Search

SUMMARY 1. The effects of indomethacin (an inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis) on the renal responses to epidermal growth factor (EGF) were investigated in conscious sheep. 2. Ewes (n = 5 per group) received an i.v. saline infusion (150 mL/day) for days 1-8, followed by either vehicle control, 15 μg/h EGF, 2mg/kg per day indomethacin or 15 μg/h EGF with 2 mg/kg per day indomethacin in 150 mL/day saline, i.v., over days 9-12. All ewes subsequently received an i.v. saline infusion (150 mL/day) over days 13-20. 3. Polydipsia, diuresis, transient natriuresis and reduced urine osmolality occurred during EGF treatment alone. There was no effect of EGF on fluid balance, plasma electrolyte or hormone concentrations, plasma osmolality or haematocrit or on the urinary excretion of potassium. 4. Simultaneous infusion of indomethacin with EGF attenuated (P>0.05) the stimulatory effects of EGF infusion alone on urine volume, water intake, natriuresis and urine osmolality. 5. We conclude that prostaglandins may be involved in the diuretic/natriuretic effects of EGF, but may not be the sole mechanism involved.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) has been shown to induce a renal diuresis and natriuresis in sheep and stimulate prostaglandin synthesis from inner rat medullary collecting duct cells in culture. The aims of our study were 1) to investigate whether the renal effects of intravenous infusion of EGF were species specific and 2) to determine the mechanism of these effects by studying the interaction between EGF and indomethacin (a prostaglandin synthase inhibitor) in the conscious rat. Sprague-Dawley rats received intravenous infusions of either 0.9% saline or 0.2 or 2.0 micrograms EGF.kg-1.h-1 over a 6-day period after an initial baseline period. Infusion of 2.0 micrograms EGF.kg-1.h-1 caused an increase in urine volume (baseline: 5.5 +/- 0.2 ml to day 5: 9.0 +/- 0.4 ml, P < 0.01) and corresponding polydipsia, but not natriuresis. Administration of indomethacin with 2.0 micrograms EGF.kg-1.h-1 attenuated (P < 0.05) the diuretic (day 5 EGF + vehicle: 12.2 +/- 1.1 ml vs. EGF + indomethacin: 8.7 +/- 0.9 ml) and polydipsic effects of EGF. These studies demonstrate that intravenous infusion of EGF causes a diuretic effect in rats without natriuresis and that prostaglandins play a role in the diuretic effect of EGF in the rat.

INTRODUCTION Testicular activity in the cockerel is controlled by the brain. Information from the external environment, such as changes in daylength, housing conditions, or social status, and from the internal environment, relating to such factors as nutritional status, somatic maturity, or general bodily health, is integrated in the brain to modulate the secretion of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH). Only small amounts of GnRH are released from the brain and they function as neuroendocrine signals which are amplified by the pituitary gland. Thus, relatively large amounts of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) are released from the pituitary gland in response to a small release of GnRH. The levels of LH and FSH in the peripheral circulation are directly related to testicular activity and to the production of spermatozoa. Avian GnRH is chemically similar but not identical to mammalian luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) (King and Millar, 1979). Mammalian …

1. In Expt 1 a study was made in goats of responses in terms of milk production, nitrogen utilization and plasma amino acids to abomasas infusions of casein (45 g/d) in goats given 2.5 kg/d of a ration containing crude protein (N x 6.25) at 109 (L1) or 146 (H1) g/kg. 2. In Expt 2 a study was made in goats of responses in terms of milk production, nitrogen utilization, plasma amino acids and growth hormone levels to abomasal infusions of casein (45 g/d) or arginine (25 g/d) in goats given 2.3 kg/d of a ration containing crude protein (N x 6.25) at 104 g/kg (L2). These observations were made also in goats given a ration containing crude protein at 136 g/kg (H2). 3. Milk production in Expt 1 was 2.75, 2.45 and 2.76 kg/d on L1+casein, H1 and H1+casein treatments respectively, the response to casein infusion being significant (P less than 0.05). Milk production in Expt 2 was 1.90, 2.04, 1.96 and 1.96 kg/d on L1, L2+casein, L2+arginine and H2 treatments respectively, and the differences were not significant. 4. Total N intake in Expt 1 was 49, 58 and 64 g/d on L1+casein, H1 and H1+casein treatments respectively. Faecal N was similar on the three treatments (14 g/d), urinary N was 15, 23 and 30 g/d and milk N was 14, 12 and 14 g/d on the respective treatments. Total N intake in Expt 2 was 33, 40, 43 and 44 g/d on L2, L2+casein, L2+arginine and H2 treatments respectively. Faecal N was similar on the four treatments (12 g/d), urinary N was 7, 10, 13 and 14 g/d and milk N was 9, 9, 8 and 8 g/d on the respective treatments. 5. The concentration of indispensable amino acids in plasma was increased by casein infusion in both experiments. It was 1279, 825 and 1133 micrometers/l on L1+casein, H1 and H1+casein treatments respectively in Expt 1, and 1081, 1582, 1055 and 1163 micrometers/l on L2, L2+casein, L2+arginine and H2 treatments respectively in Expt 2. 6. The concentration of arginine in plasma was doubled 1 h after the onset of arginine infusion in Expt 2, Growth hormone levels in plasma were not increased when arginine levels rose following arginine infusion. and did not differ between treatments. 7. The results of the two experiments showed that the stimulatory effect on milk production of intra-abomasal infusion of casein was not reproduced by increasing the dietary intake of protein or by infusing arginine. The results of the second experiment showed that abomasal infusion of arginine did not stimulate production of growth hormone and that growth hormone apparently was not implicated in the effects of casein infusion on milk production.

Thirty heifers were given 11 subcutaneous injections of 5 mg estradiol benzoate and 200 mg progesterone every 3 d to develop their mammary glands. Three days later groups of animals were treated with 1) 20 mg dexamethasone twice, 2) 500 micrograms cloprostenol thrice, 3) dexamethasone and cloprostenol, 4) oxytocin 4 IU six times, or 5) no further injections. Two further groups of six heifers each (6 and 7) were treated in a manner similar to groups 1 and 3 except the dose of estrogen to develop their mammary glands was doubled to 10 mg/3 d. Six lactating first calf heifers were controls (8). The proportion of animals lactating, combined milk yield for each group (kg), and mean days lactated were 1) 5/6, 3831, 142; 2) 1/6, 912, 195; 3) 6/6, 4898, 194; 4) 3/6, 1066, 128; 5) 1/6, 293, 154; 6) 6/6, 6109, 130; 7) 6/6, 6265, 130; and 8) 6/6, 19, 190, 251. The lactogenic response to dexamethasone and oxytocin is similar to that in sheep, but the response to cloprostenol indicates a species difference. Intensive blood sampling before and after injection of hormones, intended to trigger lactogenesis, showed that plasma prolactin rose to peaks above 210 ng/ml in cows of groups 2, 3, and 4 and were unchanged from the base below 40 ng/ml in groups 1 and 5. Monitoring of steroids after induction treatment showed estradiol-17 beta ranged between 35 and 400 pg/ml and 20 to 80 pg/ml in mammary secretion and plasma and progesterone concentrations were less than at diestrus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This experiment analysed the circadian and ultradian pattern of secretion of cortisol and prolactin in cattle, and from this a meaningful sampling technique for these hormones has been suggested. Two Friesian and two Jersey heifers, non-pregnant and 18 months of age, were bled (2 ml blood) every 10 min for 24 h via an indwelling jugular cannula inserted 6 h before sampling commenced. The concentration of cortisol in plasma showed an ultradian rhythm with an amplitude of approximately 30 ng/ml and a frequency of about 0.6 cycles/h. Elimination of the ultradian component of variation, by taking the mean of the rolling means (last three values) for individual heifers, indicated a diurnal variation in cortisol concentration which was high between midnight and midmorning and low in the afternoon. There were frequent sporadic "bursts' of prolactin secretion but these were inconsistent. There was no evidence of diurnal variation in prolactin concentration, or of a temporal relationship between cortisol and prolactin secretion.