Search

Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) VII is an ultra‐rare, progressively debilitating, life‐threatening lysosomal disease caused by deficiency of the enzyme, β‐glucuronidase. Vestronidase alfa is an approved enzyme replacement therapy for MPS VII. UX003‐CL301 was a phase 3, randomized, placebo‐controlled, blind‐start study examining the efficacy and safety of vestronidase alfa 4 mg/kg intravenously administered every 2 weeks to 12 patients with MPS VII. Due to the rarity of disease, broad eligibility criteria resulted in a highly heterogeneous population with variable symptoms. For an integrated view of the diverse data, the changes from baseline (or randomization for the placebo period) in clinical endpoints were grouped into three functional domains (mobility, fatigue, and fine motor + self‐care) and analyzed post‐hoc as subject‐level heat maps. Mobility assessments included the 6‐minute walk test, 3‐minute stair climb test, Bruininks‐Oseretsky test (BOT‐2) gross motor function subtests, and patient‐reported outcome assessments (PROs) related to movement, pain, and ambulation. Fatigue assessments included the Pediatric Quality of Life Multidimensional Fatigue Scale and other fatigue‐related PROs. Fine motor + self‐care assessments included BOT‐2 fine motor function subtests and PROs for eating, dressing, hygiene, and caregiver assistance. Most subjects showed improvement in at least one domain. Two subjects improved in two or more domains and two subjects did not show clear improvement in any domain. Both severely and mildly affected subjects improved with vestronidase alfa in clinical assessments, PRO results, or both. Heat map analysis demonstrates how subjects responded to treatment across multiple domains, providing a useful visual tool for studying rare diseases with variable symptoms.

Introduction Mucopolysaccharidosis type VII (MPS VII, Sly Syndrome) is a progressive, debilitating, ultra-rare lysosomal storage disorder caused by the deficiency of β-glucuronidase (GUS), an enzyme required for breakdown of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Vestronidase alfa, a recombinant human GUS, is an enzyme replacement therapy approved in the US and EU for the treatment of MPS VII. Methods The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of vestronidase alfa were evaluated in 23 adult and pediatric subjects with MPS VII enrolled in phase I–III clinical trials to optimize the clinical dosing regimen of vestronidase alfa. The serum concentration-time profiles were adequately described by a two-compartment population PK model incorporating subjects’ body weight as the only significant covariate. Results Model-based simulations predicted a substantially decreased time duration of serum exposures exceeding the level of Kuptake (the in vitro determined vestronidase alfa concentration corresponding to 50% maximum rate of cellular uptake) for 4 or 8 mg/kg once every 4 weeks dosing, compared with 4 mg/kg once every other week (QOW) dosing by intravenous infusion, suggesting that given the same total monthly dose, the QOW dosing frequency should result in more efficient delivery to the GUS-deficient tissue cells, and therefore superior treatment efficacy. A standard inhibitory maximal effect model reasonably explained the observed pharmacological PD responses of reduction in urinary GAGs from pretreatment baseline, which appeared to have reached the plateau of maximal effect at the 4 mg/kg QOW dose. Conclusion The modeling results, together with the clinical evidence of safety and efficacy, supported the recommended 4 mg/kg QOW dosing regimen of vestronidase alfa for pediatric and adult patients with MPS VII. Clinical Trial Registration NCT01856218, NCT02418455, NCT02230566. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40262-018-0721-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objective: To report and discuss the multi-domain impact of elosulfase alfa, with focus on tertiary and composite endpoints, in the 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in patients with Morquio A syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis IVA). Methods: Patients with Morquio A syndrome >= 5 aged years were randomized 1:1:1 to elosulfase alfa 2.0 mg/kg/week (qw; N = 58), elosulfase alfa 2.0 mg/kg/every other week (qow; N = 59), or placebo (N = 59) for 24 weeks. Primary and secondary efficacy measures were 6-minute walk test (6MWT; primary), 3-minute stair climb test (3-MSCT) and urinary keratan sulfate (KS). Safety was also evaluated. Tertiary efficacy measures included respiratory function measures, activities of daily living (MPS Health Assessment Questionnaire [MPS-HAQ]), anthropometric, echocardiographic and radiographic measures, hearing and corneal clouding assessment. In order to fully characterize treatment impact in this heterogeneous disorder, the effect of elosulfase alfa on composite efficacy measures was evaluated as well. Results: The study was not designed to have sufficient power for any of the tertiary outcomes. For most tertiary endpoints, subjects treated with the weekly dose of elosulfase alfa improved more than those receiving placebo. The largest treatment effects were seen in maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), MPS-HAQ height, and growth rate. The qow group appeared similar to placebo. The analysis of a pre-specified composite endpoint (combining changes from baseline in 6MWT, 3MSCT and MW z-scores equally weighted) showed a modest positive impact of elosulfase alfa qw versus placebo group (P = 0.053). As a pre-specified supportive analysis, the O'Brien Rank Sum composite endpoint (changes from baseline in 6MWT, 3MSC, and MW), analysis also showed that the qw group performed better than the placebo group (P = 0.011). In post-hoc analyses, combinations of other endpoints were also explored using the O'Brien Rank Sum test and showed statistically significant differences between elosulfase alfa qw and placebo favoring elosulfase alfa qw. Differences between elosulfase alfa qow and placebo were not statistically significant. Positive changes were observed in most tertiary variables, demonstrating the efficacy of weekly treatment with elosulfase alfa. Conclusions: Treatment with weekly elosulfase alfa led to improvements across most efficacy measures, resulting in clinically meaningful benefits in a heterogeneous study population. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/)

Drug development for ultra-rare diseases is challenging because small sample sizes and heterogeneous study populations hamper the ability of randomized, placebo-controlled trials with a single primary endpoint to demonstrate valid treatment effects.To overcome these challenges, a novel Blind Start design was utilized in a study of vestronidase alfa in mucopolysaccharidosis VII (Sly syndrome), an ultra-rare lysosomal disease, that demonstrates the strengths of this approach in a challenging drug-development setting. Twelve subjects were randomized to 1 of 4 blinded groups, each crossing over to active treatment in a blinded fashion at different timepoints with efficacy analysis comparing the last assessment before cross over to after 24 weeks of treatment. Study assessments included: Percentage change from baseline in urinary GAG (uGAG); a Multi-Domain Responder Index (MDRI) using prespecified minimal important differences (6-Minute Walk Test, Forced Vital Capacity, shoulder flexion, visual acuity, and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency); fatigue as assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Multidimensional Fatigue Scale; and safety.Vestronidase alfa treatment for 24 weeks significantly reduced uGAG excretion (dermatan sulfate: 64.8%, p 0.0001). Most subjects (10/12) had a clinically meaningful improvement in at least one MDRI domain with an overall mean change (±SD) of +0.5 (±0.8) at Treatment Week 24 (p = 0.0527). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of adverse events were similar between groups.The Blind Start study and MDRI design improve statistical power that enhances detection of a positive treatment effect in this rare heterogeneous disease and could be utilized for other ultra-rare diseases.

Patients with mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS), and Morquio A syndrome (MPS IVA) in particular, often report substantial pain burden. MOR-008 was a randomized, double-blind, pilot study assessing the safety and efficacy, including impact on patient-reported pain, of 52 weeks of treatment with elosulfase alfa (at a dose of 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg/week) in patients with Morquio A syndrome (≥7 years old). Assessment of pain at baseline revealed that patients (N = 25) had a mean number of pain locations of 5.7, mean pain intensity score of 4.6 (indicative of medium pain), and a mean number of selected pain descriptors of 7.4 words. Treatment with elosulfase alfa improved subjective pain score (reduced to 3.2), pain locations (reduced by a mean of 1 location), and pain descriptor words (reduced to 4.9 words) over 1 year (52 weeks), suggesting that elosulfase alfa can reduce pain in some patients with Morquio A.

Purpose Morquio A syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis IVA [MPS IVA]) is a lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficiency of the enzyme N -acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase, which is required to degrade the glycosaminoglycan keratan sulfate. Morquio A is associated with extensive morbidity and early mortality. Elosulfase alfa is an enzyme replacement therapy that provides a treatment option for patients with Morquio A. We examined the immunogenicity profile of elosulfase alfa, assessing any correlations between antidrug antibodies and the efficacy and safety outcomes in 176 patients with Morquio A from a 24-week international Phase III trial. Methods Patients were randomized to placebo (n = 59) or elosulfase alfa 2.0 mg/kg administered weekly (n = 58) or every other week (n = 59) as an ~4-hour infusion. Blood samples were routinely tested to determine drug-specific total antibody titer and neutralizing antibody (NAb) positivity. Drug-specific immunoglobulin E positivity was tested routinely and in response to severe hypersensitivity adverse events (AEs). Antidrug antibody positivity and titer were compared with efficacy and safety metrics to assess possible correlations. Findings The 176 patients in the trial were 54% female, with a mean age of 11.9 years. In all patients treated with elosulfase alfa antidrug antibodies developed, and in the majority, antibodies capable of interfering with cation-independent mannose-6-phosphate receptor binding in vitro (NAb) developed. Less than 10% of patients tested positive for drug-specific IgE during the study. Despite the high incidence of anti–elosulfase alfa antibodies, no correlations were detected between higher total antibody titers or NAb positivity and worsened 6-minute walk test results, urine keratin sulfate levels, or hypersensitivity AEs. Drug-specific IgE pos i tivity had no apparent association with the occurrence of anaphylaxis, other hypersensitivity AEs, and/or treatment withdrawal. Implications Despite the universal development of antidrug antibodies, elosulfase alfa treatment was both safe and well tolerated and immunogenicity was not associated with reduced treatment effect. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01275066. ( Clin Ther.