cases analyzed in our study, pulmonary embolism was considered as idiopathic or the result of trauma, fracture, or other form of immobilization of the patient. Clearly, the possibility of occult hematologic disease cannot be completely ruled out, especially in cases considered as idiopathic. Nevertheless, the analysis of the data coming up from patients' medical record, clinical examination, or laboratory tests does not support such a possibility. On the other hand, second-hand smoking could represent an additional limitation of our retrospective study, although it is difficult to estimate the extent of this limitation. We should also take into account the difficulty in assessing passive smokers' exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Althoughmedical history taking in our hospital checks for exposure to cigarette smoking, it does not comprise a standard questionnaire for the semiquantitative evaluation of passive smoking. Two patients who spontaneously reported a very high exposure to passive smoking were classified as smokers and were excluded from the study. Ideally, the quantification of exposure to passive smoking should be based on the information reported by parents and verified by themeasurement of cotinine levels in saliva or urine to support their statements [3]. Of course, this was impossible in our study due to its retrospective nature. Furthermore, although passive smoking has been repeatedly reported to acutely increase COHb levels, most of thesemeasurements have been carried out during participants' exposure to second-hand smoking or shortly after this. Moreover, this effect appears to be dose dependent. Thus, lower levels or shorter durations of smoke exposure fail to significantly increase COHb levels [4]. Generally, exogenously delivered CO presents a half-life of 5 to 6 hours without supplemental oxygen administration [5]. Therefore, it is not surprising that COHb had poor discriminating ability for passive smoking inwhen evaluated later after the exposure during the preoperative process [6,7]. We consider this clinical setting to present more similarities with our study compared with other studies involving the acute effects of environmental tobacco smoke exposure under experimental conditions. Yours sincerely