Search

Background and objectives Assessment of HBV-NAT testing compared to HBsAg and anti-HBc screening in German blood establishments for the period 2008-2015. Materials and methods Blood donations screened for HBsAg and anti-HBc along with HBV-NAT were evaluated. Sensitivity of HBsAg and HBV-NAT tests was compared in 30 HBV seroconversion panels and with the viral load of the NAT-only cases. Residual risk for HBV in the WP was modelled. Results A total of 45 270 111 donations were evaluated. There were 29 NAT-only cases in the HBsAg-negative HBV-WP, one by ID-NAT and 28 by MP-NAT. MP-NAT, on average, showed higher sensitivity than HBsAg testing: MP-NAT-LoD of 146 IU/ml vs. 362 IU/ml HBV DNA for positive HBsAg detection (range 135-1502 IU/ml), resulting in 3·1 days (range 2·0-4·8 days) earlier HBV detection. Viral loads of the NAT-only cases confirmed the sensitivity of the HBV tests in the seroconversion study. One HBsAg-negative case was due to a new HBsAg mutant combination. There was one HBsAg-reactive only case. In addition, HBV incidence in the HBV-WP included 41 HBsAg-/HBV-NAT-positives and three HBV transmission cases. The residual risk for HBsAg was estimated to be 1:1 619 419-1 268 474 compared to 1:2 793 365-2 134 702 for MP-NAT. Within chronic HBV (HBsAg-/anti-HBc-positive and MP-NAT-negative) 70% were ID-NAT positive at low viral load (median 20 IU/ml). Among anti-HBc-only, supplementary ID-NAT detected 23 occult HBV infections. Conclusions In the HBV-WP, MP-NAT provided a higher sensitivity than HBsAg testing, obtained a considerably higher yield and reduced the risk for HBV transmission. In later HBV stages, anti-HBc screening and HBV-ID-NAT intercepted potentially infectious donations.

Background: Blood product safety was significantly improved by the introduction of NAT testing in the late 1990s, resulting in a strong decrease of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs). Due to the occurrence of HIV-1 NAT test failures as a consequence of mismatch mutations in the amplicon regions of mono-target NAT assays, the Paul Ehrlich Institute mandated the implementation of multi-target NAT assays for HIV-1 in 2014. Commercial suppliers mostly developed dual-target NAT assays, with only one implementing a triple-target NAT assay. Methods: The HIV-1 triple-target NAT assay v3 (GFE Blut) was tested on mutated specimens and synthetic DNA bearing mutations that resulted in sample underquantification or false-negative test results. In addition, data from 2 years routine testing at three German Red Cross Blood centres were analysed. Results: The HIV-1 triple-target PCR could compensate for all mutations tested and could compensate the loss of one amplicon without a significant loss of sensitivity. Data from 2 years routine testing showed a solid performance. Conclusion: The HIV-1 triple-target v3 assay (GFE Blut) can compensate mutations in target sequences better than a dual-target assay and is applicable to high-throughput screening, thus increasing blood product safety.

International survey on NAT testing of blood donations : expanding implementation and yield from 1999 to 2009.

BACKGROUND: Five cases of human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 (HIV-1) RNA–positive blood donations are described that escaped detection by three different CE-marked nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT) screening assays. These events were associated with two HIV-1 transmissions to recipients of blood components. The implicated NAT assays are monotarget assays and amplify in different viral genome regions (group-specific antigen or long terminal repeat). Investigations into the cause of the false-negative test results were initiated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma specimens of the five NAT false-negative cases were comparatively investigated in 12 CE-marked HIV-1 NAT systems of differing design. The relative amplification efficiency for the HIV-1 variant was determined for each assay. Sequencing of the variants in the region targeted by each false-negative NAT assay allowed comparison with the respective primers and probes. RESULTS: Some of the NAT assays designed in a similar way to false-negative monotarget NATs also revealed deficiencies in detecting the viral variants. In each case sequencing of the assay target region in the variants demonstrated mismatches with primers and probes used by the assays. Some dual-target assays showed decreased amplification efficiency, but not false-negative results. CONCLUSION: HIV is characterized by its rapid evolution of new viral variants. The evolution of new sequences is unpredictable; NAT screening assays with a single target region appear to be more vulnerable to sequence variations than dual-target assays. Based on this experience with false-negative tests results by monotarget NAT assays, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut is considering requesting dual-target NAT assays for HIV-1 blood donation screening in Germany.

Background In 1997 the German Red Cross (GRC) blood donor services introduced mini-pool nucleic acid testing (NAT) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) to increase blood safety. With the new cobas s 201/cobas TaqScreen MPX, a fully automated extraction method and a multiplex amplification system specifically adapted to the needs of blood donation services is available. Methods The cobas s 201 system was evaluated at the GRC BTS locations Hagen, Springe and Frankfurt. In phase A, the analytical sensitivity for the detection of HBV, HCV and HIV-1 was investigated and in phase B, at least 60 000 samples at each test site were screened in parallel with the MPX test on s 201 system and the existing routine mini-pool NAT system to compare the diagnostic specificity and the diagnostic sensitivity. Results Comparable analytical sensitivities in a range of 1·6–3·6 IU/ml, 4·9–10·9 IU/ml and 14·7–26·6 IU/ml for HBV, HCV HIV, respectively, for the MPX test on s 201 system (95% probability based on probit analysis) were determined at all test sites. The diagnostic sensitivity was 99·8% and the diagnostic specificity was 99·85%. Conclusions The MPX test on s 201 system is a fully automated NAT system suitable for routine blood donor screening. The analytical sensitivity as well as the diagnostic sensitivity fulfilled all requirements of the Paul Ehrlich Institute for blood donor screening in mini-pools up to 96 donations per pool. A major benefit of the automated NAT system is the reduced personnel time and the extensive complete barcode-controlled process documentation.

Five blood donors with occult persistent and one donor with an early window phase HBV infection were identified. They were negative in regular HBsAg screening and had low levels of HBV DNA that were probably not detectable by current mini-pool nucleic acid amplification testing. In four donors several mutations were found located in the HBs antigen loop. In three donors the mutations were predominantly outside the "a" determinant; one donor had a wild type HBsAg sequence. Fifty-five recipients of donations from the persistently infected donors could be tested for previous or ongoing HBV infection and of them 53% (29/55) were anti-HBc positive. Based on the prevalence of anti-HBc in Germany (7%), it was assumed that four of those recipients had already been positive before transfusion. In 22 cases, it was assumed that they acquired infection by the donations, but the infection remained asymptomatic and was resolved. In three cases transmission was proven by the time course of the acute infection and sequence identity The resulting infection was fatal and associated with immunological disorders at the time of transmission: in one case sepsis and in the othertwo cases immunosuppression. In a further asymptomatic case of proven transmission from the early window phase donation passively administered anti-HBs could not prevent spread of wildtype HBV but antiviral treatment lead to resolution. Surprisingly the typical acute hepatitis B was not observed in a single one of the 26 cases of assumed or proven transmission.

Five cases of human immunodeficiency virus Type 1 (HIV-1) RNA-positive blood donations are described that escaped detection by three different CE-marked nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT) screening assays. These events were associated with two HIV-1 transmissions to recipients of blood components. The implicated NAT assays are monotarget assays and amplify in different viral genome regions (group-specific antigen or long terminal repeat). Investigations into the cause of the false-negative test results were initiated.Plasma specimens of the five NAT false-negative cases were comparatively investigated in 12 CE-marked HIV-1 NAT systems of differing design. The relative amplification efficiency for the HIV-1 variant was determined for each assay. Sequencing of the variants in the region targeted by each false-negative NAT assay allowed comparison with the respective primers and probes.Some of the NAT assays designed in a similar way to false-negative monotarget NATs also revealed deficiencies in detecting the viral variants. In each case sequencing of the assay target region in the variants demonstrated mismatches with primers and probes used by the assays. Some dual-target assays showed decreased amplification efficiency, but not false-negative results.HIV is characterized by its rapid evolution of new viral variants. The evolution of new sequences is unpredictable; NAT screening assays with a single target region appear to be more vulnerable to sequence variations than dual-target assays. Based on this experience with false-negative tests results by monotarget NAT assays, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut is considering requesting dual-target NAT assays for HIV-1 blood donation screening in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The risk of transfusion-transmitted human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections is predominantly attributable to donations given during the early stage of infection when diagnostic tests may fail. In 1997, nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT)-testing was introduced at the German Red Cross (GRC) blood donor services to reduce this diagnostic window period (WP). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 31,524,571 blood donations collected from 1997 through 2005 were screened by minipool NAT, predominantly with pool sizes of 96 donations. These donations cover approximately 80 percent of all the blood collected in Germany during that period. Based on these data, the WP risk in the GRC blood donor population was estimated by using a state-of-the-art mathematic model. RESULTS: During the observation period, 23 HCV, 7 HIV-1, and 43 HBV NAT-only–positive donations were detected. On the basis of these data and estimated pre-NAT infectious WPs, the residual risk per unit transfused was estimated at 1 in 10.88 million for HCV (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.51-19.72 million), 1 in 4.30 million for HIV-1 (95% CI, 2.39-21.37 million), and 1 in 360,000 for HBV (95% CI, 0.19-3.36 million). Based on observed cases of breakthrough infections, the risk of transfusion-related infections may be even lower. CONCLUSION: The risk of a blood recipient becoming infected with HCV, HIV-1, or HBV has reached an extremely low level. Introduction of individual donation testing for HCV and HIV-1 would have a marginal effect on interception of WP donations.