Chemolithotrophy, discovered by Sergei N. Winogradsky in 1887, originated from the observation of sulfur droplets in the filaments of Beggiatoa growing in the presence of hydrogen sulfide (18, 48). Among the few inorganic substrates used by bacteria in the chemolithotrophic process, a comparatively larger variety of reduced inorganic sulfur species support lithotrophic growth of a large number of phylogenetically diverse groups of bacteria and archaea (14). However, chemolithotrophic growth on sulfur was thought to be a conserved genetic trait and was used as the key taxonomic characteristic for the genus Thiobacillus (16, 17). As a result, a variety of physiologically and genetically unrelated eubacteria were classified as Thiobacillus species (14). Phylogenetic analyses based on 5S or 16S ribosomal DNA sequences had shown that the sulfur lithotrophs including the Thiobacillus species belong to the α, β, and γ subclasses of Proteobacteria (21, 22, 32). The knowledge of the biochemistry and molecular biology of sulfur lithotrophy in microbes must be considered important in understanding the genetic relatedness within the members of Thiobacillus and the relationship of this genus with other sulfur lithotrophs. Extensive biochemical investigations of the oxidative dissimilatory metabolism of sulfur compounds were reported previously (6, 24, 25, 29, 34, 35, 42). Even so, the mechanism involving the specific enzymes, proteins, or accessory factors is rather poorly understood. The element sulfur enjoys a wide range of oxidation states, −2 to +6, and sulfur lithotrophs are not necessarily similar in using specific sulfur species in their lithotrophic processes. Consequently, distinct biochemical pathways have been proposed for different sulfur lithotrophs (14, 16, 36). Thiosulfate is the common oxidizable substrate that is most suitable for the investigations of sulfur lithotrophic processes. For Paracoccus versutus (formerly Thiobacillus versutus), a thiosulfate-oxidizing periplasmic multienzyme system comprising enzyme A, enzyme B, and multiheme cytochromes was characterized (24, 25). The proposed mechanism is designated the Paracoccus sulfur oxidation (PSO) pathway (18). The function of enzyme A or enzyme B was not demonstrated. In Paracoccus denitrificans, a DNA region essential for sulfur oxidation (Sox) was identified (31). The sequence analysis revealed a partial open reading frame (ORF), soxA, and five additional ORFs (soxBCDEF) downstream of soxA (45, 46). soxB seems essential in sulfur lithotrophy, and the product SoxB appears similar to enzyme B of P. versutus (45). soxC encodes a sulfite dehydrogenase, the requirement for which in thiosulfate-dependent lithotrophic growth in P. denitrificans was experimentally verified (46). The products of soxD and soxE were suggested to be c-type cytochromes. The partial sequence available for soxF exhibits significant similarity with the flavoprotein of Chromatium vinosum, a thiosulfate-oxidizing phototrophic chemolithoautotroph (7, 14). The thiobacilli and other sulfur lithotrophs, phylogenetically close to P. denitrificans or P. versutus (α-3 subgroup [22]), may have acquired this PSO pathway (14, 18, 31) in the sulfur lithotrophic process. Neither P. versutus nor P. denitrificans uses tetrathionate, an oxidizable substrate commonly used to support lithotrophic growth of many species of Thiobacillus (14, 16). An alternative mechanism of thiosulfate oxidation via the formation of tetrathionate, coupled with the electron transport at the level of cytochrome b instead of cytochrome c, was proposed for obligately lithoautotrophic, moderately thermophilic Thiobacillus tepidarius (26, 47). The tetrathionate-utilizing sulfur lithotrophs such as Thiobacillus thiooxidans or Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, belonging to the β subclass of Proteobacteria and closely related to T. tepidarius (21, 22), may follow this tetrathionate intermediate pathway (16, 18). Further, cleavage of thiosulfate to sulfite and sulfur by rhodanese was demonstrated to be the primary reaction in the process of lithotrophy of thiosulfate by Thiobacillus novellus (6, 14, 16, 34). However, this process of sulfur lithotrophy, apparently distinct from the PSO or tetrathionate intermediate pathway, is yet to be investigated for other sulfur lithotrophs. Several facultative sulfur lithotrophs, KCT001, KCT002, AS001, and AS002, have been recently isolated and characterized by this laboratory. KCT002, AS001, and AS002 are classified as strains of Paracoccus, and the strain KCT001 is phylogenetically distinct from known strains of Thiobacillus, other sulfur lithotrophs, and other bacterial species of the α subclass of Proteobacteria (unpublished observation; C. Deb, E. Stackebrandt, A. Saha, and P. Roy, unpublished data). In the present study, transposon Tn5-mob insertional mutagenesis in KCT001 was performed to generate mutants impaired in the oxidation of sulfur compounds. A soxA gene was identified from transposon-adjacent genomic DNA of a thiosulfate oxidation-negative (Sox−) mutant. Two primers designed from this soxA gene and one from Tn5 were used in a PCR-based method to walk down the genome of transposon insertion Sox− mutants. We have shown that six independent insertion mutations were mapped within a DNA region of 4.4 kb in the genome of KCT001.