Search

Background and objectives Many patients, providers, and potential living donors perceive the living kidney donor evaluation process to be lengthy and difficult to navigate. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We sought consensus on key terms and process and outcome indicators that can be used to measure how efficiently a transplant center evaluates persons interested in becoming a living kidney donor. Using a RAND-modified Delphi method, 77 participants (kidney transplant recipients or recipient candidates, living kidney donors or donor candidates, health care providers, and health care administrators) completed an online survey to define the terms and indicators. The definitions were then further refined during an in-person meeting with ten stakeholders. Results We identified 16 process indicators (e.g., average time to evaluate a donor candidate), eight outcome indicators (e.g., annual number of preemptive living kidney donor transplants), and two measures that can be considered both process and outcome indicators (e.g., average number of times a candidate visited the transplant center for the evaluation). Transplant centers wishing to implement this set of indicators will require 22 unique data elements, all of which are either readily available or easily collected prospectively. Conclusions We identified a set of indicators through a consensus-based approach that may be used to monitor and improve the performance of a transplant center in how efficiently it evaluates persons interested in becoming a living kidney donor.

ObjectiveIn 2015, the Canadian Vasculitis Research Network (CanVasc) created recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) in Canada. The current update aims to revise existing recommendations and create additional recommendations, as needed, based on a review of new available evidence.MethodsA needs assessment survey of CanVasc members informed questions for an updated systematic literature review (publications spanning May 2014 to September 2019) using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. New and revised recommendations were developed and categorized according to the level of evidence and strength of each recommendation. The CanVasc working group used a 2-step modified Delphi procedure to reach > 80% consensus on the inclusion, wording, and grading of each new and revised recommendation.ResultsEleven new and 16 revised recommendations were created and 12 original (2015) recommendations were retained. New and revised recommendations are discussed in detail within this document. Five original recommendations were removed, of which 4 were incorporated into the explanatory text. The supplementary material for practical use was revised to reflect the updated recommendations.ConclusionThe 2020 updated recommendations provide rheumatologists, nephrologists, and other specialists caring for patients with AAV in Canada with new management guidance, based on current evidence and consensus from Canadian experts.

Background Living kidney donors incur donation-related expenses, but how these expenses impact postdonation mental health is unknown. Methods In this prospective cohort study, the association between mental health and donor-incurred expenses (both out-of-pocket costs and lost wages) was examined in 821 people who donated a kidney at one of the 12 transplant centers in Canada between 2009 and 2014. Mental health was measured by the RAND Short Form-36 Health Survey along with Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory. Results A total of 209 donors (25%) reported expenses of >5500 Canadian dollars. Compared with donors who incurred lower expenses, those who incurred higher expenses demonstrated significantly worse mental health-related quality of life 3 months after donation, with a trend towards worse anxiety and depression, after controlling for predonation mental health-related quality of life and other risk factors for psychological distress. Between-group differences for donors with lower and higher expenses on these measures were no longer significant 12 months after donation. Conclusions Living kidney donor transplant programs should ensure that adequate psychosocial support is available to all donors who need it, based on known and unknown risk factors. Efforts to minimize donor-incurred expenses and to better support the mental well-being of donors need to continue. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of donor reimbursement programs, which mitigate donor expenses, on postdonation mental health.

Living kidney donors incur donation-related expenses, but how these expenses impact postdonation mental health is unknown.In this prospective cohort study, the association between mental health and donor-incurred expenses (both out-of-pocket costs and lost wages) was examined in 821 people who donated a kidney at one of the 12 transplant centers in Canada between 2009 and 2014. Mental health was measured by the RAND Short Form-36 Health Survey along with Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory.A total of 209 donors (25%) reported expenses of5500 Canadian dollars. Compared with donors who incurred lower expenses, those who incurred higher expenses demonstrated significantly worse mental health-related quality of life 3 months after donation, with a trend towards worse anxiety and depression, after controlling for predonation mental health-related quality of life and other risk factors for psychological distress. Between-group differences for donors with lower and higher expenses on these measures were no longer significant 12 months after donation.Living kidney donor transplant programs should ensure that adequate psychosocial support is available to all donors who need it, based on known and unknown risk factors. Efforts to minimize donor-incurred expenses and to better support the mental well-being of donors need to continue. Further research is needed to investigate the effect of donor reimbursement programs, which mitigate donor expenses, on postdonation mental health.

To review an international guideline on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors and provide a commentary on the applicability of the recommendations to the Canadian donor population.We reviewed the 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors and compared this guideline to the Canadian 2014 Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Protocol for Participating Donors.A working group was formed consisting of members from the Canadian Society of Transplantation and the Canadian Society of Nephrology. Members were selected to have representation from across Canada and in various subspecialties related to living kidney donation, including nephrology, surgery, transplantation, pediatrics, and ethics.Many of the KDIGO Guideline recommendations align with the KPD Protocol recommendations. Canadian researchers have contributed to much of the evidence on donor evaluation and outcomes used to support the KDIGO Guideline recommendations.Certain outcomes and risk assessment tools have yet to be validated in the Canadian donor population.Living kidney donors should be counseled on the risks of postdonation outcomes given recent evidence, understanding the limitations of the literature with respect to its generalizability to the Canadian donor population.Examiner une directive internationale sur l’évaluation et la prise en charge des donneurs vivants d’un rein et formuler un commentaire sur l’applicabilité de ces recommandations à la population des donneurs canadiens.Nous avons révisé le guide des pratiques cliniques relatives à l’évaluation et à la prise en charge des donneurs vivants d’un rein (Un groupe de travail réunissant des membres de la Société canadienne de transplantation et de la Société canadienne de néphrologie a été formé. Les membres ont été sélectionnés pour représenter tout le Canada et plusieurs sous-spécialisations relatives au don vivant d’un rein, notamment la néphrologie, la chirurgie, la transplantation, la pédiatrie et l’éthique.Plusieurs des recommandations du KDIGO s’harmonisent aux recommandations du protocole de don croisé d’un rein. Les chercheurs canadiens ont contribué en grande partie aux données sur l’évaluation des donneurs et des résultats utilisées pour appuyer les recommandations formulées dans les lignes directrices du KDIGO.Certains résultats et outils d’évaluation des risques doivent encore être validés dans la population des donneurs canadiens.Compte tenu des plus récentes données, les donneurs vivants d’un rein devraient être mis en garde concernant les risques sur leur santé post-don, tout en comprenant les limites de la littérature en ce qui concerne leur généralisabilité à la population de donneurs canadiens.

Background Preemptive kidney transplants result in better outcomes and patient experiences than transplantation after dialysis onset. It is unknown how often a person initiates maintenance dialysis before living kidney donor transplantation when their donor candidate evaluation is well underway. Methods Using healthcare databases, we retrospectively studied 478 living donor kidney transplants from 2004 to 2014 across 5 transplant centers in Ontario, Canada, where the recipients were not receiving dialysis when their donor’s evaluation was well underway. We also explored some factors associated with a higher likelihood of dialysis initiation before transplant. Results A total of 167 (35%) of 478 persons with kidney failure initiated dialysis in a median of 9.7 months (25th-75th percentile, 5.4-18.7 months) after their donor candidate began their evaluation and received dialysis for a median of 8.8 months (3.6-16.9 months) before kidney transplantation. The total cohort’s dialysis cost was CAD $8.1 million, and 44 (26%) of 167 recipients initiated their dialysis urgently in hospital. The median total donor evaluation time (time from evaluation start to donation) was 10.6 months (6.4-21.6 months) for preemptive transplants and 22.4 months (13.1-38.7 months) for donors whose recipients started dialysis before transplant. Recipients were more likely to start dialysis if their donor was female, nonwhite, lived in a lower-income neighborhood, and if the transplant center received the recipient referral later. Conclusion One third of persons initiated dialysis before receiving their living kidney donor transplant, despite their donor’s evaluation being well underway. Future studies should consider whether some of these events can be prevented by addressing inappropriate delays to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Although living kidney donation is safe, some donors experience perioperative complications.This study explored how perioperative complications affected donor-reported health-related quality of life, depression, and anxiety.This research was a conducted as a prospective cohort study.Twelve transplant centers across Canada.A total of 912 living kidney donors were included in this study.Short Form 36 health survey, Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory.Living kidney donors were prospectively enrolled predonation between 2009 to 2014. Donor perioperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Mental and physical health-related quality of life was assessed with the 3 measurements; measurements were taken predonation and at 3- and 12-months postdonation.Seventy-four donors (8%) experienced a perioperative complication; most were minor (n = 67 [91%]), and all minor complications resolved before hospital discharge. The presence (versus absence) of a perioperative complication was associated with lower mental health-related quality of life and higher depression symptoms 3-month postdonation; neither of these differences persisted at 12-month. Perioperative complications were not associated with any changes in physical health-related quality of life or anxiety 3-month postdonation.Minor complications may have been missed and information on complications postdischarge were not collected. No minimal clinically significant change has been defined for kidney donors across the 3 measurements.These findings highlight a potential opportunity to better support the psychosocial needs of donors who experience perioperative complications in the months following donation.NCT00319579 and NCT00936078.Bien que le don vivant d’un rein soit une procédure sécuritaire, certains donneurs souffrent tout de même de complications périopératoires.Cette étude a examiné l’incidence des complications périopératoires sur la qualité de vie liée à la santé et les symptômes de dépression et d’anxiété rapportés par les donneurs.Étude de cohorte prospective.Douze centers de transplantation à travers le Canada.912 donneurs vivants d’un rein.Un questionnaire abrégé de 36 questions sur l’état de santé, l’inventaire de dépression Beck et l’inventaire d’anxiété Beck.Les donneurs ont été inscrits avant le don de façon prospective entre 2009 et 2014. Les complications périopératoires des donneurs ont été classées à l’aide du système de classification Clavien-Dindo. La qualité de vie liée à la santé physique et mentale a été évaluée à l’aide des trois outils de mesure; ces mesures ont été faites avant le don, puis 3 et 12 mois après le don.Au total, 74 donneurs (8 %) ont souffert d’une complication périopératoire; la plupart étaient mineures (n = 67 [91 %]) et ont été résolues avant le congé de l’hôpital. La présence (par rapport à l’absence) d’une complication périopératoire a été associée à une plus faible qualité de vie liée à la santé mentale et à des symptômes de dépression plus graves 3 mois après le don; aucune de ces différences n’a persisté après 12 mois. Les complications périopératoires n’ont pas été associées à des changements dans la qualité de vie liée à la santé physique ou à l’anxiété 3 mois après le don.Certaines complications mineures ont pu être manquées. L’information sur les complications survenues après le congé n’a pas été recueillie. Dans les trois outils de mesure, aucune variation minimale cliniquement significative n’a été définie pour les donneurs d’un rein.Ces résultats soulignent une occasion de mieux répondre aux besoins psychosociaux des donneurs d’un rein qui présentent des complications périopératoires dans les mois suivant le don.

Purpose Catheter locking solutions such as recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) are used to treat and prevent clotting of hemodialysis (HD) catheters during HD treatments and the interdialytic period. However, evidence to guide the use of rt-PA for catheter dysfunction is limited. Methods We evaluated outcomes using two catheter dysfunction protocols in a cohort of consecutive prevalent dialysis patients (Jan 2013 to Sep 2014) undergoing HD with a tunneled catheter. In the intensive protocol, rt-PA was administered to all catheters based on blood flow and/or line reversal. In the standard protocol, rt-PA administration was based only on blood flow. The primary outcome was the rate of rt-PA use for catheter malfunction (rt-PA treatment days/1000 total line days; [TLD]). Secondary outcomes included the cost of rt-PA/TLD and the rate of catheter-related bacteremia. Results There were 26 and 35 patients managed by the intensive and standard protocols, respectively. The rate of rt-PA use was 52/1000 TLD (intensive) versus 39/1000 TLD (standard) (rate ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.12-1.52 CI, pConclusions Managing catheter dysfunction based on line reversal and blood flow as opposed to only blood flow was associated with a higher rate of rt-PA use, but at a reduced overall cost.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 40% of the kidneys for transplant worldwide come from living donors. Despite advantages of living donor transplants, rates have stagnated in recent years. One possible barrier may be costs related to the transplant process that potential willing donors may incur for travel, parking, accommodation, and lost productivity. METHODS: To better understand and quantify the financial costs incurred by living kidney donors, we conducted a prospective cohort study, recruiting 912 living kidney donors from 12 transplant centers across Canada between 2009 and 2014; 821 of them completed all or a portion of the costing survey. We report microcosted total, out-of-pocket, and lost productivity costs (in 2016 Canadian dollars) for living kidney donors from donor evaluation start to 3 months after donation. We examined costs according to (1) the donor’s relationship with their recipient, including spousal (donation to a partner), emotionally related nonspousal (friend, step-parent, in law), or genetically related; and (2) donation type (directed, paired kidney, or nondirected). RESULTS: Living kidney donors incurred a median (75th percentile) of $1254 ($2589) in out-of-pocket costs and $0 ($1908) in lost productivity costs. On average, total costs were $2226 higher in spousal compared with emotionally related nonspousal donors (P=0.02) and $1664 higher in directed donors compared with nondirected donors (P

BACKGROUND Kidney transplants from living donors with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 80 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) may be at risk for increased graft loss compared with a recipient who receives a kidney from a living donor with a higher eGFR. METHODS This retrospective cohort study considered 2057 living kidney donors and their recipients from July 1993 to March 2010 at five centres in Ontario, Canada, and linked them to population-based, universal healthcare databases. Recipients were divided into five groups based on their donor's baseline eGFR. The median (inter-quartile range) for the lowest eGFR group was 73 (68-77) mL/min per 1.73 m(2). Subjects were followed for a median of 6 years (IQR: 3-10 years). RESULTS There was no significant difference in the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss when comparing recipients in each eGFR category to the referent group (≥110 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)). The adjusted HRs (95% CI) from the lowest (

Catheter-related bloodstream infections, exit-site infections, and tunnel infections are common complications related to hemodialysis central venous catheter use. The various definitions of catheter-related infections are reviewed, and various preventive strategies are discussed. Treatment options, for both empiric and definitive infections, including antibiotic locks and systemic antibiotics, are reviewed.Les bactériémies liées à l’utilisation d’un cathéter, les infections au point d’émergence de celui-ci ainsi que les infections du tunnel constituent les complications les plus courantes associées à l’utilisation d’un cathéter veineux central pour l’hémodialyse. Le présent chapitre expose les multiples définitions d’une infection liée à l’utilisation d’un cathéter pour la dialyse, et discute des stratégies préventives à adopter. On y présente également les options de traitement pour ces infections, empiriques ou définitives, notamment l’ajout d’antibiotiques dans le dispositif de verrouillage du cathéter et l’usage d’antibiotiques systémiques.

Noninfectious hemodialysis catheter complications include catheter dysfunction, catheter-related thrombus, and central vein stenosis. The definitions, causes, and treatment strategies for catheter dysfunction are reviewed below. Catheter-related thrombus is a less common but serious complication of catheters, requiring catheter removal and systemic anticoagulation. In addition, the risk factors, clinical manifestation, and treatment options for central vein stenosis are outlined.La défaillance du cathéter, la formation d’un thrombus en raison de la présence du cathéter et la sténose des veines centrales constituent les principales complications non infectieuses associées à l’utilisation d’un cathéter pour la dialyse. Les définitions de la défaillance du cathéter, ses causes ainsi que les stratégies de traitement préconisées sont discutées dans le présent chapitre. La formation d’un thrombus due à la présence du cathéter est plus rare. Elle représente néanmoins une complication sérieuse qui requiert le retrait du cathéter et l’administration d’un anticoagulant systémique. Enfin, ce chapitre expose les facteurs de risque, les manifestations cliniques ainsi que les options de traitement associés à la sténose des veines centrales.

Complications of vascular access lead to morbidity and may reduce quality of life. In this module, we review both infectious and noninfectious arteriovenous access complications including neuropathy, aneurysm, and high-output access. For the challenging patients who have developed many complications and are now nearing their last vascular access, we highlight some potentially novel approaches.Les complications encourues après la création d’un accès vasculaire entraînent de la morbidité article pour le patient et peuvent contribuer à la diminution de sa qualité de vie. Dans ce chapitre, nous examinons les possibles complications artérioveineuses infectieuses et non infectieuses liées à l’accès vasculaire. La neuropathie, la rupture d’anévrisme et le débit sanguin élevé dans l’accès vasculaire sont notamment abordés. De plus, nous mettons l’accent sur des approches innovantes qui pourraient être utilisées pour les cas complexes de patients ayant développé plusieurs complications, et qui ont peu de sites potentiels pour la création de nouveaux abords vasculaires.

The Canadian Vasculitis research network (CanVasc) is composed of physicians from different medical specialties, including rheumatology and nephrology and researchers with expertise in vasculitis. One of its aims was to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides in Canada. This executive summary features the 19 recommendations and 17 statements addressing general AAV diagnosis and management, developed by CanVasc group based on a synthesis of existing international guidelines, other published supporting evidence and expert consensus considering the Canadian healthcare context.

Objective.The Canadian Vasculitis research network (CanVasc) is composed of physicians from different medical specialties and researchers with expertise in vasculitis. One of its aims is to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) in Canada.Methods.Diagnostic and therapeutic questions were developed based on the results of a national needs assessment survey. A systematic review of existing non-Canadian recommendations and guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AAV and studies of AAV published after the 2009 European League Against Rheumatism/European Vasculitis Society recommendations (publication date: January 2009) until November 2014 was performed in the Medline database, Cochrane library, and main vasculitis conference proceedings. Quality of supporting evidence for each therapeutic recommendation was graded. The full working group as well as additional reviewers, including patients, reviewed the developed therapeutic recommendations and nontherapeutic statements using a modified 2-step Delphi technique and through discussion to reach consensus.Results.Nineteen recommendations and 17 statements addressing general AAV diagnosis and management were developed, as well as appendices for practical use, for rheumatologists, nephrologists, respirologists, general internists, and all other healthcare professionals more occasionally involved in the management of patients with AAV in community and academic practice settings.Conclusion.These recommendations were developed based on a synthesis of existing international guidelines, other published supporting evidence, and expert consensus considering the Canadian healthcare context, with the intention of promoting best practices and improving healthcare delivery for patients with AAV.

Chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) has been identified as an important risk factor for cardiac events. Studies in the United States reported decreased survival and decreased use of surgical and medical interventions after myocardial infarction in patients with CRI.We studied the impact of renal function on health outcomes in a Canadian cohort of consecutive patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) between October 1997 and October 1999. The study design is an observational cohort of 5,549 adult patients who survived to discharge with a discharge diagnosis of ACS. Renal function is classified into 4 levels: (1) normal, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) greater than 80 mL/min/1.73 m2 (1.33 mL/s); (2) mild CRI, GFR of 60 to 80 mL/min/1.73 m2 (1.00 to 1.33 mL/s); (3) moderate CRI, GFR of 30 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2 (0.50 to 0.98 mL/s); and (4) severe CRI, GFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (0.50 mL/s). The primary outcome is death.Advanced and moderate CRI independently predicted death (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.12; and hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.29). Severe anemia (hemoglobin level9.0 g/dL [90 g/L]) also was an independent risk factor for death (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.61). Use of beta-blockers (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.97), acetylsalicylic acid (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.97), lipid-lowering therapy (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.89), and medical thrombolysis (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.97) were associated with reduced risk for death. Medical interventions with beta-blockers, acetylsalicylic acid, lipid-lowering therapy, and thrombolysis and surgical intervention were significantly less likely to be used in patients with CRI.Despite universal access to health care, Canadian patients with CRI are more likely to die after a cardiac event and less likely to receive important interventions.

Young women wishing to become living kidney donors frequently ask whether nephrectomy will affect their future pregnancies.We conducted a retrospective cohort study of living kidney donors involving 85 women (131 pregnancies after cohort entry) who were matched in a 1:6 ratio with 510 healthy nondonors from the general population (788 pregnancies after cohort entry). Kidney donations occurred between 1992 and 2009 in Ontario, Canada, with follow-up through linked health care databases until March 2013. Donors and nondonors were matched with respect to age, year of cohort entry, residency (urban or rural), income, number of pregnancies before cohort entry, and the time to the first pregnancy after cohort entry. The primary outcome was a hospital diagnosis of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes were each component of the primary outcome examined separately and other maternal and fetal outcomes.Gestational hypertension or preeclampsia was more common among living kidney donors than among nondonors (occurring in 15 of 131 pregnancies [11%] vs. 38 of 788 pregnancies [5%]; odds ratio for donors, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 5.0; P=0.01). Each component of the primary outcome was also more common among donors (odds ratio, 2.5 for gestational hypertension and 2.4 for preeclampsia). There were no significant differences between donors and nondonors with respect to rates of preterm birth (8% and 7%, respectively) or low birth weight (6% and 4%, respectively). There were no reports of maternal death, stillbirth, or neonatal death among the donors. Most women had uncomplicated pregnancies after donation.Gestational hypertension or preeclampsia was more likely to be diagnosed in kidney donors than in matched nondonors with similar indicators of baseline health. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others.).

BackgroundIn the general population, high serum uric acid concentration is a risk factor for gout. It is unknown whether donating a kidney increases a living donor’s risk of gout as serum uric acid concentration increases in donors after nephrectomy.Study DesignRetrospective matched cohort study using large health care databases.Setting & ParticipantsWe studied living kidney donors who donated in 1992 to 2010 in Ontario, Canada. Matched nondonors were selected from the healthiest segment of the general population. 1,988 donors and 19,880 matched nondonors were followed up for a median of 8.4 (maximum, 20.8) years.PredictorLiving kidney donor nephrectomy.OutcomesThe primary outcome was time to a diagnosis of gout. The secondary outcome in a subpopulation was receipt of medications typically used to treat gout (allopurinol or colchicine).MeasurementsWe assessed the primary outcome with health care diagnostic codes.ResultsDonors compared with nondonors were more likely to be given a diagnosis of gout (3.4% vs 2.0%; 3.5 vs 2.1 events/1,000 person-years; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.1; P

When making decisions regarding vascular access creation, the clinician and vascular access team must evaluate each patient individually with consideration of life expectancy, timelines for dialysis start, risks and benefits of access creation, referral wait times, as well as the risk for access complications. The role of the multidisciplinary team in facilitating access choice is reviewed, as well as the clinical evaluation of the patient.Au moment de prendre la décision de créer un accès vasculaire, le médecin traitant et l’équipe qui le soutient se doivent d’évaluer chaque patient de façon individuelle et tenir compte de plusieurs facteurs. Ces derniers incluent l’espérance de vie du patient, l’échéancier à respecter pour le démarrage de la dialyse, les risques et les avantages liés à la création d’un accès vasculaire, les temps d’attente à prévoir pour la consultation, de même que les risques de complications encourus à la suite de la procédure. Ce chapitre évalue le rôle de facilitateur que joue l’équipe multidisciplinaire dans la prise de décision de créer un accès vasculaire, de même que l’examen clinique du patient.

Vascular access-related complications can lead to patient morbidity and reduced patient quality of life. Some of the common arteriovenous access complications include failure to mature, stenosis formation, and thrombosis.Les complications liées à la création d’un accès vasculaire peuvent s’avérer une cause de morbidité et entraîner une réduction de la qualité de vie du patient. Les complications artérioveineuses les plus répandues incluent un défaut de maturation et le développement d’une sténose ou d’une thrombose.

We implemented a protocol at our center to automate intravenous vancomycin dosing in hemodialysis patients. The effectiveness of this protocol is evaluated.This was a prospective cohort study of all hemodialysis patients in our unit. Patients were enrolled from August 2005 to May 2007. Thirty-eight episodes of infection required vancomycin in 32 patients over the study period. All patients were dialyzed with an F8 or F160 (Fresenius) membrane. A load of vancomycin was administered based on weight to a maximum of 1,500 mg in the last 90 minutes of dialysis. Subsequent doses were 500 mg with each dialysis. Trough levels were taken predialysis prior to the third and fifth doses. If a therapeutic range of 10-20 mg/L was not achieved, the next vancomycin dose was decreased by 50% (if greater than 20 mg/L) or increased by 50% (if less than 10 mg/L).Ninety-three levels were taken; 81 were in range. Of those requiring a dose change, 4 were above 20 mg/L, and 8 were below 10 mg/L. Membrane type did not predict a requirement for dose adjustment (chi-square test: p=0.9341). A dose change after the third dose did not predict subsequent dose adjustments. Thirty-five of the 36 episodes were eradicated with this protocol. No follow-up data were available on 2 infection episodes (censored). No side effects from vancomycin were identified.The protocol successfully achieved therapeutic vancomycin levels and treated infection in our patients. It worked for both high- and low-flux membranes.

Peritoneal dialysis adequacy has an impact on patient mortality. Both the CANUSA study and DOQI Guidelines outline targets for adequacy, and it has been suggested that quantitative adequacy determinations be made at regular intervals. Some groups believe these targets are not achievable because of lack of patient acceptance and high complication rate. We examined the outcome of peritoneal dialysis in a setting where prescription changes are made on clinical grounds, and determined the complication rates and patient acceptance of prescription changes. A total of 154 patients commencing peritoneal dialysis from January 1, 1994,-December 31, 1996, were studied to determine reasons for dialysis prescription changes, patient acceptance of, and complications related to these changes. Point prevalence data for dialysis prescription for our center and other Canadian centers were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Co-morbidity - adjusted patient and technique survival for our center versus other centers in Canada was performed by Poisson regression analysis. Dialysis prescription changes were based on clinical assessment. A total of 102 patients started on either > 8 L of dialysate or had an increase in dialysis prescription during the study period. These patients were heavier, on peritoneal dialysis for longer, and fewer were transplanted compared with the patients on standard prescription (8 L or less). Only 4% of patients refused the change in dialysis prescription, and only 13 peritoneal leaks occurred, resulting in 3 transfers to hemodialysis. Our center prescribed a larger number of exchanges than other Canadian centers in 1995-1997. Adjusted mortality rate ratios for our center versus the other Canadian Centers (1990-1996) are equal. The 3 year technique survival for peritoneal dialysis patients from our center between 1990-1996 was 75% vs. 61 % for other centers in Canada. At last follow-up, > 60% of patients had a Kt/V urea >2.1 and 45% had a creatinine clearance > 70 L/1.73 m 2 /week. This Regional Program has successfully prescribed high volume and frequency peritoneal dialysis on clinical grounds alone. This practice is associated with high patient acceptance, equivalent mortality, and higher technique survival compared with the rest of Canada. ASAIO Journal 2001; 47:224-228.

Objective To determine whether people who donate a kidney have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Design Retrospective population based matched cohort study. Participants All people who were carefully selected to become a living kidney donor in the province of Ontario, Canada, between 1992 and 2009. The information in donor charts was manually reviewed and linked to provincial healthcare databases. Matched non-donors were selected from the healthiest segment of the general population. A total of 2028 donors and 20 280 matched non-donors were followed for a median of 6.5 years (maximum 17.7 years). Median age was 43 at the time of donation (interquartile range 34-50) and 50 at the time of follow-up (42-58). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite of time to death or first major cardiovascular event. The secondary outcome was time to first major cardiovascular event censored for death. Results The risk of the primary outcome of death and major cardiovascular events was lower in donors than in non-donors (2.8 v 4.1 events per 1000 person years; hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.90). The risk of major cardiovascular events censored for death was no different in donors than in non-donors (1.7 v 2.0 events per 1000 person years; 0.85, 0.57 to 1.27). Results were similar in all sensitivity analyses. Older age and lower income were associated with a higher risk of death and major cardiovascular events in both donors and non-donors when each group was analysed separately. Conclusions The risk of major cardiovascular events in donors is no higher in the first decade after kidney donation compared with a similarly healthy segment of the general population. While we will continue to follow people in this study, these interim results add to the evidence base supporting the safety of the practice among carefully selected donors.