualized the results in network graphs.ResultsFrom 2014 to 2024, papers from 39 journals from 11 countries were among the top 100 cited. Most papers were published in Neurology, with the highest average citations per paper in Nature Neuroscience. The United States (US) contributed the most publications, followed by the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany. In terms of total publications, University College London (UCL) contributed the most papers. The primary classifications of articles were Clinical Neurology, Neurosciences, and Surgery. The top five keywords were subthalamic nucleus, DBS, PD, medical therapy, and basal ganglia. Cluster analysis indicates that DBS research focus on improving quality of life and applying computational models.ConclusionThrough bibliometric analysis, researchers could quickly and clearly understand the hotspots and boundaries of their research field, thus guiding their research direction and scope to improve research efficiency and the quality of outcomes. Although studies indicate that DBS is currently a crucial method for treating advanced PD, in the long run, creating a personalized, low-cost treatment regimen with precise targeting and long-term efficacy poses a challenge.

BackgroundExtensive observational evidence suggests an association between psychiatric disorders (PDs) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but their causal relationship remains unexplored. The objective of this study was to examine the causal relationship between PDs and OSA.MethodsMendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted with summary genetic data from the FinnGen and Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC). Inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods were employed to ascertain causal influence. Sensitivity analysis employing various methodologies assessed the robustness of the findings. Furthermore, multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) was used to clarify if the exposures independently caused OSA.ResultsMR analysis showed that genetically determined major depressive disorder (MDD) increased the risk of OSA (IVW odds ratio [OR]: 1.377, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.242–1.526, P = 1.05×10-9). Sensitivity analysis showed no evidence of pleiotropy and heterogeneity. In MVMR, the significant association persisted after adjusting for BMI, smoking, and alcohol consumption. No conclusive evidence indicated the causal impact of other psychological characteristics on OSA. In the reverse MR analyses, there was no causal effect of OSA on PDs.ConclusionThis study suggests a causal effect of MDD on OSA risk. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and understand how MDD contributes to OSA development, potentially aiding in reducing OSA incidence.

BackgroundPrevious observational studies have provided cumulative data linking gut microbiota to myasthenia gravis (MG). However, the causal link between the two remains unexplored. Hence, the current study was performed to explore the causal link between them.MethodsMendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted using the summary statistics of 211 gut microbiota taxa and the largest genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for MG currently available. The inverse variance-weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods were employed to ascertain the causal influence. Sensitivity studies utilizing several methodologies were then used to assess the robustness of the findings. Lastly, to evaluate reverse causality, a reverse MR analysis was performed.ResultsSeven suggestive causal associations between the gastrointestinal microbiota and MG were identified based on the outcomes of the MR analysis. Specifically, phylum Actinobacteria (OR: 0.602, 95% CI: 0.405–0.896, p = 0.012), class Gammaproteobacteria (OR: 0.587, 95% CI: 0.357–0.968, p = 0.037), and families Defluviitaleaceae (OR: 0.695, 95% CI: 0.485–0.996, p = 0.047), Family XIII (OR: 0.614, 95% CI: 0.412–0.916, p = 0.017), and Peptococcaceae (OR: 0.698, 95% CI: 0.505–0.964, p = 0.029) had suggestive protective effects on MG, while order Mollicutes RF9 (OR: 1.424, 95% CI: 1.015–1.998, p = 0.041) and genus Faecalibacterium (OR: 1.763, 95% CI: 1.220–2.547, p = 0.003) were suggestive risk factors for MG. The outcomes indicate that neither heterogeneity nor horizontal pleiotropy had any discernible impact. Nevertheless, this reverse analysis did not reveal any apparent effect of MG on the gut microbiota composition.ConclusionThe MR investigation has substantiated the suggestive causal connection between gut microbiota and MG, which may provide helpful insights for innovative therapeutic and preventative approaches for MG. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to elucidate the gut microbiota’s precise role and therapeutic potential in the pathogenesis of MG.