Search

Abstract Dasatinib, a second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for treating chronic myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. As a sensitive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate and weak base with strong pH‐sensitive solubility, dasatinib is susceptible to enzyme‐mediated drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with CYP3A4 perpetrators and pH‐dependent DDIs with acid‐reducing agents. This work aimed to develop a whole‐body physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of dasatinib to describe and predict enzyme‐mediated and pH‐dependent DDIs, to evaluate the impact of strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers on dasatinib exposure and to support optimized dasatinib dosing. Overall, 63 plasma profiles from perorally administered dasatinib in healthy volunteers and cancer patients were used for model development. The model accurately described and predicted plasma profiles with geometric mean fold errors (GMFEs) for area under the concentration–time curve from the first to the last timepoint of measurement (AUClast) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 1.27 and 1.29, respectively. Regarding the DDI studies used for model development, all (8/8) predicted AUClast and Cmax ratios were within twofold of observed ratios. Application of the PBPK model for dose adaptations within various DDIs revealed dasatinib dose reductions of 50%–80% for strong and 0%–70% for moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors and a 2.3–3.1‐fold increase of the daily dasatinib dose for CYP3A4 inducers to match the exposure of dasatinib administered alone. The developed model can be further employed to personalize dasatinib therapy, thereby help coping with clinical challenges resulting from DDIs and patient‐related factors, such as elevated gastric pH.

Abstract The first‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib has revolutionized the development of targeted cancer therapy and remains among the frontline treatments, for example, against chronic myeloid leukemia. As a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8, CYP3A4, and various transporters, imatinib is highly susceptible to drug–drug interactions (DDIs) when co‐administered with corresponding perpetrator drugs. Additionally, imatinib and its main metabolite N‐desmethyl imatinib (NDMI) act as inhibitors of CYP2C8, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 affecting their own metabolism as well as the exposure of co‐medications. This work presents the development of a parent–metabolite whole‐body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for imatinib and NDMI used for the investigation and prediction of different DDI scenarios centered around imatinib as both a victim and perpetrator drug. Model development was performed in PK‐Sim® using a total of 60 plasma concentration–time profiles of imatinib and NDMI in healthy subjects and cancer patients. Metabolism of both compounds was integrated via CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, with imatinib additionally transported via P‐glycoprotein. The subsequently developed DDI network demonstrated good predictive performance. DDIs involving imatinib and NDMI were simulated with perpetrator drugs rifampicin, ketoconazole, and gemfibrozil as well as victim drugs simvastatin and metoprolol. Overall, 12/12 predicted DDI area under the curve determined between first and last plasma concentration measurements (AUClast) ratios and 12/12 predicted DDI maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) ratios were within twofold of the respective observed ratios. Potential applications of the final model include model‐informed drug development or the support of model‐informed precision dosing.

Clomiphene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), has been used for the treatment of anovulation for more than 50 years. However, since (E)-clomiphene ((E)-Clom) and its metabolites are eliminated primarily via Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP3A4, exposure can be affected by CYP2D6 polymorphisms and concomitant use with CYP inhibitors. Thus, clomiphene therapy may be susceptible to drug–gene interactions (DGIs), drug–drug interactions (DDIs) and drug–drug–gene interactions (DDGIs). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a tool to quantify such DGI and DD(G)I scenarios. This study aimed to develop a whole-body PBPK model of (E)-Clom including three important metabolites to describe and predict DGI and DD(G)I effects. Model performance was evaluated both graphically and by calculating quantitative measures. Here, 90% of predicted Cmax and 80% of AUClast values were within two-fold of the corresponding observed value for DGIs and DD(G)Is with clarithromycin and paroxetine. The model also revealed quantitative contributions of different CYP enzymes to the involved metabolic pathways of (E)-Clom and its metabolites. The developed PBPK model can be employed to assess the exposure of (E)-Clom and its active metabolites in as-yet unexplored DD(G)I scenarios in future studies.