Search

To determine whether carbon dioxide (CO(2)) vena cavography can safely guide the placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters.One hundred nineteen patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. CO(2 )cavograms were obtained and evaluated for IVC diameter, location of renal veins, and presence of thrombus and venous anomalies. If CO(2 )cavography was judged to be adequate, an IVC filter was deployed. After filter placement, cavography was performed with iodinated contrast material; these images were compared with the CO(2) cavograms.Two patients experienced mild side effects related to venous CO(2) injection. Comparison of cavograms obtained with CO(2) and iodinated contrast-enhanced material showed the caval size to be within 3 mm in all 119 patients. In 116 patients (97.5%), CO(2) cavography was judged to be adequate, and in 115 patients, filters were placed. In three (2.5%) patients, it was necessary to perform iodinated contrast-enhanced cavography before filter deployment. All six cases of venous anomaly and 11 (78.6%) of 14 cases of thrombosis were clearly identified with CO(2) cavography. One filter was maldeployed owing to misinterpretation of the CO(2) cavogram.CO(2) cavography is well tolerated, safe, and adequate for identification of the parameters necessary for filter deployment. It is especially valuable in patients with a history of reaction to iodinated contrast material or renal insufficiency.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fluoroscopically directed percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy catheter placement with gastropexy.The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts from 643 patients referred for fluoroscopically directed percutaneous gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy during a 9 1/2-year period. In 615 patients, placement was attempted with use of three T-fastener gastropexy devices followed by percutaneous gastric puncture. Placement of a 14-F gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy catheter was then accomplished with the Seldinger technique.A catheter could not be placed in 28 patients (4.4%) owing to overlying viscera or prior gastric surgery. In the remaining patients, 701 procedures, including revisions, were performed, including 643 gastrojejunostomies (92%) and 58 gastrostomies (8.3%). The success rate for catheter placement was 100%. Revision was necessary in 83 instances in 64 patients (13.5%). Forty-six (55%) of these were attributed to tube dislodgment, but only two repeat gastric punctures were necessary secondary to tract disruption. There were three major complications (0.5%) and 29 minor complications (5.3%). No complications were attributed directly to gastropexy. Thirty-day follow-up data were available for 393 patients (64%), and 14-day follow-up data were available for 550 (89%). The 30-day mortality rate was 5.8% (23 of 393 patients); none of the deaths were related to the procedure.Fluoroscopically directed percutaneous placement of gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy catheters with routine gastropexy is a safe procedure. Catheter revision was necessary in 13% of patients and was usually secondary to tube dislodgment, with tract disruption an unusual complication.

Study objectives: To determine normative values for superior vena cava (SVC) length and the utility of radiographic landmarks for identifying the boundaries of the SVC for assisting central line placement. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Urban tertiary care medical centers. Patients: Patients undergoing thoracic MRI scanning for various indications. Interventions: None. Measurements and results: The SVC dimensions and relationship to radiographic landmarks were determined from MRI scans of 42 patients (22 men, 20 women; median age, 57 years). The median length of the SVC was 6.8 cm (range, 4.4 to 10.0 cm) and did not correlate with gender or other measured cardiovascular dimensions. The right tracheobronchial angle was the best radiographic landmark for determining the cephalad origin of the SVC being always caudad and within a median of 1.5 cm (range, 0.1 to 3.8 cm) of the upper SVC. It was always at least 2.9 cm above the atriocaval junction. The right superior heart border was formed by the left atrium in 38% (95% confidence interval, 23 to 53%) of patients and did not reliably identify the atriocaval junction. Conclusions: The right tracheobronchial angle is the most reliable landmark for the upper margin of the SVC. Venous catheters placed caudad to this landmark and cephalad to the right superior cardiac silhouette or no more than 2.9 cm caudad to the tracheobronchial angle result in catheter tips within the SVC. (CHEST 1998; 114:820–826) Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CSE=conventional spin echo; ICC=intraclass correlation coefficient; SVC=superior vena cava