Search

Background Lebrikizumab is a novel, high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin (IL)-13. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab monotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) over 52 weeks of treatment in ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967). Methods Patients who responded to lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) at the end of the 16-week induction period were re-randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to receive lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab 250 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or placebo Q2W (lebrikizumab withdrawal) for 36 additional weeks. Response at week 16 was defined as achieving a 75% reduction in Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI 75) or an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1, with a ≥ 2-point improvement and no rescue medication use. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data. Intermittent use of topical therapy was permitted during the maintenance period. Results After 52 weeks, an IGA of 0 or 1 with a ≥ 2 point improvement was maintained by 71.2% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 76.9% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 47.9% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm. EASI 75 was maintained by 78.4% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W, 81.7% of patients treated with lebrikizumab Q4W and 66.4% of patients in the lebrikizumab withdrawal arm at week 52. Across treatment arms, proportions of patients using any rescue therapy were 14.0% (ADvocate1) and 16.4% (ADvocate2). During the combined induction and maintenance periods of ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, 63.0% of lebrikizumab-treated patients reported any treatment emergent adverse event, with most events (93.1%) being mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions After a 16-week induction period with lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W maintained similar improvement of the signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe AD, with a safety profile consistent with previously published data.

Lebrikizumab is an injectable, IgG4 monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to interleukin-13 with high affinity. Injection-site reactions (ISRs) are localized adverse events in the immediate site of administration of a drug and are common with injectable therapies. This analysis reports ISRs in patients from eight lebrikizumab (LEB) clinical trials in atopic dermatitis. To report ISRs in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with LEB, from an integrated safety analysis of phase 2 and 3 LEB clinical trials. These data sets include adolescents and adult patients who received at least one dose of LEB from a total of eight atopic dermatitis clinical trials, including four 16-week placebo-controlled clinical trials. Eight trials consist of: ADvocate1, ADvocate2, ADhere, ADore, ADjoin (ongoing), ARBAN, TREBLE and Phase 2b study. Treatment duration ranged from a single dose to 100 weeks. ISRs were defined using the preferred terms from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities high-level term, injection site reactions, excluding terms related to joints. This analysis includes ISRs frequencies in patients treated with LEB compared to placebo (ALL PC week 0–16), and all patients who received any dose of LEB (ALL LEB), and reports ISRs type, exposure adjusted incidence rates (EAIR) per 100 patient-years, the timing of ISRs occurrence, and ISRs leading to discontinuation. In the ALL PC week 0–16 analysis, 2.6% (n = 20/783, EAIR 9.0) of patients in the LEB group reported ISRs vs. 1.5% (n = 6/404 EAIR 5.4) in the placebo group. Injection site pain (n = 7, 0.9%) and injection site erythema (n = 7, 0.9%) were the most frequent reactions reported in the LEB group. Most ISRs were mild or moderate, with only 1 (0.1%) severe event. In the ALL LEB analysis, 3.1% of patients reported ISRs (n = 53/1720, EAIR 3.3). Injection site pain (n = 16, 0.9%) and injection site erythema (n = 12, 0.7%) were the most frequent reactions. Almost all reports were mild or moderate, with 3 (0.2%) severe. The incidence of ISRs did not increase with a longer duration of LEB exposure. The majority of ISRs were reported between weeks 0 and 16 (n = 38, 2.2%). The frequency of ISRs from week 16 to 32 was 1.0% (n = 15), from week 32 to 48 was 0.4% (n = 4) and from week 48 to 64 was 0.2% (n = 2). Treatment discontinuation due to ISRs occurred in a few patients (n = 5, 0.3%). Overall, a low proportion of patients reported ISRs (

Background Asthma exacerbation risk increases with worsening asthma control. Prevailing numerical control tools evaluate only current symptom impairment despite the importance of also assessing risk based on exacerbation history. An easy-to-use questionnaire addressing impairment and risk domains of control is needed. Objective To validate a composite asthma control tool that includes impairment and risk assessments (Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire [AIRQ]). Methods Four-hundred forty-two patients aged ≥12 years with physician-diagnosed asthma who were followed in specialty practices completed 15 impairment and risk questions with dichotomized yes/no responses. Patients spanned all Global Initiative for Asthma severities and were classified as well-controlled, not well-controlled, or very poorly controlled according to a standard of Asthma Control Test (ACT) score plus prior-year exacerbations. Logistic regression analyses identified questions with the greatest predictive validity to discriminate among patients and determine cut points for these 3 classifications. Results The final AIRQ comprises 10 equally weighted yes/no impairment and risk questions. The final 10-item models yielded receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.94 to identify well-controlled versus not well-/very poorly controlled and 0.93 to identify well-/not well-controlled versus very poorly controlled asthma, as reflected by the ACT plus prior-year exacerbations standard. Cut points of 0-1, 2-4, and 5-10 best represented well-, not well-, and very poorly controlled asthma. Conclusions AIRQ is a rigorously validated composite measure designed to identify adults and adolescents with varying degrees of asthma control. Ongoing investigations will determine test-retest reliability, responsiveness to change, and predictive ability for future exacerbations.