Search

Background. Flavin mononucleotide (FMN), released from damaged mitochondrial complex I during hypothermic liver perfusion, has been shown to be predictive of 90-day graft loss. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) are used for organ reconditioning and quality assessment before transplantation. This pilot study aimed to investigate the changes of FMN levels during normothermic reperfusion of kidneys, livers, and lungs and examine whether FMN could serve as a biomarker to predict posttransplant allograft quality. Methods. FMN concentrations, in perfusates collected during NMP of kidneys, abdominal NRP, and ex vivo lung perfusion, were measured using fluorescence spectrometry and correlated to the available perfusion parameters and clinical outcomes. Results. Among 7 transplanted kidneys out of the 11 kidneys that underwent NMP, FMN levels at 60 minutes of NMP were significantly higher in the allografts that developed delayed graft function and primary nonfunction (P = 0.02). Fifteen livers from 23 circulatory death donors that underwent NRP were deemed suitable for transplantation. Their FMN levels at 30 minutes of NRP were significantly lower than those not procured for transplantation (P = 0.004). In contrast, little FMN was released during the 8 lung perfusions. Conclusions. This proof of concept study suggested that FMN in the perfusates of kidney NMP has the potential to predict posttransplant renal function, whereas FMN at 30 minutes of NRP predicts whether a liver would be accepted for transplantation. More work is required to validate the role of FMN as a putative biomarker to facilitate safe and reliable decision-making before embarking on transplantation.

Background. It is well recognized that there is significant variation between centers in access to kidney transplantation. In the absence of high-grade evidence, it is unclear whether variation is due to patient case mix, other center factors, or individual clinician decisions. This study sought consensus between UK clinicians on factors that should influence access to kidney transplantation. Methods. As part of the Access to Transplantation and Transplant Outcome Measures project, consultant nephrologists and transplant surgeons in 71 centers were invited to participate in a Delphi study involving 2 rounds. During rounds 1 and 2, participants rated their agreement to 29 statements covering 8 topics regarding kidney transplantation. A stakeholder meeting was used to discuss statements of interest after the 2 rounds. Results. In total, 122 nephrologists and 16 transplant surgeons from 45 units participated in rounds 1 and 2. After 2 rounds, 12 of 29 statements reached consensus. Fifty people participated in the stakeholder meeting. After the stakeholder meeting, a further 4 statements reached agreement. Of the 8 topics covered, consensus was reached in 6: use of a transplant protocol, patient age, body mass index, patient compliance with treatment, cardiac workup, and use of multidisciplinary meetings. Consensus was not reached on screening for malignancy and use of peripheral Doppler studies. Conclusions. The Delphi process identified factors upon which clinicians agreed and areas where consensus could not be achieved. The findings should inform national guidelines to support decision making in the absence of high quality evidence and to guide areas that warrant future research.