Search

Breast and prostate cancers are the two predominant hormone-responsive tumours. The use of the antioestrogen tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer has evolved over the past 30 y from treatment for advanced breast cancer to prevention. Tamoxifen is currently the endocrine treatment of choice for advanced breast cancer and for adjuvant therapy in a broad spectrum of women whose primary tumours have functional oestrogen receptors. It has also been shown to reduce the incidence of breast cancer in high-risk women. Non-steroidal antiandrogen therapy is used in the treatment of prostate cancer, but its role is still being defined. The clinical development of tamoxifen and that of the antiandrogens are reviewed and parallels are uncovered which provide insight into contemporary and future management of hormone-responsive prostate cancer.Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2001) 4, 72–80 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to develop and test a prostate cancer educational program, as well as an electronic keypad survey procedure, among African-Americans. A 1 h seminar and 12-item knowledge questionnaire were reviewed by both professional and lay consultants and then tested among African-American men and women recruited from the city of Chicago. Eight free presentations were delivered to a total of 63 attendees. Mean percent correct rose from 20% pre-program to 57% post-program (P<0.001) and there was an increase on all individual questions. This feasibility study demonstrated: (a) there is a general lack of information about prostate cancer among African-Americans; (b) know-ledge can be significantly increased by means of an hour-long seminar; and (c) electronic keypads provide an easy, acceptable means of collecting data. Finally, the study underscored the need for the development of active and creative recruitment strategies to increase attendance. Such efforts are currently underway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess prostate cancer mortality in men undergoing routine screening by routine digital rectal examination.Design: Cohort study with a median follow-up period of 75 months.Setting: Population consisted of volunteers at a university clinic and men in an institutional health maintenance clinic.Patients: Fifty-six men with a mean age of 65 years (range, 52 to 79 years) diagnosed with prostate cancer.Interventions: Patients treated initially by observation, external or interstitial radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy, hormone therapy, or combination.Main Outcome Measures: Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to local progression, distant metastases, death from all causes, and death from prostate cancer. Mantel-Haenszel log-rank statistic was used to compare outcome in men diagnosed on initial examination with those diagnosed on subsequent examinations.Results: Clinically localized prostate cancer was diagnosed in 73% during an initial examination and 83% on subsequent examinations and (P.35). Grade distribution of tumors was similar in both groups. Overall 5 and 10 year survival of all cancer patients was 85% and 67%, respectively. Death from prostate cancer was 8% (3/38) in men diagnosed on initial examination and 33% (6/18) during subsequent examinations. Five- and 10-year disease-specific survival was 97% and 86%, respectively, for men diagnosed during the first rectal examination compared with only 81% and 57%, respectively, for men diagnosed on subsequent rectal examinations (P = .02).Conclusion: Routine screening for prostate cancer by annual digital rectal examination alone may be insufficiently frequent and/or sensitive to prevent significant mortality from this disease [corrected]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a case of blindness, secondary to hormone-refractory prostate cancer, occurring 7 years after the diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer and 3.5 years after the clinical onset of the hormone-refractory state. Prolonged suppression of the disease with chemotherapy may have contributed to the unusual clinical findings. We discuss the role of supportive care in the management of prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was conducted to identify factors associated with intention to be tested for prostate cancer risk among African-American men. Participants in this study included African-American men (n = 548) who were patients at the University Health Service at the University of Chicago, were 40 to 70 years of age, and did not have a personal history of prostate cancer. Baseline telephone survey data were collected for 413 (75%) men. Respondents were asked if they intended to have a blood test to assess prostate cancer risk. Univariate and multivariate analyses of intention to be tested for risk were performed. Eighty-six percent of the men said that they intended to be tested. Multivariate analysis results show that belief in the efficacy of prostate cancer screening [odds ratio (OR) = 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.4, 9.1] and intention to undergo a prostate cancer-screening (i.e., digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen testing; OR = 2.8; 95% CI = 1.3, 6.3) were positively associated with intention to be tested for prostate cancer risk. Being older (OR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2, 0.9), having had a prostate cancer-screening examination in the past year (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.2, 1.0), perceiving one's prostate cancer susceptibility to be high (OR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2, 0.8), and being fatalistic about prostate cancer prevention (OR = 0.3; 95% CI = 0.2, 0.7) were negatively associated with intention to be tested for risk. Intention to be tested for prostate cancer risk was high among men in the study. Past screening, perceived susceptibility, and beliefs related to early detection might influence receptivity to genetic testing for prostate cancer risk.

Unlabelled: Changes in health care have prompted efforts to reduce length of hospitalization while maintaining quality care. Therefore, we evaluated short-term outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy on 100 consecutive men undergoing surgery for clinically localized prostate cancer performed under epidural anesthesia followed by epidural morphine or combined with spinal anesthesia using bupivacaine and fentanyl (25 micrograms) and followed by i.m. methadone (10-20 mg). All patients received oral acetaminophen and ibuprofen beginning 4 h after surgery. Length of hospital stay, responses to written satisfaction survey, postoperative morbidity and readmission to the hospital were recorded. Using either pathway, 83% of the patients were discharged after one night in the hospital. The mean hospital stay was 1.34 +/- 1.10 and 1.28 +/- 1.0 days, respectively. Although three men were rehospitalized, it was not because of the early discharge. More than 95% of patients were satisfied with pain control, and patients discharged after one night were not more likely to be dissatisfied than patients hospitalized longer., Implications: Both clinical pathways provide excellent anesthesia and analgesia and allow discharge 1 day after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Shortened hospital stay does not increase patient dissatisfaction or add to postoperative morbidity. Patients undergoing other pelvic and abdominal operations may also derive similar benefits using these pathways.

Purpose: We define changes in prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurements with time in 49 men 71.9 +/- 7.0 years old (mean plus or minus standard deviation) with clinically localized prostate cancer who remain untreated., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed PSA changes in prostate cancer patients managed by watchful waiting. In all patients a minimum of 3 PSA levels were measured at intervals of at least 6 months after malignancy was diagnosed. The rate of change in serum PSA level with time (PSA velocity) was determined using an exponential, log linear model., Results: In 49 patients treated conservatively mean initial PSA level plus or minus standard deviation was 12.3 +/- 11.1 ng./ml. and mean PSA followup during which no therapy for prostate cancer was introduced was 32.1 +/- 13.2 months. PSA levels decreased during the observation period in 11 of the 49 patients (22%) and median PSA doubling time in the remaining 38 was 55.7 months (range 15.1 to 994.5). There was no significant correlation between age at diagnosis, Gleason sum, initial PSA level or clinical stage and PSA velocity. The short-term rate of change in PSA during the first 9 months after prostate cancer was diagnosed correlated poorly with overall PSA velocity. The short-term rate of PSA change was greater than the overall rate of change in 14 of 37 patients (38%)., Conclusions: There is significant variability in the rate of change of PSA with time in men with clinically localized prostate cancer who remain untreated. The usefulness of serial PSA measurements in the management of watchful waiting is unclear. Changes in PSA may not be helpful or appropriate in determining the need for therapy after a period of observation.

Objectives: To evaluate the BTA stat Test in the detection of recurrent bladder cancer., Methods: Sensitivity and specificity were determined using frozen voided urine samples from patients with recurrent bladder cancer, volunteers, patients with nonurologic conditions, and patients with a history of bladder cancer but free of disease. Results of cytology and the original BTA Test were compared with the sensitivity of the BTA stat Test in a large subgroup of the patients with cancer., Results: The BTA stat Test detected 147 (67%) of 220 recurrent cancers. For those urine samples with previous cytologic and BTA Test results available, cytology had a sensitivity of 23%, the BTA Test 44%, and the BTA stat Test 58% for detection of recurrent cancer (P < 0.001, stat versus cytology). The specificity of the BTA stat Test was 72% for benign genitourinary disease and 95% in healthy volunteers., Conclusions: The BTA stat Test has high sensitivity and is significantly superior to voided urine cytologic analysis in the detection of recurrent bladder cancer.