Search

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) associated infections (LVADIs) have substantial morbidity and mortality. We aim to describe the incidence and epidemiology of LVADIs in an Asian cohort. This is currently not well studied.We conducted a retrospective review of 52 patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 1 May 2009-31 December 2014 in National Heart Centre Singapore. LVADIs were defined based on definitions proposed by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.There were 39 males and 13 females. Seventy-three percent had Heartmate II LVAD implant while 27% received Heartware HVAD. Eighty-one percent were implanted as bridge to heart transplantation, 19% as destination therapy. Forty-five episodes of LVADIs occurred in 25 patients. Overall LVADI incidence was 47.5 cases per 100 patient-years. Driveline infections (58%) were the commonest type of LVADI. The commonest causative organisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (33%), Staphylococcus aureus (31%) and Corynebacterium species (19%). Twelve percent of patients with LVADI required surgical debridement and one patient required pump exchange due to pump pocket infection. All-cause mortality was 13%.The findings of our study add to the understanding and epidemiology of LVADIs, particularly in the Asian setting. This can contribute to the development of evidence based strategies to prevent and manage LVADIs.

Background: Little is known regarding the impact of socioeconomic factors on the use of evidence-based therapies and outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction across Asia. Methods: We investigated the association of both patient-level (household income, education levels) and country-level (regional income level by World Bank classification, income disparity by Gini index) socioeconomic indicators on use of guideline-directed therapy and clinical outcomes (composite of 1-year mortality or HF hospitalization, quality of life) in the prospective multinational ASIAN-HF study (Asian Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure). Results: Among 4540 patients (mean age: 60±13 years, 23% women) with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, 39% lived in low-income regions; 34% in regions with high-income disparity (Gini ≥42.8%); 64.4% had low monthly household income (P interaction Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of socioeconomic determinants among patients with heart failure in Asia and suggest that attention should be paid to address disparities in access to care among the poor and less educated, including those from wealthy regions. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT01633398.

Background Data comparing outcomes in heart failure ( HF ) across Asia are limited. We examined regional variation in mortality among patients with HF enrolled in the ASIAN ‐HF (Asian Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure) registry with separate analyses for those with reduced ejection fraction ( EF ; Methods and Results The ASIAN ‐ HF registry is a prospective longitudinal study. Participants with symptomatic HF were recruited from 46 secondary care centers in 3 Asian regions: South Asia (India), Southeast Asia (Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore), and Northeast Asia (South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China). Overall, 6480 patients aged >18 years with symptomatic HF were recruited (mean age: 61.6±13.3 years; 27% women; 81% with HF and reduced r EF ). The primary outcome was 1‐year all‐cause mortality. Striking regional variations in baseline characteristics and outcomes were observed. Regardless of HF type, Southeast Asians had the highest burden of comorbidities, particularly diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, despite being younger than Northeast Asian participants. One‐year, crude, all‐cause mortality for the whole population was 9.6%, higher in patients with HF and reduced EF (10.6%) than in those with HF and preserved EF (5.4%). One‐year, all‐cause mortality was significantly higher in Southeast Asian patients (13.0%), compared with South Asian (7.5%) and Northeast Asian patients (7.4%; P Conclusions This first multinational prospective study shows that the outcomes in Asian patients with both HF and reduced or preserved EF are poor overall and worst in Southeast Asian patients. Region‐specific risk factors and gaps in guideline‐directed therapy should be addressed to potentially improve outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ . Unique identifier: NCT 01633398.

Globalization has resulted in epidemiologic transition in developing countries from infectious disease and nutritional deficiencies to non-communicable diseases. Epidemiologic data on heart failure (HF), particularly advanced HF therapy, in Asia are increasingly becoming available, although they remain sparse. Heart transplantation for advanced stage HF remains very low in Asia-approximately 0.075 heart transplants per 1 million population. North America, which comprises 7.5% of the world population, accounted for 55.8% of transplants recorded in the 2012 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry, whereas Asia, with 62.5% of the world population, accounted for 5.7% of transplants. There is also lack of reporting from heart transplant centers in Asia to the ISHLT Registry. Most transplant programs in Asia are in economically stable South East Asian countries, whereas in other parts of developing countries, the cost and health care infrastructures remain prohibitive for the development of these programs. Multi-cultural and racial factors, religious beliefs, and diverse traditions of many centuries have resulted in reluctance to organ donation. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is emerging as a viable alternative to transplantation, but despite technical capabilities, limitations in embracing MCS in Asia exist. Discrepant practices in the reimbursement of costly MCS therapy have led to differences in the availability of these devices to patients in the region. The HeartMate II (St. Jude Medical, Inc, St. Paul, MN) left ventricular assist device is currently the most widely used durable device in Asia, whereas the HeartWare HVAD (HeartWare, Inc, Framingham, MA) is used most often in Australia. By September 9, 2015, 341 HeartMate implants (293 as bridge to transplant and 48 as destination therapy) had been performed, of which 180 implants were in Japan. The overall 4-year survival is 88%. The longest duration of support is 6.5 years. By the end of 2015, 243 HeartWare HVADs had been implanted in Asia Pacific. There is a need for focused efforts at improving the reporting of data and intensifying health policy within the region to advocate organ transplantation. Individual governments need to take national responsibility to fulfill organ donation and transplantation needs of their populations. International collaboratives, coordinated by societies such as the ISHLT, will be essential in moving this field forward in Asia Pacific.

INTRODUCTION Device therapy is efficacious in preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with reduced ejection fraction. However, few who need the device eventually opt to undergo implantation and even fewer reconsider their decisions after deliberation. This is due to many factors, including unresolved patient barriers. This study identified the factors that influenced patients' decision to decline implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, and those that influenced patients who initially declined an implant to reconsider having one. METHODS A single-centre survey was conducted among 240 patients who had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and met the ICD implantation criteria, but had declined ICD implantation. RESULTS Participants who refused ICD implantation were mostly male (84%), Chinese (71%), married (72%), currently employed (54%), and had up to primary or secondary education (78%) and monthly income of < SGD 3,000 (51%). Those who were more likely to reconsider their decision were aware that SCD was a consequence of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, knowledgeable of the preventive role of ICDs, currently employed and aware that their doctor strongly recommended the implant. Based on multivariate analysis, knowledge of the role of ICDs for primary prophylaxis was the most important factor influencing patient decision. CONCLUSION This study identified the demographic and social factors of patients who refused ICD therapy. Knowledge of the role of ICDs in preventing SCD was found to be the strongest marker for reconsidering ICD implantation. Measures to address this information gap may lead to higher rates of ICD implantation.

Objective Multimorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) results in poor prognosis and is an increasing public health concern. We aim to examine the effect of multimorbidity focusing on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) on all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific mortality among patients diagnosed with HF in Singapore. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Primary and tertiary care in three (out of six) Regional Health Systems in Singapore. Participants Patients diagnosed with HF between 2003 and 2016 from three restructured hospitals and nine primary care polyclinics were included in this retrospective cohort study. Primary outcomes All-cause mortality and CVD-specific mortality. Results A total of 34 460 patients diagnosed with HF from 2003 to 2016 were included in this study and were followed up until 31 December 2016. The median follow-up time was 2.1 years. Comorbidities prior to HF diagnosis were considered. Patients were categorised as (1) HF only, (2) T2DM+HF, (3) CKD+HF and (4) T2DM+CKD+HF. Cox regression model was used to determine the effect of multimorbidity on (1) all-cause mortality and (2) CVD-specific mortality. Adjusting for demographics, other comorbidities, baseline treatment and duration of T2DM prior to HF diagnosis, ‘T2DM+CKD+HF’ patients had a 56% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.56, 95% CI 1.48 to 1.63) and a 44% higher risk of CVD-specific mortality (HR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.56) compared with patients diagnosed with HF only. Conclusion All-cause and CVD-specific mortality risks increased with increasing multimorbidity. This study highlights the need for a new model of care that focuses on holistic patient management rather than disease management alone to improve survival among patients with HF with multimorbidity.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) has been shown to be of better or equivalent prognosis than heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF). We aimed to characterize and study the outcome of HF-PEF in a multiethnic South East Asian context.This is a single-centre retrospective analysis of 312 patients admitted with decompensated heart failure over 1 year from January to December 2009. We evaluated clinical characteristics of patients according to left ventricular ejection fraction at least 50 or less than 50%. Outcomes as defined by 1-year mortality and 90-day re-hospitalization rates for heart failure were compared between the two groups in an in-patient setting.The median age was 68 years and median length of hospitalization was 4 days. Around 21.8% had HF-PEF. Patients with preserved ejection fraction were more often older, female, hypertensive, with atrial fibrillation, had no coronary artery disease and had never smoked before. They were less often prescribed antiplatelets, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-II receptor blocker, aldosterone-receptor antagonists, digoxin and loop diuretics. After 1 year, mortality was 5.9% in patients with HF-PEF and 11.3% in those with HF-REF, but the difference was nonsignificant (P = 0.195). There was also no difference in 90-day rehospitalization rates between the groups (16.2 vs. 17.6%, respectively, P = 0.780). Poor prognostic factors for the cohort of heart failure patients included increased age, diabetes and renal impairment, but not left ventricular ejection fraction.HF-PEF is associated with distinct risk factors from HF-REF, but has a similar morbidity and mortality to HF-REF.

In patients with advanced heart failure, morbid obesity is a relative contraindication to heart transplantation due to higher morbidity and mortality in these patients.We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive morbidly obese patients with advanced heart failure who underwent bariatric surgery for durable weight loss in order to meet eligibility criteria for cardiac transplantation.Seven patients (4 M/3 F, age range 31-56 years) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 25 % underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Median preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 42.8 kg/m(2) (range 37.5-50.8). There were no major perioperative complications in six of seven patients. Median length of hospital stay was 5 days. There was no mortality recorded during complete patient follow-up. At a median follow-up of 406 days, median BMI reduction was 12.9 kg/m(2) (p = 0.017). Postoperative LVEF improved to a median of 30 % (interquartile range (IQR) 25-53 %; p = 0.039). Two patients underwent successful cardiac transplantation. Two patients reported symptomatic improvement with little change in LV function and now successfully meet listing criteria. Three patients showed marked improvement of their LVEF and functional status, thus removing the requirement for transplantation.Bariatric surgery can achieve successful weight loss in morbidly obese patients with advanced cardiac failure, enabling successful heart transplantation. In some patients, cardiac transplantation can be avoided through surgical weight loss.

Background Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a complication reported in patients post left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation that is associated with high mortality rates. Thalidomide is an anti-angiogenic compound that may offer a potential option for management of refractory LVAD-related GIB. Methods A single-center, retrospective review was conducted from January 2009 to October 2016 at a tertiary cardiology center. It included LVAD patients initiated on thalidomide for refractory GIB. Results All patients (n = 11) were started on thalidomide 50 mg nocte and there was resolution of GIB in all patients except one (90.9%) during initial thalidomide treatment. The median duration of thalidomide therapy was 98 days (interquartile range: 34–215). The dose of thalidomide was reduced for 2 patients due to adverse effects. Thalidomide therapy was discontinued in 6 patients due to cessation of GIB (n = 4) and adverse effects (n = 2). Reported adverse effects included LVAD thrombosis (n = 2), somnolence (n = 1), neuropathy (n = 1), constipation (n = 1), and transaminitis (n = 1). Recurrent GIB occurred in 4 patients (45.4%) post-discontinuation of thalidomide therapy, which led to the re-initiation of therapy. Conclusions Thalidomide appears to be a safe and effective option for management of refractory LVAD-related GIB. Monitoring for recurrent GIB should be performed closely following cessation of thalidomide therapy.

Background The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has revolutionised our treatment of advanced stage heart failure, giving debilitated patients a new lease on life. A small proportion of these LVAD patients can be bridged-to-recovery. The identification of these patients and decision to wean, however, can be challenging. Methods The need to fully explant the device upon recovery has evolved to a minimalist approach aiming to avoid injury to the ‘recovered’ heart. A review of the evolution of explant strategies was performed to guide our decision to wean the LVAD in our early experience. Results Between 2009 and 2014, two patients in our series of 69 LVAD implants (2.9%) were successfully weaned off their LVADs. The second patient had a minimal access implantation of his HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD, Medtronic Inc, Framingham, MA, USA). His clinical variables and minimalist weaning strategy are described. Conclusions A case of LVAD decommissioning by thrombosis of the outflow graft, using percutaneous Amplatzer Vascular Plug II (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) without surgery is reported.

Purpose Patients with advanced heart failure often have significant mitral valve regurgitation (MR).The Alfieri stich mitral valve repair (AsMVR) can be performed during LVAD implantation with negligible additional surgical time. We report our experience on concomitant AsMVR during LVAD surgery. Methods A single-centre retrospective analysis of patients receiving LVADs between May 2009 to November 2017. Patients with moderate to severe MR were included. Patients who underwent mitral annuloplasty were excluded. MR was scored according to severity: No MR = 0; Trivial MR = 1, Mild MR = 2; Moderate MR = 3; Severe MR = 4. Safety and efficacy outcomes of patients who underwent AsMVR were compared against patients who did not. Results Ninety patients were included. 53 patients had at least moderate MR. Eleven underwent AsMVR. Pre-operatively, there was no difference in mean MR grade (3.45±0.47 vs 3.37±0.42, p=0.58), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (46±17 vs 46±6, p=0.93) and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) (33±12 vs 34±6, p=0.66) between the AsMVR and the non-AsMVR groups. Three months after LVAD implantation, there was no difference in mean MR grade between the AsMVR and no-AsMVR groups (2.05±0.76 vs 1.71±-0.92, P=0.3). mPAP (25±6 vs 24±9, p=0.85) and PAWP (14±6 vs 15±9, p=0.68) at 6 months were also not different. Mean transmitral pressure gradient was 2.1± 1.3 mmHg after AsMVR. Seven patients had mitral valve prolapse after AsMVR. There was no mortality at 30-days in the AsMVR group. Conclusion Alfieri stitch mitral valve repair can be safely performed during LVAD surgery. However, it does not appear to reduce mitral regurgitation nor pulmonary artery pressure beyond what the LVAD does.

Purpose Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) has become the standard of care for many patients with advanced heart failure awaiting cardiac transplant. However, due to the lack of available donor hearts in Singapore, the length of time on LVAD support as a Bridge to Transplant (BTT) therapy has increased over the years. Methods A single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing LVAD implantation between May 2009 and October 2017. Results Sixty-five patients (82% male) had LVAD implanted as BTT therapy. Mean age was 45 ± 11years old. Main heart failure etiologies were dilated cardiomyopathy (45%) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (39%). 39% were INTERMACS 1, 13% INTERMACS 2, 39% INTERMACS 3 and 8% INTERMACS 4. LVADs implanted included 55% HeartMate II, 31% HeartWare HVAD and 14% HeartMate 3.Median duration of post-operative hospitalization and intensive care stay were 29 (range 9 to 130) and 7 (range 3 to 122) days respectively. Four patients (6%) had right ventricular failure leading to right VAD placement post-operatively. Other early postoperative complications included infections (61%), gastrointestinal bleeding (19%), stroke (6%) and cardiac tamponade (3%). Haemodialysis was instituted in28%.Median duration of device support was 805 (range 9 to 3102) days. Late complications, expressed in events per patient year, included driveline infection (0.99+/-1.42), pump pocket infection (0.03+/-0.15), pump thrombosis (0.20+/-1.01), stroke (0.19+/-0.81), and gastrointestinal bleeding (0.42+/-1.31). 8% underwent aortic valve closure for late-onset severe aortic regurgitation while 8 (13%) patients underwent pump exchange surgeries.Five-year survival was 89.2%. Twenty-one patients (33%) successfully received cardiac transplantation. Median wait to heart transplant was 893days (range 62 to 1685 days). Myocardial recovery was achieved in two patients (3%). Conclusion Due to the scarcity of cardiac transplants, many patients remain on LVAD support for an extended period. This has resulted in an increased incidence of complications while awaiting a suitable donor.

Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become an important tool as a bridge-to-heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in Singapore. We report our experience with the HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge-to-heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent HMII LVAD implantation in our center between May 2009 and December 2012. All patients were classified as Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) levels 1 to 3 and underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge-to-heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were INTERMACS level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent HMII LVAD implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after LVAD implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow-up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub-therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post-LVAD implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, while 3 reported NYHA III symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after LVAD implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow-up period. The average duration of LVAD support was 522 days (range 47 to 1316 days). The HeartMate II LVAD has proven to be effective in our Asian population. Driveline infection rate remains low even in the tropical hot, humid climate in Singapore. With more patients ending up on extended periods of LVAD support, increased emphasis in the detection and management of long-term complications of ventricular assist devices will be needed.

Background Bleeding is an important and common complication of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). One of the common causes of gastrointestinal bleeding is arteriovenous malformations. However, the source of bleeding is often hard to identify. Thalidomide is efficacious in treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in non-LVAD patients. We report our experience of the use of thalidomide in the treatment of GI bleeding in four patients with LVAD. Method and Results Four patients who had recurrent GI bleeding from May 2009 to December 2014 were started on thalidomide. All of them responded to treatment and had no further gastrointestinal bleeding while on thalidomide. One patient developed constipation, requiring thalidomide to be stopped. Another patient developed symptomatic neuropathy, that resolved with reduction of dosage. Conclusion Thalidomide appears safe and efficacious in LVAD patients with recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding.

Diuretics are the mainstay of therapy for restoring the euvolaemic state in patients with decompensated heart failure. However, diuretic resistance remains a challenge.We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration (UF) in 44 hospitalised patients who had decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance between October 2011 and July 2013.Among the 44 patients, 18 received UF (i.e. UF group), while 26 received diuretics (i.e. standard care group). After 48 hours, the UF group achieved lower urine output (1,355 mL vs. 3,815 mL, p = 0.0003), greater fluid loss (5,058 mL vs. 1,915 mL, p0.0001) and greater weight loss (5.0 kg vs. 1.0 kg, p0.0001) than the standard care group. The UF group also had a shorter duration of hospitalisation (5.0 days vs. 9.5 days, p = 0.0010). There were no differences in the incidence of 30-day emergency department visits and rehospitalisations for heart failure between the two groups. At 90 days, the UF group had fewer emergency department visits (0.2 vs. 0.8, p = 0.0500) and fewer rehospitalisations for heart failure (0.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0442). Reduction in EQ-5D™ scores was greater in the UF group, both at discharge (2.7 vs. 1.4, p = 0.0283) and 30 days (2.5 vs. 0.3, p = 0.0033). No adverse events were reported with UF.UF is an effective and safe treatment that can improve the health outcomes of Asian patients with decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance.

As the aortic valve (AV) opens, the pump pressure head remains constant, which is reflected as a "notch/plateau" in pump pressure and flow signals. However, instantaneous flow estimation may be influenced by friction and is particularly difficult in axial pumps. Therefore, a new method to determine the duration of AV opening based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the power spectral density analysis of pump speed signal was developed. Data from patients implanted with HeartWare HVAD left ventricular assist device were studied at different pump speeds, with simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography in two cohorts. In the first group, pump data of 15 patients were used to investigate the ability to discriminate between an open and closed AV. In the second cohort of a further 13 patients, the duration of AV opening was measured from digitized M-mode images, and the relationship between the AV opening time and the new method assessed. In 14 of the initial 15 patients, AV status could be discriminated using only one threshold for all patients. In the second cohort, gradual speed reduction resulted in aortic valve opening in 12 of the 13 patients. The correlation between AV opening duration and AUC was 0.96 ± 0.03. Regression analysis indicated a linear relationship in each of the patients with a small error between the fit and the measured opening time (root mean square error = 11.0 ± 7.6 ms). However, the slopes (69.0 ± 52.8) and intercepts (-31.4 ± 78.0) varied widely between patients. The sensitivity and specificity for the new method using AUC threshold of 0.95 for aortic valve closure was 95% and 91%, respectively. The newly developed method to detect AV opening not only provides information on the AV status during LVAD support (open/closed) but also gives insight into the duration of AV opening. Because the slope of the relationship varies from patient to patient, initial training and adaptation of the method to each patient seems to be required.

Coronary stent infection is exceedingly rare, with only 23 reported cases. We present a patient with an everolimus-coated stent infection that led to an infected pseudoaneurysm in the left anterior descending artery. Medical therapy failed and the patient underwent emergent surgical intervention; however, he died of multiorgan failure after the operation.

Recent advances in medical and device therapies in heart failure have improved the survival of patients with heart failure. However, due to the limited availability of suitable heart donors, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have become an important tool as a bridge-to-heart transplantation for patients with refractory heart failure in Singapore. We report our experience with the HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA) as a bridge-to-heart transplant in our center from 2009 to 2012. This was a retrospective review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent HMII LVAD implantation in our center between May 2009 and December 2012. All patients were classified as Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) levels 1 to 3 and underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge-to-heart transplant. There were 17 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 43.6 years old (range 14 to 64). The etiologies of heart failure included ischemic heart disease [8], idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [11], viral myocarditis [2], and chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy [2]. Nine patients were INTERMACS level 1, 12 patients level 2, and two patients level 3. All patients successfully underwent HMII LVAD implantation. There was no mortality within the first 30 postoperative days. Postoperative complications included stroke with full neurological recovery (21.7%), mediastinal infection (21.7%), cardiac tamponade or mediastinal collection requiring reopening of the chest (39.1%), cardiac arrhythmia (13.0%), and pump thrombosis with pump replacement (4.3%). All patients were discharged from hospital after LVAD implantation. Three patients experienced driveline infections during outpatient follow-up. There were 19 readmissions due to the following conditions: sub-therapeutic anticoagulation (13.0%), gastrointestinal bleeding (13.0%), suspected pump thrombosis (13.0%), transient ischemic attack (8.7%), arrhythmia (8.7%), congestive cardiac failure due to severe aortic regurgitation (8.7%), right ventricular failure (4.3%), rhabdomyolysis (4.3%), and hematuria (4.3%). Post-LVAD implantation, 20 patients were functionally New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, while 3 reported NYHA III symptoms. Three patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient was successfully explanted 11 months after LVAD implantation. There were two mortalities during the follow-up period. The average duration of LVAD support was 522 days (range 47 to 1316 days). The HeartMate II LVAD has proven to be effective in our Asian population. Driveline infection rate remains low even in the tropical hot, humid climate in Singapore. With more patients ending up on extended periods of LVAD support, increased emphasis in the detection and management of long-term complications of ventricular assist devices will be needed.

Introduction Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare but life-threatening condition. We report 11 patients admitted to the National Heart Centre Singapore with a diagnosis of PPCM over a period of 14 months. Methods Baseline demographics, pregnancy history, haematology, serum biochemistry and echocardiographic findings of women admitted with a diagnosis of PPCM were analysed. Results The incidence of PPCM was 0.89 per 1,000 live births in our cohort. 63.6% of the patients were Malay and 27.3% were Chinese. 45.5% of the patients were smokers and 45.5% had a history of pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia. There was no maternal mortality. Mean left ventricular ejection fractions at diagnosis and at six months were 26.9% ± 9.1% and 51.9% ± 10.6%, respectively. Mean left ventricular internal diameters in end-diastole at diagnosis and at six months were 5.5 ± 0.5 cm and 5.1 ± 0.6 cm, respectively. All patients were treated successfully for the acute episode and all but one patient had returned to New York Heart Association functional class I status at six months. Conclusion PPCM remains a rare condition and appears to occur more commonly in Malay patients. Smoking and pregnancy-induced hypertension appear to be significant risk factors. While short-term outcome remains excellent, collaborative studies with other tertiary centres will help enhance our understanding of the long-term management of and clinical outcomes in these patients.