Andreas Prinzing, Conrad C. Labandeira, Wim A. Ozinga, Christian Parisod, Martin Brändle, Igor V. Bartish, Françoise Hennion, Mickael Pihain, Pierre-Emmanuel Courty, Ecosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution [Rennes] (ECOBIO), Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut Ecologie et Environnement (INEE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Rennes (OSUR), Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Rennes 2 (UR2)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Rennes 2 (UR2)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Alterra Wageningen University & Research Centre (ALTERRA), Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Department of Ecology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Radboud University [Nijmegen], University of Nijmegen, Department of Animal Ecology, Philipps Universität Marburg = Philipps University of Marburg, Département de Biologie, Université de Fribourg = University of Fribourg (UNIFR), Department of Biology [Fribourg], University of Freiburg [Freiburg], University of Maryland [College Park], University of Maryland System, Department of Paleobiology [Washington], Smithsonian Institution, Institute of Biology, Neuchatel, Université de Neuchâtel (UNINE), Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences [Prague] (CAS), CNRS ATIP grant, French Polar Institute (IPEV) [136], Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Swiss National Science Foundation [PZ00P3-136651], Dutch Science Foundation (NWO Biodiversity Works), Synthesis Centre for Biodiversity Sciences (sDiv), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Rennes (OSUR)-Institut Ecologie et Environnement (INEE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Rennes 1 (UR1), Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES), Radboud university [Nijmegen], Phillips Universität (Marburg), and Universite de Fribourg
SPE IPM UB; International audience; Contents 66 I. 67 II. 68 III. 69 IV. 70 V. 73 VI. 75 VII. 77 78 References 78 SUMMARY: Recent decades have seen declines of entire plant clades while other clades persist despite changing environments. We suggest that one reason why some clades persist is that species within these clades use similar habitats, because such similarity may increase the degree of co-occurrence of species within clades. Traditionally, co-occurrence among clade members has been suggested to be disadvantageous because of increased competition and enemy pressure. Here, we hypothesize that increased co-occurrence among clade members promotes mutualist exchange, niche expansion or hybridization, thereby helping species avoid population decline from environmental change. We review the literature and analyse published data for hundreds of plant clades (genera) within a well-studied region and find major differences in the degree to which species within clades occupy similar habitats. We tentatively show that, in clades for which species occupy similar habitats, species tend to exhibit increased co-occurrence, mutualism, niche expansion, and hybridization - and rarely decline. Consistently, throughout the geological past, clades whose species occupied similar habitats often persisted through long time-spans. Overall, for many plant species, the occupation of similar habitats among fellow clade members apparently reduced their vulnerability to environmental change. Future research should identify when and how this previously unrecognized eco-evolutionary feedback operates.