Search

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated disorder that commonly affects adults and children. In recent years, pediatric psoriasis has increased in prevalence and the disease is often associated with various comorbidities and psychological distress. The conventional topical treatments for psoriasis, such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs, anthralin, and coal tar, are often limited by their side effects, tolerability, and/or efficacy, particularly for use in children and on sensitive and intertriginous areas. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration approved two new topical non-steroidal agents for treating psoriasis that target different pathogenic pathways than the conventional treatments. Roflumilast is a phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in patients aged 12 years and older. Tapinarof is a novel aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulator approved for adult psoriasis and currently undergoing studies for pediatric psoriasis. Ongoing efforts are also being made to optimize conventional treatments, for instance, a new foam formulation of halobetasol propionate was recently approved for pediatric psoriasis. Clinical trials of various new drugs targeting one or multiple pathogenic pathways of psoriasis, such as Janus kinase inhibitors, different formulations of phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulators have also been explored. The recent emergence of novel topical agents provides promising new options for managing pediatric psoriasis with the potential to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life. In this article, we review the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety profile of novel topical agents and discuss their potential roles in the management of pediatric psoriasis.

Introduction: The transplantation of highly sensitized patients remains a major obstacle. Immunized patients wait longer for a transplant if not prioritized, and if transplanted, their transplant outcome is worse. Case Presentation: We report a successful AB0- and HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation in a 35-year-old female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome. The patient had a positive T- and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch and previous graft loss due to renal vein thrombosis. We treated the patient with intravenous immunoglobulins, rituximab, horse anti-thymocyte globulin, daratumumab, and imlifidase, besides standard immunosuppression. All IgG antibodies were sensitive to imlifidase treatment. Besides donor-specific HLA antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and antiphospholipid antibodies were cleaved. The patient initially had delayed graft function. Two kidney biopsies (day 7 and day 14) revealed acute tubular necrosis without signs of HLA antibody-mediated rejection. On posttransplant day 30, hemodialysis was stopped, and creatinine levels declined over the next weeks to a baseline creatinine of about 1.7 mg/dL after 12 months. Conclusion: In this case, a novel multimodal treatment strategy including daratumumab and imlifidase enabled successful kidney transplantation for a highly immunized patient with antiphospholipid antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) may cause antibody-mediated rejection and graft dysfunction. Little is known about the clinical course after first detection of dnDSAs during screening in asymptomatic patients. We aimed to assess the value of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria to predict graft failure in patients with dnDSAs and their potential utility as surrogate endpoints. Methods All 400 kidney transplant recipients with dnDSAs at our centre (1 March 2000–31 May 2021) were included in this retrospective study. The dates of graft loss, rejection, doubling of creatinine, ≥30% eGFR decline, proteinuria ≥500 mg/g and ≥1000 mg/g were registered from the first dnDSA appearance. Results During 8.3 years of follow-up, graft failure occurred in 33.3% of patients. Baseline eGFR and proteinuria correlated with 5-year graft loss (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.75 and 0.80, P  < .001). Creatinine doubled after a median of 2.8 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.5–5.0] from dnDSA and the time from doubling creatinine to graft failure was 1.0 year (IQR 0.4–2.9). Analysing eGFR reduction ≥30% as a surrogate endpoint (148/400), the time from dnDSA to this event was 2.0 years (IQR 0.6–4.2), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.9% to predict graft loss, which occurred after 2.0 years (IQR 0.8–3.2). The median time from proteinuria ≥500 mg/g and ≥1000 mg/g to graft failure was identical, 1.8 years, with a PPV of 43.8% and 49.0%, respectively. Composite endpoints did not improve PPV. Multivariable analysis showed that rejection was the most important independent risk factor for all renal endpoints and graft loss. Conclusions Renal function, proteinuria and rejection are strongly associated with graft failure in patients with dnDSA and may serve as surrogate endpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: CMV infections remain a problem after kidney transplantation, particularly if patients are refractory or resistant (r/r) to treatment with valganciclovir (VGCV) or ganciclovir (GCV). (2) Methods: In a single-center retrospective study, kidney transplant recipients (KTR) receiving letermovir (LTV) as rescue therapy for VGCV-/GCV-r/r CMV disease were analyzed regarding CMV history, immunosuppression, and outcomes. (3) Results: Of 201 KTR treated for CMV between 2017 and 2022, 8 patients received LTV following treatment failure with VGCV/GCV. All patients received CMV prophylaxis with VGCV according to the center's protocol, and 7/8 patients had a high-risk (D+/R−) CMV constellation. In seven of eight cases, rising CMV levels occurred during prophylaxis. In seven of eight patients, a mutation in UL97 associated with a decreased response to VGCV/GCV was detected. In four of eight patients, LTV resulted in CMV clearance after 24 ± 10 weeks (16–39 weeks), two of eight patients stabilized at viral loads <2000 cop/mL (6–20 weeks), and two of eight patients developed LTV resistance (range 8–10 weeks). (4) Conclusion: LTV, which is currently evaluated for CMV prophylaxis in kidney transplantation, also shows promising results for the treatment of patients with VGCV/GCV resistance despite the risk of developing LTV resistance. Additional studies are needed to further define its role in the treatment of patients with CMV resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novel mRNA-based vaccines have been proven to be powerful tools in combating the global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, with BNT162b2 (trade name: Comirnaty) efficiently protecting individuals from COVID-19 across a broad age range. Still, it remains largely unknown how renal insufficiency and immunosuppressive medication affect development of vaccine-induced immunity. We therefore comprehensively analyzed humoral and cellular responses in kidney transplant recipients after the standard second vaccination dose. As opposed to all healthy vaccinees and the majority of hemodialysis patients, only 4 of 39 and 1 of 39 transplanted individuals showed IgA and IgG seroconversion at day 8 [+ or -] 1 after booster immunization, with minor changes until day 23 [+ or -] 5, respectively. Although most transplanted patients mounted spike-specific T helper cell responses, frequencies were significantly reduced compared with those in controls and dialysis patients and this was accompanied by a broad impairment in effector cytokine production, memory differentiation, and activation-related signatures. Spike-specific [CD8.sup.+] T cell responses were less abundant than their [CD4.sup.+] counterparts in healthy controls and hemodialysis patients and almost undetectable in transplant patients. Promotion of anti-HLA antibodies or acute rejection was not detected after vaccination. In summary, our data strongly suggest revised vaccination approaches in immunosuppressed patients, including individual immune monitoring for protection of this vulnerable group at risk of developing severe COVID-19., Introduction Kidney transplant (KTx) recipients and patients suffering from kidney failure are imperiled by increased infection risks, either due to dialysis-associated (reviewed in ref. 1) or therapeutic immunosuppression (IS). This [...]