Search

Objectives: Although patients suffering from severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) and severe trauma patients (STP) have been extensively studied separately, there is scarce evidence concerning STP with concomitant sTBI. In particular, there are no guidelines regarding the emergency surgical management of patients presenting a concomitant life-threatening intracranial hematoma (ICH) and a life-threatening non-compressible extra-cranial hemorrhage (NCEH). Materials and Methods: A scoping review was conducted on Medline database from inception to September 2021. Results: The review yielded 138 articles among which 10 were retained in the quantitative analysis for a total of 2086 patients. Seven hundrer and eighty-seven patients presented concomitant sTBI and extra-cranial severe injuries. The mean age was 38.2 years-old and the male to female sex ratio was 2.8/1. Regarding the patients with concomitant cranial and extra-cranial injuries, the mean ISS was 32.1, and the mean AIS per organ were 4.0 for the head, 3.3 for the thorax, 2.9 for the abdomen and 2.7 for extremity. This review highlighted the following concepts: emergency peripheric osteosynthesis can be safely performed in patients with concomitant sTBI (grade C). Invasive intracranial pressure monitoring is mandatory during extra-cranial surgery in patients with sTBI (grade C). The outcome of STP with concomitant sTBI mainly depends on the seriousness of sTBI, independently from the presence of extra-cranial injuries (grade C). After exclusion of early-hospital mortality, the impact of extra-cranial injuries on mortality in patients with concomitant sTBI is uncertain (grade C). There are no recommendations regarding the combined surgical management of patients with concomitant ICH and NCEH (grade D). Conclusion: This review revealed the lack of evidence for the emergency surgical management of patients with concomitant ICH and NCEH. Hence, we introduce the concept of combined cranial and extra-cranial surgery. This damage-control surgical strategy aims to reduce the time spent with intracranial hypertension and to hasten the admission in the intensive care unit. Further studies are required to validate this concept in clinical practice.

Introduction There are little data regarding elective referral to the military specialist, especially considering common pathologies such as spinal diseases, which, in the French forces, involve military neurosurgeons. An overview of the management of the military patient referred to neurosurgery consultation, especially considering spinal diseases that both constitute an operational healthissue in the forces and appear of special interest. The objective was to describe the reasons, demographics, and care pathways, addressed to the neurosurgeon. Materials and methods This retrospective, single-center study focused on all military patients referred for neurosurgery consultation at Sainte Anne Military Hospital in Toulon. Extracted data included demographic characteristics, army, unit, military specialty, the reason for referral, the diagnosis by the neurosurgeon, treatment, and outcome. Results From January 2018 to December 2019, 352 patients were referred for neurosurgical consultation by the unit general practitioner. Spinal disease (n = 297, 91%) was the most frequent reason. Lumbar degenerative disk disease accounted for 20% of consultations, regardless of the patient’s unit or specialty. Most of the patients seen in consultation received nonsurgical management (n = 271, 82.6%). These patients mainly presented with cervical or lumbar degenerative disk disease (n = 99, 36.5%) or cervical or lumbar herniated discs (n = 57, 21.0%). Ninety-eight patients (29.9%) were referred exclusively for medical fitness assessment. Few patients experienced full resolution of their presenting complaint after management (n = 9, 2.8%). Conclusions This descriptive study demonstrates the predominance of degenerative spinal diseases in military patients referred to neurosurgery. It reflects the importance of the medical and military competence required to maintain operational capability upstream and downstream of war traumatology. The description of the care pathways invites us to define more proactive multidisciplinary pathways for the management of these diseases in the armed forces.

Introduction To date, there is no evidence concerning the emergency surgical management of severe trauma patients (STP) with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) presenting a life-threatening intracranial hematoma and a concomitant extra-cranial noncompressible active bleeding. Current guidelines recommend stopping the extra-cranial bleeding first. Nevertheless, the long-term outcome of STP with STBI mainly depends from intracranial lesions. Thus, we propose a combined damage-control surgical strategy aiming to reduce the time spent with intracranial hypertension and to hasten the admission in the intensive care unit. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the benefits of combined cranial and extra-cranial surgery of STP on the long-term outcome. Materials and Methods We retrospectively searched through the database of STBI of a level 1 trauma center facility (Sainte-Anne Military Teaching Hospital, Toulon, France) from 2007 until 2021 looking for patients who benefited from combined cranial and extra-cranial surgery in an acute setting. Results The research yielded 8 patients. The mean age was 35 years old (±14) and the male to female sex ratio was 1.7/1. The trauma mechanism was a fall in 50% of the cases and a traffic accident in 50% of the cases. The median Glasgow coma scale score was 8 (IQR 4) before intubation. The median Injury Severity Score was 41 (IQR 16). Seven patients (88%) presented hypovolemic shock upon admission. Six patients (75%) benefited from damage-control laparotomy among, whom 4 (67%) underwent hemostatic splenectomy. One patient benefited from drainage of tension pneumothorax, and one patient benefited from external fixator of multiple limb fractures. Seven patients (88%) benefited from decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma (5 patients) or major brain contusion (2 patients). One patient (12%) benefited from craniotomy for epidural hematoma. Three patients presented intraoperative profound hypovolemic shock. Six patients (75%) presented a favorable neurologic outcome with minor complications from extra-cranial surgeries and 2 patients died (25%). Conclusion Performing combined life-saving cranial and extra-cranial surgery is feasible and safe as long as the trauma teams are trained according to the principles of damage control. It may be beneficial for the neurologic prognostic of STP with STBI requiring cranial and extra-cranial surgery.

Background A specific training course was formalized in 2007 in order to facilitate the management of cranio-encephalic injuries by French military general surgeons during deployment, within the Advanced Course for Deployment Surgery (ACDS). The objective is to evaluate the neurosurgical pre-deployment training course attended by the military surgeons. Methods From June 2019 to September 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional survey in the form of a digital self-completed questionnaire, addressed to all graduated military surgeons working in the French Military Training Hospitals. The survey included: (1) a knowledge assessment; and (2) a self-assessment of the training course. The participating surgeons were classified into two groups according to their participation (group 1) or not (group 2) in the neurosurgical module. The main outcome was the score received on the knowledge assessment. Results Among the 145 military surgeons currently in service, 76 participated in our study (53%), of which 49 were classified in group 1 (64%) and 27 in group 2 (36%). Group 1 surgeons had a significantly higher score than Group 2 at the knowledge assessment (mean 21.0 ± 7.1 vs. 17.8 ± 6.0, P = 0.041). The most successful questions were related to TBI diagnosis and surgical technique, while the least successful questions dealt with “beyond emergency care” and surgical indications. Conclusion The French pre-deployment neurosurgical training course provides a strong neurosurgical background, sufficient to perform life-saving procedures in a modern conflict situation. However, neurosurgical specialized advice should be solicited whenever possible to assist the in-theatre surgeon in surgical decisions.

Introduction Unlike orthopedic or visceral surgeons, French military neurosurgeons are not permanently deployed on the conflict zone. Thus, craniocerebral war casualties are often managed by general surgeons in the mobile field surgical team. The objective of the study was to provide the feedback of French military surgeons who operated on craniocerebral injuries during their deployment in a role 2 surgical hospital without a neurosurgeon. Materials and Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted by phone in March 2020, involving every military surgeon currently working in the French Military Training Hospitals, with an experience of cranial surgery without the support of a neurosurgeon during deployment. We strived to obtain contextual, clinical, radiological, and surgical data. Results A total of 33 cranial procedures involving 64 surgeons were reported from 1993 to 2018. A preoperative CT scan was not available in 18 patients (55%). Half of the procedures consisted in debridement of craniocerebral wounds (52%, n = 17), followed by decompressive craniectomies (30%, n = 10), craniotomy with hematoma evacuation (15%, n = 5), and finally one (3%) surgery with exploratory burr holes were performed. The 30-day survival rate was 52% (n = 17) and 50% (n = 10/20) among the patients who sustained severe traumatic brain injury. Conclusions This survey demonstrates the feasibility and the plus-value of a neurosurgical damage control procedure performed on the field by a surgeon nonspecialized in cranial surgery. The stereotyped neurosurgical techniques used by the in-theater surgeon were learned during a specific predeployment training course. However, the use of a live telemedicine neurosurgical support seems indispensable and could benefit the general surgeon in strained resources setting.

Background During deployment of military medical teams similarly to prehospital practice, without immediate computed tomography scan access, identifying patients requiring neuro-specific care to manage pragmatic triage proves crucial. We assessed the contribution of this portable near-infrared spectroscope (NIRS) handheld device, Infrascanner Model 2000 (InfraScan Inc.; Philadelphia, PA), to screen patients suspected to require specific neurosurgical care. Materials and methods This single-center retrospective analysis was based on the data from the medical records of the traumatic brain injured patients. We analyzed all the patients strictly over 18 years old presenting a clinical history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Results Thirty-seven medical records of patients admitted for TBI met the inclusion criteria for our analysis. The median GCS was 9 [3-14]. Eight patients (21.6%) underwent neurosurgery and 25 (67.6%) required intensive care unit (ICU) admission, after initial assessment and resuscitation. The NIRS was the most sensible to detect intracranial hematoma (n = 21), intracranial hematoma leading to surgery (n = 8), and intracranial hematoma leading to admission in ICU (n = 25). Its negative predictive value was 100% regarding hematomas leading to surgery. False-positive results were encountered in 10 cases (27.0%). Excluding cases harboring confounding extracranial hematomas, parietal area was still the most represented (n = 3). Conclusion The NIRS was relevant to detect hematoma leading to prompt surgery in our study. The lack of specificity in a nonselected cohort of patients underlines the need to associate simple clinical feature such as neurological deficit and NIRS results to perform rational triage.

BackgroundFrom a series of penetrating head and neck trauma managed in a level-1 Trauma Center, the main aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for early definitive airway management, during pre-hospital time or in the emergency room. The secondary objective was to perform a descriptive epidemiological analysis of the series.MethodsA single-center retrospective study was conducted between January 1 2012 and June 30 2020. in a French Level 1 Trauma Center. The patients included were adults treated for penetrating head and neck trauma, regardless of the mechanism and the causal agent.Results 56 patients were included. Ballistic origin, Shock Index >0.9 and active bleeding in the emergency room were predictive criteria for definitive airway management during pre-hospital time or in the emergency room. 78.6% of patients were male. Median age was 54 years. The trauma followed a suicide attempt in 50% of cases, an accident in 26.7% and an assault in 23.2%, with use of a knife in 42.9% and firearm in 26.8%. Mortality was 10.7%. 16.1% of patients had undergone pre-hospital intubation and 19.1% intubation in the emergency room. CT scan was performed in 87.5% of cases, surgery in 96.4% and tracheotomy in 37.5%. A laryngotracheal lesion was seen in 14.2%. In 50% of patients, primary admission was to intensive care. Conclusions Ballistic origin, Shock Index >0.9 and active bleeding in the emergency room were predictive criteria for early definitive airway management. This study established the profile of patients suffering from penetrating head and neck trauma managed in a Trauma Center over a period of 9 years.

Spontaneous acute subdural hematoma should raise clinical suspicion for underlying pathology, the most common etiology being a ruptured aneurysm. Through this case report, our team developed a clinical decision-making tool to help physicians decide when it is necessary to order an acute subdural hematoma to assess for ruptured aneurysm.

Resume Les derivations ventriculo-peritoneales (DVP) constituent le traitement recommande des hydrocephalies chroniques. Elles comportent un taux non negligeable de complications abdominales. La necessite d’une prise en charge chirurgicale conjointe abdominale et neurologique est une situation courante. Le but de ce travail est de decrire les complications abdominales des DVP et leur prise en charge. Cette mise au point traite : (1) des complications abdominales aigues ou chroniques apres pose de DVP, notamment celles demandant une prise en charge par des chirurgiens visceraux ; et (2), des precautions particulieres devant etre prises, par les 2 specialistes, neurochirurgien et chirurgien visceral, lors d’intervention abdominales chez des patients porteurs de DVP.

Acute spinal cord compression usually results from trauma, infection, or cancer. Spinal subdural hematoma is an uncommon cause of spinal cord compression that occurs after spine trauma or spinal invasive procedure, especially in context of coagulopathy. In the following reported case, an 82-year-old woman with a history of rapidly progressive paraparesis after a sudden middle back pain, with no previous trauma or coagulopathy, due to an acute spontaneous spinal subdural hematoma. In fact, the main difficulty was to determine, in an emergency situation, the right strategy to identify both the lesion and its cause to adapt therapeutics. This case not only provides an illustrative unusual condition in an emergency department but also a challenging discussion to choose the right treatment for a sudden neurological impairment. According to a literature review of the idiopathic cases of spinal subdural hematomas without coagulopathy, the clinical outcome depends on severity of neurological impairment. MRI is the main examination to perform in an emergency. Thus surgical evacuation should be performed in emergency in patients presenting with severe neurological impairment.

Background Anterior lumbar approach, routinely used in spinal surgery, provides many advantages, specifically avoidance of manipulation and potential injury to nervous system structures; it also provides indirect central and foraminal decompression, with a complication rate of 1%–3%. Chyloretroperitoneum is a rare complication of spinal procedures using anterior lumbar approach. The aim of this study was to discuss diagnosis, treatment, and management of chyloretroperitoneum based on review of the international literature through 2017. Methods The literature review was conducted using the terms “chyloretroperitoneum,” “spinal surgery,” and “lymphocele.” Additionally, an illustrative case of chyloretroperitoneum following anterior retroperitoneal lumbar approach was presented. Results In 33 cases, including the present case, clinical symptoms appeared after discharge in 75.8% (n = 25) and reflected direct mass effect. Abdominopelvic computed tomography permitted assessment of the fluid collection observed as a hypodense collection around the psoas muscle. In 24 cases, drainage of the chyloretroperitoneum was maintained for a mean duration of 2.9 days. Surgery was performed in 14 patients (42.4%) owing to lymphatic collection. In 5 cases, surgery was performed for direct lymphatic vessel treatment. Laparoscopic marsupialization of the collection and peritoneal fenestration were performed, especially after percutaneous drainage failure. Conclusions Computed tomography was the most useful imaging modality for diagnosis and assessment of associated complications. If puncture alone is not sufficient and should be avoided, percutaneous computed tomography–guided drainage with sclerosing agent administration appears to be a safe and efficient first-line treatment. Laparoscopic fenestration should be used in cases of complicated or recurrent lymphoceles.